<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Engadget RSS Feed</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com</link>
<description>Engadget</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2013 AOL Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[W3C to explore a proposal bringing DRM hooks to HTML]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2013/02/12/w3c-to-explore-a-proposal-bringing-drm-hooks-to-html/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2013/02/12/w3c-to-explore-a-proposal-bringing-drm-hooks-to-html/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2013/02/12/w3c-to-explore-a-proposal-bringing-drm-hooks-to-html/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p class="image-container" style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/02/12/w3c-to-explore-a-proposal-bringing-drm-hooks-to-html/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="W3C open to a proposal bringing DRM hooks to HTML" data-src-height="340" data-src-width="620" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2013/02/padlock-340.jpg" /></a></p><p> The web is defined by the free, open exchange of information, right? Not necessarily. The <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/W3C/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">W3C</a> has decided that it's "in scope" for its HTML Working Group to explore a specification for the Encrypted Media Extensions framework, which would allow companies to plug in their own copy protection for web content. In other words, the effort would add support for <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/DRM/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">DRM</a> extensions to the web itself, rather than leave it to content plugins like Flash. The W3C's Philippe Le Hegaret is careful to note that this isn't an explicit endorsement of EME as it's suggested, or even the call for consensus on the proposal -- there are already concerns that the spec would lead to an abundance of DRM plugins that wouldn't work in certain browsers or operating systems. However, there's a chance it may become reality when EME's backers include content hosts or producers like the BBC, Google, Microsoft and Netflix.</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/internet/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/microsoft/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Microsoft</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/google/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Google</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/02/12/w3c-to-explore-a-proposal-bringing-drm-hooks-to-html/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>
<p><strong>Via:</strong> <a href="http://www.webmonkey.com/2013/02/drm-for-the-web-say-it-aint-so/" target="_blank">Wired</a><!--//-->, <a href="http://slashdot.org/story/13/02/12/014257/w3c-declares-drm-in-scope-for-html" target="_blank">Slashdot</a><!--//--></p>
<p><strong>Source:</strong> <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-admin/2013Feb/0122.html" target="_blank">W3C</a><!--//--></p>
]]>
</description>
<category>bbc</category><category>drm</category><category>eme</category><category>encryptedmediaextensions</category><category>google</category><category>html</category><category>microsoft</category><category>netflix</category><category>standard</category><category>w3c</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Fingas]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 18:02:00 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20458985</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[ITU approves the H.265 video format, takes us closer to high-quality mobile video]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2013/01/27/itu-approves-h265-video-format/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2013/01/27/itu-approves-h265-video-format/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2013/01/27/itu-approves-h265-video-format/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p class="image-container" style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/01/27/itu-approves-h265-video-format/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="ITU approves the H265 video format, takes us closer to highquality mobile video" data-src-height="340" data-src-width="620" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2013/01/amazon-buffering-340.jpg" /></a></p><p> Any smartphone owner who's ever watched a streaming HD video buffer... and buffer... and buffer on even LTE connections will appreciate the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/ITU/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">ITU's</a> speediness today. Just months after MPEG proposed the extra-miserly <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/15/mpeg-drafts-twice-as-efficient-h-265-video-standard/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">H.265 video codec</a>, the ITU has approved it as an official standard. As it's greenlit so far, the format (also known as <span>High Efficiency Video Coding) includes 8-bit, 10-bit and photo-oriented</span> profiles that should cover most 2D capture and playback. Pros are promised 12-bit and chroma profiles in the future, while there's work on 3D for all of us. We'll have to wait for both software support and hardware acceleration to reap the rewards, but there should be many: the halved bandwidth requirements have obvious benefits for cellular devices as well as 4K media delivery for that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/01/14/ces-2013-hdtv-and-connected-devices-round-up/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">rash of giant TVs</a> about to hit the market. Let's hope that camera and mobile device makers are just as impatient as we are.</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cameras/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Cameras</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/software/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Software</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/hd/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">HD</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/01/27/itu-approves-h265-video-format/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>
<p><strong>Via:</strong> <a href="http://techcrunch.com/2013/01/25/h265-is-approved/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Techcrunch+%28TechCrunch%29" target="_blank">TechCrunch</a><!--//--></p>
<p><strong>Source:</strong> <a href="http://www.itu.int/net/pressoffice/press_releases/2013/01.aspx#.UQMsh0rLOtU" target="_blank">ITU</a><!--//--></p>
]]>
</description>
<category>4k</category><category>codec</category><category>h.265</category><category>hdpostcross</category><category>hevc</category><category>HighEfficiencyVideoCoding</category><category>itu</category><category>standard</category><category>streaming</category><category>StreamingVideo</category><category>ultrahd</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Fingas]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2013 04:25:00 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20439609</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Alliance for Wireless Power approves its specification, edges closer to truly cable-free charging]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/10/30/alliance-for-wireless-power-approves-its-specification/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/10/30/alliance-for-wireless-power-approves-its-specification/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/10/30/alliance-for-wireless-power-approves-its-specification/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p class="image-container" style="text-align: center; "> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/10/30/alliance-for-wireless-power-approves-its-specification/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Alliance for Wireless Power" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/alliance-for-wireless-power.jpg" /></a></p><p> Design by committee might not be the death knell for technology after all. Over four months after the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/08/samsung-qualcomm-start-alliance-for-wireless-power/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Alliance for Wireless Power</a> was founded in earnest, the coalition has already greenlit a specification for its partners to work from. The guideline lets device makers start building devices that charge through a magnetic resonance technology more forgiving of distance and material than <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Qi/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Qi</a> while simplifying the process through short-range wireless formats like <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Bluetooth4.0/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Bluetooth 4.0</a>. While the A4WP group hasn't made all the details public, it's holding meetings this week to speed up the commercialization process -- it's here that we'll learn whether the corporate bureaucracy is just as quick at getting wireless charging hardware into our hands as it is handshaking on standards.</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cellphones/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Cellphones</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/peripherals/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Peripherals</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/tablets/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Tablets</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/10/30/alliance-for-wireless-power-approves-its-specification/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>a4wp</category><category>alliance for wireless power</category><category>AllianceForWirelessPower</category><category>bluetooth 4.0</category><category>Bluetooth4.0</category><category>charging</category><category>magnetic resonance</category><category>MagneticResonance</category><category>resonance</category><category>specification</category><category>standard</category><category>standards</category><category>wireless charger</category><category>wireless charging</category><category>wireless power</category><category>WirelessCharger</category><category>WirelessCharging</category><category>WirelessPower</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Fingas]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2012 01:13:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20364030</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[W3C says HTML 5 will be finalized in 2014, HTML 5.1 to follow in 2016]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/09/22/w3c-says-html-5-will-be-finalized-in-2014/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/09/22/w3c-says-html-5-will-be-finalized-in-2014/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/09/22/w3c-says-html-5-will-be-finalized-in-2014/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p class="image-container" style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/09/22/w3c-says-html-5-will-be-finalized-in-2014/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="W3C says HTML 5 will be finalized in 2014, HTML 51 to follow in 2016" data-src-height="410" data-src-width="620" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/09/9-22-2012html5.jpg" /></a></p><p> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/html5?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">HTML 5</a> has been a buzz word around the interwebs for so long you'd be forgiven if you thought it was a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/18/html5-gets-a-brave-new-logo-for-this-brave-new-world/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">well-established standard</a> looking for a successor. In fact, nothing could be farther from the truth. The World Wide Web Consortium (<a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/w3c?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">W3C</a>), which helps establish the primary standards used online, didn't actually intend to complete HTML 5 until 2022. Thankfully, the group has reconsidered that seemingly absurd timeline and now plans to have this whole mess wrapped up by the end of 2014. The revised plan calls for an HTML 5 Candidate Recommendation (sort of like a feature-frozen beta) to be submitted by the end of 2012, before being finalized in 2014. All existing bits of the standard that are unstable or that suffer interoperability problems will be pulled from that candidate and pushed to a draft version of HTML 5.1. While HTML 5 is being completed, its evolutionary successor will begin the process of marching towards standardization, with a target completion date of 2016. For a more detailed exploration of the future of HTML hit up the source link.</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/internet/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Internet</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/09/22/w3c-says-html-5-will-be-finalized-in-2014/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>
<p><strong>Via:</strong> <a href="http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2012/09/w3c-announces-plan-to-deliver-html-5-by-2014-html-5-1-in-2016/" target="_blank">Ars Technica</a><!--//--></p>
<p><strong>Source:</strong> <a href="http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/html5-2014-plan.html" target="_blank">W3C</a><!--//--></p>
]]>
</description>
<category>html</category><category>HTML 5</category><category>HTML 5.1</category><category>Html5</category><category>Html5.1</category><category>internet</category><category>standard</category><category>standards</category><category>w3c</category><category>web</category><category>World Wide Web Consortium</category><category>WorldWideWebConsortium</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Terrence O'Brien]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2012 10:29:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20330247</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[iPhone 5 confirmed to use nano-SIM, current SIMs not compatible]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/09/12/iphone-5-confirmed-to-use-nano-sim-current-sims-not-compatible/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/09/12/iphone-5-confirmed-to-use-nano-sim-current-sims-not-compatible/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/09/12/iphone-5-confirmed-to-use-nano-sim-current-sims-not-compatible/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/09/12/iphone-5-confirmed-to-use-nano-sim-current-sims-not-compatible/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Nano-SIM card" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/09/nanosim04_120x90.jpg" style="float: right;" /></a>While Apple was busy announcing the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/09/12/iphone-5-officially-announced/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">iPhone 5</a>, it left out mention of whether the device would use the recently approved (and Apple-designed) <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/nano-sim?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">nano-SIM</a> standard. Sure enough, the leaks were right <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/06/the-next-iphones-nano-sim-cradle-allegedly-leaked/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">once more</a> -- Apple is relying on that even tinier subscriber module for GSM, HSPA and LTE networks. The company also makes clear that there's no going back, so you'll have to chuck your earlier micro-SIM card if you've got one. Such is the price of progress.</p><p> [Thanks to <a href="http://www.newgadgets.de/">Johannes Knapp</a> for the nano-SIM]</p><p> <em>Myriam Joire and Brad Molen contributed to this report.</em></p><p> <em>Check out all the coverage at our iPhone 2012 <a href="http://www.engadget.com/event/apple-iphone5-event-2012?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">event hub</a>!</em><em> </em><div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/the-nano-sim-is-here-0/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">The nano-SIM is here</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/the-nano-sim-is-here-0/5281174?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/09/nanosim04_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/the-nano-sim-is-here-0/5281172?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/09/nanosim02_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/the-nano-sim-is-here-0/5281171?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/09/nanosim01_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/the-nano-sim-is-here-0/5281173?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/09/nanosim03_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div></p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cellphones/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Cellphones</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/mobile/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Mobile</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/09/12/iphone-5-confirmed-to-use-nano-sim-current-sims-not-compatible/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>

<p><strong>Source:</strong> <a href="http://www.apple.com/iphone/compare-iphones/" target="_blank">Apple</a><!--//--></p>
]]>
</description>
<category>4g</category><category>apple</category><category>apple iphone</category><category>apple iphone 5</category><category>AppleIphone</category><category>AppleIphone5</category><category>gsm</category><category>hspa</category><category>iphone</category><category>iphone 2012</category><category>iphone 2012 event</category><category>iphone 5</category><category>Iphone2012</category><category>Iphone2012Event</category><category>Iphone5</category><category>lte</category><category>micro-sim</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>nano sim</category><category>nano-sim</category><category>NanoSim</category><category>sim</category><category>sim card</category><category>SimCard</category><category>standard</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Fingas]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 15:10:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20322094</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Ethernet gets new IEEE standard, still requires your thumbnail]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/09/05/ethernet-gets-new-ieee-standard/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/09/05/ethernet-gets-new-ieee-standard/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/09/05/ethernet-gets-new-ieee-standard/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/09/05/ethernet-gets-new-ieee-standard/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Ethernet gets new IEEE standard, still requires your thumbnail" data-src-height="188" data-src-width="250" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/09/ethernettattoo2.jpg" style="float: right;" /></a>If you've been taking your trusty ethernet cable for granted since 1985, then we don't blame you -- that's when the IEEE 802.3 standard was first published and it hasn't had a full revision since 2008. Behind the scenes, however, the IEEE Ethernet Working Group has continued to add extras like 100Gbps compatibility (1Tbps will <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/20/ieee-pushes-for-ethernet-standard-between-400gbps-and-1tbps/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">have to wait</a>), improved energy efficiency and greater suitability for in-car networking. As of today, all of those amendments have been incorporated into 802.3-2012, which makes this a good time to pay homage and remember just how often <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/02/olympic-wifi-snatcher/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">thin air</a> lets you down.<br /> <br /> [Tattoo credit: Nick Thompson, <a href="http://sinoth.net/blog/2009/06/09/no-return-now/">Sinoth.net</a>]</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/networking/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Networking</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/09/05/ethernet-gets-new-ieee-standard/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>100Gbps</category><category>ethernet</category><category>IEEE</category><category>IEEE 802.3</category><category>IEEE 802.3-2012</category><category>Ieee802.3</category><category>Ieee802.3-2012</category><category>standard</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sharif Sakr]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 23:16:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20316377</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Microsoft delivers Windows Server 2012, puts the enterprise on cloud 8]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/09/04/microsoft-delivers-windows-server-2012/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/09/04/microsoft-delivers-windows-server-2012/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/09/04/microsoft-delivers-windows-server-2012/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/09/04/microsoft-delivers-windows-server-2012/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Microsoft delivers Windows Server 2012, puts the enterprise on cloud 8" data-src-height="449" data-src-width="600" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/09/windows-server-2012-essentials.jpg" style="margin: 4px;" /></a></p><p> Forget Windows 8, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/WindowsServer2012/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Windows Server 2012</a> is where it's at... if you're a corporate IT manager, that is. Microsoft has just posted the finished version of its suit-and-tie OS for immediate sale in download form. Not surprisingly given Microsoft's big cloud push, the emphasis with the upgrade is on improving how well the software scales for internet hosting -- the company wants one common backbone that can handle as little as a small e-mail server to large-scale <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Azure/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Azure</a> deployments and virtualization. Server 2012 is also defined by what you won't find: while the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Metro/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Metro</a>-style interface from the platform's Windows 8 cousin shows its face in the Essentials version, it's noticeably stripped down and goes away in the more advanced tiers. The real shakeup for some might just be the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/05/windows-server-2012-pares-back-to-four-versions/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">new price points</a>, which drop the cost by a large amount for offices that don't need more than a slice of what the all-out Datacenter edition has to offer. We'll admit that most of our attention as end users will be focused on what happens <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/18/microsoft-windows-8-ship-date-october-26-confirmed/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">several weeks from now</a>, but if you're one of those rare server operators that can't wait to start testing a new OS release almost immediately, you've got a head start on most of us.</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Desktops</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/internet/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/software/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Software</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/09/04/microsoft-delivers-windows-server-2012/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>
<p><strong>Via:</strong> <a href="http://www.zdnet.com/windows-server-2012-launches-as-cornerstone-of-microsofts-cloud-os-7000003690/" target="_blank">ZDNet</a><!--//--></p>
<p><strong>Source:</strong> <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/server-cloud/evaluate/trial-software.aspx" target="_blank">Microsoft</a><!--//--></p>
]]>
</description>
<category>azure</category><category>cloud</category><category>data center</category><category>DataCenter</category><category>desktop</category><category>desktops</category><category>enterprise</category><category>essentials</category><category>foundation</category><category>internet</category><category>metro</category><category>microsoft</category><category>microsoft azure</category><category>microsoft windows</category><category>microsoft windows server 2012</category><category>MicrosoftAzure</category><category>MicrosoftWindows</category><category>MicrosoftWindowsServer2012</category><category>server</category><category>servers</category><category>software</category><category>standard</category><category>virtual machine</category><category>virtualization</category><category>VirtualMachine</category><category>windows</category><category>windows server 2012</category><category>WindowsServer2012</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Fingas]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2012 13:42:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20315844</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Bluetooth SIG releases certifications for fitness devices aimed at runners and cyclists]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/27/bluetooth-sig-releases-certifications-for-fitness-devices/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/27/bluetooth-sig-releases-certifications-for-fitness-devices/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/27/bluetooth-sig-releases-certifications-for-fitness-devices/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/27/bluetooth-sig-releases-certifications-for-fitness-devices/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/02/fuelband2.jpg" style="width: 600px; height: 317px;" /></a></p><p> <a href="http://any shortage">Fitness gadgets</a> are great, but you never quite know what you're going to get when it comes to calorie counts, or a reading of how many miles you've run. That could change, though, thanks to a set of standards the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Bluetooth+SIG/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Bluetooth Special Interest Group</a> (SIG) is adopting with regard to fitness devices. These two certifications, which apply to running and cycling gadgets, respectively, affect the way data (e.g., cadence, speed, distance) is transmitted to paired devices like smartphones, sports watches and cycling computers. As far as SIG is concerned, too, more standardization means OEMs will have an easier time bringing new products to market -- not that there's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/19/nike-introduces-nikefuel-wristband/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">any</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/03/fitbit-ultra-review/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">current</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/motoactv/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">shortage</a> of options to choose from.</p><p></p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/wearables/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Wearables</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/wireless/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Wireless</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/27/bluetooth-sig-releases-certifications-for-fitness-devices/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>
<p><strong>Via:</strong> <a href="http://gigaom.com/mobile/bluetooth-gets-physical-with-new-fitness-certifications/" target="_blank">GigaOm</a><!--//--></p>

]]>
</description>
<category>Bluetooth</category><category>Bluetooth SIG</category><category>Bluetooth Smart</category><category>BluetoothSig</category><category>BluetoothSmart</category><category>certification</category><category>certifications</category><category>cycling</category><category>cyclists</category><category>fitness</category><category>fitness gadget</category><category>fitness gadgets</category><category>FitnessGadget</category><category>FitnessGadgets</category><category>health</category><category>runner</category><category>runners</category><category>running</category><category>standard</category><category>standards</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dana Wollman]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 23:11:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20310037</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[ITU approves NHK's Super Hi-Vision as 8K standard, sets the UHDTV ball rolling very slowly]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/25/itu-approves-nhk-super-hi-vision-as-8k-standard/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/25/itu-approves-nhk-super-hi-vision-as-8k-standard/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/25/itu-approves-nhk-super-hi-vision-as-8k-standard/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/25/itu-approves-nhk-super-hi-vision-as-8k-standard/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="ITU approves NHK's Super HiVision as 8K standard, sets the UHDTV ball rolling very slowly" data-src-height="395" data-src-width="600" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/08/panasonic-8k-145-inch-tv.jpg" style="margin: 4px;" /></a></p><p> We'd heard that the International Telecommunication Union was close to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/22/itu-near-recommending-nhk-super-hi-vision/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">approving Super Hi-Vision</a> as an <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/UltraHighDefinition/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Ultra High Definition</a> TV standard, and the UN agency hasn't waited long to confirm the rumors. The recommendation to use <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/NHK/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">NHK's</a> 7,680 x 4,320 format has gone unopposed and should define the parameters for <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/31/super-hi-vision-eyes-on/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">incredibly detailed</a> 8K video worldwide. This shouldn't lead anyone to return that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/22/lg-4k-84-inch-uhdtv/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">4K TV</a> just yet -- once again, it's important to remember that NHK still won't start any kind of wider testing until 2020. That's also assuming that the first 8K sets are down to Earth instead of the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/27/panasonic-145-inch-8k-plasma-nhk-japan/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">incredibly expensive 145-inch</a> variety.</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/displays/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Displays</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/home-entertainment/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Home Entertainment</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/hd/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">HD</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/25/itu-approves-nhk-super-hi-vision-as-8k-standard/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>
<p><strong>Via:</strong> <a target="_blank" href="http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-19370582#?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">BBC</a><!--//--></p>
<p><strong>Source:</strong> <a target="_blank" href="http://www.itu.int/md/R00-CACE-CIR-0581/en">ITU</a><!--//-->, <a target="_blank" href="http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=ja&amp;tl=en&amp;js=n&amp;prev=_t&amp;hl=en&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;layout=2&amp;eotf=1&amp;u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nhk.or.jp%2Fpr%2Fmarukaji%2Fm-giju337.html">NHK (translated)</a><!--//--></p>
]]>
</description>
<category>8k</category><category>approval</category><category>broadcast</category><category>broadcasting</category><category>display</category><category>displays</category><category>hdpostcross</category><category>hdpostmini</category><category>home entertainment</category><category>HomeEntertainment</category><category>international telecommunication union</category><category>InternationalTelecommunicationUnion</category><category>itu</category><category>minipost</category><category>nhk</category><category>shv</category><category>standard</category><category>standards</category><category>super hi-vision</category><category>SuperHi-vision</category><category>television</category><category>tv</category><category>uhd</category><category>uhdtv</category><category>ultra high definition</category><category>ultra high definition tv</category><category>UltraHighDefinition</category><category>UltraHighDefinitionTv</category><category>un</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Fingas]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2012 05:37:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20308779</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Nikkei: ITU near recommending NHK's Super Hi-Vision as official TV standard]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/22/itu-near-recommending-nhk-super-hi-vision/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/22/itu-near-recommending-nhk-super-hi-vision/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/22/itu-near-recommending-nhk-super-hi-vision/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/22/itu-near-recommending-nhk-super-hi-vision/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="NHK Super Hi-Vision at Olympics" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/07/super-hi-vision-lead2.jpg" style="width: 600px; height: 397px;" /></a></p><p> We've seen <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/NHK/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">NHK</a> preparing its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/31/super-hi-vision-eyes-on/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Super Hi-Vision</a> 8K video since <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/01/super-hi-vision-creeps-towards-reality-with-latest-breakthrough/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">time immemorial</a>. Wouldn't it be nice if the TV broadcast technology was more than just a perpetual research project? If sources for Japan's <em>Nikkei</em> aren't dreaming, the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/itu?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">International Telecommunication Union</a> is now "likely" to declare the format an official standard for broadcasters and TV makers. Should it go ahead, the UN telecom body would ask the world to rely on Super Hi-Vision as an eventual successor to HDTV and reduce the balkanization of TV standards that we've seen in the past. Neither the ITU nor NHK is known to have commented on the claim so far, but NHK isn't exactly in a rush to get a seal of approval from anyone -- widescale test broadcasts aren't coming <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/19/sharp-shows-off-the-worlds-first-super-hi-vision-lcd-with-16x-m/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">until 2020</a>, and production TVs themselves are only just entering a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/22/lg-4k-84-inch-uhdtv/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">4K universe</a>.</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/home-entertainment/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Home Entertainment</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/hd/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">HD</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/22/itu-near-recommending-nhk-super-hi-vision/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>8k</category><category>broadcast</category><category>hdpostcross</category><category>hdpostmini</category><category>home entertainment</category><category>HomeEntertainment</category><category>international telecommunication union</category><category>InternationalTelecommunicationUnion</category><category>itu</category><category>minipost</category><category>nhk</category><category>shv</category><category>standard</category><category>standards</category><category>super hi-vision</category><category>SuperHi-vision</category><category>television</category><category>tv</category><category>uhd</category><category>uhdtv</category><category>ultra high definition</category><category>ultra high definition tv</category><category>UltraHighDefinition</category><category>UltraHighDefinitionTv</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Fingas]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2012 22:08:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20307074</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[IEEE pushes for Ethernet standard between 400Gbps and 1Tbps, hopes to head off big data crunch]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/20/ieee-pushes-for-ethernet-standard-between-400gbps-and-1tbps/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/20/ieee-pushes-for-ethernet-standard-between-400gbps-and-1tbps/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/20/ieee-pushes-for-ethernet-standard-between-400gbps-and-1tbps/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/20/ieee-pushes-for-ethernet-standard-between-400gbps-and-1tbps/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="IEEE pushes for Ethernet standard between 400Gbps and 1Tbps, hopes to head off big data crunch" data-src-height="419" data-src-width="600" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/08/ethernet-cable-justin-marty-flickr.jpg" style="margin: 4px;" /></a></p><p> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Ethernet/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Ethernet</a> might seem pass&eacute; to those of us toting <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Ultrabook/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Ultrabooks</a>, but it's important enough to provoke a crisis for internet providers and many of those who depend on high-speed computing networks for a living: based on the rises of streaming video and social networking, the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/IEEE/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">IEEE</a> is worried that many of those large-scale networks will need 10Tbps of total bandwidth just to avoid a logjam in 2020. To that end, the standards body has formed a <span>Higher-Speed Ethernet Consensus</span> group that's mulling a new, breakneck-speed format reaching either 400Gbps or 1Tbps, depending on whose approach you'd favor. Fight the urge to pick the 1Tbps option on instinct, however. Both options would depend on bonding multiple connections together, and the faster of the two formats could lead to some expensive and very ungainly cables if it's not handled well. A meeting is scheduled for late September in Geneva to at least begin hashing out the details. Although we won't be wiring our homes with terabit Ethernet anytime soon, the standard should come quickly enough that the Googles and Netflixes of the world can satisfy our data addictions for a good while longer.</p><p> [Image credit: Justin Marty, <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jmarty/3677688990/">Flickr</a>]</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/networking/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Networking</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/20/ieee-pushes-for-ethernet-standard-between-400gbps-and-1tbps/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>1tbps</category><category>802.3</category><category>ethernet</category><category>gigabit</category><category>gigabits per second</category><category>GigabitsPerSecond</category><category>High performance computing</category><category>high-performance computing</category><category>High-performanceComputing</category><category>higher-speed ethernet consensus</category><category>Higher-speedEthernetConsensus</category><category>HighPerformanceComputing</category><category>hsec</category><category>ieee</category><category>internet service provider</category><category>internet service providers</category><category>InternetServiceProvider</category><category>InternetServiceProviders</category><category>isp</category><category>network</category><category>networking</category><category>networks</category><category>standard</category><category>standards</category><category>terabit</category><category>terabits per second</category><category>TerabitsPerSecond</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Fingas]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2012 18:40:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20304837</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[MPEG drafts twice-as-efficient H.265 video standard, sees use in phones as soon as 2013]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/15/mpeg-drafts-twice-as-efficient-h-265-video-standard/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/15/mpeg-drafts-twice-as-efficient-h-265-video-standard/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/15/mpeg-drafts-twice-as-efficient-h-265-video-standard/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p> <a href="http://engadget.com/2012/08/15/mpeg-drafts-twice-as-efficient-h-265-video-standard/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="MPEG drafts twiceasefficient H265 video standard, sees use in phones as soon as 2013" data-src-height="60" data-src-width="245" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/08/mpeg-group-logo.jpg" style="margin: 12px 16px; float: right; " /></a></p><p> All of that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/h.264,microsoft,motorola?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">squabbling over H.264</a> may be rendered moot in the near future. The Motion Picture Experts Group (better known as MPEG) has just let us know that it was quietly drafting a new video standard while everyone was on <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/19/engadget-podcast-302-07-19-2012/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">summer vacation</a> last month: H.265, also called High Efficiency Video Coding, promises to squeeze video sizes with double the efficiency of H.264. As you might imagine, this could lead either to a much smaller video footprint for bandwidth-starved mobile users or a hike to image quality with the same size as before. Imagine fast-loading HD streaming on 4G, or cable TV without all the excess compression, and you've got the idea. <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Ericsson/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Ericsson</a> Research visual technology lead <span>Per Fr&ouml;jdh anticipates H.265 </span>coming as soon as 2013, when our smartphones and tablets are most likely to play it first. TV and other areas might have to wait, although <span>Fr&ouml;jdh</span> is offering a consolation prize -- he's teasing a separate MPEG project that could give us glasses-free, compressed 3D video as a standard by 2014.</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cellphones/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Cellphones</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/home-entertainment/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Home Entertainment</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/software/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Software</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/hd/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">HD</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/mobile/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Mobile</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/15/mpeg-drafts-twice-as-efficient-h-265-video-standard/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>3d</category><category>cable television</category><category>cable Tv</category><category>CableTelevision</category><category>CableTv</category><category>cellphone</category><category>cellphones</category><category>codec</category><category>draft</category><category>encoding</category><category>ericsson</category><category>ericsson research</category><category>EricssonResearch</category><category>format</category><category>glasses-free</category><category>h.264</category><category>h.265</category><category>hdpostcross</category><category>hevc</category><category>high efficiency video coding</category><category>HighEfficiencyVideoCoding</category><category>home entertainment</category><category>HomeEntertainment</category><category>mobile</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>motion picture experts group</category><category>MotionPictureExpertsGroup</category><category>mpeg</category><category>smartphone</category><category>smartphones</category><category>software</category><category>standard</category><category>standards</category><category>television</category><category>tv</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Fingas]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2012 21:46:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20301712</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[OpenGL ES 3.0 and OpenGL 4.3 squeeze textures to the limit, bring OpenVL along for the ride]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/07/opengl-es-3-0-and-opengl-4-3-squeeze-textures-to-the-limit/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/07/opengl-es-3-0-and-opengl-4-3-squeeze-textures-to-the-limit/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/07/opengl-es-3-0-and-opengl-4-3-squeeze-textures-to-the-limit/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p style="text-align: center; "> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/07/opengl-es-3-0-and-opengl-4-3-squeeze-textures-to-the-limit/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="OpenGL ES 30 and OpenGL 43 squeeze textures to the limit, bring OpenVL along for the ride" data-src-height="197" data-src-width="600" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/08/khronos-astc-opengl-es-3.jpg" style="margin: 4px; " /></a></p><p> Mobile graphics are clearly setting the agenda at <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/SIGGRAPH/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">SIGGRAPH</a> this year -- ARM's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/06/arm-second-gen-mali-t600-gpus/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Mali T600-series</a> parts have just been chased up by a new <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/KhronosGroup/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Khronos Group</a> standard that will likely keep those future video cores well-fed. <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/OpenGLES/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">OpenGL ES</a> 3.0 represents a big leap in textures, introducing "guaranteed support" for more advanced texture effects as well as a new version of ASTC compression that further shrinks texture footprints without a conspicuous visual hit. OpenVL is also coming to give <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/augmentedreality/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">augmented reality</a> apps their own standard. Don't worry, desktop users still get some love through OpenGL 4.3: it adds the new ASTC tricks, new visual effects (think blur) and support for compute shaders without always needing to use <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/OpenCL/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">OpenCL</a>. All of the new standards promise a bright future in graphics for those living outside of Microsoft's Direct3D universe, although we'd advise being patient: there won't be a full Open GL ES 3.0 testing suite for as long as six months, and any next-generation phones or tablets will still need the graphics hardware to match.</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cellphones/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Cellphones</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/gaming/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Gaming</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/tablets/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Tablets</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/07/opengl-es-3-0-and-opengl-4-3-squeeze-textures-to-the-limit/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>adaptive scalable texture compression</category><category>AdaptiveScalableTextureCompression</category><category>astc</category><category>augmented reality</category><category>AugmentedReality</category><category>cellphone</category><category>cellphones</category><category>compression</category><category>extension</category><category>extensions</category><category>gaming</category><category>khronos</category><category>khronos group</category><category>KhronosGroup</category><category>mobile gaming</category><category>mobile graphics</category><category>MobileGaming</category><category>MobileGraphics</category><category>opengl</category><category>opengl 4.3</category><category>opengl es</category><category>opengl es 3.0</category><category>Opengl4.3</category><category>OpenglEs</category><category>OpenglEs3.0</category><category>openvl</category><category>siggraph</category><category>siggraph 2012</category><category>Siggraph2012</category><category>smartphone</category><category>smartphones</category><category>standard</category><category>standards</category><category>tablet</category><category>tablet pc</category><category>tablet pcs</category><category>TabletPc</category><category>TabletPcs</category><category>tablets</category><category>texture</category><category>textures</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Fingas]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 04:54:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20294570</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Microsoft no fan of existing WebRTC standard, proposes its own to get Skype onboard]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/06/microsoft-no-fan-of-existing-webrtc-standard-proposes-its-own/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/06/microsoft-no-fan-of-existing-webrtc-standard-proposes-its-own/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/06/microsoft-no-fan-of-existing-webrtc-standard-proposes-its-own/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p style="text-align: center; "> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/06/microsoft-no-fan-of-existing-webrtc-standard-proposes-its-own/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Microsoft no fan of WebRTC standard in Chrome, proposes its own to get Skype onboard" data-src-height="162" data-src-width="600" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/08/microsoft-cu-rtc-web.jpg" style="margin: 4px; " /></a></p><p> Microsoft, objecting to a web standard promoted by its competitors? <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/13/microsoft-mocks-google-likens-webm-to-failed-esperanto-language/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Get out</a>. While Firefox, Opera and now <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/31/google-chrome-21-stable-release-adds-retina-macbook-pro-support/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Chrome</a> have implemented <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/WebRTC/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">WebRTC</a> on some level for plugin-free VoIP and webcam chats, Microsoft doesn't think the existing, proposed standard is up to snuff for linking with existing devices or obeying "key web tenets." It's suggesting a new CU-RTC-Web standard to fix what it claims is broken with WebRTC. Thankfully, the changes are more technical improvements than political maneuvering: Microsoft wants a peer-to-peer transport level that gives more control as well as to reduce some of the requirements that it sees holding the technology back as of today. There's no doubt an economic incentive for a company that wants to push <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/31/outlook-preview-email-service-microsoft/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Skype in the browser</a>, but the format is already in front of the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/W3C/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">W3C</a> and could become a real cross-platform standard. If other W3C members are willing to (slightly) reinvent the wheel, Microsoft's approach could get Chrome and Internet Explorer users talking -- no, really talking.</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/internet/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Internet</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/06/microsoft-no-fan-of-existing-webrtc-standard-proposes-its-own/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>browser</category><category>cu-rtc-web</category><category>internet</category><category>microphone</category><category>microphones</category><category>microsoft</category><category>outlook</category><category>outlook.com</category><category>skype</category><category>standard</category><category>standards</category><category>video chat</category><category>VideoChat</category><category>voice chat</category><category>VoiceChat</category><category>voip</category><category>w3c</category><category>web</category><category>web browser</category><category>WebBrowser</category><category>webcam</category><category>webcams</category><category>webrtc</category><category>World Wide Web Consortium</category><category>WorldWideWebConsortium</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Fingas]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2012 15:46:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20294472</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[USB Power Delivery spec upped to 100W, aims to make proprietary power connectors obsolete]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/23/usb-100w-power-delivery-spec/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/23/usb-100w-power-delivery-spec/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/23/usb-100w-power-delivery-spec/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/23/usb-100w-power-delivery-spec/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="USB Power Delivery spec upped to 100W, aims to make proprietary power connectors obsolete" data-src-height="102" data-src-width="250" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/07/hedusbpd.jpg" style="margin: 4px 16px; float: left;" /></a>The battle between Thunderbolt and USB 3.0 has only recently begun in earnest, what with <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/05/gigabyte-z77x-up5-th-motherboard/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">mobo's</a> finally emerging to give non-Mac computers access to the 10Gbps interface. While USB 3.0 can't match Thunderbolt in terms of data throughput, it now has the upper hand in power capabilities, as last week the 100W Power Delivery spec was approved for both USB 2.0 and 3.0. That's ten times what Thunderbolt can do, and it means that you can charge up your laptop or power most <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/06/aoc-reveals-22-inch-usb-powered-1080p-monitor/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">any peripheral</a> via Universal Serial Bus. Naturally, the new specification relies on beefier cables to deliver maximum juice, but we won't have to go replacing all our old wires -- it includes a means to check attached cables and devices and set the voltage and amperage accordingly. Perfect, that means we won't have to carry around bundle of proprietary power cords when we travel, and we get peace of mind that charging via USB won't have any, <em>ahem</em>, unpleasant <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/21/exploding-se-phone-charger-hits-three-year-old/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">side effects</a>.</p><p></p><p></p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/misc/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Misc</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/23/usb-100w-power-delivery-spec/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>charger</category><category>charging</category><category>power</category><category>spec</category><category>specification</category><category>standard</category><category>usb</category><category>usb 2.0</category><category>usb 3.0</category><category>usb power</category><category>usb power delivery</category><category>Usb2.0</category><category>Usb3.0</category><category>UsbPower</category><category>UsbPowerDelivery</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Gorman]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 18:37:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20284081</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[WiFi Direct headed for a revamp: simpler integration, better support]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/13/wifi-direct-headed-for-a-revamp-simpler-integration-better-sup/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/13/wifi-direct-headed-for-a-revamp-simpler-integration-better-sup/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/13/wifi-direct-headed-for-a-revamp-simpler-integration-better-sup/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p style="text-align: center; "> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/13/wifi-direct-headed-for-a-revamp-simpler-integration-better-sup/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="WiFi Direct headed for a revamp: simpler integration, better support" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/10/wi-fi-direct-banner.jpg" style="width: 517px; height: 183px; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px; " /></a></p><p> We love <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/wifidirect?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">WiFi Direct</a>, we do, but there's no denying the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/25/wi-fi-direct-certification-begins-today-device-to-device-transm/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">standard</a> has failed to take the world by storm. The WiFi Alliance is going back to the drawing board and looking to streamline its system of connecting devices. A new Wi-Fi Direct Services task group was formed last month, charged with building new tools for helping apps and devices <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/16/wifi-direct-and-dlna-get-friendly-make-streaming-media-a-little/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">work together</a>. The plan is to have what amounts to a complete revamp of the WiFi Direct standard within 12 to 18 months. One of the keys will be exposing the feature more directly to end users. Often it hides in the background, but the alliance is working on a way for apps to advertise their <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/07/wifi-direct-helps-you-kill-space-chickens-without-an-access-poin/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">capabilities</a> to each other and consumers. Developers have also struggled with poorly defined hooks that often lead to incompatible products. Will 2013 finally be the year that WiFi Direct takes off? Who can say. Considering the break-neck pace our technological world moves at, something better may have come along by the time the WiFi Alliance gets its act together.</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/networking/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Networking</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/13/wifi-direct-headed-for-a-revamp-simpler-integration-better-sup/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>802.11</category><category>reboot</category><category>revamp</category><category>standard</category><category>standards</category><category>Wi-Fi Direct Services</category><category>Wi-fiDirectServices</category><category>wifi</category><category>wifi alliance</category><category>wifi direct</category><category>WifiAlliance</category><category>WifiDirect</category><category>wireless</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Terrence O'Brien]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 02:16:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20276667</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[ITU wants to bring smartphone makers to peace talks, hash out patent wars]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/06/itu-wants-to-bring-smartphone-makers-to-peace-talks/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/06/itu-wants-to-bring-smartphone-makers-to-peace-talks/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/06/itu-wants-to-bring-smartphone-makers-to-peace-talks/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/06/itu-wants-to-bring-smartphone-makers-to-peace-talks/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="ITU wants to bring smartphone makers to peace talks, hash out patent wars" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/07/united-nations-assembly-patrick-gruban-flickr.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 600px; height: 372px;" /></a></p><p> The <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/UnitedNations/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">United Nations</a> defines the stereotype of a peace broker, so it's not that far-fetched to hear that its International Telecommunication Union (<a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/ITU/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">ITU</a>) wing is hoping to step in and cool down the rapidly escalating <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/patent,lawsuit?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">patent world war</a>. The organization plans to convene a Patent Roundtable on October 10th -- in neutral Geneva, Switzerland, of course -- to have smartphone makers, governments and standards groups try and resolve some of their differences. Those mostly concerned about <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/03/samsung-denied-judge-declines-to-lift-injunction-against-galaxy/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Apple's actions</a> won't be happy with the focus of the sit-down, however. Most of the attention will surround allegations that companies are abusing standards-based patents, which will put the heat largely on a Google-owned <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/03/motorola-europe-patent-abuse/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Motorola</a> as well as <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/31/samsung-faces-eu-antitrust-investigation-over-mobile-patents/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Samsung</a>. Still, there's hope when the ITU's Secretary-General <span>Dr. Hamadoun Tour&eacute;</span> talks of desiring a "balancing act" between what patent holders want and what customers need. Our real hope is that we don't have to hear talk of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/06/htc-q2-2012-results-57-8-percent-fall-in-net-profit/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">customs delays</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/30/motorola-itc-case-vs-microsoft-remanded/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">product bans</a> for a long while afterwards.</p><p> [Image credit: Patrick Gruban, <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/19473388@N00/336920038">Flickr</a>]</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/mobile/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Mobile</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/06/itu-wants-to-bring-smartphone-makers-to-peace-talks/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>apple</category><category>frand</category><category>google</category><category>international telecommunication union</category><category>InternationalTelecommunicationUnion</category><category>itu</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>lawsuits</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>motorola</category><category>negotiation</category><category>negotiations</category><category>patent</category><category>patent roundtable</category><category>patent war</category><category>PatentRoundtable</category><category>patents</category><category>PatentWar</category><category>rand</category><category>roundtable</category><category>samsung</category><category>standard</category><category>standards</category><category>standards based</category><category>standards essential</category><category>standards-based</category><category>standards-essential</category><category>StandardsBased</category><category>StandardsEssential</category><category>talk</category><category>talks</category><category>un</category><category>united nations</category><category>UnitedNations</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Fingas]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2012 17:44:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20273198</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Windows Server 2012 pares back to four versions, looks to give small businesses more bang for the buck]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/05/windows-server-2012-pares-back-to-four-versions/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/05/windows-server-2012-pares-back-to-four-versions/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/05/windows-server-2012-pares-back-to-four-versions/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/05/windows-server-2012-pares-back-to-four-versions/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Windows Server 2012 pares back to four versions, looks to give small businesses more bang for the buck" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/07/windows-server-2012-versions.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 470px; height: 465px;" /></a></p><p> Microsoft has been devoting most of its OS update attention this year to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/31/windows-8-release-preview-detailed-impressions/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Windows 8</a>, not its suit-wearing <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/WindowsServer/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Windows Server</a> 2012 counterpart. Some of the mystery has been cleared up through word of a greatly simplified server OS lineup. Just four versions of Windows Server will sit in IT backrooms versus the whopping 12 from Server 2008 R2, with an emphasis on making the feature slope a little gentler. The biggest improvement is the near-identical feature set of Windows Server 2012 Standard compared to its Datacenter equivalent: the only advantage of Datacenter is the jump to unlimited virtual machines, giving smaller businesses a way to save some cash. Foundation and Essentials will cover the basics for these outfits if just 15 or 25 very real machines need to hop onboard. The base prices of $425 to $4,809 per copy for all but the OEM-only Foundation still make it doubtful that we'll be loading Server 2012 on a PC tucked into a closet at home, but it's evident between this and the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/16/microsoft-outs-three-flavors-of-windows-8-windows-8-windows-8/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">streamlined Windows 8 selection</a> that Microsoft wants to avoid the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/03/windows-7-skus-announced-yes-your-worst-nightmare-has-come-to/2?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">flood of versions</a> that confused buyers during the Windows Vista and 7 days.</p>

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/05/windows-server-2012-pares-back-to-four-versions/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>datacenter</category><category>desktop</category><category>desktops</category><category>essentials</category><category>foundation</category><category>microsoft</category><category>microsoft windows</category><category>microsoft windows server 2012</category><category>MicrosoftWindows</category><category>MicrosoftWindowsServer2012</category><category>oem</category><category>software</category><category>standard</category><category>virtual machine</category><category>virtualization</category><category>VirtualMachine</category><category>windows</category><category>windows server</category><category>windows server 2012</category><category>windows server 2012 datacenter</category><category>windows server 2012 essentials</category><category>windows server 2012 foundation</category><category>windows server 2012 standard</category><category>WindowsServer</category><category>WindowsServer2012</category><category>WindowsServer2012Datacenter</category><category>WindowsServer2012Essentials</category><category>WindowsServer2012Foundation</category><category>WindowsServer2012Standard</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Fingas]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2012 14:23:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20272370</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[VESA's Mobility DisplayPort standard links smartphones to PC displays, jabs MHL]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/28/vesa-mobility-displayport-standard-links-smartphones-to-pc-displays/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/28/vesa-mobility-displayport-standard-links-smartphones-to-pc-displays/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/28/vesa-mobility-displayport-standard-links-smartphones-to-pc-displays/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/28/vesa-mobility-displayport-standard-links-smartphones-to-pc-displays/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="VESA's Mobility DisplayPort standard links smartphones to PC displays, jabs MHL " src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/06/samsung-galaxy-s-iii-micro-usb.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 600px; height: 357px;" /></a></p><p> If you own a modern Android smartphone, there's a reasonable chance you're familiar with MHL for video out to a TV. The format saves the trouble of adding an extra port, but it's really only intended for HDMI-based destinations and occasionally runs into <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/09/galaxy-s-iii-incompatible-with-previous-mhl-dongles/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">compatibility issues</a>. <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/VESA/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">VESA</a> is hoping to settle all that with its newly available Mobility DisplayPort standard, or MyDP. Existing micro-USB ports will still serve as the output, but you'll have the option of plugging into DVI or VGA displays with the right adapter, in addition to HDMI and full-size DisplayPort. Picture connecting to an older projector and you'll see why that might make sense. The new spec will charge up your device like with MHL, but it also has about 1Mbps of bandwidth for input, such as keyboards and trackpads in some future <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/lapdock/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">lapdock</a>. Video still tops out at 1080p and 60Hz, so there's no hooking into a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/05/viewsonic-vp3280-led-4k-monitor-hands-on/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">4K display</a> here. The real advantage, for many, is simply in having a broadly-adopted standard in the first place: VESA backing sees 180 companies tacitly endorsing the idea, producing a big improvement over the patchwork results that we've seen from MHL's much smaller alliance. The chief obstacle is the wait for the first smartphones, Ultrabooks and tablets with MyDP, which could be months or more away.</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/mobile/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Mobile</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/28/vesa-mobility-displayport-standard-links-smartphones-to-pc-displays/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>cellphone</category><category>cellphones</category><category>displayport</category><category>hdmi</category><category>micro usb</category><category>micro-usb</category><category>MicroUsb</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>mobility displayport</category><category>MobilityDisplayport</category><category>mydp</category><category>smartphone</category><category>smartphones</category><category>standard</category><category>standards</category><category>tablet</category><category>tablet pc</category><category>tablet pcs</category><category>TabletPc</category><category>TabletPcs</category><category>tablets</category><category>ultrabook</category><category>ultrabooks</category><category>vesa</category><category>video out</category><category>VideoOut</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Fingas]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 03:28:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20267267</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[24 wireless operators agree on data roaming alert mechanisms, do nothing about actual roaming rates]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/21/gsma-global-wireless-data-roaming-alert-agreement/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/21/gsma-global-wireless-data-roaming-alert-agreement/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/21/gsma-global-wireless-data-roaming-alert-agreement/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/21/gsma-global-wireless-data-roaming-alert-agreement/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="24 global wireless operators agree on data roaming alert mechanisms, do nothing about actual roaming rates" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/06/att-roaming-alert.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 320px; height: 480px;" /></a></p><p> GSMA, also known as the entity that produces Mobile World Congress and Mobile Asia Expo each year, seems to be onto something. And by "something," we mean "getting 24 carriers around the globe to agree on a single point." That's no easy feat, mind you, and the latest release from Shanghai asserts that 24 operator groups have agreed to implement new measures in order to better inform jetsetters about data roaming rates when they land. America Movil, AT&amp;T, China Mobile, China Unicom, Deutsche Telekom, France Telecom-Orange, Hutchison 3 Group, SoftBank Mobile Corp., Verizon Communications, VimpelCom and Vodafone Group (among others) are all onboard, with the following measures to go into effect by the end of 2012. For one, texts will be sent to remind customers of their data roaming tariffs when they arrive in another country, and there will also be a monthly data roaming spending limit paired with the ability to "temporarily suspend" one's data when usage exceeds said threshold. Of course, alerting users to how they're about to be hosed only seems like part of the issue. Till that's addressed, we'll keep carrying an <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/01/xcom-global-international-mifi-data-rental-service-review/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Xcom Global MiFi</a> or <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/how-to-stay-connected-while-traveling-internationally/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">hunting for a local SIM</a> upon arrival.</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/mobile/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Mobile</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/21/gsma-global-wireless-data-roaming-alert-agreement/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>agreement</category><category>bill shock</category><category>BillShock</category><category>data</category><category>data roaming</category><category>data usage</category><category>DataRoaming</category><category>DataUsage</category><category>gsma</category><category>mobilepostmini</category><category>protocol</category><category>standard</category><category>throttling</category><category>tier</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2012 14:08:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20263250</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Qualcomm building babel-fish chip to support multiple LTE bands]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/06/qualcomm-new-lte-chip/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/06/qualcomm-new-lte-chip/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/06/qualcomm-new-lte-chip/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/06/qualcomm-new-lte-chip/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Qualcomm building babelfish chip to support multiple LTE bands" height="306" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/06/babelfish.jpg" style="margin:4px" width="600" /></a></p><p> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/21/qualcomm-reports-record-quarterly-revenues-boasts-100th-snapdra/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Qualcomm</a> has revealed that it's developing a new mobile radio that'll operate across multiple LTE bands. While dreams of a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/11/wherever-i-wander-wherever-i-roam-lte-probably-wont-work/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">cross-network standard</a> were burned to the ground <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/15/verizon-lte-no-roaming-even-if-you-want-to/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">last July</a>, the chip company revealed that the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/13/qualcomm-snapdragon-s4-msm8960-development-tablet-hands-on-vide/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">MSM-8960</a> will connect to three frequencies below 1GHz and four above. Qualcomm has said that the hardware will make its way into handsets by the end of the year at the same time it voiced opposition to the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/25/fcc-clears-sprint-to-run-cdma-and-4g-lte-on-800mhz/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">FCC's</a> plan to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/21/fcc-weighs-dish-4g-network-and-700mhz-interoperability/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">standardize</a> the lower 700MHz band -- something the smaller networks feel is necessary to prevent them being squeezed out by the big three.</p><p></p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/mobile/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Mobile</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/06/qualcomm-new-lte-chip/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>28-nanometer</category><category>700MHZ LTE</category><category>700mhzLte</category><category>ATT</category><category>Cross-Network</category><category>FCC</category><category>Filing</category><category>Interoperability</category><category>LTE</category><category>LTE Roaming</category><category>LteRoaming</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>MSM-8960</category><category>PDF</category><category>Qualcomm</category><category>Roaming LTE</category><category>RoamingLte</category><category>Spectrum</category><category>Sprint</category><category>Standard</category><category>Standards</category><category>Verizon</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Cooper]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2012 11:59:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20252551</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[ITU meets to define 4K and 8K UHDTV parameters]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/24/itu-meets-to-define-4k-and-8k-uhdtv-parameters/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/24/itu-meets-to-define-4k-and-8k-uhdtv-parameters/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/24/itu-meets-to-define-4k-and-8k-uhdtv-parameters/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/24/itu-meets-to-define-4k-and-8k-uhdtv-parameters/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="ITU meets to define 4K and 8K UHDTV parameters" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/05/uhdvcomparison060107.jpg" style="width: 425px; height: 239px; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></p><p> This month NHK has been previewing a slew of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/superhi-vision?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Super Hi-Vision</a> equipment, but there's still much work to be done to make high res broadcasts a reality worldwide. There's where the ITU steps in, and as it did for HDTV back in the 90s it's been meeting to decide just what <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/4k?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">4K</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/8k?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">8K</a> Ultra High Definition TV (UHDTV) broadcasts are and how they will work. There's no word on minimum pixel counts for the standards -- we expect that quad-HD vs. 4K battle to rage on, remember these are the people who <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/18/itu-capitulates-admits-that-the-term-4g-could-apply-to-lte-w/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">"defined" 4G </a>-- but they're establishing color range, frame rate, and whether the broadcasts will go over unused satellite bandwidth or regular antenna frequencies. If you're somehow confused by the 33MP video streams that are coming our way... some day, check out a video featuring European Broadcast Union Deputy Director of Technology and Development David Wood.</p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/hd/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">HD</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/24/itu-meets-to-define-4k-and-8k-uhdtv-parameters/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>4k</category><category>8k</category><category>ebu</category><category>european broadcast union</category><category>EuropeanBroadcastUnion</category><category>format</category><category>hdpostmini</category><category>itu</category><category>shv</category><category>standard</category><category>super hi-vision</category><category>SuperHi-vision</category><category>uhdtv</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawler]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 08:26:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20241253</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Google's self-driving cars will return to roots, tour California]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/22/california-law-passed-google-driverless-cars/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/22/california-law-passed-google-driverless-cars/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/22/california-law-passed-google-driverless-cars/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/22/california-law-passed-google-driverless-cars/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="california-law-passed-google-driverless-cars" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/google-driverless-cali-05-22-12-02.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 600px; height: 337px;" /></a></p><p> Thanks to a new law passed in California, Google's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/15/googles-driverless-car-gets-driven-video/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">driverless cars</a> might soon be stuck in its traffic with all the other hapless commuters. Although they won't hit the highway yet, like they can in <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/07/nevada-lets-googles-driverless-car-hit-the-open-road/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Nevada</a>, the bipartisan bill will allow <span>bureaucrats</span> to craft safety and performance standards -- letting the robotic rigs roll (with licensed minders) in the near future. Joining Hawaii, Florida, Arizona and Oklahoma with similar legislation, the state hopes to reduce carnage on the roads caused by human error, and is backed by Google, the California Highway Patrol and various civic, auto and tech clubs. Of course, given that it was birthed in <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/13/googleplex-expansion/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Google's</a> Mountain View <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/14/google-x-lab-is-full-of-smart-people-with-crazy-dreams-and-froze/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">X lab</a>, it's only natural that the autonomous <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/25/nrg-to-bring-200-fast-charging-ev-stations-to-the-golden-state/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">EV</a> should be allowed to roam free on its home turf.</p>

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/22/california-law-passed-google-driverless-cars/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>auto</category><category>autonomous automobile</category><category>autonomous car</category><category>AutonomousAutomobile</category><category>AutonomousCar</category><category>california</category><category>department of transportation</category><category>DepartmentOfTransportation</category><category>driverless</category><category>driverless car</category><category>driverless cars</category><category>DriverlessCar</category><category>DriverlessCars</category><category>driving</category><category>EV</category><category>google</category><category>google car</category><category>google self-driving cars</category><category>GoogleCar</category><category>GoogleSelf-drivingCars</category><category>law</category><category>legislation</category><category>politics</category><category>safety</category><category>self driving car</category><category>self-driving car</category><category>Self-drivingCar</category><category>SelfDrivingCar</category><category>standard</category><category>state</category><category>transport</category><category>vehicle</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Dent]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 13:41:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20242386</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[RIM and Motorola modify nano-SIM proposal, hope to meet Apple halfway]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/18/rim-motorola-nano-sim-redesign/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/18/rim-motorola-nano-sim-redesign/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/18/rim-motorola-nano-sim-redesign/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/18/rim-motorola-nano-sim-redesign/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Image" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/nanosim1-1.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 600px; height: 409px;" /></a></p><p> It's been a battle of epic proportions over a microscopic piece of plastic, but the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/30/nano-sim-postponed/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">warring sides</a> appear to be working together to find a compromise. We're referring to the fight between Apple and a coalition formed by RIM, Motorola and Nokia as each group attempts to make their own <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/nano-SIM/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">nano-SIM</a> design the ETSI standard. Neither entity has seemed willing to extend an olive branch and come up with any compromise -- until recently. RIM and Motorola have updated their design proposal in an effort to reach middle ground with Cupertino, and it appears that they were more than accommodating in the chip's refreshed look (seen above).</p><p> So how different can two nano-SIM designs be? Worlds apart, it turns out. For instance, RIM and Motorola have insisted from the beginning that a notch is necessary to allow for "push-push" mechanisms (push to lock the chip in place, push to pop it back out again); Apple, on the other hand, has been entirely anti-notch -- not a surprise, given the fact that the company uses SIM trays on the iPhone, therefore making the concept of a notch completely irrelevant. In its redesign, however, RIM and Motorola took elements from both sides of the fight and combined them. The new look retains Apple's simple rectangular style, but still makes room for a low-key notch on one side. It's difficult to say whether this move will be enough to gain the affection of Tim Cook's company and sway the vote -- Apple is still hard at work <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/08/apple-mods-nano-sim-design-awaits-nokias-tiny-rebuttal/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">modding</a> its own design, after all -- but it's nice to see both factions playing nice with each other prior to the next ETSI meeting on May 31st. Head to the source to see the difference between the original designs and the latest version.</p><p></p>
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/mobile/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget" rel="tag">Mobile</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/18/rim-motorola-nano-sim-redesign/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>apple</category><category>ejectable sim card</category><category>EjectableSimCard</category><category>etsi</category><category>iphone</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>motorola</category><category>nano sim</category><category>nano-SIM</category><category>NanoSim</category><category>nokia</category><category>proposal</category><category>rim</category><category>sim</category><category>standard</category><category>standards</category><category>vote</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brad Molen]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 00:13:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20240483</dc:identifier>

</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Nevada lets Google's driverless car hit the open road, requires it to bring a driver]]></title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/07/nevada-lets-googles-driverless-car-hit-the-open-road/?utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/07/nevada-lets-googles-driverless-car-hit-the-open-road/</guid>
<comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/07/nevada-lets-googles-driverless-car-hit-the-open-road/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments</comments>
<description>
<![CDATA[
<p style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/07/nevada-lets-googles-driverless-car-hit-the-open-road/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"><img alt="Nevada lets Google's driverless car hit the open road, requires it to bring a driver" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/06/las-vegas-drive.jpg" style="width: 500px; height: 439px;" /></a></p><p> Driving through Las Vegas can be distracting -- bright lights, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/29/vdara-hotel-death-ray-claiming-victims-in-the-las-vegas-strip/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">sun-powered death rays</a> and international <a href="http://www.engadget.com/ces?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">Consumer Electronics Shows</a> have a tendency to catch a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/GrowingUpGeek/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">geek's eye</a> -- good thing, then, that Nevada's deemed Google fit to test its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/autonomous+car/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">autonomous automobile</a> on public streets. The state's Department of Transportation was tasked with penning a set of<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/17/nevada-driverless-cars-law-regulation/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget"> safety standards</a> for self-driving cars <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/23/nevada-prepares-itself-for-the-imminent-rise-of-driverless-cars/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">last June</a>, and is now letting the cars run amok on city streets, with a few restrictions.</p><p> Mountain View's three <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/03/googles-self-driving-cars-take-ted-attendees-for-a-wild-ride/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget">test vehicles</a>, for instance, will need to haul a carpool of at least two passengers before driving down the strip, one person to take the wheel in case of an emergency, and another to monitor a computer screen that details the car's planned route. Test vehicles will also don red license plates and an infinity symbol to mark them as self-driving prototypes. Nevada DMV Director Bruce Breslow says those plates will be green once the vehicles are ready for market, something he hopes to see in three to five years.</p>

<p><strong><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/07/nevada-lets-googles-driverless-car-hit-the-open-road/?utm_source=Feed_Classic&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Engadget#comments">Comments</a></strong></p>


]]>
</description>
<category>auto</category><category>autonomous automobile</category><category>AutonomousAutomobile</category><category>car</category><category>department of transportation</category><category>DepartmentOfTransportation</category><category>driverless</category><category>driverless car</category><category>driverless cars</category><category>DriverlessCar</category><category>DriverlessCars</category><category>driving</category><category>google</category><category>google car</category><category>google self-driving cars</category><category>GoogleCar</category><category>GoogleSelf-drivingCars</category><category>law</category><category>nevada</category><category>politics</category><category>safety</category><category>self driving car</category><category>self-driving car</category><category>Self-drivingCar</category><category>SelfDrivingCar</category><category>standard</category><category>state</category><category>transport</category><category>vehicle</category>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Buckley]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 23:26:00 -0400</pubDate>
<dc:identifier>21|20233385</dc:identifier>

</item>
</channel></rss>