<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Engadget</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com</link>
<description>Engadget</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Lenovo recalls 188,000 ThinkCentres, perilous power packs to blame]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/09/lenovo-faulty-power-recall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/09/lenovo-faulty-power-recall/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/09/lenovo-faulty-power-recall/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/09/lenovo-faulty-power-recall/"><img alt="Image" height="425" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/thinkcenterfire.jpg" style="margin:4px" width="517" /></a></p><p> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Lenovo/">Lenovo</a> is recalling a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/09/lenovo-pcs-recalled/">further 188,000</a> of its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/02/lenovos-all-in-one-thinkcentre-gets-official-becomes-a70z/">ThinkCentre PCs</a> due to a possible fire risk. The M70z and M90z all-in-ones come with a faulty component in its embedded power supply that has already seen two units self-immolate. The company recommends that you check the serial number (via our source link) stamped on the base of the housing, let Lenovo know, unplug the unit and wait for a replacement.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/09/lenovo-faulty-power-recall/">Lenovo recalls 188,000 ThinkCentres, perilous power packs to blame</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 09 May 2012 10:47:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/09/lenovo-faulty-power-recall/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20234359/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/09/lenovo-faulty-power-recall/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>defect</category><category>fire hazard</category><category>FireHazard</category><category>Lenovo</category><category>Lenovo ThinkCentre M70z</category><category>Lenovo ThinkCentre M90z</category><category>LenovoThinkcentreM70z</category><category>LenovoThinkcentreM90z</category><category>Recall</category><category>ThinkCentre M70z</category><category>ThinkCentre M90z</category><category>ThinkcentreM70z</category><category>ThinkcentreM90z</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Cooper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 10:47:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Fisker plans to replace the battery packs on 640 Karma sedans]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/26/fisker-plans-to-replace-the-battery-packs-on-640-karma-sedans/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/26/fisker-plans-to-replace-the-battery-packs-on-640-karma-sedans/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/26/fisker-plans-to-replace-the-battery-packs-on-640-karma-sedans/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/26/fisker-plans-to-replace-the-battery-packs-on-640-karma-sedans/"><img alt="Image" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/03/fisker-karma.jpg" style="margin:4px" /></a></div>Fisker Automotive hasn't exactly had the smoothest of launches for its all-electric <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/FiskerKarma/">Karma</a> sedan, and it's now been dealt yet another small setback. As <em>Wired Autopia</em> reports, Fisker now plans to replace the battery packs on nearly all of the Karmas that have rolled off the assembly line -- apparently due to the same issue that caused the car to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/09/fisker-karma-breaks-down-during-review/">break down</a> during <em>Consumer Reports</em>' test of the car. That includes some 640 cars in all (up from 239 in an <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/01/fisker-karma-recall-is-official-239-cars-will-need-their-batter/">earlier recall</a>), although Fisker notes that it has only seen the issue on a "handful" of vehicles. If you're the owner of one of those, you can expect to receive a notice in the next few days, along with a software update (unrelated to the recall) that promises improvements on everything form the powertrain to infotainment system.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/26/fisker-plans-to-replace-the-battery-packs-on-640-karma-sedans/">Fisker plans to replace the battery packs on 640 Karma sedans</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 26 Mar 2012 17:32:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/26/fisker-plans-to-replace-the-battery-packs-on-640-karma-sedans/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20201349/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/26/fisker-plans-to-replace-the-battery-packs-on-640-karma-sedans/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>A123</category><category>A123 Systems</category><category>A123Systems</category><category>battery</category><category>battery pack</category><category>battery packs</category><category>BatteryPack</category><category>BatteryPacks</category><category>electric vehicle</category><category>ElectricVehicle</category><category>ev</category><category>fisker</category><category>fisker karma</category><category>FiskerKarma</category><category>karma</category><category>recall</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald Melanson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 17:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Consumer Reports' Fisker Karma gets fixed, testing resumes, for now]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/13/fisker-karma-part-two/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/13/fisker-karma-part-two/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/13/fisker-karma-part-two/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/13/fisker-karma-part-two/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/03/fiskerbreakdown-1331639930.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div><div> Remember <em>Consumer Reports'</em> bought a Fisker Karma that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/09/fisker-karma-breaks-down-during-review/">broke down</a> while on the test track? Well after it had made the 200-mile round-trip to the dealership, it turned out the inverter cable and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/01/fisker-karma-recall-is-official-239-cars-will-need-their-batter/">battery</a> were both faulty and replaced them, before fully recharging the vehicle. The car has now been returned to the test track where a full review can begin -- give it a week, and we'll start taking bets on if it actually gets that "recommended" rating.</div><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/13/fisker-karma-part-two/">Consumer Reports' Fisker Karma gets fixed, testing resumes, for now</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 13 Mar 2012 15:06:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/13/fisker-karma-part-two/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20191952/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/13/fisker-karma-part-two/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Breakdown</category><category>Consumer Reports</category><category>ConsumerReports</category><category>Fisker</category><category>Fisker Karma</category><category>FiskerKarma</category><category>Hybrid Electric Vehicle</category><category>HybridElectricVehicle</category><category>Karma</category><category>Plug in Hybrid</category><category>PlugInHybrid</category><category>Recall</category><category>Testing</category><category>Tom Mutchler</category><category>TomMutchler</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Cooper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 15:06:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Fisker Karma breaks down in CR test, risks that 'recommended' rating (video)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/09/fisker-karma-breaks-down-during-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/09/fisker-karma-breaks-down-during-review/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/09/fisker-karma-breaks-down-during-review/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/09/fisker-karma-breaks-down-during-review/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/03/fiskerbreakdown.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div><div> <em><a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/consumer+reports/">Consumer Reports</a></em> splashed out $107,850 to buy its own <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/26/fisker-karma-boss-nabs-first-set-of-keys-spose-wed-do-the-sam/">Fisker Karma</a>, but before the car had traveled 200 miles, it had broken down. Partway through calibration testing on the <em>CR</em> Track, the car's dashboard began issuing warnings, but when tester Tom Mutchler pulled over to identify the issue, it wouldn't get going again. Mutchler was forced to call the dealership, located 100 miles away, to collect it on a flatbed for repair. It's the first time in memory that the testing organization can recall a vehicle breaking down partway through testing, but when it comes to the Karma, you can only be sure that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/01/fisker-karma-recall-is-official-239-cars-will-need-their-batter/">nothing's</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/27/fisker-karma-battery-poses-potential-safety-issue-for-about-50/">too</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/07/with-federal-loans-blocked-fisker-halts-work-on-project-nina-l/">calamitous</a>.</div><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/09/fisker-karma-breaks-down-during-review/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Fisker Karma breaks down in CR test, risks that 'recommended' rating (video)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/09/fisker-karma-breaks-down-during-review/">Fisker Karma breaks down in CR test, risks that 'recommended' rating (video)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 09 Mar 2012 18:26:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/09/fisker-karma-breaks-down-during-review/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20189935/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/09/fisker-karma-breaks-down-during-review/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Breakdown</category><category>Consumer Reports</category><category>ConsumerReports</category><category>Fisker</category><category>Fisker Karma</category><category>FiskerKarma</category><category>Hybrid Electric Vehicle</category><category>HybridElectricVehicle</category><category>Karma</category><category>Plug in Hybrid</category><category>PlugInHybrid</category><category>Recall</category><category>Testing</category><category>Tom Mutchler</category><category>TomMutchler</category><category>video</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Cooper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 18:26:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Lenovo ThinkCentre PCs recalled over fire hazard defect]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/09/lenovo-pcs-recalled/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/09/lenovo-pcs-recalled/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/09/lenovo-pcs-recalled/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/09/lenovo-pcs-recalled/"><img alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/10/lenovo-thinkcentre-10-28-09.jpg" style="width: 487px; height: 400px;" /></a></div>Lenovo is recalling more than 50,000 of its PCs due to a possible fire risk. The 2010 <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/02/lenovos-all-in-one-thinkcentre-gets-official-becomes-a70z/">ThinkCentre M70z </a>and M90z both house a defective component in their power supplies that can overheat. Worse still, the power units are embedded within these all-in-one models and so are not readily replaceable. The manufacturer is arranging appointments to fix the power supply problem. Fire-averse customers can double-check all the details at the source below.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/09/lenovo-pcs-recalled/">Lenovo ThinkCentre PCs recalled over fire hazard defect</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 09 Mar 2012 08:17:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/09/lenovo-pcs-recalled/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20189569/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/09/lenovo-pcs-recalled/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>defect</category><category>fire hazard</category><category>FireHazard</category><category>Lenovo</category><category>Lenovo ThinkCentre M70z</category><category>Lenovo ThinkCentre M90z</category><category>LenovoThinkcentreM70z</category><category>LenovoThinkcentreM90z</category><category>recall</category><category>ThinkCentre M70z</category><category>ThinkCentre M90z</category><category>ThinkcentreM70z</category><category>ThinkcentreM90z</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mat Smith]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 08:17:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Oops! Motorola sold refurbished Xooms without deleting previous owners' data]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/03/oops-motorola-sold-refurbished-xooms-without-deleting-previous/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/03/oops-motorola-sold-refurbished-xooms-without-deleting-previous/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/03/oops-motorola-sold-refurbished-xooms-without-deleting-previous/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/03/oops-motorola-sold-refurbished-xooms-without-deleting-previous/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/02/xoomhands640.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px; height: 398px; width: 600px;" /></a></div>Usually, when <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/02/sony-woes-continue-as-soe-confirms-data-breach/">passwords and personal information</a> are exposed, it's because someone <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/02/verisign-revealed-to-have-suffered-repeated-security-breaches-in/">hacked</a> a company's not-so-secure system. Motorola, however, managed to put people's info at risk without such malfeasance when it failed to wipe the memory of a batch of refurbished <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/23/motorola-xoom-review/">Xooms</a>. The tablets in question were sold by <em>Woot.com</em> between October and December of last year, and Moto is claiming that it made the mistake on only small number of slates. Of course, we don't know exactly how many Xooms were shipped with previous owners' data onboard, but we do know that the company is actively attempting to make amends. Moto's offering two years of Experian identification protection services to those whose info was exposed and owners of affected Xooms are getting a little something too. Just send the device back to Motorola on the company's dime -- where it'll be properly reset and sent back to you, along with a $100 American Express gift card for your efforts. Wondering if you're among the unlucky? Hit the PR after the break for more info, and those with Wooted Xooms can plug in their slate's serial number at the source link below to find out for sure.<br /><br />[Thanks, Scott]<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/03/oops-motorola-sold-refurbished-xooms-without-deleting-previous/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Oops! Motorola sold refurbished Xooms without deleting previous owners' data</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/03/oops-motorola-sold-refurbished-xooms-without-deleting-previous/">Oops! Motorola sold refurbished Xooms without deleting previous owners' data</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 03 Feb 2012 20:52:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/03/oops-motorola-sold-refurbished-xooms-without-deleting-previous/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20164427/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/03/oops-motorola-sold-refurbished-xooms-without-deleting-previous/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>motorola</category><category>motorola xoom</category><category>motorola xoom wifi</category><category>MotorolaXoom</category><category>MotorolaXoomWifi</category><category>personal information</category><category>PersonalInformation</category><category>privacy</category><category>recall</category><category>security breach</category><category>SecurityBreach</category><category>wifi</category><category>xoom</category><category>xoom wifi</category><category>XoomWifi</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Gorman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 20:52:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[HP feels the heat, recalls 1040 and 1050 fax machines]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/03/hp-recalls-1040-and-1050-fax-machines/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/03/hp-recalls-1040-and-1050-fax-machines/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/03/hp-recalls-1040-and-1050-fax-machines/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/03/hp-recalls-1040-and-1050-fax-machines/"><img alt="HP feels the heat, recalls 1040 and 1050 fax machines" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/02/hp-burn-baby-burn-1328223288.jpg" style="margin: 4px;" /></a></div>Hey, office workers -- listen up. You know that cheap, god-forsaken fax machine that you've come to loathe something fierce? Well, if it's an <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/hp">HP</a> unit, go ahead and peep the model number on the front -- don't worry, we'll wait. If it says either 1040 or 1050, in addition to being a pain in the ass to operate (like all fax machines are), there's also a small chance the cursed thing could catch on fire. Of the 1.1 million units sold between 2004 and 2011, only seven documented cases have (literally) gone up in flames, but the risk has instigated a voluntary recall for both models. If you're among the affected owners, go ahead and unplug the machine from its power source, then give HP a call at (888) 654-9296 to get a rebate. Also, be forewarned that while it's illegal to sell a recalled product, we've found scads of these units currently for sale on eBay. Like the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/hp,recall">previously recalled HP products</a>, that's one smokin' hot deal we're inclined to skip.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/03/hp-recalls-1040-and-1050-fax-machines/">HP feels the heat, recalls 1040 and 1050 fax machines</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 03 Feb 2012 14:53:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/03/hp-recalls-1040-and-1050-fax-machines/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20163384/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/03/hp-recalls-1040-and-1050-fax-machines/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>1040</category><category>1050</category><category>consumer product safety commission</category><category>ConsumerProductSafetyCommission</category><category>cspc</category><category>fax</category><category>fax machine</category><category>FaxMachine</category><category>fire</category><category>hewlett packard</category><category>hewlett-packard</category><category>HewlettPackard</category><category>hp</category><category>HP 1040 fax</category><category>HP 1050 fax</category><category>Hp1040Fax</category><category>Hp1050Fax</category><category>recall</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Lutz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 14:53:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Burn baby burn: HP pays out $425,000 to prevent a disco (laptop) inferno]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/24/hp-425-000-flammable-battery-recall-fine/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/24/hp-425-000-flammable-battery-recall-fine/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/24/hp-425-000-flammable-battery-recall-fine/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/24/hp-425-000-flammable-battery-recall-fine/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/01/laptop-fire.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div><a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/hp/">The Haus of Meg</a> will pay $425,000 in order to settle a claim that it consciously flogged laptops with batteries that could overheat or catch fire. The <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/consumer+product+safety+commission/">US Consumer Product Safety Commission</a> slapped the company on the wrist for not issuing a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/14/70-000-hp-laptop-batteries-recalled-due-to-fire-hazard/">recall</a> quickly enough. It claimed that HP knew about 22 incidents involving battery <em>'splosions</em> by September 2007 -- including one instance of a user being hospitalized, but didn't begin issuing a recall until ten months later. By May 2011, the company had recalled over 90,000 affected units that were prone to the odd bout of spontaneous combustion. If you're concerned you've got a duff battery, check out our list <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/28/hp-expands-laptop-battery-recall-doesnt-want-you-to-feel-the-b/">here</a>.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/24/hp-425-000-flammable-battery-recall-fine/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Burn baby burn: HP pays out $425,000 to prevent a disco (laptop) inferno</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/24/hp-425-000-flammable-battery-recall-fine/">Burn baby burn: HP pays out $425,000 to prevent a disco (laptop) inferno</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 24 Jan 2012 12:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/24/hp-425-000-flammable-battery-recall-fine/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20155401/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/24/hp-425-000-flammable-battery-recall-fine/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Battery</category><category>Battery Recall</category><category>Battery Safety</category><category>BatteryRecall</category><category>BatterySafety</category><category>Consumer Product Safety Commission</category><category>ConsumerProductSafetyCommission</category><category>CPSC</category><category>Hewlett</category><category>Hewlett Packard</category><category>Hewlett-Packard</category><category>HewlettPackard</category><category>HP</category><category>Laptop Battery</category><category>Laptop Battery Recall</category><category>LaptopBattery</category><category>LaptopBatteryRecall</category><category>Packard</category><category>Product Recall</category><category>ProductRecall</category><category>Recall</category><category>Safety</category><category>US Consumer Product Safety Commission</category><category>US CPSC</category><category>UsConsumerProductSafetyCommission</category><category>UsCpsc</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Cooper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 12:01:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[GM to add 'enhancements' to Chevy Volt's battery coolant system, will call back 8,000 cars]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/05/GM-Chevy-Volt-Battery-Fire-Test/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/05/GM-Chevy-Volt-Battery-Fire-Test/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/05/GM-Chevy-Volt-Battery-Fire-Test/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center; ">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/05/gm-to-add-enhancements-to-chevy-volts-battery-coolant-system/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/01/chevy-volt.jpg" style="border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-top-style: solid; border-right-style: solid; border-bottom-style: solid; border-left-style: solid; margin-left: 4px; margin-right: 4px; margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; " /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
	In the wake of an NHSTA "<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/27/dnp-chevy-volt-under-formal-safety-investigation-by-nhtsa-due/">formal safety investigation</a>," GM today announced plans to add enhancements to the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/ChevyVolt/">Chevy Volt</a>'s battery coolant system, in the hopes of preventing any post-crash electrical fires. As a result, some 8,000 Volt drivers will have to bring their cars back to their dealerships, as part of a move that's one notch below a formal recall. GM made the decision following federal investigation that saw three batteries erupt in flames after side-impact crash tests. Regulators blamed the irregularity on a coolant leak though thus far, no similar incidents have been reported among any Volt owners. The manufacturer plans to remedy the situation by adding extra support to protect the battery during side collisions, adding an extra sensor to keep an eye on coolant levels, and by incorporating an extra bracket atop the coolant reservoir to guard against potential overflows. Vehicles with these enhancements, GM said, passed the tests without any leakage or battery pack damage. Head past the break for the full PR.<br />
	<br />
	<strong>Update</strong>: Chevrolet has just reached out to us to clarify that adding these enhancements is voluntary, and not mandatory for Volt owners:<font color="#500050" face="arial, sans-serif"><span style="line-height: normal;"> </span></font>"These modifications are part of a voluntary customer satisfaction effort. While we will encourage customers to return to a dealership to have their Volt's modified, it is voluntary for them as well."</div><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/05/GM-Chevy-Volt-Battery-Fire-Test/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>GM to add 'enhancements' to Chevy Volt's battery coolant system, will call back 8,000 cars</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/05/GM-Chevy-Volt-Battery-Fire-Test/">GM to add 'enhancements' to Chevy Volt's battery coolant system, will call back 8,000 cars</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 05 Jan 2012 12:25:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/05/GM-Chevy-Volt-Battery-Fire-Test/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20141203/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/05/GM-Chevy-Volt-Battery-Fire-Test/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>battery</category><category>call back</category><category>CallBack</category><category>car</category><category>cars</category><category>chevy</category><category>chevy volt</category><category>ChevyVolt</category><category>danger</category><category>electric</category><category>electric vehicle</category><category>ElectricVehicle</category><category>ev</category><category>fire</category><category>general motors</category><category>GeneralMotors</category><category>gm</category><category>lithium ion battery</category><category>LithiumIonBattery</category><category>NHSTA</category><category>recall</category><category>test</category><category>volt</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Amar Toor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 12:25:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple reportedly swapping recalled iPod nanos for 6G counterparts; you have yours?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/20/apple-reportedly-swapping-recalled-ipod-nanos-for-six-gen-counte/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/20/apple-reportedly-swapping-recalled-ipod-nanos-for-six-gen-counte/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/20/apple-reportedly-swapping-recalled-ipod-nanos-for-six-gen-counte/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/20/apple-reportedly-swapping-recalled-ipod-nanos-for-six-gen-counte/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/12/-1.jpg.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
<div>
	It's been a few weeks since Apple's issued a worldwide recall on a number of its first-gen iPod nanos at risk for becoming uncomfortably <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/12/apple-to-replace-first-gen-ipod-nanos-in-the-us-due-to-faulty-ba/">hot under the collar</a>. Evidently, many folks who've sent their devices into AppleCare to get swapped are finding that they've being treated with an upgrade to the current <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/07/ipod-nano-review-2010/">sixth-gen</a> variant. Lovers of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/clickwheel/">click wheels</a> may view its square, touchscreen shell as folly, but hey, its hard to fuss over owning latest there is, right? The replacement program is still ongoing, so if you haven't checked to see if your nano qualifies, hit up the "more coverage" link below to find out. Already got yours back? Let us know your mileage in comments!<br />
	<br />
	[Thanks, Scott]</div>
<div>
</div><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/20/apple-reportedly-swapping-recalled-ipod-nanos-for-six-gen-counte/">Apple reportedly swapping recalled iPod nanos for 6G counterparts; you have yours?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 20 Dec 2011 22:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/20/apple-reportedly-swapping-recalled-ipod-nanos-for-six-gen-counte/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20132449/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/20/apple-reportedly-swapping-recalled-ipod-nanos-for-six-gen-counte/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>apple care</category><category>AppleCare</category><category>battery</category><category>breaking news</category><category>BreakingNews</category><category>explode</category><category>faulty</category><category>ipod</category><category>ipod nano</category><category>ipod nano 6g</category><category>iPod Nano 6th generation</category><category>IpodNano</category><category>IpodNano6g</category><category>IpodNano6thGeneration</category><category>lithium ion</category><category>LithiumIon</category><category>music player</category><category>MusicPlayer</category><category>nano</category><category>overheat</category><category>pmp</category><category>recall</category><category>replacement</category><category>replacement program</category><category>ReplacementProgram</category><category>swelling</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe Pollicino]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 22:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[PSA: Mophie and Best Buy issue separate iDevice battery pack recalls due to overheating concerns]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/02/psa-mophie-and-best-buy-issue-seperate-idevice-battery-pack-rec/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/02/psa-mophie-and-best-buy-issue-seperate-idevice-battery-pack-rec/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/02/psa-mophie-and-best-buy-issue-seperate-idevice-battery-pack-rec/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/02/psa-mophie-and-best-buy-issue-seperate-idevice-battery-pack-rec/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/12/mophie---iphone-battery-ipod-cases-iphone-accessories-and-more.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
<div>
	Sporting an external battery pack on your iPod Touch or iPhone? If it happens to be from Mophie or Best Buy's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/rocketfish/">Rocketfish</a> brand, we'd advise you to take note and avoid getting burned. Rocketfish's <font face="Arial,Helvetica,Geneva,Swiss,SunSans-Regular" size="2">RF-KL12</font> battery case for the iPhone 3G / 3GS has been reported in a small number of burn and "minor" fire incidents, while Mophie's announced that a select number of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/juice%20pack%20air">Juice Pack Air </a>models for the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/iPod+Touch+4th+generation/">4th generation iPod Touch</a> (seen above) are at risk for overheating, and potentially even melting. Suffice it to say, if you're currently in possession of said battery extenders you should stop using it immediately. Best Buy asks that owners of the Rocketfish case get in touch to facilitate a return, which will be met with a $70 gift card in the US ($105 in Canada) as compensation. As for Mophie? If your Juice Pack Air is among the affected serial numbers, you'll be able to initiate a swap for a fresh unit via a return form on its website. Hit those source links below for all the details -- this is one case where you definitely won't want to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/29/the-elliptical-machine-office-desk-putting-the-commute-back-i/">feel the burn</a>.</div><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/02/psa-mophie-and-best-buy-issue-seperate-idevice-battery-pack-rec/">PSA: Mophie and Best Buy issue separate iDevice battery pack recalls due to overheating concerns</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 02 Dec 2011 14:34:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/02/psa-mophie-and-best-buy-issue-seperate-idevice-battery-pack-rec/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20119483/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/02/psa-mophie-and-best-buy-issue-seperate-idevice-battery-pack-rec/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>battery</category><category>battery case</category><category>BatteryCase</category><category>best buy</category><category>best buy mobile</category><category>BestBuy</category><category>BestBuyMobile</category><category>canada</category><category>fire hazard</category><category>FireHazard</category><category>ipod</category><category>ipod touch</category><category>ipod touch 4g</category><category>IpodTouch</category><category>IpodTouch4g</category><category>minipost</category><category>mophie</category><category>Mophie Juice Pack</category><category>mophie juice pack air</category><category>MophieJuicePack</category><category>MophieJuicePackAir</category><category>overheating</category><category>psa</category><category>recall</category><category>RF-KL12</category><category>US</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe Pollicino]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 14:34:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple is replacing first gen iPod nanos due to faulty batteries]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/12/apple-to-replace-first-gen-ipod-nanos-in-the-us-due-to-faulty-ba/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/12/apple-to-replace-first-gen-ipod-nanos-in-the-us-due-to-faulty-ba/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/12/apple-to-replace-first-gen-ipod-nanos-in-the-us-due-to-faulty-ba/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/12/apple-to-replace-first-gen-ipod-nanos-in-the-us-due-to-faulty-ba/"><img alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/08/fight-club-no-soap-ipod-nano-smoking.jpg" style="width: 600px; height: 435px; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 1px 16px;" /></a></div>
After offering to swap out a few faulty first gen <a _mce_href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/ipodnano/" href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/ipodnano/">iPod nanos</a> in Korea <a _mce_href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/apple-recalls-faulty-first-generation-ipod-nano-players-in-korea/" href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/09/apple-recalls-faulty-first-generation-ipod-nano-players-in-korea/">back in 2009</a>, it appears Apple has finally seen fit to get them out of owner's pockets here in the US (<strong>update</strong>: worldwide) too. An email just sent to registered owners (included after the break) and notice posted on its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/apple,replacement">replacement program</a> site inform users the affected units were sold between September 2005 and December 2006. If you have one (seriously, yours still works?), stop using it <em>right now</em> and fill out the form at the link below to order a free replacement unit. The main inconvenience -- other than finding out you've been walking around with the possibility of a "rare case" of overheating taking place in your skinny jeans -- is an anticipated six-week lag between Apple receiving the old unit and shipping you out a replacement.<br />
<br />
The reason given for waiting so long to replace them is that when it comes to this issue "the likelihood increases as the battery ages"; that, and it's finally too late for you to run out and get a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/03/zune-is-dead-long-live-zune/">Zune</a>. No word yet on which models will be sent out as replacements, but if yours is personalized, then sorry -- no inscriptions available.<br />
<br />
[Thanks, Paul &amp; Jordan]<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/12/apple-to-replace-first-gen-ipod-nanos-in-the-us-due-to-faulty-ba/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Apple is replacing first gen iPod nanos due to faulty batteries</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/12/apple-to-replace-first-gen-ipod-nanos-in-the-us-due-to-faulty-ba/">Apple is replacing first gen iPod nanos due to faulty batteries</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sat, 12 Nov 2011 00:53:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/12/apple-to-replace-first-gen-ipod-nanos-in-the-us-due-to-faulty-ba/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20104902/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/12/apple-to-replace-first-gen-ipod-nanos-in-the-us-due-to-faulty-ba/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>battery</category><category>breaking news</category><category>explode</category><category>faulty</category><category>ipod</category><category>ipod nano</category><category>IpodNano</category><category>lithium ion</category><category>LithiumIon</category><category>music player</category><category>MusicPlayer</category><category>nano</category><category>overheat</category><category>pmp</category><category>recall</category><category>replacement</category><category>replacement program</category><category>ReplacementProgram</category><category>swelling</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 00:53:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Sony to recall 1.6 million Bravia TVs due to melting components (update: not a full recall)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/12/sony-to-recall-1-6-million-bravia-tvs-due-to-melting-components/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/12/sony-to-recall-1-6-million-bravia-tvs-due-to-melting-components/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/12/sony-to-recall-1-6-million-bravia-tvs-due-to-melting-components/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/12/sony-to-recall-1-6-million-bravia-tvs-due-to-melting-components/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/10/sony-bravia-logo.png" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px; float: right;" /></a></div>
<p>
	A vast number of Bravia LCD TVs dating from 2007 and 2008 will be recalled after components in some Japanese sets went into meltdown and started smoking. So far only eleven incidents have been reported and it looks like no one has been hurt or experienced any wider damage, but Sony says it wants to take back 1.6 million TVs that were sold in the US, Europe, Japan and elsewhere. No word on exactly which models are affected, but we're expecting further details from Sony imminently.<br />
	<br />
	<strong>Update:</strong> Looks like this might not be a full recall after all. We can't access Sony's support site right now, but the BBC reports that UK owners of the following models can summon an engineer to inspect their set if they're worried: KDL-40D3400, KDL-40D3500, KDL-40D3550, KDL-40D3660, KDL-40V3000, KDL-40W3000, KDL-40X3000, KDL-40X3500.</p>
<p>
	<br />
	<strong>Update 2</strong>: Check after the break for US recall information.</p><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/12/sony-to-recall-1-6-million-bravia-tvs-due-to-melting-components/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Sony to recall 1.6 million Bravia TVs due to melting components (update: not a full recall)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/12/sony-to-recall-1-6-million-bravia-tvs-due-to-melting-components/">Sony to recall 1.6 million Bravia TVs due to melting components (update: not a full recall)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 12 Oct 2011 05:41:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/12/sony-to-recall-1-6-million-bravia-tvs-due-to-melting-components/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20079551/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/12/sony-to-recall-1-6-million-bravia-tvs-due-to-melting-components/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bravia</category><category>hdpostcross</category><category>LCD TV</category><category>LcdTv</category><category>melting</category><category>product recall</category><category>product recalls</category><category>ProductRecall</category><category>ProductRecalls</category><category>recall</category><category>smoke</category><category>Sony</category><category>Sony Bravia</category><category>SonyBravia</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sharif Sakr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 05:41:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Dell to fix faulty M11x hinges the world over regardless of warranty status]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/12/dell-to-fix-faulty-m11x-hinges-the-world-over-regardless-of-warr/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/12/dell-to-fix-faulty-m11x-hinges-the-world-over-regardless-of-warr/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/12/dell-to-fix-faulty-m11x-hinges-the-world-over-regardless-of-warr/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/12/dell-to-fix-faulty-m11x-hinges-the-world-over-regardless-of-warr/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/09/2010-02-22m11xhands-17.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
Are you one of the unlucky <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/alienware-m11x-review/">Alienware M11x</a> owners who had <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/05/alienware-m11x-hinge-issues-yeah-dell-knows/">hinge issues</a> with the laptop, but feared you'd be stuck with a faulty folding mechanism due to an out of date warranty? Well, worry no more, because Dell has extended its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/26/dell-to-begin-fixing-busted-m11x-in-march-or-thereabouts/">hinge replacement program</a> to include owners anywhere on earth with an R1 or R2 M11x regardless of warranty status. Getting those busted bits replaced is easy peasy, as affected parties need only contact Dell Tech support to get the repair process started. For full details about getting your afflicted alien fixed hit the source below -- and feel free to give Dell some daps for doing the right thing while you're at it.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/12/dell-to-fix-faulty-m11x-hinges-the-world-over-regardless-of-warr/">Dell to fix faulty M11x hinges the world over regardless of warranty status</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 12 Sep 2011 13:49:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/12/dell-to-fix-faulty-m11x-hinges-the-world-over-regardless-of-warr/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20040563/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/12/dell-to-fix-faulty-m11x-hinges-the-world-over-regardless-of-warr/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>alienware</category><category>alienware m11x</category><category>AlienwareM11x</category><category>dell</category><category>dell alienware</category><category>DellAlienware</category><category>hinge</category><category>hinge issue</category><category>HingeIssue</category><category>m11 x</category><category>M11X</category><category>m11x r1</category><category>m11x r2</category><category>M11xR1</category><category>M11xR2</category><category>recall</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Gorman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 13:49:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple initiates replacement program for 'small number' of iMacs with 1TB Seagate HDDs]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/24/apple-initiates-replacement-program-for-small-number-of-imacs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/24/apple-initiates-replacement-program-for-small-number-of-imacs/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/24/apple-initiates-replacement-program-for-small-number-of-imacs/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/24/apple-initiates-replacement-program-for-small-number-of-imacs/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/07/apple---support---imac-1tb-seagate-hard-drive-replacement-program.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
Did you pick up a new <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/09/apple-imac-spring-2011-review/">iMac</a> between May and July 2011 sporting a 1TB Seagate HDD? You should probably know that the platter might be of the <em>prone to failing</em> variety. No worries though, Apple's announced it'll replace potentially faulty drives at no cost to keep ya smiling, and your fixed disk a-spinnin'. Owners of registered rigs at risk are being notified via email, but if you skipped that form you can check the serial number on Camp Cupertino's website (linked below). After confirming that the machine's eligible, you'll be able to drop it off at an Apple Store or authorized service center for the swap. It's also suggested that you back up the drive prior to bringing it down; at the very least, it's an excuse to make use of that Thunderbolt port, right?<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/24/apple-initiates-replacement-program-for-small-number-of-imacs/">Apple initiates replacement program for 'small number' of iMacs with 1TB Seagate HDDs</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sun, 24 Jul 2011 12:48:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/24/apple-initiates-replacement-program-for-small-number-of-imacs/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19998656/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/24/apple-initiates-replacement-program-for-small-number-of-imacs/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>1tb</category><category>1tb seagate hdd</category><category>1tbSeagateHdd</category><category>21.5-inch iMac</category><category>21.5-inchImac</category><category>27-inch imac</category><category>27-inchImac</category><category>apple</category><category>desktop</category><category>HardDrive</category><category>hdd failure</category><category>HddFailure</category><category>imac</category><category>mac</category><category>recall</category><category>replacement</category><category>replacement program</category><category>ReplacementProgram</category><category>seagate</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe Pollicino]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2011 12:48:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel to owners of failed SSD 320s: we're 'aware of the customer sightings']]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/12/intel-to-owners-of-failed-ssd-320s-were-aware-of-the-customer/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/12/intel-to-owners-of-failed-ssd-320s-were-aware-of-the-customer/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/12/intel-to-owners-of-failed-ssd-320s-were-aware-of-the-customer/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/12/intel-to-owners-of-failed-ssd-320s-were-aware-of-the-customer/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/07/ssd.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
We can imagine few things more horrible than booting up your new 600GB SSD and seeing a reported capacity of 8MB. That's exactly the situation reported by users of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Intel/">Intel</a>'s SSD 320 series for over a month on the company's support forums, as well as on Amazon reviews. One disappointed (to say the least) user describes that very scenario, and he's not alone. According to several forum members, the problem seems firmware related and shouldn't require a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/08/corsair-recalls-its-120gb-force-3-ssd-due-to-stability-issues/">recall</a>, while Intel says it's "aware of the customer sightings." Short on meaningful details, the statement promises an update is coming with more information -- bite-sized consolation for the owners of byte-sized drives.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/12/intel-to-owners-of-failed-ssd-320s-were-aware-of-the-customer/">Intel to owners of failed SSD 320s: we're 'aware of the customer sightings'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 12 Jul 2011 22:27:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/12/intel-to-owners-of-failed-ssd-320s-were-aware-of-the-customer/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19989425/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/12/intel-to-owners-of-failed-ssd-320s-were-aware-of-the-customer/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>8MB</category><category>Disk</category><category>DiskDrive</category><category>drives</category><category>failure</category><category>firmware</category><category>Intel</category><category>recall</category><category>solid state drive</category><category>solid state drives</category><category>SolidStateDrive</category><category>SolidStateDrives</category><category>SSD</category><category>SSD 320</category><category>Ssd320</category><category>storage</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesse Hicks]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 22:27:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cloud Engines updates Pogoplug's software-only version with OneView, enhanced iOS support]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/22/cloud-engines-updates-pogoplugs-software-only-version-with-onev/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/22/cloud-engines-updates-pogoplugs-software-only-version-with-onev/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/22/cloud-engines-updates-pogoplugs-software-only-version-with-onev/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/22/cloud-engines-updates-pogoplugs-software-only-version-with-onev/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/06/devicescreenshot-1308694757.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
<div>
	The smoke from Cloud Engines' <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/17/cloud-engines-recalls-potentially-flammable-pogoplug-video/">Pogoplug Video recall</a> (Pogo-<em>un</em>-plugged?) may still be settling, but on a better note, today the company has announced the first major update to its software-based version. To refresh your memory, it essentially turns any network-connected computer into a Pogoplug, allowing it to be accessed like a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/NAS/">NAS</a> drive (think iCloud, but with <em>your</em> drives). The new version's main advantage is OneView, which can display every connected computer's drives separately or compiled together sans duplicates -- iOS devices are also supported in this feature. You'll be pleased to know that the service is free, excluding video and off-LAN music streaming. Those features can be enabled by purchasing the premium version for a one-time fee of 29 bones, and unlike before, a single purchase will take care of your entire stable of devices. You'll find some screenshots of the software below, as well as a PR crash course in 'personal cloud management' just after the break. <div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/pogoplug-oneview-software-update/">Pogoplug OneView software update</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/pogoplug-oneview-software-update/#4240448"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/06/devicescreenshot-1308686640_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/pogoplug-oneview-software-update/#4240449"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/06/oneview-cinema2-1308686642_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/pogoplug-oneview-software-update/#4240450"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/06/oneview-cinemascreenshot-1308686644_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/pogoplug-oneview-software-update/#4240451"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/06/oneview-galleryscreenshot-1308686646_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/pogoplug-oneview-software-update/#4240453"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/06/oneview-jukeboxscreenshot-1308686648_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div></div><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/22/cloud-engines-updates-pogoplugs-software-only-version-with-onev/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cloud Engines updates Pogoplug's software-only version with OneView, enhanced iOS support</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/22/cloud-engines-updates-pogoplugs-software-only-version-with-onev/">Cloud Engines updates Pogoplug's software-only version with OneView, enhanced iOS support</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 22 Jun 2011 10:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/22/cloud-engines-updates-pogoplugs-software-only-version-with-onev/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19972067/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/22/cloud-engines-updates-pogoplugs-software-only-version-with-onev/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cloud</category><category>cloud engines</category><category>cloud storage</category><category>CloudEngines</category><category>CloudStorage</category><category>NAS</category><category>network attached storage</category><category>NetworkAttachedStorage</category><category>plug computer</category><category>PlugComputer</category><category>pogo plug</category><category>pogoplug</category><category>Pogoplug biz</category><category>PogoPlug Video</category><category>PogoplugBiz</category><category>PogoplugVideo</category><category>recall</category><category>remote access</category><category>RemoteAccess</category><category>streaming video</category><category>StreamingVideo</category><category>the official pogoplug blog</category><category>TheOfficialPogoplugBlog</category><category>video streaming</category><category>VideoStreaming</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe Pollicino]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 10:01:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cloud Engines recalls potentially flammable Pogoplug Video (update)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/17/cloud-engines-recalls-potentially-flammable-pogoplug-video/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/17/cloud-engines-recalls-potentially-flammable-pogoplug-video/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/17/cloud-engines-recalls-potentially-flammable-pogoplug-video/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div>
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/17/cloud-engines-recalls-potentially-flammable-pogoplug-video/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/06/pogoplugprowirelessmultimediafilesharingdeviceside95632zoom.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px; height: 245px; width: 245px; float: left;" /></a>Looks like sharing videos over the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/cloud">cloud</a> may be a risky task -- if you're using the box shown here on the left, that is. The <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/06/pogoplug-video-converts-footage-on-the-fly-streams-it-to-all-yo/">Pogoplug Video</a> hit the retail scene about <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/07/pogoplug-video-and-buffalo-cloudstor-now-shipping-streaming-you/">two months ago</a>, but Cloud Engines has already issued a recall after two devices nearly went up in flames. According to <em>The Official Pogoplug Blog,</em> the internal chip that handles video encoding can experience "<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/12/toshibas-super-charge-li-ion-batteries-will-crush-wont-explo/">thermal runaways</a>" after long periods of use, which could cause the device to reach unsafe temperatures; this despite having a fan to keep things cool. The affected model numbers include Pogo P-11 through 14, and the company asks that owners get in contact to setup a return and refund. In the meantime, it also suggests that the units be unplugged -- a good idea if you want to avoid possibly <a href="http://hd.engadget.com/2008/03/05/oy-flatscreens-burning-down-the-house/">burning the house down</a>.<br />
	<br />
	<strong>Update:</strong> It appears that Cloud Engines' initial statement has been condensed and slightly modified. Zenverge, the chip's manufacturer, has also informed us that the silicon itself isn't exactly the problem. The end result remains the same, however: this Pogoplug is too hot for video.</div><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/17/cloud-engines-recalls-potentially-flammable-pogoplug-video/">Cloud Engines recalls potentially flammable Pogoplug Video (update)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 17 Jun 2011 09:48:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/17/cloud-engines-recalls-potentially-flammable-pogoplug-video/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19969302/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/17/cloud-engines-recalls-potentially-flammable-pogoplug-video/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cloud engines</category><category>cloud storage</category><category>CloudEngines</category><category>CloudStorage</category><category>fire</category><category>hot</category><category>NAS</category><category>network attached storage</category><category>NetworkAttachedStorage</category><category>plug computer</category><category>PlugComputer</category><category>pogo plug</category><category>PogoPlug</category><category>PogoPlug Video</category><category>PogoplugVideo</category><category>recall</category><category>refund</category><category>remote access</category><category>RemoteAccess</category><category>smoke</category><category>streaming video</category><category>StreamingVideo</category><category>the official pogoplug blog</category><category>TheOfficialPogoplugBlog</category><category>thermal runaway</category><category>ThermalRunaway</category><category>video streaming</category><category>VideoStreaming</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe Pollicino]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 09:48:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple returns a few Verizon iPad 2s to sender (updated: some got through)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/11/apple-recalls-a-few-verizon-ipad-2s-citing-connectivity-issues/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/11/apple-recalls-a-few-verizon-ipad-2s-citing-connectivity-issues/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/11/apple-recalls-a-few-verizon-ipad-2s-citing-connectivity-issues/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/11/apple-recalls-a-few-verizon-ipad-2s-citing-connectivity-issues/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/06/6-11-11-vzw-ipad-2-return.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
Several <em>9to5Mac</em> readers noticed a rather peculiar phenomenon this last week -- their freshly-ordered Verizon iPad 2 units shipped all the way from China just fine, only to boomerang back to sender right before delivery time. Now, <em>Reuters</em> has the official word: Apple's recalling an "extremely <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/09/apple-investigating-3g-issues-on-some-verizon-ipad-2s-software/">small number</a>" of Verizon iPad 2s which were flashed with a duplicate MEID code. Should they have been delivered, users would probably have found themselves unable to connect to 3G, or booted off before long, as Verizon reportedly can only have one device with that unique identifier on the network at once. We're not sure whether to applaud, but it's good to see manufacturers <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/14/rim-recalls-at-least-900-faulty-blackberry-playbooks-here-are-t/">taking responsibility for their hardware</a> before it hits shelves.<br />
<br />
<strong>Update</strong>: We spoke with Apple about this, who wouldn't give us much beyond the official quote -- which is, for the record: "Duplicate MEID codes were flashed onto an extremely small number of iPad units for the Verizon 3G network." That said, we <em>were </em>able to confirm that a few of these 3G iPad 2s sneaked through and got into the hands of customers. Apple is, of course, replacing those free of charge, so if you're in possession of a brand new iPad that was never able to get on 3G... you know who to call.<br />
<br />
[Thanks to everyone who sent this in]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/11/apple-recalls-a-few-verizon-ipad-2s-citing-connectivity-issues/">Apple returns a few Verizon iPad 2s to sender (updated: some got through)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sat, 11 Jun 2011 18:11:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/11/apple-recalls-a-few-verizon-ipad-2s-citing-connectivity-issues/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19964570/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/11/apple-recalls-a-few-verizon-ipad-2s-citing-connectivity-issues/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Apple</category><category>bug</category><category>error</category><category>errors</category><category>fault</category><category>faulty</category><category>iPad</category><category>iPad 2</category><category>Ipad2</category><category>issue</category><category>issues</category><category>MEID</category><category>mistake</category><category>recall</category><category>recalls</category><category>return</category><category>return to sender</category><category>returns</category><category>ReturnToSender</category><category>tablet</category><category>tablets</category><category>Verizon</category><category>Verizon Wireless</category><category>VerizonWireless</category><category>VZW</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Hollister]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2011 18:11:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Corsair recalls its 120GB Force 3 SSD due to 'stability issues']]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/08/corsair-recalls-its-120gb-force-3-ssd-due-to-stability-issues/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/08/corsair-recalls-its-120gb-force-3-ssd-due-to-stability-issues/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/08/corsair-recalls-its-120gb-force-3-ssd-due-to-stability-issues/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/08/corsair-recalls-its-120gb-force-3-ssd-due-to-stability-issues/"><img border="0" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/06/king-kong-with-corsaircrop.jpg" vspace="4" /></a></div>
Living amongst us right now, on our street, metro carriage, or section of highway, there are people who have recently bought a Corsair 120GB Force Series 3 with product code CSSD-F120GB3-BK. If you're one of them you need to know that this particular drive is subject to a recall due to "stability issues". <em>Sweclockers</em> has reported rumors that other SSDs might also be affected, but the manufacturers in question have swiftly denied it -- so it is only this very specific Corsair drive that is being recalled. Backup your data and hit the source link for further instructions. Don't get mad, get a replacement.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/08/corsair-recalls-its-120gb-force-3-ssd-due-to-stability-issues/">Corsair recalls its 120GB Force 3 SSD due to 'stability issues'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 08 Jun 2011 11:43:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/08/corsair-recalls-its-120gb-force-3-ssd-due-to-stability-issues/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19961329/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/08/corsair-recalls-its-120gb-force-3-ssd-due-to-stability-issues/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Corsair</category><category>corsair force</category><category>Corsair Force Series 3</category><category>CorsairForce</category><category>CorsairForceSeries3</category><category>faulty</category><category>recall</category><category>replacement</category><category>returns</category><category>RMA</category><category>SSD</category><category>stability</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sharif Sakr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 11:43:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[HP expands laptop battery recall, doesn't want you to feel the burn]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/28/hp-expands-laptop-battery-recall-doesnt-want-you-to-feel-the-b/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/28/hp-expands-laptop-battery-recall-doesnt-want-you-to-feel-the-b/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/28/hp-expands-laptop-battery-recall-doesnt-want-you-to-feel-the-b/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">  <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/28/hp-expands-laptop-battery-recall-doesnt-want-you-to-feel-the-b/"><img border="1" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/05/battery-1306523760.jpg" vspace="4" /></a></div> <div>  HP wants to make sure you don't get burned, literally. For the third May in a row, it's issuing another expansion of its voluntary battery recall on laptops produced from July 2007 to May 2008 -- frankly, we're considering a holiday to mark the occasion. May 2009 saw a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/14/70-000-hp-laptop-batteries-recalled-due-to-fire-hazard/">recall of 70,000 batteries</a> followed by an expansion to cover <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/26/hp-recalls-another-15-000-laptop-batteries-this-time-in-china/">15,000 in China</a>, totaling 85,000 affected laptops. It didn't end there though, as further expansion was put in place during <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/20/hp-expands-laptop-battery-recall-again/">May 2010</a> to cover even <em>more</em> models, and this time around, a sizeable number of lappies have been added to the ever-growing list. About five percent of the models from the aforementioned time frame could have problematic batteries, and HP will be providing replacements for those at risk of getting a little too hot under the collar. If your machine was also part of the previous recalls, HP's saying those should be verified as well, even if you've done so in the past already. The full grid of affected laptops can be perused after the break -- Memorial Day weekend will be full of grilling, but we wouldn't want that to include your skin, okay?</div><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/28/hp-expands-laptop-battery-recall-doesnt-want-you-to-feel-the-b/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>HP expands laptop battery recall, doesn't want you to feel the burn</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/28/hp-expands-laptop-battery-recall-doesnt-want-you-to-feel-the-b/">HP expands laptop battery recall, doesn't want you to feel the burn</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sat, 28 May 2011 00:24:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/28/hp-expands-laptop-battery-recall-doesnt-want-you-to-feel-the-b/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19952216/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/28/hp-expands-laptop-battery-recall-doesnt-want-you-to-feel-the-b/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>batteries</category><category>battery</category><category>compaq</category><category>compaq presario</category><category>CompaqPresario</category><category>hp</category><category>hp pavilion</category><category>HpPavilion</category><category>laptop</category><category>pavilion</category><category>presario</category><category>recall</category><category>recall expansion</category><category>RecallExpansion</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe Pollicino]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 May 2011 00:24:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[RIM recalls 900 faulty BlackBerry PlayBooks, here are the serial numbers (update)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/14/rim-recalls-at-least-900-faulty-blackberry-playbooks-here-are-t/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/14/rim-recalls-at-least-900-faulty-blackberry-playbooks-here-are-t/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/14/rim-recalls-at-least-900-faulty-blackberry-playbooks-here-are-t/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/14/rim-recalls-at-least-900-faulty-blackberry-playbooks-here-are-t/"><img border="1" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/05/20110514-14551942--5-14-11-blackberry-playbook.jpg" vspace="4" /></a></div>
We found the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/13/blackberry-playbook-review/">BlackBerry PlayBook</a> to be a pretty solid piece of hardware, but it seems there was a problem batch -- an inside source tells us that nearly 1,000 faulty tablets were shipped to Staples, and now they're being recalled. We're hoping that Staples (and any other affected retailers) will reach out to customers and inform them of the problem right away, but just in case that doesn't happen, we've compiled a searchable spreadsheet of all 935 alleged serial numbers for you to check against your own. Find it right after the break.<br />
<br />
<strong>Update: </strong>RIM <a href="http://crackberry.com/official-statement-research-motion-regarding-recall-approximately-one-thousand-blackberry-playbook-u">tells <em>Crackberry</em></a> that the faulty batch of the 16GB tablets was indeed limited to the approximately 1,000 units described here, and that they had a faulty build of the OS "that may result in the devices being unable to properly load software upon initial set-up." Furthermore, the company says that only a few went out to customers and that most are still in distribution, so with any luck you'll never have to deal with this problem to begin with.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/14/rim-recalls-at-least-900-faulty-blackberry-playbooks-here-are-t/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>RIM recalls 900 faulty BlackBerry PlayBooks, here are the serial numbers (update)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/14/rim-recalls-at-least-900-faulty-blackberry-playbooks-here-are-t/">RIM recalls 900 faulty BlackBerry PlayBooks, here are the serial numbers (update)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sat, 14 May 2011 21:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/14/rim-recalls-at-least-900-faulty-blackberry-playbooks-here-are-t/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19940715/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/14/rim-recalls-at-least-900-faulty-blackberry-playbooks-here-are-t/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>blackberry</category><category>blackberry playbook</category><category>BlackberryPlaybook</category><category>exclusive</category><category>faulty</category><category>playbook</category><category>recall</category><category>recalled</category><category>recalls</category><category>return</category><category>returns</category><category>RIM</category><category>tablet</category><category>tablet pc</category><category>TabletPc</category><category>tablets</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Hollister]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 May 2011 21:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Samsung offering refunds for PCs affected by Sandy Bridge glitch, NEC looking at delays]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/01/samsung-offering-refunds-for-pcs-affected-by-sandy-bridge-glitch/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/01/samsung-offering-refunds-for-pcs-affected-by-sandy-bridge-glitch/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/01/samsung-offering-refunds-for-pcs-affected-by-sandy-bridge-glitch/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/01/samsung-offering-recalls-for-pcs-affected-by-sandy-bridge-recall/"><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="0" alt="Samsung offering recalls for PCs affected by Sandy Bridge recall, NEC looking at delays" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/02/sandy-bridge.2011-02-01.jpg" /></a></div>
We finally received <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/01/intel-sandy-bridge-chipset-flaw-identified-as-a-rogue-transistor/">full details</a> on the issue affecting Intel's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/intel,sandybridge">Sandy Bridge</a> chipsets this morning, and now we're hearing of what looks to be the first confirmed recall. <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/samsung">Samsung</a> is indicating it will offer refunds for affected computers and, while it isn't saying exactly which models will be affected, it did give a number: six models sold in South Korea and one available in the US will be eligible for return or refund, about 3,000 total machines. <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/nec">NEC</a>, meanwhile, who just went <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/27/lenovo-and-nec-partner-up-to-become-japans-biggest-pc-vendor/">all-in with Lenovo</a>, is indicating that it may push back the release of four separate models. Naturally we'll keep the updates coming as we get more details.<br />
<br />
[Thanks, Peter]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/01/samsung-offering-refunds-for-pcs-affected-by-sandy-bridge-glitch/">Samsung offering refunds for PCs affected by Sandy Bridge glitch, NEC looking at delays</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 01 Feb 2011 10:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/01/samsung-offering-refunds-for-pcs-affected-by-sandy-bridge-glitch/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19823537/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/01/samsung-offering-refunds-for-pcs-affected-by-sandy-bridge-glitch/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>chipset</category><category>desktop</category><category>intel</category><category>nec</category><category>p67</category><category>recall</category><category>refund</category><category>samsung</category><category>sandy bridge</category><category>SandyBridge</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Stevens]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 10:28:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel Sandy Bridge chipset flaw identified as a rogue transistor affecting SATA ports]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/01/intel-sandy-bridge-chipset-flaw-identified-as-a-rogue-transistor/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/01/intel-sandy-bridge-chipset-flaw-identified-as-a-rogue-transistor/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/01/intel-sandy-bridge-chipset-flaw-identified-as-a-rogue-transistor/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/01/intel-sandy-bridge-chipset-flaw-identified-as-a-rogue-transistor/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/02/11x02010921nsata.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
Intel raised quite a few eyebrows yesterday by disclosing that its Cougar Point chipsets suffer from an <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/31/intel-finds-sandy-bridge-chipset-design-flaw-shipments-stopped/">incurable design issue</a> that would potentially degrade Serial ATA transfers over time. <em>AnandTech</em> has gone to the trouble of getting in touch with Intel to seek more information and the problem, as it turns out, is a single transistor that's prone to a higher current leakage than tolerable. This can not only diminish performance over the 3Gbps SATA ports, it can actually make them fail altogether. There is more comforting news, however, in that the pair of 6Gbps SATA ports on the chipset are untroubled by this ailment, so devices and users that never plug into the 3Gbps connections can just carry on as if nothing's ever happened. For everyone else, a repair and replacement service is taking place now, with Intel's budget for dealing with this problem said to be a generous $700 million.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/01/intel-sandy-bridge-chipset-flaw-identified-as-a-rogue-transistor/">Intel Sandy Bridge chipset flaw identified as a rogue transistor affecting SATA ports</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 01 Feb 2011 04:56:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/01/intel-sandy-bridge-chipset-flaw-identified-as-a-rogue-transistor/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19823210/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/01/intel-sandy-bridge-chipset-flaw-identified-as-a-rogue-transistor/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>anand</category><category>anandtech</category><category>bug</category><category>chipset</category><category>components</category><category>cougar point</category><category>CougarPoint</category><category>hardware</category><category>intel</category><category>issue</category><category>oversight</category><category>problem</category><category>recall</category><category>sandy bridge</category><category>SandyBridge</category><category>sata</category><category>serial ata</category><category>SerialAta</category><category>steve smith</category><category>SteveSmith</category><category>transistor</category><category>transistors</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlad Savov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 04:56:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel finds Sandy Bridge chipset design flaw, shipments stopped and recalls beginning]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/31/intel-finds-sandy-bridge-chipset-design-flaw-shipments-stopped/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/31/intel-finds-sandy-bridge-chipset-design-flaw-shipments-stopped/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/31/intel-finds-sandy-bridge-chipset-design-flaw-shipments-stopped/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/31/intel-finds-sandy-bridge-chipset-design-flaw-shipments-stopped/"><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/01/intelsandybridgesilicon-2011-01-31.jpg" alt="Intel finds Sandy Bridge chipset design flaw, shipments stopped and recalls beginning" /></a></div>
A problem requiring a "silicon fix" is bad news in the chipset business, and sadly that's what <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/intel">Intel</a> is announcing. Its new Intel 6 Series chipset, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/cougarpoint">Cougar Point</a>, has been found to have a flaw, something to do with the SATA controller. Intel is indicating that the ports can "degrade over time," leading to poor i/o performance down the road. All shipments have been stopped and a fix has been implemented for new deliveries, but it sounds like recalls will be starting soon for those with this ticking time bomb silicon within. It isn't a critical problem right now, though, so if you own a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/sandybridge">Sandy Bridge</a> Core i5 or Core i7 system keep computing with confidence while looking for a recall notice, but it is bad news for Intel's bottom line: the company is advising a $300 million hit to revenue.<br />
<br />
<strong>Update</strong>: Jimmy sent us a chat log with an Intel customer service representative indicating that this recall only affects "some desktop boards based on Intel P67 chipset," that the H67 chipset boards appear to not be affected, but that the company doesn't have a comprehensive list yet. We've certainly seen cases where CSRs don't have all the info in this sort of situation, but still we'd advise waiting a bit before tearing your new mobo out and bringing it back to the store.<br />
<br />
[Thanks, Matt]<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/31/intel-finds-sandy-bridge-chipset-design-flaw-shipments-stopped/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Intel finds Sandy Bridge chipset design flaw, shipments stopped and recalls beginning</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/31/intel-finds-sandy-bridge-chipset-design-flaw-shipments-stopped/">Intel finds Sandy Bridge chipset design flaw, shipments stopped and recalls beginning</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 31 Jan 2011 10:53:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/31/intel-finds-sandy-bridge-chipset-design-flaw-shipments-stopped/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19822008/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/31/intel-finds-sandy-bridge-chipset-design-flaw-shipments-stopped/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>chipset</category><category>core i5</category><category>core i7</category><category>CoreI5</category><category>CoreI7</category><category>cougar point</category><category>CougarPoint</category><category>intel</category><category>oops</category><category>recall</category><category>sandy bridge</category><category>SandyBridge</category><category>sata</category><category>silicon fix</category><category>SiliconFix</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Stevens]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 10:53:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Dell to begin fixing busted M11x in March -- or thereabouts]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/26/dell-to-begin-fixing-busted-m11x-in-march-or-thereabouts/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/26/dell-to-begin-fixing-busted-m11x-in-march-or-thereabouts/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/26/dell-to-begin-fixing-busted-m11x-in-march-or-thereabouts/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/26/dell-to-begin-fixing-busted-m11x-in-march-or-thereabouts/"><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" alt="Dell to begin fixing busted M11x in March -- or thereabouts" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/01/m11x-hinge-2011-01-26.jpg" /></a></div>
<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/05/alienware-m11x-hinge-issues-yeah-dell-knows/">Creaky or cracking hinge</a> up in your <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/alienware">Alienware</a> lappy? Its days are numbered -- though exactly what that number is remains to be seen. <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/dell">Dell</a> Forum Liaison Chris Mixon posted that the company is working on getting a hinge replacement program going for the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/m11x">M11x</a> laptop with "an ETA around March," but cautions that start date is "dependent on a 3rd party vendor and other details so it is not concrete." In other words, April or May might not be a bad month to keep in mind if you hate being disappointed, but know that the hinges will be repaired regardless of when your warranty expires. So, hopefully no fears for disappointment there.<br />
<br />
[Thanks, Esteef]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/26/dell-to-begin-fixing-busted-m11x-in-march-or-thereabouts/">Dell to begin fixing busted M11x in March -- or thereabouts</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 26 Jan 2011 09:49:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/26/dell-to-begin-fixing-busted-m11x-in-march-or-thereabouts/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19815815/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/26/dell-to-begin-fixing-busted-m11x-in-march-or-thereabouts/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>alienware</category><category>dell</category><category>hinge</category><category>laptop</category><category>m11x</category><category>recall</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Stevens]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 09:49:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[WakeMate sleep-aid recalled due to 'exploding' USB charger, gives new meaning to being hot in the sack]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/31/wakemate-sleep-aid-recalled-due-to-exploding-usb-charger-give/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/31/wakemate-sleep-aid-recalled-due-to-exploding-usb-charger-give/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/31/wakemate-sleep-aid-recalled-due-to-exploding-usb-charger-give/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/31/wakemate-sleep-aid-recalled-due-to-exploding-usb-charger-give/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/12/wakemate-recall-2010-12-31.jpg" /></a></div>
Early this morning, Perfect Third Inc. -- makers of the less than perfect <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/21/wakemate-review/">WakeMate</a> wristband -- issued a recall for the sleep analyzer's USB charger, which apparently has a tendency to go <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/25/atandt-quickfire-could-overheat-spontaneously-burst-into-irony-if/">up in smoke</a>, and we don't mean disappear. An e-mail sent out by the company's CEO at 12:30 AM states, "we were informed by a customer of a safety incident with the black USB chargers." A little vague if you ask us, considering the video we received shows the device "smoking after exploding." The recall ensures that the WakeMate itself is perfectly safe, and that the Chinese-manufactured USB cables are at fault, but if you ask us, anything that is supposed to help you sleep soundly shouldn't put you in danger of catching fire. <br />
<br />
[Thanks, Ringram and Nick]<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/31/wakemate-sleep-aid-recalled-due-to-exploding-usb-charger-give/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>WakeMate sleep-aid recalled due to 'exploding' USB charger, gives new meaning to being hot in the sack</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/31/wakemate-sleep-aid-recalled-due-to-exploding-usb-charger-give/">WakeMate sleep-aid recalled due to 'exploding' USB charger, gives new meaning to being hot in the sack</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 31 Dec 2010 16:09:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/31/wakemate-sleep-aid-recalled-due-to-exploding-usb-charger-give/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19782727/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/31/wakemate-sleep-aid-recalled-due-to-exploding-usb-charger-give/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>fire</category><category>fire hazard</category><category>FireHazard</category><category>recall</category><category>recall alert</category><category>RecallAlert</category><category>Recalls</category><category>sleep</category><category>sleep aid</category><category>sleep aids</category><category>sleep-aid</category><category>sleep-aids</category><category>SleepAid</category><category>SleepAids</category><category>sleeping</category><category>video</category><category>Wake Mate</category><category>wakemate</category><category>wrist band</category><category>wristband</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Christopher Trout]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 16:09:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[ThinkFlood's RedEye universal remote control becomes web compatible, leaves past woes in the dust]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/03/thinkfloods-redeye-universal-remote-control-becomes-web-compati/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/03/thinkfloods-redeye-universal-remote-control-becomes-web-compati/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/03/thinkfloods-redeye-universal-remote-control-becomes-web-compati/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/03/thinkfloods-redeye-universal-remote-control-becomes-web-compati/"><img hspace="4" border="0" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/12/redeye-wifi-with-browser-app.jpg" /></a></div>
After going through some <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/24/thinkflood-recalls-lot-of-redeye-mini-ir-dongles/">rough times</a> with its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/search/?q=think+flood&amp;invocationType=wl-gadget">RedEye mini dongle</a> and doing right by <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/09/thinkflood-survives-recall-now-shipping-redesigned-redeye-mini/">replacing them</a>, ThinkFlood appears to be running full beam ahead once more. Specifically, the company has announced that RedEye owners will soon have the ability to setup and control their remote systems straight from their PC or mobile browser. On the mobile front, apparently the web app will even work on Android and BlackBerry devices, despite being optimized for Safari on iOS -- hinting that non iPhone owners could possibly let their phones control more than their social lives soon. Setup wise, the web version also allows users to automatically align and move multiple buttons at once, plus assign commands to over 70+ keyboard shortcuts. Combined with the ability to make adjustments using a mouse on a computer's larger screen, tweaking custom RedEye remote layouts just got infinitely easier -- you hear that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/search/?q=harmony+remotes&amp;invocationType=wl-gadget">Harmony</a>? The iOS app 2.0 update is also now available as a free 'Plus' download in the iTunes store, and finally supports the iPad's lovely screen in either orientation. In a sense, it's further substantiating the tablet's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/02/dish-network-launches-remote-access-app-brings-live-tv-and-sche/">new career path</a> as a jumbo-buttoned geezer remote of the future, but hey -- no gripes here.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/03/thinkfloods-redeye-universal-remote-control-becomes-web-compati/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>ThinkFlood's RedEye universal remote control becomes web compatible, leaves past woes in the dust</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/03/thinkfloods-redeye-universal-remote-control-becomes-web-compati/">ThinkFlood's RedEye universal remote control becomes web compatible, leaves past woes in the dust</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 03 Dec 2010 10:41:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/03/thinkfloods-redeye-universal-remote-control-becomes-web-compati/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19742934/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/03/thinkfloods-redeye-universal-remote-control-becomes-web-compati/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>android</category><category>BlackBerry</category><category>IOS</category><category>ipad</category><category>ipad remote</category><category>IpadApp</category><category>IpadRemote</category><category>iphone</category><category>iphone app</category><category>iPhone Applications</category><category>iphone remote</category><category>iphone remote app</category><category>IphoneApp</category><category>IphoneApplications</category><category>IphoneRemote</category><category>IphoneRemoteApp</category><category>mobile browser</category><category>MobileBrowser</category><category>pc</category><category>pcs</category><category>recall</category><category>Recalls</category><category>red eye</category><category>RedEye</category><category>RedEye app</category><category>RedEye App 2.0</category><category>RedEye remote</category><category>redeye-mini</category><category>RedeyeApp</category><category>RedeyeApp2.0</category><category>RedeyeMini</category><category>RedeyeRemote</category><category>remote</category><category>remote app</category><category>remote control</category><category>RemoteApp</category><category>RemoteControl</category><category>thinkflood</category><category>ThinkFlood RedEye</category><category>ThinkfloodRedeye</category><category>ThinkfloodRedeyeMini</category><category>web browser</category><category>WebBrowser</category><category>wifi remote</category><category>WifiRemote</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Bowers]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 10:41:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[PC World stops selling the Toshiba Folio 100, we go hands-on to find out why (video)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/14/pc-world-stops-selling-the-toshiba-folio-100-we-go-hands-on-to/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/14/pc-world-stops-selling-the-toshiba-folio-100-we-go-hands-on-to/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/14/pc-world-stops-selling-the-toshiba-folio-100-we-go-hands-on-to/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/14/pc-world-stops-selling-the-toshiba-folio-100-we-go-hands-on-to/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/11/folio100store11142010-1289764943.jpg" /></a></div>
&pound;999.99 ($1,612) for a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/folio+100">Toshiba Folio 100</a>?! That's a fair bit more expensive than its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/04/toshiba-folio-100-now-shipping-its-tegra-2-powered-froyo-wares-a/">original</a> $560 price point -- either its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/tegra2">Tegra 2</a> chip's made out of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/14/scientists-put-color-on-your-bling-with-micro-carvings-gangster/">gold</a> (which would explain its rarity) or someone got super bored at that PC World store in the British Midlands. Soon after receiving this photo, we put on our detective hat and headed over to our local branch in London, only to find that it had already stopped selling the offending <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/android%2Ctablet">Android tablet</a> merely ten days after its European launch. We quizzed the staff about the aforementioned &pound;999.99 pricing and then all was clear: apparently this is a standard internal convention to stop its folks from selling certain products, so the price tag <em>and</em> display unit you see above weren't supposed to be there at all. Oopsie!<br />
<br />
So why is PC World (and the whole DSG International chain) pulling the Folio 100? Turns out this has nothing to do with Toshiba; but it's simply because of a high return rate from disappointed customers. In fact, head over to <em>MoDaCo</em> and you'll see a screenshot of PC World's internal memo that confirms this sad news. We had already given the tablet some decent (and disheartening) hands-on time <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/02/toshiba-folio-100-preview/">back at IFA</a>, but since our new friends at the store kindly offered to let us unbox a Folio 100 for a giggle, we decided to give it another go. And boy, it sure was a letdown: you'll see in our hands-on video after the break that the 10.1-inch LCD is haunted by an inferior pixel density plus narrow viewing angles; and the cheap plastic casing doesn't help, either. Most importantly, the official Android Market app was still MIA, which is no doubt the biggest turn-off for the buyers. Too bad, Toshiba, but do come back next year when you have <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/honeycomb">Honeycomb</a> and some decent screens.<br />
<br />
[Thanks, John L. and Adam C.]<br />
<br />
<strong>Update:</strong> Some commenters are pointing out that many software bugs -- especially in the Toshiba Market Place app -- and the lack of pinch-to-zoom in the browser are to be blamed as well. Yikes.<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/toshiba-folio-100-in-store-unboxing/">Toshiba Folio 100 in-store unboxing</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/toshiba-folio-100-in-store-unboxing/#3569952"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/11/folio100uk2010-11-14-0_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/toshiba-folio-100-in-store-unboxing/#3569953"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/11/folio100uk2010-11-14-1_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/toshiba-folio-100-in-store-unboxing/#3569954"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/11/folio100uk2010-11-14-2_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/toshiba-folio-100-in-store-unboxing/#3569955"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/11/folio100uk2010-11-14-3_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/toshiba-folio-100-in-store-unboxing/#3569956"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/11/folio100uk2010-11-14-4_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/14/pc-world-stops-selling-the-toshiba-folio-100-we-go-hands-on-to/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>PC World stops selling the Toshiba Folio 100, we go hands-on to find out why (video)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/14/pc-world-stops-selling-the-toshiba-folio-100-we-go-hands-on-to/">PC World stops selling the Toshiba Folio 100, we go hands-on to find out why (video)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sun, 14 Nov 2010 16:33:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/14/pc-world-stops-selling-the-toshiba-folio-100-we-go-hands-on-to/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19716059/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/14/pc-world-stops-selling-the-toshiba-folio-100-we-go-hands-on-to/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>android</category><category>android 2.2</category><category>Android2.2</category><category>currys</category><category>dixons</category><category>dsg</category><category>DSG International</category><category>dsgi</category><category>DsgInternational</category><category>folio</category><category>folio 100</category><category>Folio100</category><category>froyo</category><category>hands-on</category><category>nvidia tegra 2</category><category>NvidiaTegra2</category><category>pc world</category><category>PcWorld</category><category>recall</category><category>retail</category><category>tablet</category><category>tegra 2</category><category>Tegra2</category><category>toshiab folio 100</category><category>ToshiabFolio100</category><category>toshiba</category><category>uk</category><category>video</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lai]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2010 16:33:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Tesla recalls 439 Roadster 2.0 and 2.5 electric cars due to fire hazard]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/04/tesla-recalls-439-roadster-2-0-and-2-5-electric-cars-due-to-fire/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/04/tesla-recalls-439-roadster-2-0-and-2-5-electric-cars-due-to-fire/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/04/tesla-recalls-439-roadster-2-0-and-2-5-electric-cars-due-to-fire/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/04/tesla-recalls-439-roadster-2-0-and-2-5-electric-cars-due-to-fire/"><img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="1" align="left" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/10/tesla-wind-farm.jpg" /></a>Tesla Motors is pretty proud of the fact that it decided to recall 439 <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Roadster/">Roadster</a> 2.0 and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/12/inhabitats-week-in-green-solar-jellyfish-goo-the-worlds-smal/">2.5</a> vehicles after a single one saw "a short, smoke and possible fire behind the right front headlamp," but a fire hazard in every one of 439 shipping products isn't exactly a ratio to be boasting about. At any rate, nearly a third of its 1,300 vehicles sold are affected by the recall, which "involves the 12v low voltage auxiliary cable from a redundant back up system that provides power to various systems, including the headlamps, taillights, turn signals and hazard lights, and airbags in the unlikely event the primary 12V power fails or drops below a minimum threshold value." The repair involves checking the routing of the 12V low voltage auxiliary cable and installing a protective sleeve over it, and it should take around an hour to complete. Unless, of course, you're the Tesla owner residing on the north shore of Kauai. Yeah, we're talking to you... Mr. Guy with "TESLA" on his Hawaii plate.<br />
<br />
[Thanks, Jim]<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/04/tesla-recalls-439-roadster-2-0-and-2-5-electric-cars-due-to-fire/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Tesla recalls 439 Roadster 2.0 and 2.5 electric cars due to fire hazard</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/04/tesla-recalls-439-roadster-2-0-and-2-5-electric-cars-due-to-fire/">Tesla recalls 439 Roadster 2.0 and 2.5 electric cars due to fire hazard</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 04 Oct 2010 18:02:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/04/tesla-recalls-439-roadster-2-0-and-2-5-electric-cars-due-to-fire/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19660427/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/04/tesla-recalls-439-roadster-2-0-and-2-5-electric-cars-due-to-fire/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dangerous</category><category>fire</category><category>fire hazard</category><category>FireHazard</category><category>recall</category><category>roadster</category><category>roadster 2</category><category>roadster 2.0</category><category>roadster 2.5</category><category>Roadster2</category><category>Roadster2.0</category><category>Roadster2.5</category><category>tesla</category><category>tesla motors</category><category>tesla roadster</category><category>tesla roadster sport</category><category>TeslaMotors</category><category>TeslaRoadster</category><category>TeslaRoadsterSport</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 18:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Dell Streak's pre-rooted Android 2.1 update quietly suspended, revision coming in two or three weeks]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/20/dell-streaks-pre-rooted-android-2-1-update-quietly-suspended-r/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/20/dell-streaks-pre-rooted-android-2-1-update-quietly-suspended-r/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/20/dell-streaks-pre-rooted-android-2-1-update-quietly-suspended-r/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/20/dell-streaks-pre-rooted-android-2-1-update-quietly-suspended-r/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/08/dellstreak2108052010.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
Ruh roh. Looks like <a href="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/tag/dell">Dell's</a> stepped onto its own toes real hard with the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/30/dell-streak-to-get-official-android-2-1-update-on-september-1st/">Streak's Android 2.1 update</a> -- <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/o2">O2</a> just confirmed to us that due to some "feedback from users," it's decided to suspend said download while Dell gets cranking on a revised software release over the next two or three weeks. We weren't given the exact reasons behind this quiet withdrawal, but our friends over at <em>MoDaCo</em> might have had the answer for some time -- soon after the release, they discovered that the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/eclair">2.1</a> firmware was in fact <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/android,root">pre-rooted</a>, thus leaving the Streak vulnerable to unauthorized access and modification (although handy for the seriously tech-minded). Yikes. On the bright side, such substantial time frame suggests that the upcoming fix should also address other bugs like incompatibility with the desktop suite, weird loading behavior in the browser, and missing WMV video playback functionality. <br />
<br />
And here comes the inevitable question: what about <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/froyo">Froyo</a>? Well, neither Dell nor O2 could provide a date for the Streak's scoop of frozen dessert, but we'll bet you a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/whiteiphone4">white iPhone 4</a> that it won't be out in October.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/20/dell-streaks-pre-rooted-android-2-1-update-quietly-suspended-r/">Dell Streak's pre-rooted Android 2.1 update quietly suspended, revision coming in two or three weeks</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 20 Sep 2010 17:08:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/20/dell-streaks-pre-rooted-android-2-1-update-quietly-suspended-r/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19640769/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/20/dell-streaks-pre-rooted-android-2-1-update-quietly-suspended-r/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>1.6</category><category>2.1</category><category>2.2</category><category>android</category><category>android 1.6</category><category>android 2.1</category><category>android 2.2</category><category>Android1.6</category><category>Android2.1</category><category>Android2.2</category><category>bug</category><category>cellphone</category><category>dell</category><category>donut</category><category>eclair</category><category>firmware</category><category>firmware update</category><category>FirmwareUpdate</category><category>froyo</category><category>issue</category><category>mobile</category><category>mobile phone</category><category>MobilePhone</category><category>o2</category><category>phone</category><category>problem</category><category>recall</category><category>rollback</category><category>root</category><category>rooted</category><category>rooted firmware</category><category>RootedFirmware</category><category>security</category><category>security hole</category><category>SecurityHole</category><category>smartphone</category><category>streak</category><category>tabletphone</category><category>uk</category><category>update</category><category>vulnerability</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lai]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 17:08:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Toshiba issues recall for 41,000 T Series laptops because of burn hazard]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/02/toshiba-issues-recall-for-41-000-t-series-laptops-because-of-bur/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/02/toshiba-issues-recall-for-41-000-t-series-laptops-because-of-bur/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/02/toshiba-issues-recall-for-41-000-t-series-laptops-because-of-bur/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/02/toshiba-issues-recall-for-41-000-t-series-laptops-because-of-bur/"><img border="1" vspace="4" hspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/09/t100-tosh-1top.jpg" /><br />
</a></div>
<a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Toshiba/">Toshiba</a>'s announced a worldwide, voluntary recall of about 41,000 T Series laptops because of a burn hazard. The laptops apparently carry the risk of overheating AC adapters which can then... burn you. Toshiba has reported that its received 129 complaints, including two minor burns, about the laptops, which include the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/06/toshibas-t115-and-t135-thin-and-lights-start-at-450-offer-int/">Satellite T135</a>, Satellite T135D and Satellite Pro T130, which were sold between August of 2009 through August of 2010. If you happened to buying one of these burn-prone babies, hit up the source to contact Toshiba for more information. </a><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/02/toshiba-issues-recall-for-41-000-t-series-laptops-because-of-bur/">Toshiba issues recall for 41,000 T Series laptops because of burn hazard</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 02 Sep 2010 18:25:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/02/toshiba-issues-recall-for-41-000-t-series-laptops-because-of-bur/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19619406/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/02/toshiba-issues-recall-for-41-000-t-series-laptops-because-of-bur/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>consumer</category><category>consumer safety</category><category>consumers</category><category>ConsumerSafety</category><category>laptop</category><category>laptops</category><category>recall</category><category>satellite</category><category>Satellite Pro T130</category><category>satellite T135</category><category>Satellite T135D</category><category>SatelliteProT130</category><category>SatelliteT135</category><category>SatelliteT135d</category><category>toshiba</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Laura June]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 18:25:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Garmin recalls 1.25 million navigation units due to potential fire hazard]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/25/garmin-recalls-1-25-million-navigation-units-due-to-potential-fi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/25/garmin-recalls-1-25-million-navigation-units-due-to-potential-fi/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/25/garmin-recalls-1-25-million-navigation-units-due-to-potential-fi/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/25/garmin-recalls-1-25-million-navigation-units-due-to-potential-fi/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/08/garmin-nuvi-recall-08-25-2010.jpg" /></a></div>
GPS recalls haven't been nearly as common as some other <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/recall,laptop">battery-related recalls</a> in recent years, but Garmin has now been hit with a fairly big one -- it's voluntarily recalling some 1.25 million nuvi units due to an overheating issue that could pose a fire hazard. The recall affects certain nuvi <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/200w,250w">200W, 250W</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/260w">260W</a>, and 7xx models that use batteries from an unnamed third-party supplier and a specific PCB design, which Garmin says can "in rare circumstances, increase the possibility of overheating." While there's still been no reports of significant damage or injuries, Garmin is nonetheless advising anyone with an affected unit to stop using it immediately and return it for service -- hit up the link below to check if your nuvi is included in the recall.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/25/garmin-recalls-1-25-million-navigation-units-due-to-potential-fi/">Garmin recalls 1.25 million navigation units due to potential fire hazard</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 25 Aug 2010 15:17:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/25/garmin-recalls-1-25-million-navigation-units-due-to-potential-fi/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19608174/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/25/garmin-recalls-1-25-million-navigation-units-due-to-potential-fi/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>200w</category><category>250w</category><category>260w</category><category>7xx</category><category>battery</category><category>battery recall</category><category>BatteryRecall</category><category>garmin</category><category>garming</category><category>gps</category><category>nuvi</category><category>recall</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald Melanson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 15:17:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple ordered to make public iPod nano battery fix in Japan]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/06/apple-ordered-to-publish-statement-on-receiving-replacement-ipod/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/06/apple-ordered-to-publish-statement-on-receiving-replacement-ipod/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/06/apple-ordered-to-publish-statement-on-receiving-replacement-ipod/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/06/apple-ordered-to-publish-statement-on-receiving-replacement-ipod/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/08/brad-pitt-hot-ipod.jpg" alt="" /><br />
</a></div>
We had an <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/12/japan-orders-apple-to-investigate-exploding-ipod-nanos/">eerie feeling</a> it'd come to this, and come it has. Nearly <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/19/japan-investigates-exploding-first-generation-ipod-nanos-again/">two full years to the day</a> after the government of Japan began a thorough investigation into the spontaneous <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/08/ipod-nano-sparks-bedroom-fire-no-humans-harmed/">combusting</a> of iPod nano devices, that same entity is now mandating that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Apple/">Apple</a> publish an "easy to understand" statement on the web that explains how customers can "receive replacement batteries and obtain advice." So far, these volatile Li-ion cells have been blamed for four cases of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/05/ipod-nana-spews-chest-high-flames-from-trousers-lawsuit-at/">minor burns</a> in the Land of the Rising Sun, and while Apple has been replacing first-generation iPod nano batteries since 2008 for those that complained, it seems that Japan wants the company to make the option readily apparent to consumers. Be sure to keep an eye on Apple's Japanese site for more, but as of now, we're not seeing any such PSA posted.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/06/apple-ordered-to-publish-statement-on-receiving-replacement-ipod/">Apple ordered to make public iPod nano battery fix in Japan</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 06 Aug 2010 08:51:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/06/apple-ordered-to-publish-statement-on-receiving-replacement-ipod/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19583689/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/06/apple-ordered-to-publish-statement-on-receiving-replacement-ipod/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Apple</category><category>apple ipod</category><category>AppleIpod</category><category>battery</category><category>burns</category><category>charger</category><category>charging</category><category>exploding</category><category>exploding battery</category><category>ExplodingBattery</category><category>explosion</category><category>fire</category><category>fire hazard</category><category>FireHazard</category><category>fix</category><category>government</category><category>hazard</category><category>ipod</category><category>ipod nano</category><category>IpodNano</category><category>japan</category><category>lithium ion</category><category>LithiumIon</category><category>MA004JA</category><category>ma005</category><category>MA005JA</category><category>ma099</category><category>MA099JA</category><category>MA107JA</category><category>nano</category><category>overheat</category><category>overheating</category><category>portable audio</category><category>portableaudio</category><category>recall</category><category>safety</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 08:51:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple issuing free repairs or replacements of wonky 2008 Time Capsules]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/12/apple-issuing-free-repairs-or-replacements-of-wonky-2008-time-ca/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/12/apple-issuing-free-repairs-or-replacements-of-wonky-2008-time-ca/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/12/apple-issuing-free-repairs-or-replacements-of-wonky-2008-time-ca/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/12/apple-issuing-free-repairs-or-replacements-of-wonky-2008-time-ca/"><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/07/10x0712iub2435scaap.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
It takes quite a lot to get Apple (or <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/02/dell-responds-to-latest-capacitor-related-fallout-ignores-the-w/">any</a> of the other big timers) to swallow its pride and admit a faulty product, but the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/06/are-some-apple-time-capsules-locking-themselves-up-for-good/">random deaths of its Time Capsules</a> seem to have fit that bill. Of course, in classic corporate fashion, we're not told that there's a problem at all, but if you bought one of the earliest batches of Time Capsules -- between February and June 2008 -- and it has since suffered a fatal malfunction, you may now be entitled to a free repair or replacement. This new coverage is also being extended to people who've already had to pay to deal with a less than reliable Capsule; they'll get full refunds of their money, but we doubt their hearts will heal that quickly, and let's not even talk about the lost data that was supposed to be getting backed up on the thing.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/12/apple-issuing-free-repairs-or-replacements-of-wonky-2008-time-ca/">Apple issuing free repairs or replacements of wonky 2008 Time Capsules</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 12 Jul 2010 01:42:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/12/apple-issuing-free-repairs-or-replacements-of-wonky-2008-time-ca/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19549983/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/12/apple-issuing-free-repairs-or-replacements-of-wonky-2008-time-ca/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2008</category><category>apple</category><category>apple time capsule</category><category>AppleTimeCapsule</category><category>backup</category><category>nas</category><category>recall</category><category>repair</category><category>replacement</category><category>time capsule</category><category>time station</category><category>TimeCapsule</category><category>TimeStation</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlad Savov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 01:42:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Sony to recall half a million 'too hot to handle' VAIO laptops]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/30/sony-to-recall-half-a-million-too-hot-to-handle-vaio-laptops/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/30/sony-to-recall-half-a-million-too-hot-to-handle-vaio-laptops/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/30/sony-to-recall-half-a-million-too-hot-to-handle-vaio-laptops/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/30/sony-to-recall-half-a-million-too-hot-to-handle-vaio-laptops/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/06/avaio-w-2010-01-0718-03-12-rm-eng600x398.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
Well, this isn't good. <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Sony/">Sony</a>'s issued a warning that about half a million of its VAIO laptops are at risk of seriously overheating, and could even cause burns. The company says that the heat-monitoring chips of its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/VAIOF/">VAIO F</a> and C series laptops (which were launched in January) could be defective, causing them to overheat and physically warp. Sony says it's received about 40 total complaints about the issue, and that affected customers will be able to download a software fix or contact the company directly to have the laptop picked up for a repair.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/30/sony-to-recall-half-a-million-too-hot-to-handle-vaio-laptops/">Sony to recall half a million 'too hot to handle' VAIO laptops</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 30 Jun 2010 09:54:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/30/sony-to-recall-half-a-million-too-hot-to-handle-vaio-laptops/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19536743/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/30/sony-to-recall-half-a-million-too-hot-to-handle-vaio-laptops/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>laptop</category><category>recall</category><category>recalls</category><category>sony</category><category>vaio</category><category>vaio c</category><category>vaio f</category><category>VaioC</category><category>VaioF</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Laura June]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 09:54:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Pandigital rolls out Novel firmware fix following recall]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/pandigital-rolls-out-novel-firmware-fix-following-recall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/pandigital-rolls-out-novel-firmware-fix-following-recall/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/pandigital-rolls-out-novel-firmware-fix-following-recall/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/pandigital-rolls-out-novel-firmware-fix-following-recall/"><img hspace="4" border="0" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/06/pandigital-e-reader.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">Pandigital's launch of its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/pandigital,novel">Novel</a> e-reader quickly turned into something of a mess after it was forced to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/kohls-pulls-pandigital-novel-ereader-for-a-firmware-fix/">pull the device</a> from retail partner Kohl's due to some major firmware issues, but it looks like the company has now gotten things sorted out (or so it hopes). It's just rolled out a firmware update for the device that apparently fixes the problems, and which should also pave the way for its return to retail (though it's still not available from Kohl's just yet). It remains to be seen if the update also fixes the many issues reported in an early review of the device, however, but we're going to go out on a limb and say it doesn't make it any lighter. As we'd heard before, you can also still return the device for a full refund if you're not satisfied with it, or you grab the firmware update at the link below and see if it makes things a bit more bearable.<br />
<br />
[Thanks, joelaf]</div>
<div style="text-align: left;"> </div><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/pandigital-rolls-out-novel-firmware-fix-following-recall/">Pandigital rolls out Novel firmware fix following recall</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 16 Jun 2010 06:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/pandigital-rolls-out-novel-firmware-fix-following-recall/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19517544/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/pandigital-rolls-out-novel-firmware-fix-following-recall/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>e book</category><category>e books</category><category>e reader</category><category>e readers</category><category>e-book</category><category>e-book reader</category><category>E-bookReader</category><category>e-books</category><category>e-reader</category><category>e-readers</category><category>ebook reader</category><category>EbookReader</category><category>ereader</category><category>firmware</category><category>firmware update</category><category>FirmwareUpdate</category><category>fix</category><category>novel</category><category>pandigital</category><category>recall</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald Melanson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 06:01:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Kohl's pulls Pandigital Novel eReader for a firmware fix?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/kohls-pulls-pandigital-novel-ereader-for-a-firmware-fix/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/kohls-pulls-pandigital-novel-ereader-for-a-firmware-fix/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/kohls-pulls-pandigital-novel-ereader-for-a-firmware-fix/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/kohls-pulls-pandigital-novel-ereader-for-a-firmware-fix/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/06/pandigital-e-reader.jpg" /></a></div>
It seems <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Pandigital/">Pandigital</a> read <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/07/pandigital-novel-goes-on-sale-hopes-youll-take-a-look/">a bit too far ahead</a> in the story of its Novel eReader. <em>The Digital Readers</em>, which has been covering the device extensively, reports that Kohl's is currently going through something of a recall so that Pandigital can install an updated firmware. Customers can return it for a full refund -- and if the publication's review is to be believed, that might be the best course of action. In one of the first impressions pieces we've seen, <em>TDR</em> lambasts the Novel both as an e-reader and as a tablet. Apparently the hardware is overly heavy, the screen is laggy, WiFi is broken, and it doesn't charge over USB... but don't just take our word for it. See and hear it for yourself in the video critique after the break -- and if you're still jonesing, JCPenny continues to list it on sale.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.the-digital-reader.com/2010/06/09/pandigital-has-recalled-the-novel/">Read</a> - Recall<br />
<a href="http://www.the-digital-reader.com/2010/06/11/review-pandigital-novel-video/">Read</a> - Review<br />
<a href="http://www.the-digital-reader.com/2010/06/06/pandigital-novel-first-impressions/">Read</a> - First impressions<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/kohls-pulls-pandigital-novel-ereader-for-a-firmware-fix/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Kohl's pulls Pandigital Novel eReader for a firmware fix?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/kohls-pulls-pandigital-novel-ereader-for-a-firmware-fix/">Kohl's pulls Pandigital Novel eReader for a firmware fix?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sun, 13 Jun 2010 13:02:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/kohls-pulls-pandigital-novel-ereader-for-a-firmware-fix/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19514019/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/kohls-pulls-pandigital-novel-ereader-for-a-firmware-fix/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bug</category><category>buggy</category><category>bugs</category><category>e book</category><category>e books</category><category>e reader</category><category>e readers</category><category>e-book</category><category>e-books</category><category>e-reader</category><category>e-readers</category><category>EReader</category><category>firmware</category><category>fix</category><category>novel</category><category>pan digital</category><category>pan digital novel</category><category>pan digital novel e reader</category><category>PanDigital</category><category>PanDigitalNovel</category><category>PanDigitalNovelEReader</category><category>recall</category><category>update</category><category>video</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ross Miller]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2010 13:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[HP expands laptop battery recall, again]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/20/hp-expands-laptop-battery-recall-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/20/hp-expands-laptop-battery-recall-again/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/20/hp-expands-laptop-battery-recall-again/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/20/hp-expands-laptop-battery-recall-again/"><img hspace="4" border="1" align="left" vspace="14" alt="HP's expands latptop battery recall, again" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/05/total-recall-20100520-250.jpg" /></a>We haven't heard any tales of exploding batteries in quite some time, and we're sure that's in large part thanks to proactive battery recalls like the one HP has been running since about <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/14/70-000-hp-laptop-batteries-recalled-due-to-fire-hazard/">this time last year</a>. However, it's a little disconcerting that this recall keeps <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/26/hp-recalls-another-15-000-laptop-batteries-this-time-in-china/">getting expanded</a>. For the second time a new group of laptops are being added to the pile, entries from the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/pavilion,hp">Pavilion</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/presario">Compaq Presario</a>, and other lines manufactured between August of 2007 and May of 2008. We have the complete chart included below. If you're included the bad news is that your aging laptop could explode and wipe out your entire neighborhood <em>at any moment</em>. But, the good news is... free replacement battery!<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/20/hp-expands-laptop-battery-recall-again/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>HP expands laptop battery recall, again</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/20/hp-expands-laptop-battery-recall-again/">HP expands laptop battery recall, again</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 20 May 2010 11:22:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/20/hp-expands-laptop-battery-recall-again/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19484723/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/20/hp-expands-laptop-battery-recall-again/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>battery</category><category>compaq</category><category>compaq presario</category><category>CompaqPresario</category><category>hp</category><category>hp pavilion</category><category>HpPavilion</category><category>laptop</category><category>pavilion</category><category>presario</category><category>recall</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Stevens]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 11:22:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Saving Private Ryan Blu-ray discs recalled due to audio glitch]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/14/saving-private-ryan-blu-ray-discs-recalled-due-to-audio-glitch/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/14/saving-private-ryan-blu-ray-discs-recalled-due-to-audio-glitch/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/14/saving-private-ryan-blu-ray-discs-recalled-due-to-audio-glitch/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/14/saving-private-ryan-blu-ray-discs-recalled-due-to-audio-glitch/"><img vspace="4" hspace="16" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/05/savingprivateryanblu-ray-1273864409.jpg" /></a>So nice, they'll have to release it twice. Apparently a problem with the audio synchronization in at least one of the chapters of <em>Saving Private Ryan </em>slipped past Technicolor and Paramount, causing the whole lot to be recalled. If you own it, you've got a bad disc, so check the press release after the break for a number to call for the replacements which should arrive at retail next week on the 18th -- check for a yellow UPC label to make sure you're getting a fixed one. We hadn't noticed any of the numerous reviews mention problems with the audio, let us know if you picked up on it when you watched.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/14/saving-private-ryan-blu-ray-discs-recalled-due-to-audio-glitch/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Saving Private Ryan Blu-ray discs recalled due to audio glitch</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/14/saving-private-ryan-blu-ray-discs-recalled-due-to-audio-glitch/">Saving Private Ryan Blu-ray discs recalled due to audio glitch</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 14 May 2010 15:17:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/14/saving-private-ryan-blu-ray-discs-recalled-due-to-audio-glitch/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19478044/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/14/saving-private-ryan-blu-ray-discs-recalled-due-to-audio-glitch/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>blu-ray</category><category>hd</category><category>paramount</category><category>recall</category><category>saving private ryan</category><category>SavingPrivateRyan</category><category>technicolor</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 15:17:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
