<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Engadget</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com</link>
<description>Engadget</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Intel 313 SSDs bring improved caching to ultrabooks, desktops, life in general]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/06/intel-313-cache-ssd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/06/intel-313-cache-ssd/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/06/intel-313-cache-ssd/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/06/intel-313-cache-ssd/"><img alt="Intel 313 cache SSD" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/04/intel-ssd-313.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 280px; height: 203px; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; float: right;" /></a>Just like Intel's older <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/27/intels-larsen-creek-ssds-leak-out-courtesy-of-asrocks-z68-mot/">311</a> batch of small <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/ssd|cache">cache SSDs</a>, the new 313 series is designed to sit alongside a traditional spinning HDD in order provide a tasty blend of speed and capacity. These newer drives are still SATA II, so there's no 6Gbps action here, but they use superior 25nm SLC flash, offer faster speeds for the same price (starting at $120 for 20GB) and are explicitly approved for use in the coming wave of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/ultrabook">Ultrabooks</a> -- so don't be surprised if that's where you meet 'em next.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/06/intel-313-cache-ssd/">Intel 313 SSDs bring improved caching to ultrabooks, desktops, life in general</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 06 Apr 2012 07:55:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/06/intel-313-cache-ssd/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20209985/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/06/intel-313-cache-ssd/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>25nm</category><category>7mm</category><category>cache</category><category>cache ssd</category><category>CacheSsd</category><category>hybrid</category><category>hybrid storage</category><category>HybridStorage</category><category>intel</category><category>intel 313</category><category>intel 313 ssd</category><category>intel smart response</category><category>intel smart response technology</category><category>intel ssd</category><category>Intel313</category><category>Intel313Ssd</category><category>IntelSmartResponse</category><category>IntelSmartResponseTechnology</category><category>IntelSsd</category><category>sales</category><category>slc</category><category>smart response technology</category><category>SmartResponseTechnology</category><category>solid state</category><category>solid state drive</category><category>solid state storage</category><category>SolidState</category><category>SolidStateDrive</category><category>SolidStateStorage</category><category>ssd</category><category>ssd cache</category><category>SsdCache</category><category>ultrabook</category><category>ultrabooks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sharif Sakr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 07:55:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[OCZ expects to ship cheap TLC solid state drives in early 2012]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/04/ocz-expects-to-ship-cheap-tlc-solid-state-drives-in-early-2012/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/04/ocz-expects-to-ship-cheap-tlc-solid-state-drives-in-early-2012/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/04/ocz-expects-to-ship-cheap-tlc-solid-state-drives-in-early-2012/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/04/ocz-expects-to-ship-cheap-tlc-solid-state-drives-in-early-2012/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/11/nand-technology-cost-comparison2.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
It's about time <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/04/hynix-develops-triple-level-cell-nand-flash-30-percent-cheaper/">triple-level-cell NAND</a> came to life in consumer products and it looks like OCZ is blazing that trail. The company expects to release its first TLC drive early next year, with a vaunted 30 percent price reduction compared to current MLC drives, which are themselves much cheaper than SLC. The downside is shorter life expectancy, which will be as low as four years, but more durable forms of the technology are due to arrive later in 2012.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/04/ocz-expects-to-ship-cheap-tlc-solid-state-drives-in-early-2012/">OCZ expects to ship cheap TLC solid state drives in early 2012</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 04 Nov 2011 11:42:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/04/ocz-expects-to-ship-cheap-tlc-solid-state-drives-in-early-2012/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20098610/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/04/ocz-expects-to-ship-cheap-tlc-solid-state-drives-in-early-2012/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cheap</category><category>cheaper</category><category>flash</category><category>minipost</category><category>MLC</category><category>NAND</category><category>SLC</category><category>solid state</category><category>solid state drive</category><category>SolidState</category><category>SolidStateDrive</category><category>SSD</category><category>three-bit-per-cell</category><category>TLC</category><category>triple level cell</category><category>triple-level-cell</category><category>TripleLevelCell</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sharif Sakr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 11:42:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Engadget Primed: SSDs and you]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/31/engadget-primed-ssds-and-you/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/31/engadget-primed-ssds-and-you/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/31/engadget-primed-ssds-and-you/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<em><strong>Primed </strong>goes in-depth on the technobabble you hear on Engadget every day -- we dig deep into each topic's history and how it benefits our lives. You can follow the series <a href="http://www.engadget.com/all/engadgetprimed"><strong>here</strong></a>. Looking to suggest a piece of technology for us to break down? Drop us a line at <strong>primed *at* engadget *dawt* com</strong>.</em><br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/31/engadget-primed-ssds-and-you/"><img  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/12/eng-primed-logo-600-1324060369.png" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
<div>
	If you're a storage aficionado -- and who here isn't? -- you've probably heard a lot about SSDs, those friendly solid-state disks promising dramatically improved performance over their magnetically inclined brethren. No doubt you've heard about the advantages, thanks to NAND storage that makes them silent, shock resistant, energy efficient and lightning quick. Yet you've also heard the horror stories: drive slowdowns, controller failures and manufacturer recalls. And adding to all those anxiety-producing headlines, there's the price premium. While most magnetic drives average around a nickel or dime per gigabyte, even consumer-grade SSDs still run $1-2 per gigabyte, often for drastically smaller-capacity drives.<br />
	<br />
	Three years ago, Intel <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/15/intels-mainstream-80gb-and-160gb-ssds-ready-to-launch-with-ma/">launched its X25-M and X18-M</a>: the "M" stood for "mainstream," and the pair of drives were designed to reintroduce solid-state storage to a cost-conscious consumer market. (Perhaps more importantly, they were also meant to solidify Intel's standing in the nascent SSD realm, up to that point a chaotic, Wild West-style domain. But we'll get to that.) For most users magnetic drives still remain king, with solid states appealing primarily to a niche of enterprise IT professionals and modding enthusiasts. How did that happen -- and should it be different? After the break we'll look at how and why SSDs haven't (yet) conquered the storage world, and examine whether they're poised to do just that.</div><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/31/engadget-primed-ssds-and-you/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Engadget Primed: SSDs and you</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/31/engadget-primed-ssds-and-you/">Engadget Primed: SSDs and you</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 31 Oct 2011 16:46:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/31/engadget-primed-ssds-and-you/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20075225/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/31/engadget-primed-ssds-and-you/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Compaq</category><category>Connor Peripherals</category><category>ConnorPeripherals</category><category>duraclass</category><category>energy efficient</category><category>EnergyEfficient</category><category>engadget primed</category><category>EngadgetPrimed</category><category>HDD</category><category>HP</category><category>IBM</category><category>intel</category><category>Maxtor</category><category>micron</category><category>MIPS</category><category>mlc</category><category>nand</category><category>primed</category><category>Quantum</category><category>RAM</category><category>RAMAC</category><category>RPM</category><category>RPMs</category><category>SandForce</category><category>Scorpio</category><category>seagate</category><category>Seagate Technology</category><category>SeagateTechnology</category><category>slc</category><category>solid state drive</category><category>SolidStateDrive</category><category>SPE</category><category>SSD</category><category>ssd controller</category><category>SsdController</category><category>SsdDrive</category><category>SSDs</category><category>storage</category><category>VelociRaptor</category><category>video</category><category>Western Digital</category><category>WesternDigital</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesse Hicks]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 16:46:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Open your IOPS to ioDrive's next-gen SSDs]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/04/open-your-iops-to-iodrives-next-gen-ssds/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/04/open-your-iops-to-iodrives-next-gen-ssds/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/04/open-your-iops-to-iodrives-next-gen-ssds/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/04/open-your-iops-to-iodrives-next-gen-ssds/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/10/iodriveduo2.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
We're ripe for an ioRefresh and thankfully here it is: the ioDrive2 and ioDrive2 Duo will be out from November, bringing hugely faster speeds at a much lower dollar-per-gig compared to their <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/11/fusion-io-breaks-out-roomy-nimble-iodrive-duo-ssds/">predecessors</a>. The single-level cell version of the next-gen Duo (depicted above) will deliver 700,000 read IOPS, 900,000 write IOPS and a 3GB/s bandwidth that could possibly surpass OCZ's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/28/ocz-z-drive-r4-review-roundup-this-is-what-2-800mb-s-looks-like/">Z-Drive R4</a>. Prices start at $6,000 and top out at something too ridiculous to mention for a maximum 2.4TB of storage. But you're an enterprise, remember, so at least try to haggle before you settle for a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/12/angelbirds-pcie-based-ssd-its-real-its-shipping-its-800mb/ ">cheaper alternative</a>. Full PR after the break.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/04/open-your-iops-to-iodrives-next-gen-ssds/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Open your IOPS to ioDrive's next-gen SSDs</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/04/open-your-iops-to-iodrives-next-gen-ssds/">Open your IOPS to ioDrive's next-gen SSDs</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 04 Oct 2011 11:08:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/04/open-your-iops-to-iodrives-next-gen-ssds/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20073175/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/04/open-your-iops-to-iodrives-next-gen-ssds/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2.4TB</category><category>3gbs</category><category>enterprise</category><category>flash</category><category>iodrive</category><category>iodrive duo</category><category>iodrive2</category><category>iodrive2 duo</category><category>Iodrive2Duo</category><category>IodriveDuo</category><category>iops</category><category>mlc</category><category>nand</category><category>slc</category><category>SSD</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sharif Sakr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 11:08:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel's 710 'Lyndonville' and 720 'Ramsdale' SSDs see full spec leak well ahead of release]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/16/intels-710-lyndonville-and-720-ramsdale-ssds-see-full-spec/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/16/intels-710-lyndonville-and-720-ramsdale-ssds-see-full-spec/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/16/intels-710-lyndonville-and-720-ramsdale-ssds-see-full-spec/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/16/intels-710-lyndonville-and-720-ramsdale-ssds-see-full-spec/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/06/intel-ssd-leak.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
You may recall Intel's 710 "Lyndonville" and 720 "Ramsdale" enterprise SSDs outted by a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/28/intel-ssd-720-710-and-520-series-leak-out-larsen-creek-and-pai/">leaked roadmap</a> back in April, but details were as thin as high mountain air. Luckily, German site <em>Computer Base</em> has obtained what appears to be a full spec sheet for the aforementioned drives. Starting with the 710, this 25nm HET MLC -- a more durable variant of MLC -- device will come in 100GB, 200GB, and 300GB flavors, and it claims to have read and write speeds at up to 270 MB/s and 210 MB/s, respectively, along with a 3Gbps SATA connection.<br />
<br />
Things are a bit wild with the 720: not only does it have 34nm <em>SLC</em> chips making up the 200GB and 400GB versions, but it also boasts some <em>truly</em> insane read and write speeds of up to 2200 MB/s and 1800 MB/s, respectively. Yes, <em>2200 MB/s and 1800 MB/s</em>, garnished by the fast 4K IOPs as well. We had our doubts initially, but looking at the previously stated 6Gbps PCIe interface and the much higher power draw, we think there's a good chance for this to come into reality. Well, only time will tell if these numbers will stick around for the Q3 launch this year -- not that our wallets will want to know, mind you. Hit the source link for the full lowdown.<br />
<br />
<strong>Update: </strong>As pointed out by our readers, it looks like the 720 will need more than 6Gbps at the PCIe bus to accommodate its maximum read and write speeds. At this point, we can only assume that there is indeed a typo somewhere -- either on the roadmap or on this table.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/16/intels-710-lyndonville-and-720-ramsdale-ssds-see-full-spec/">Intel's 710 'Lyndonville' and 720 'Ramsdale' SSDs see full spec leak well ahead of release</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 16 Jun 2011 02:54:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/16/intels-710-lyndonville-and-720-ramsdale-ssds-see-full-spec/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19968331/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/16/intels-710-lyndonville-and-720-ramsdale-ssds-see-full-spec/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>710</category><category>720</category><category>drive</category><category>HET</category><category>HET MLC</category><category>HetMlc</category><category>intel</category><category>intel ssd</category><category>IntelSsd</category><category>leak</category><category>Lyndonville</category><category>MLC</category><category>Ramsdale</category><category>SLC</category><category>solid state</category><category>solid state drive</category><category>SolidState</category><category>SolidStateDrive</category><category>spec</category><category>spec leak</category><category>SpecLeak</category><category>ssd</category><category>storage</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lai]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 02:54:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Micron RealSSD P320h can read 3GBps, write 2GBps, impress millions of geeks per second]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/03/micron-realssd-p320h-can-read-3gbps-write-2gbps-impress-millio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/03/micron-realssd-p320h-can-read-3gbps-write-2gbps-impress-millio/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/03/micron-realssd-p320h-can-read-3gbps-write-2gbps-impress-millio/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/03/micron-realssd-p320h-can-read-3gbps-write-2gbps-impress-millio/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/06/11x0603n82refc.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
Speed may be a relative thing, but whatever you choose to compare Micron's new <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/realssd">RealSSD</a> P320h series to, you'll probably find them pretty competitive. Coming in 350GB and 700GB capacities, these PCI Express solid state drives can process data at a rate of 3GB per second and write it at a no less impressive 2GBps. If you're more interested in input / output operations per second, the P320h clocks in at 750,000 IOPS when running Linux or 650,000 with Windows Server as the OS. You don't need us to tell you that both numbers represent screaming-fast performance. Such mighty feats are achieved with the use of 34nm <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/slc">SLC</a> NAND flash memory and Micron's own controller chip. Samples of the P320h are trickling out now and mass production is coming in the third quarter of 2011, and while no pricing info has been offered yet, it's safe to say you'll be needing your company CFO's blessing before making any P320h purchases. Video and full PR after the break.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/03/micron-realssd-p320h-can-read-3gbps-write-2gbps-impress-millio/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Micron RealSSD P320h can read 3GBps, write 2GBps, impress millions of geeks per second</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/03/micron-realssd-p320h-can-read-3gbps-write-2gbps-impress-millio/">Micron RealSSD P320h can read 3GBps, write 2GBps, impress millions of geeks per second</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 03 Jun 2011 03:09:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/03/micron-realssd-p320h-can-read-3gbps-write-2gbps-impress-millio/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19957193/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/03/micron-realssd-p320h-can-read-3gbps-write-2gbps-impress-millio/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>34nm</category><category>fast</category><category>flash</category><category>flash storage</category><category>FlashStorage</category><category>micron</category><category>nand</category><category>pci</category><category>pci express</category><category>pci-express</category><category>pcie</category><category>PciExpress</category><category>realssd</category><category>slc</category><category>slc nand</category><category>SlcNand</category><category>solid state</category><category>solid state drive</category><category>solid state storage</category><category>SolidState</category><category>SolidStateDrive</category><category>SolidStateStorage</category><category>speed</category><category>ssd</category><category>storage</category><category>video</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlad Savov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 03:09:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel SSD 720, 710 and 520 Series leak out, Larsen Creek and Paint Creek bring up rear guard]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/28/intel-ssd-720-710-and-520-series-leak-out-larsen-creek-and-pai/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/28/intel-ssd-720-710-and-520-series-leak-out-larsen-creek-and-pai/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/28/intel-ssd-720-710-and-520-series-leak-out-larsen-creek-and-pai/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/28/intel-ssd-720-710-and-520-series-leak-out-larsen-creek-and-pai/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/04/20110427-22374883--intelssdroadmap.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
Remember Intel's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/27/intels-larsen-creek-ssds-leak-out-courtesy-of-asrocks-z68-mot/">Larsen Creek SSD</a>? It's not alone. By the end of the year, it looks like Intel expects to ship <em>five</em> new solid state storage series in total -- some of them even speedier than its current <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/28/intel-outs-ssd-510-series-with-6gbps-sata-interface-500mbps-tra/">SSD 510 Series</a> flagship. We managed to obtain this leaked roadmap listing the potential additions, and we're afraid to ask how much the new kings of the hill might cost -- the "Ramsdale" SSD 720 Series uses up to 400GB of SLC NAND in a PCI Express card form factor, and the "Lyndonville" SSD 710 series with a similar quantity of enterprise-grade MLC flash. There's also a direct successor to the current top-of-the-line in the "Cherryville" SSD 520 Series, which will stretch all the way up to 480GB and down to 64GB in Q4 of this year, as well as Paint Creek, which seems destined for boot drives with only 80GB and 40GB capacities to choose from. Still, the most intriguing addition might be Larsen Creek after all, which sounds like it's been purpose-built for caching data from your existing rotational storage. It's slated to come in both 2.5-inch SATA and mSATA configurations in Q3 and uses SLC NAND, which suggests it won't run cheap despite the tiny capacity here. We can't wait to find out for sure.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/28/intel-ssd-720-710-and-520-series-leak-out-larsen-creek-and-pai/">Intel SSD 720, 710 and 520 Series leak out, Larsen Creek and Paint Creek bring up rear guard</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 28 Apr 2011 05:04:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/28/intel-ssd-720-710-and-520-series-leak-out-larsen-creek-and-pai/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19926111/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/28/intel-ssd-720-710-and-520-series-leak-out-larsen-creek-and-pai/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>boot drive</category><category>BootDrive</category><category>Cherryville</category><category>Intel</category><category>Larsen Creek</category><category>LarsenCreek</category><category>Lyndonville</category><category>MLC</category><category>MLC-HET</category><category>mSATA</category><category>Paint Creek</category><category>PaintCreek</category><category>Ramsdale</category><category>SLC</category><category>solid state drive</category><category>solid state storage</category><category>SolidStateDrive</category><category>SolidStateStorage</category><category>SSD</category><category>SSD 710</category><category>SSD 720</category><category>Ssd710</category><category>Ssd720</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Hollister]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 05:04:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[(You can't get no) SATAsfaction 6Gbps SSDs (yet)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/you-cant-get-no-satasfaction-6gbps-ssds-yet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/you-cant-get-no-satasfaction-6gbps-ssds-yet/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/you-cant-get-no-satasfaction-6gbps-ssds-yet/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/04/4-26-10-satasfaction.jpg" alt="" /></div>
Enterprise solid state drives aren't typically our foray, but when they support <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/SATA%206G">SATA 6G</a>, we pay attention. It also doesn't hurt when they sport a fantastic name. The SATAsfaction drives from Accelerated Memory Production (AMP) have both <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/sandforce">Sandforce controllers</a> and the speedy ports to match, alongside 12 byte per sector ECC error correction and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/TRIM">TRIM</a> support. Still, they're not the fastest SSDs around, clocking in at <em>only</em> 260MB / sec reads and 150MB / sec writes, but they do have SLC flash memory for likely higher reliability than <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/04/realssd-c300-tested-offers-sublime-speed-at-superlative-prices/">the current speed demon</a>. No pricing or availability yet, but SLC NAND is pretty expensive stuff... so unless you're buying for a corporation with a large bankroll, better count on waiting for the cheaper Devo version.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/you-cant-get-no-satasfaction-6gbps-ssds-yet/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>(You can't get no) SATAsfaction 6Gbps SSDs (yet)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/you-cant-get-no-satasfaction-6gbps-ssds-yet/">(You can't get no) SATAsfaction 6Gbps SSDs (yet)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 27 Apr 2010 01:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/you-cant-get-no-satasfaction-6gbps-ssds-yet/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19455071/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/you-cant-get-no-satasfaction-6gbps-ssds-yet/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Accelerated Memory Production</category><category>AcceleratedMemoryProduction</category><category>AMP</category><category>ECC</category><category>enterprise storage</category><category>EnterpriseStorage</category><category>sandforce</category><category>sandforce controller</category><category>SandforceController</category><category>Sata 3.0</category><category>SATA 6G</category><category>SATA III</category><category>Sata3.0</category><category>Sata6g</category><category>SataIii</category><category>SATAsfaction</category><category>slc</category><category>SLC NAND</category><category>SlcNand</category><category>solid state disk</category><category>solid state drive</category><category>SolidStateDisk</category><category>SolidStateDrive</category><category>SSD</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Hollister]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 01:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Toshiba bolsters 32nm mSATA SSD lineup, your future netbook nods approvingly]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/toshiba-bolsters-32nm-msata-ssd-lineup-your-future-netbook-nods/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/toshiba-bolsters-32nm-msata-ssd-lineup-your-future-netbook-nods/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/toshiba-bolsters-32nm-msata-ssd-lineup-your-future-netbook-nods/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.electronicstalk.com/news/tos/tos432.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/01/ssd-toshiba-nsata.jpg" /></a></div>
We like to think of 'em as the SSDs for the little guys, and we couldn't be happier to hear that they're getting bigger and bigger in terms of capacity. Toshiba introduced the first solid state drives to use the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/toshiba-announces-first-ssd-drives-using-new-mini-sata-interface/">mini-SATA interface</a> back in September of '09, and while those 32nm units were made available in 30GB and 62GB sizes, the pack rats weren't satisfied. Now, the company has introduced a 128GB flavor with an mSATA interface, offering up a maximum sequential read speed of 180MB/s and a maximum sequential write speed of 70MB/s. The 128GB modules are said be one-seventh the volume and one-eighth the weight of 2.5-inch SSDs, and in case that's not enough, the third-generation HG SSDs will bring nearly twice the aforesaid speed and will ship in capacities of 64GB, 128GB, 256GB and 512GB. Hit the source link for all the dirt... except for the pricing, naturally.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/toshiba-bolsters-32nm-msata-ssd-lineup-your-future-netbook-nods/">Toshiba bolsters 32nm mSATA SSD lineup, your future netbook nods approvingly</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sat, 09 Jan 2010 08:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/toshiba-bolsters-32nm-msata-ssd-lineup-your-future-netbook-nods/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19309170/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/toshiba-bolsters-32nm-msata-ssd-lineup-your-future-netbook-nods/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>32nm</category><category>ces</category><category>ces 2010</category><category>CES 2010 video</category><category>Ces2010</category><category>Ces2010Video</category><category>flash memory</category><category>FlashMemory</category><category>mini sata</category><category>mini-sata</category><category>MiniSata</category><category>msata</category><category>nand</category><category>nand flash</category><category>nand flash memory</category><category>NandFlash</category><category>NandFlashMemory</category><category>sata</category><category>slc</category><category>solid state disk</category><category>SolidStateDisk</category><category>ssd</category><category>stores-and-shopping</category><category>Toshiba</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 08:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Seagate's first Pulsar SSDs ready to blast the enterprise]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/seagates-first-pulsar-ssds-ready-to-blast-the-enterprise/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/seagates-first-pulsar-ssds-ready-to-blast-the-enterprise/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/seagates-first-pulsar-ssds-ready-to-blast-the-enterprise/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://hothardware.com/News/Seagate-Introduces-First-Solid-State-Drive-25-Pulsar-Up-To-200GB/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/12/seagate-pulsar-ssd.jpg" /></a></div>
We first heard of Seagate's plans to enter the SSD market way back in <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/23/seagate-makes-plans-for-an-ssd-future/">mid 2007</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/30/seagate-to-jump-into-the-ssd-games-2tb-spinners-planned-for-nex/">then again in 2008</a>. Here we are in the final days of 2009 and guess what: the first Seagate SSD has been announced. Unfortunately, Seagate's 2.5-inch SATA Pulsar SSD targets the raised-floor crowd locked away in your corporate data center, not you directly. The SLC-based Pulsar tops out at 200GB and claims a peak performance of 30,000 read IOPS and 25,000 write IOPS and a 240MBps sequential read and 200MBps sequential write -- damn quick compared to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/31/samsungs-25gb-50gb-enterprise-ssds-cant-stop-wont-stop-und/">Samsung's enterprise-class SSDs</a> released last year clocking 100MBps sequential reads and 80MBps writes. Hopefully, we'll see Seagate push into the consumer sector once they finish milking corporate IT budgets, or what's left of 'em.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/seagates-first-pulsar-ssds-ready-to-blast-the-enterprise/">Seagate's first Pulsar SSDs ready to blast the enterprise</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 08 Dec 2009 05:04:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/seagates-first-pulsar-ssds-ready-to-blast-the-enterprise/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19269569/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/seagates-first-pulsar-ssds-ready-to-blast-the-enterprise/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>200gb</category><category>corporate</category><category>enterprise</category><category>iops</category><category>it</category><category>pulsar</category><category>sata</category><category>seagate</category><category>slc</category><category>ssd</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Ricker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 05:04:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Leaked Lenovo roadmap shows Calpella laptops coming January 2010?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/19/leaked-lenovo-roadmap-shows-calpella-laptops-coming-january-2010/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/19/leaked-lenovo-roadmap-shows-calpella-laptops-coming-january-2010/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/19/leaked-lenovo-roadmap-shows-calpella-laptops-coming-january-2010/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/18/rlenovo-calpella-roadmap/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/06/lenovo-road-map-engg.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
Our compatriots at <span style="font-style: italic;">Engadget Chinese</span> have happened upon what looks to be a roadmap for Lenovo's upcoming laptops between now and March 2010. Recently <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/11/lenovos-thinkpad-t400s-in-the-wild-still-waiting-on-an-officia/">in the wild</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/T400/">T400s</a> is on there, slated for mid-July or so, with a pair of new SL models following in August. More interesting than all that, however, is the sheer number of new X, T, W, SL, and SLc laptops listed for the beginning of 2010 that utilize Intel's upcoming <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Calpella/">Calpella</a> platform. We're not gonna put too much stock into these pictures right now, but it definitely raises a few eyebrows. More slides after the break.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/19/leaked-lenovo-roadmap-shows-calpella-laptops-coming-january-2010/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Leaked Lenovo roadmap shows Calpella laptops coming January 2010?</em></a></p><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/laptops/" rel="tag">Laptops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/19/leaked-lenovo-roadmap-shows-calpella-laptops-coming-january-2010/">Leaked Lenovo roadmap shows Calpella laptops coming January 2010?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 19 Jun 2009 00:49:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://chinese.engadget.com/2009/06/18/rlenovo-calpella-roadmap/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/19/leaked-lenovo-roadmap-shows-calpella-laptops-coming-january-2010/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19071900/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/19/leaked-lenovo-roadmap-shows-calpella-laptops-coming-january-2010/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>calpella</category><category>intel calpella</category><category>IntelCalpella</category><category>leak</category><category>lenovo</category><category>lenovo sl</category><category>lenovo slc</category><category>lenovo t400</category><category>LenovoSl</category><category>LenovoSlc</category><category>LenovoT400</category><category>r</category><category>roadmap</category><category>rumor</category><category>rumors</category><category>sl</category><category>slc</category><category>t</category><category>t400</category><category>t400s</category><category>thinkpad</category><category>w</category><category>x</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ross Miller]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 00:49:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Samsung's 30nm NAND chips give birth to 32GB memory cards]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/12/samsungs-30nm-nand-chips-give-birth-to-32gb-memory-cards/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/12/samsungs-30nm-nand-chips-give-birth-to-32gb-memory-cards/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/12/samsungs-30nm-nand-chips-give-birth-to-32gb-memory-cards/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/home/permalink/?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;newsId=20090511006559&amp;newsLang=en"><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" alt="Samsung's 30nm NAND chips give birth to 32GB memory cards" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/05/samsung-nand-20090512.jpg" /></a><br /></div>
Remember the halcyon days of 2007, when Beyonce's "Irreplaceable" rocked the charts and Samsung <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/23/samsung-reveals-first-30-nm-64gb-nand-chip-and-a-bit-of-skin/">revealed</a> its 30-nm manufacturing process, promising a 128GB memory card in every digicam? We're still not quite there yet, but the company is finally releasing the first cards to utilize that manufacturing process, the biggest offering 32GB of storage goodness. That's twice the capacity of its 40nm cards, which never made it past the 16GB mark. 30nm moviNAND chips are in production now in 4GB, 8GB, 16GB, and 32GB sizes, and hopefully will hit retail before that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/19/mamiya-announces-dl33-for-those-who-need-more-than-28-megapixels/">33 megapixel Mamiya</a> we've had on order finally ships.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/storage/" rel="tag">Storage</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/12/samsungs-30nm-nand-chips-give-birth-to-32gb-memory-cards/">Samsung's 30nm NAND chips give birth to 32GB memory cards</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 12 May 2009 08:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/home/permalink/?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;newsId=20090511006559&amp;newsLang=en>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/12/samsungs-30nm-nand-chips-give-birth-to-32gb-memory-cards/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1543491/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/12/samsungs-30nm-nand-chips-give-birth-to-32gb-memory-cards/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>16gb</category><category>30-nm</category><category>30nm</category><category>32gb</category><category>4gb</category><category>8gb</category><category>flash</category><category>movinand</category><category>nand</category><category>samsung</category><category>samsung 30nm</category><category>samsung movinand</category><category>samsung nand</category><category>Samsung30nm</category><category>SamsungMovinand</category><category>SamsungNand</category><category>slc</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Stevens]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 08:29:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Texas Memory Systems goes Texas, hobbles together RamSan-620 5TB SSD "drive"]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/22/texas-memory-systems-goes-texas-hobbles-together-ramsan-620-5tb/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/22/texas-memory-systems-goes-texas-hobbles-together-ramsan-620-5tb/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/22/texas-memory-systems-goes-texas-hobbles-together-ramsan-620-5tb/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.ramsan.com/products/ramsan-620.htm"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/04/ramsan-620-1.jpg"  alt="" /></a><br /></div>
Way to play to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/09/geostationary-banana-blimp-to-hover-over-texas/">your stereotypes</a>, Texas. Texas Memory Systems just announced what it claims is the largest <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/slc">SLC SSD</a> on the market, with 5TB of single level cell (the good kind) flash memory spread across a 2U rack shelf. The drive can handle 250,000 sustained I/Os per second, churn through 3GB of data a second, and has 80 microsecond write latency. Texas Memory Systems claims that for similar performance from a HDD setup you'd need half a million dollars and consume 20x the power. TMS calls the system "affordable for mainstream IT shops" but hasn't mentioned a price or release date just yet. We'll take two.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.channelregister.co.uk/2009/04/22/tms_5tb_ssd/">Channel Register</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/storage/" rel="tag">Storage</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/networking/" rel="tag">Networking</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/22/texas-memory-systems-goes-texas-hobbles-together-ramsan-620-5tb/">Texas Memory Systems goes Texas, hobbles together RamSan-620 5TB SSD "drive"</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 22 Apr 2009 09:09:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.ramsan.com/products/ramsan-620.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/22/texas-memory-systems-goes-texas-hobbles-together-ramsan-620-5tb/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1524590/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/22/texas-memory-systems-goes-texas-hobbles-together-ramsan-620-5tb/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ramsan</category><category>ramsan-620</category><category>slc</category><category>slc ssd</category><category>SlcSsd</category><category>ssd</category><category>texas memory systems</category><category>TexasMemorySystems</category><category>tms</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Miller]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 09:09:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel 80GB SSD price cut by one-third, still very expensive]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/06/intel-80gb-ssd-price-cut-by-one-third-still-very-expensive/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/06/intel-80gb-ssd-price-cut-by-one-third-still-very-expensive/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/06/intel-80gb-ssd-price-cut-by-one-third-still-very-expensive/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2340525,00.asp"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/02/intel-80gb-ssd-drive-price-slash-rm-eng.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
Looks like <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Intel/">Intel</a> is giving some of its<a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/SSDs/"> </a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/SSD/">SSDs</a> a more reasonable -- yet still very exorbitant -- price tag. The company has slashed the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/19/intel-announces-its-first-ssds-plans-to-ship-in-a-month/">2.5-inch 80GB X25-M</a> from $595 in September to now $390. While a 34 percent cut is nothing to scoff at, that's still $90 more expensive than <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/27/western-digitals-2tb-caviar-green-hard-drive-launches-gets-pre/">Western Digital's 2TB spinner</a>, which offers 25 times the capacity. The company also recently discounted its 160GB variant 19 percent, from $945 to $765. No reason was given for the markdown, but it doesn't take a rocket scientist to realize the economy isn't looking too kindly on solid state's dollar-to-data ratio.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/storage/" rel="tag">Storage</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/06/intel-80gb-ssd-price-cut-by-one-third-still-very-expensive/">Intel 80GB SSD price cut by one-third, still very expensive</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 06 Feb 2009 17:27:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2340525,00.asp>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/06/intel-80gb-ssd-price-cut-by-one-third-still-very-expensive/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1452851/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/06/intel-80gb-ssd-price-cut-by-one-third-still-very-expensive/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>intel</category><category>intel ssd</category><category>IntelSsd</category><category>mlc</category><category>slc</category><category>solid state drive</category><category>SolidStateDrive</category><category>ssd</category><category>x-18m</category><category>x-25e</category><category>x-25m</category><category>x18-m</category><category>x25-e</category><category>x25-m</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ross Miller]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 17:27:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Video: Micron's Washington PCIe prototype SSD card is wicked quick]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/05/video-microns-washington-pcie-prototype-ssd-card-is-wicked-qui/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/05/video-microns-washington-pcie-prototype-ssd-card-is-wicked-qui/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/05/video-microns-washington-pcie-prototype-ssd-card-is-wicked-qui/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m1GBPreUPXk&amp;eurl=http://advancedstorage.micronblogs.com/2008/11/iops-like-youve-never-seen/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/12/12-5-08-micron_washington.jpg" /></a><br /></div>
Up until now, Fusion-io's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/28/fusion-ios-iodrive-puts-power-of-a-san-on-a-pcie-card/">ioDrive</a> has pretty much put every other SSD-on-a-PCIe-card to shame in terms of sheer performance, but it just might be looking at its first formidable competitor in the Micron Washington. The prototype device was recently showcased on video (posted after the break), and while we're not told how capacious it is, it is understood to be using 64-bit SLC NAND chips. When placed in a Xeon-powered server, the unit is able to achieve 150,000 to 160,000 random write IOPS with a bandwidth of 800MB/sec per card. Micron is convinced that it can reach a bandwidth of 1GB/sec and 200,000 IOPS with this technology, though Fusion-io's CTO proclaims that users can achieve "over 6GB per second" when using eight of its ioDrives in conjunction. Of course, the aforementioned ioDrive is actually shipping, whereas this elusive Washington doodad won't see commercial light until at least 2010.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/12/03/micron_washinghton_fast_flash_demo/">The Register</a>, thanks Vik]<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/05/video-microns-washington-pcie-prototype-ssd-card-is-wicked-qui/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Video: Micron's Washington PCIe prototype SSD card is wicked quick</em></a></p><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/storage/" rel="tag">Storage</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/05/video-microns-washington-pcie-prototype-ssd-card-is-wicked-qui/">Video: Micron's Washington PCIe prototype SSD card is wicked quick</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 05 Dec 2008 09:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m1GBPreUPXk&amp;eurl=http://advancedstorage.micronblogs.com/2008/11/iops-like-youve-never-seen/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/05/video-microns-washington-pcie-prototype-ssd-card-is-wicked-qui/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1392277/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/05/video-microns-washington-pcie-prototype-ssd-card-is-wicked-qui/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>flash memory</category><category>FlashMemory</category><category>fusion</category><category>Fusion-io</category><category>Iometer</category><category>iops</category><category>Micron</category><category>NAND</category><category>PCIe</category><category>SAN</category><category>SLC</category><category>SLC NAND</category><category>SlcNand</category><category>speed</category><category>ssd</category><category>ssd controller</category><category>SsdController</category><category>storage</category><category>video</category><category>Washington</category><category>x25-e</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 09:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Samsung's 25GB / 50GB Enterprise SSDs can't stop, won't stop under heavy loads]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/31/samsungs-25gb-50gb-enterprise-ssds-cant-stop-wont-stop-und/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/31/samsungs-25gb-50gb-enterprise-ssds-cant-stop-wont-stop-und/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/31/samsungs-25gb-50gb-enterprise-ssds-cant-stop-wont-stop-und/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/home/permalink/?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;newsId=20081030006048&amp;newsLang=en"><img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/10/10-30-08-samsung_ssd.jpg" /></a>pureSilicon's rugged <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/29/puresilicons-rugged-renegade-ssd-touts-hardware-based-encryptio/">Renegade SSDs</a> may be tough as nails, but if you're lookin' to start up your own video-on-demand server or online transaction processing center, you may want to look Samsung's way. The outfit has just announced that it's mass producing 25GB and 50GB Enterprise SSDs, which are designed for "performance-optimized server applications." Sammy proclaims that the SLC-based drives have around "twice the random write performance of its standard 32GB and 64GB SLC SSDs," and better still, they consume less than 25% of the power of a 2.5-inch 15k SAS HDD. More specifically, this duo will provide 100 times the number of IOPS per watt as a typical 15K 2.5-inch SAS HDD and five times the number of IOPS per dollar as a 10K 2.5-inch SCSI HDD. Not surprisingly, Samsung doesn't bother dishing out prices, but you can expect to pay top dollar given the abuse these are built to withstand.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/storage/" rel="tag">Storage</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/31/samsungs-25gb-50gb-enterprise-ssds-cant-stop-wont-stop-und/">Samsung's 25GB / 50GB Enterprise SSDs can't stop, won't stop under heavy loads</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 31 Oct 2008 05:26:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/home/permalink/?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;newsId=20081030006048&amp;newsLang=en>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/31/samsungs-25gb-50gb-enterprise-ssds-cant-stop-wont-stop-und/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1358248/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/31/samsungs-25gb-50gb-enterprise-ssds-cant-stop-wont-stop-und/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>enterprise</category><category>Enterprise SSD</category><category>EnterpriseSsd</category><category>flash memory</category><category>FlashMemory</category><category>NAND</category><category>samsung</category><category>SLC</category><category>SLC NAND</category><category>SlcNand</category><category>SSD</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 05:26:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel announces its first SSDs, plans to ship in a month]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/19/intel-announces-its-first-ssds-plans-to-ship-in-a-month/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/19/intel-announces-its-first-ssds-plans-to-ship-in-a-month/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/19/intel-announces-its-first-ssds-plans-to-ship-in-a-month/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2328330,00.asp"><img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/08/8-19-08-intelssd.jpg" alt="" /></a>Intel's keeping the announcements coming at this year's <a href="http://engadget.com/tag/idf">IDF</a> -- today we got word that the company will launch <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/15/intels-mainstream-80gb-and-160gb-ssds-ready-to-launch-with-ma/">its first SSDs</a> in a month or so just as we expected. The 1.8-inch X-18M and 2.5-inch X-25M drives will be targeted at laptops and MIDs and come in 80GB and 160GB sizes using MLC tech, while the 32GB and 64GB SLC-based X-25E is aimed at servers and will be out in 90 days. Intel hasn't locked down pricing, but the M-series drives should cost about $8/GB, which would put the 160GB unit at a whopping $1,280 and the 80GB at $640. We're hoping those estimates are skewed a little high -- and Intel says there might be a cheaper 40GB unit on the way as well. We'll see in a month, we suppose.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.electronista.com/articles/08/08/19/intel.mainstream.ssds/">Electronista</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/storage/" rel="tag">Storage</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/19/intel-announces-its-first-ssds-plans-to-ship-in-a-month/">Intel announces its first SSDs, plans to ship in a month</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 19 Aug 2008 18:24:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2328330,00.asp>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/19/intel-announces-its-first-ssds-plans-to-ship-in-a-month/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1289091/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/19/intel-announces-its-first-ssds-plans-to-ship-in-a-month/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>intel</category><category>mlc</category><category>slc</category><category>ssd</category><category>x-18m</category><category>x-25e</category><category>x-25m</category><category>x18-m</category><category>x25-e</category><category>x25-m</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nilay Patel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 18:24:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel's "mainstream" 80GB and 160GB SSDs ready to launch with mainstream price?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/15/intels-mainstream-80gb-and-160gb-ssds-ready-to-launch-with-ma/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/15/intels-mainstream-80gb-and-160gb-ssds-ready-to-launch-with-ma/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/15/intels-mainstream-80gb-and-160gb-ssds-ready-to-launch-with-ma/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://en.expreview.com/2008/08/13/intel-to-unveil-ssd-with-speed-up-to-240170mb/#more-635"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/08/intel_ssd_3-1.jpg" /></a><br />
<div align="left">Looks like Intel, the big bad daddy of silicon, is about to unleash its first consumer oriented SSDs into the market. While Intel's 1.8- and 2.5-inch 80GB and 160GB SSD plans were pretty <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/23/video-intel-launching-80gb-1-8-and-2-5-inch-ssds-in-q3/">thoroughly detailed</a> in those May leaks, <em>Expreview</em> has slapped up an honest-to-goodness slide which looks like it came straight from the Intel deck. Assuming it's authentic, then we now know that Intel's 2.5-inch X25-M and 1.8-inch X18-M SSDs top out with a 240MBps sustained read and 70MBps write. That's just a bit slower than the blazing <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/05/micron-announces-insanely-quick-realssd-c200-ssds/">Micron RealSSD C20</a> but still seriously quick and hopefully priced for the mainstream audience they are targeting. Dell, for example, sells a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/12/dell-adds-450-ssd-option-to-xps-m1330-and-m1530/">128GB Samsung SSD for $450</a> -- surely Intel can beat that cost per Byte... right Intel? We're guessing that the enterprise-class 32GB and 64GB X25-E SSDs will feature some of that Micron co-developed <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/01/intel-and-micron-develop-worlds-fastest-nand-kiss-ssd-rand/">"world's fastest" SLC NAND</a> in order to achieve that ridiculous 240MBps / 170MBps read / write speed at what's expected to be an equally ridiculous price. The 80GB X25-M and X18-M are expected to launch in Q3 (so any day now) while the 160GB solid state slab should break free for consumers in Q1 (<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/23/video-intel-launching-80gb-1-8-and-2-5-inch-ssds-in-q3/">not Q4 2008</a>) of 2009. Expect to hear more on these next week as Intel kicks off another International Developers Forum. <br /></div>
</div>
<br />[Via <a href="http://www.tgdaily.com/content/view/38903/135/">TG Daily</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/storage/" rel="tag">Storage</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/15/intels-mainstream-80gb-and-160gb-ssds-ready-to-launch-with-ma/">Intel's "mainstream" 80GB and 160GB SSDs ready to launch with mainstream price?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 15 Aug 2008 03:58:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://en.expreview.com/2008/08/13/intel-to-unveil-ssd-with-speed-up-to-240170mb/#more-635>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/15/intels-mainstream-80gb-and-160gb-ssds-ready-to-launch-with-ma/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1285334/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/15/intels-mainstream-80gb-and-160gb-ssds-ready-to-launch-with-ma/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>high performance ssd</category><category>HighPerformanceSsd</category><category>intel</category><category>micron</category><category>mlc</category><category>nand</category><category>rumor</category><category>slc</category><category>ssd</category><category>x18-m</category><category>x25-e</category><category>x25-m</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Ricker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 03:58:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Toshiba launches 32GB embedded NAND for PMPs and handsets]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/07/toshiba-launches-32gb-embedded-nand-for-pmps-and-handsets/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/07/toshiba-launches-32gb-embedded-nand-for-pmps-and-handsets/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/07/toshiba-launches-32gb-embedded-nand-for-pmps-and-handsets/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.toshiba.com/taec/news/press_releases/2008/memy_08_536.jsp"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/08/8-6-08-toshiba-32gb-nand.jpg"  alt="" /></a><br /></div>
Look out memory nerds, as Toshiba has just announced a more capacious embedded <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/NAND/">NAND</a> flash memory device than you <em>ever</em> thought possible. The new 32GB chip boasts full compliance with eMMC and eSD standards, is fabricated with Tosh's 43-nanometer process technology, includes a dedicated controller and should slip right into your favorite handset / PMP of tomorrow. Samples are slated to hit couriers in September for an undisclosed price, while mass production will get going in Q4. So, how long 'til you guys and gals repeat this news with "64" or "128" in place of that lowly "32?"<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.electronista.com/articles/08/08/06/toshiba.32gb.flash/">Electronista</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/storage/" rel="tag">Storage</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/07/toshiba-launches-32gb-embedded-nand-for-pmps-and-handsets/">Toshiba launches 32GB embedded NAND for PMPs and handsets</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 07 Aug 2008 08:56:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.toshiba.com/taec/news/press_releases/2008/memy_08_536.jsp>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/07/toshiba-launches-32gb-embedded-nand-for-pmps-and-handsets/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1277753/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/07/toshiba-launches-32gb-embedded-nand-for-pmps-and-handsets/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>32gb nand</category><category>32gbNand</category><category>eMMC</category><category>eSD</category><category>flash memory</category><category>flash storage</category><category>FlashMemory</category><category>FlashStorage</category><category>nand</category><category>SLC</category><category>TAEC</category><category>TOSHIBA</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 08:56:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Hynix develops triple-level-cell NAND flash: 30 percent cheaper than MLC]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/04/hynix-develops-triple-level-cell-nand-flash-30-percent-cheaper/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/04/hynix-develops-triple-level-cell-nand-flash-30-percent-cheaper/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/04/hynix-develops-triple-level-cell-nand-flash-30-percent-cheaper/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/nation/2008/06/123_25230.html"><img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/06/6-03-08-hynixlogo.jpg" /></a>The more cells you can pack onto a NAND chip, the cheaper the storage, so we're excited about Hynix's recent announcement of triple-level-cell NAND flash. You might have noticed that MLC-based SSDs are cheaper than SLC units, and TLC keeps the trend alive -- Hynix says the cost of TLC production is some 30 percent lower than current chips. On top of that, the 32GB chips themselves are 30 percent smaller than current NAND chips, meaning device manufacturers will be able to cram more storage into our PMPs and phones. We'll have to wait a little while though: production is going to ramp up in October, and Hynix hasn't committed to using the new chips in SSDs quite yet.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/storage/" rel="tag">Storage</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/04/hynix-develops-triple-level-cell-nand-flash-30-percent-cheaper/">Hynix develops triple-level-cell NAND flash: 30 percent cheaper than MLC</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 04 Jun 2008 10:25:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/nation/2008/06/123_25230.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/04/hynix-develops-triple-level-cell-nand-flash-30-percent-cheaper/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1214304/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/04/hynix-develops-triple-level-cell-nand-flash-30-percent-cheaper/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>flash</category><category>hynix</category><category>mlc</category><category>nand</category><category>slc</category><category>ssd</category><category>tlc</category><category>triple level cell</category><category>triple-level-cell</category><category>TripleLevelCell</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nilay Patel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 10:25:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[TDK intros SATA-compatible industrial SSD drives]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/12/tdk-intros-sata-compatible-industrial-ssd-drives/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/12/tdk-intros-sata-compatible-industrial-ssd-drives/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/12/tdk-intros-sata-compatible-industrial-ssd-drives/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://techon.nikkeibp.co.jp/english/NEWS_EN/20080509/151512/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/05/tdk-sata-ssd.jpg"  alt="" /></a>It's far from the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/11/pqis-64gb-ssd-with-sata-connector-a-worlds-first-twice/">first</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/search/?q=ssd+sata&amp;searchsubmit=">SATA-compatible</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/ssd">SSD drive</a>, but TDK seems to think its new GBDisk RS1 series drives will be just the ticket for some very particular users (though not likely you or us). Apparently designed specifically for industrial use, the drive uses single level cell NAND flash memory (as opposed to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/search/?q=MLC&amp;searchsubmit=">multi-level cell</a>) and a GBDriver RS1 SATA controller, which TDK says will together help it maintain data reliability while standing up to frequent, high-speed data writing. You will have to make do with some fairly small storage capacities even by SSD standards, however, with the drives topping out at 16GB, all of which come in 2.5-inch drive enclosures. No word on prices just yet, but you can look for them to start rolling out this June.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/storage/" rel="tag">Storage</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/12/tdk-intros-sata-compatible-industrial-ssd-drives/">TDK intros SATA-compatible industrial SSD drives</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 12 May 2008 11:25:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://techon.nikkeibp.co.jp/english/NEWS_EN/20080509/151512/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/12/tdk-intros-sata-compatible-industrial-ssd-drives/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1192919/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/12/tdk-intros-sata-compatible-industrial-ssd-drives/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>flash memory</category><category>FlashMemory</category><category>nannd</category><category>sata</category><category>SLC</category><category>ssd</category><category>tdk</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald Melanson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 11:25:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel and Micron develop "world's fastest" NAND -- kiss SSD random write lag goodbye]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/01/intel-and-micron-develop-worlds-fastest-nand-kiss-ssd-rand/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/01/intel-and-micron-develop-worlds-fastest-nand-kiss-ssd-rand/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/01/intel-and-micron-develop-worlds-fastest-nand-kiss-ssd-rand/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/home/index.jsp?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;ndmConfigId=1000001&amp;newsId=20080201005228&amp;newsLang=en"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/02/micron-nand-01feb.jpg" /></a>How do 200MBps reads and 100MBps writes in a storage device sound to you? Pretty sweet if you ask us. That's the upper spec for Micron's new highspeed 8Gb (<em>Gigabit</em> not Gigabyte, kids) SLC NAND co-developed with Intel on a 50-nm processes node. Once slapped together in an SSD, you can expect performance to easily outshine any existing SSD or mechanical drive on the market while easily kicking the SSD bugbear -- random read/writes -- to the curb. The rub, of course, is that SLC NAND is more expensive than MLC so you can expect to pay dearly for that performance. Watch for the speedy Micron flash to pop in cellphones, camcorders, SSDs (and pretty much every portable consumer electronics device out there) sometime in the second half of 2008 -- sampling now to manufacturers.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/storage/" rel="tag">Storage</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/01/intel-and-micron-develop-worlds-fastest-nand-kiss-ssd-rand/">Intel and Micron develop "world's fastest" NAND -- kiss SSD random write lag goodbye</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 01 Feb 2008 03:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/home/index.jsp?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;ndmConfigId=1000001&amp;newsId=20080201005228&amp;newsLang=en>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/01/intel-and-micron-develop-worlds-fastest-nand-kiss-ssd-rand/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1103828/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/01/intel-and-micron-develop-worlds-fastest-nand-kiss-ssd-rand/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>50-nm</category><category>50nm</category><category>breaking news</category><category>BreakingNews</category><category>flash</category><category>im flash technologies</category><category>ImFlashTechnologies</category><category>imft</category><category>intel</category><category>micron</category><category>mlc</category><category>nand</category><category>slc</category><category>ssd</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Ricker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 03:01:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Samsung reveals first 30-nm 64Gb NAND chip -- and a bit of skin]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/23/samsung-reveals-first-30-nm-64gb-nand-chip-and-a-bit-of-skin/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/23/samsung-reveals-first-30-nm-64gb-nand-chip-and-a-bit-of-skin/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/23/samsung-reveals-first-30-nm-64gb-nand-chip-and-a-bit-of-skin/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.newswire.co.kr/read_sub.php?id=291315"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/10/samsung-64gb-mlc-nand.jpg" /></a><br /></div>
We're not sure what's more impressive here: the fact that Samsung has produced the world's first 30nm-class 64Gb (bit, not byte!) NAND chip or that they're now roping defenseless product waifs into hawking their silicon wafers. Nevertheless, we're looking at a serious jump in density in just <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/03/samsungs-high-density-16gb-nand-flash-released-cheaper-faster/">10 months</a>. A maximum of 16 of the new chips can be combined for cost-effective 128GB (byte, not bit!) MLC NAND-based flash cards used primarily for data storage. Sammy's faster <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/27/samsung-unveils-quick-64gb-ssd/">SLC based</a> flash cards will still be the preferred choice when speed is of the utmost priority and cost isn't an issue. As such, Samsung also announced a 32Gb SLC NAND chip based on the same SaDPT (Self-aligned double patterning technology) manufacturing process. Sadly, we'll have to wait until 2009 for production to begin. Still, he looks happy dontchathink?<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://64.233.179.104/translate_c?u=http%3A%2F%2Faving.net%2Fkr%2Fnews%2Fdefault.asp%3Fmode%3Dread%26c_num%3D63010%26C_Code%3D02%26SP_Num%3D0&amp;langpair=ko%7Cen&amp;hl=en&amp;ie=UTF8">AVING</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/storage/" rel="tag">Storage</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/23/samsung-reveals-first-30-nm-64gb-nand-chip-and-a-bit-of-skin/">Samsung reveals first 30-nm 64Gb NAND chip -- and a bit of skin</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 23 Oct 2007 03:18:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.newswire.co.kr/read_sub.php?id=291315>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/23/samsung-reveals-first-30-nm-64gb-nand-chip-and-a-bit-of-skin/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1019598/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/23/samsung-reveals-first-30-nm-64gb-nand-chip-and-a-bit-of-skin/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>30-nm</category><category>30nm</category><category>32-nm</category><category>32nm</category><category>64Gb</category><category>flash</category><category>mlc</category><category>nand</category><category>sadpt</category><category>samsung</category><category>slc</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Ricker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 03:18:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
