<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Engadget</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com</link>
<description>Engadget</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Peek killing off US email and Twitter devices after 'lifelong service']]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/02/peek-killing-off-devices/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/02/peek-killing-off-devices/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/02/peek-killing-off-devices/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/02/peek-killing-off-devices/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/02/peek.jpg" style="border-bottom: 0px solid; border-left: 0px solid; margin: 4px; border-top: 0px solid; border-right: 0px solid" /></a></div>
There's an old saying that eternal love lasts for two years. Apparently, that also applies to Peek's bare bones <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/24/peek-pronto-sneaks-out-the-door-with-support-for-more-accounts/">email</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/05/twitterpeek-review/">Twitter</a> devices, which launched in 2008 and 2009 respectively. We've received emails from users anxious that their handsets -- all running on T-Mo's network -- stopped working on January 30th, despite them having paid up to $299 for "<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/peek-pronto-with-lifetime-service-299/">lifelong service</a>." Although at least some users received emails about this, we've just had confirmation from Peek's CEO, Amol Sarva, that the products really are being abandoned. By way of justification, he told us that they're "seriously old" and have reached their end of life, with only a "handful of users" left in the US. He adds that anyone who bought the $299 one-off bundle still eked out 28 months of service, whereas paying the monthly $19.95 subscription plus extra for the device would have added up to much more. As to why the service is being killed, perhaps we should have taken the hint <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/21/peek-calls-own-internet-only-devices-collectors-items-heads/">back in July</a>, because now the company is all about software-only cloud services rather than handsets. Here's some more detail from Sarva himself:
<blockquote>
	<p>
		"Unfortunately we cannot maintain the network forever for a few users, so that end time has come. The networks are changing standards, protocols etc and the old units are now end of life. We have lots going with rapid adoption of our software by phone brands around the world, so Peek is flat out building for a number of platforms that our OEM customers are deploying like Android and Mediatek. We are not offering a Peek-made device to replace these old ones."</p>
</blockquote>
<br />
[Thanks to everyone who sent this in]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/02/peek-killing-off-devices/">Peek killing off US email and Twitter devices after 'lifelong service'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 02 Feb 2012 07:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/02/peek-killing-off-devices/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20162638/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/02/peek-killing-off-devices/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>amol sarva</category><category>AmolSarva</category><category>end of life</category><category>EndOfLife</category><category>lifelong service</category><category>LifelongService</category><category>mobilepostcross</category><category>peek</category><category>twitterpeek</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sharif Sakr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 07:59:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[How would you change the TwitterPeek?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/25/how-would-you-change-the-twitterpeek/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/25/how-would-you-change-the-twitterpeek/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/25/how-would-you-change-the-twitterpeek/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/12/fronttwitterpeek2009a.jpg"  alt="" /></div>
It's Christmas day, so we're asking you to go a little easy on <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Peek/">Peek</a> here, but we've got a sneaking suspicion that our request will be cutely ignored in comments below. This week's episode of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/HWYC/">How Would You Change</a> features Peek's latest handheld -- you know, the one that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/"><i>only does Twitter</i></a>. We didn't find the creature too incredibly useful / valuable <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/05/twitterpeek-review/">during our time with it</a>, but that's not to say it couldn't be molded into a pristine object of desire. Speaking of which, how would you go about tweaking or overhauling the TwitterPeek? Make the screen resolution higher? Change the user interface? Add support for apps, email and calling? Make Peek pay <em>you</em> to use it? Sound off below!<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/25/how-would-you-change-the-twitterpeek/">How would you change the TwitterPeek?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 25 Dec 2009 23:12:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/25/how-would-you-change-the-twitterpeek/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19292129/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/25/how-would-you-change-the-twitterpeek/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>feature</category><category>FeaturedStories</category><category>FeaturesVsExperienceEvolution</category><category>handheld gaming</category><category>HandheldGaming</category><category>hwyc</category><category>PeekPronto</category><category>social networking for over 50</category><category>social networks</category><category>SocialNetworkingForOver50</category><category>SocialNetworks</category><category>Twitter mailbag</category><category>TwitterMailbag</category><category>twitterpeek</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 23:12:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[TwitterPeek review]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/05/twitterpeek-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/05/twitterpeek-review/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/05/twitterpeek-review/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/05/twitterpeek-review/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/11/tp_main_pic.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
Peek is a company with ideas -- but they like to tackle them one at a time. Last year, amid snickering and cries of uselessness from the gadget world, the tiny company launched an email-only handheld that's attempted to bring the idea of email on the go to the smartphone fearing crowd... and we do know at least <em>one</em> avid user. Now the company has turned around and tried it again, this time with a seemingly even less essential device, the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/">TwitterPeek</a>. <br />
<br />
The TwitterPeek works in conjunction with Twitter, and only with Twitter. It's that simple. There's nothing else to figure out or set up, so presumably, the idea is that the device, like the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/24/peek-pronto-sneaks-out-the-door-with-support-for-more-accounts/">original Peek</a>, is intended for the dumbphone lover who just can't go without a constant stream of Tweets. So, fair enough -- those of us who are more than a little tech savvy may find reason to smile at this, but supposedly this will be attractive to someone. Right?<br />
<br />
So how did the TwitterPeek fare when we got our mitts on it? Read on to find out.<br />
<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/twitter-peek-hands-on-1/">TwitterPeek hands-on</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/twitter-peek-hands-on-1/#2426785"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/11/twitterpeekhands200902_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/twitter-peek-hands-on-1/#2426763"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/11/twitterpeekhands200903_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/twitter-peek-hands-on-1/#2426775"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/11/twitterpeekhands200904_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/twitter-peek-hands-on-1/#2426768"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/11/twitterpeekhands200905_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/twitter-peek-hands-on-1/#2426770"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/11/twitterpeekhands200906_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/05/twitterpeek-review/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>TwitterPeek review</em></a></p><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/handhelds/" rel="tag">Handhelds</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/05/twitterpeek-review/">TwitterPeek review</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 05 Nov 2009 15:19:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/05/twitterpeek-review/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19225042/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/05/twitterpeek-review/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>feature</category><category>featured</category><category>features</category><category>handheld</category><category>handhelds</category><category>hands-on</category><category>peek</category><category>review</category><category>reviews</category><category>twitter</category><category>twitter peek</category><category>twitterpeek</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Laura June]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 15:19:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Josh reveals TwitterPeek on Late Night with Jimmy Fallon, Qlorigan** (video)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/03/josh-reveals-twitterpeek-on-late-night-with-jimmy-fallon-qlorig/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/03/josh-reveals-twitterpeek-on-late-night-with-jimmy-fallon-qlorig/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/03/josh-reveals-twitterpeek-on-late-night-with-jimmy-fallon-qlorig/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
<div align="center"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/03/josh-reveals-twitterpeek-on-late-night-with-jimmy-fallon-qlorig/#continued"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="Josh on Late Night with Jimmy Fallon" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/11/latenight110209_lg.jpg" /></a></div>
</div>
Only on Late Night with Jimmy Fallon could the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/twitterpeek">TwitterPeek</a> overshadow Verizon's DROID. Fact of the matter is, it's easier to grasp the idea of a dedicated tweeting device than a Verizon phone touting "open development" as one of its main features. TwitterPeek is available now for $200, a price that includes lifetime service, or $100 for a 6 month subscription. Hit the read link below for details or mosey on through to the other side of the break for the Late Night buffoonery. <br />
<br />
<em>** Qlorigan is a trademark of Fallon Corp. <br />
</em><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/03/josh-reveals-twitterpeek-on-late-night-with-jimmy-fallon-qlorig/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Josh reveals TwitterPeek on Late Night with Jimmy Fallon, Qlorigan** (video)</em></a></p><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/cellphones/" rel="tag">Cellphones</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/handhelds/" rel="tag">Handhelds</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/03/josh-reveals-twitterpeek-on-late-night-with-jimmy-fallon-qlorig/">Josh reveals TwitterPeek on Late Night with Jimmy Fallon, Qlorigan** (video)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 03 Nov 2009 02:02:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/03/josh-reveals-twitterpeek-on-late-night-with-jimmy-fallon-qlorig/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19220160/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/03/josh-reveals-twitterpeek-on-late-night-with-jimmy-fallon-qlorig/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>android</category><category>android 2.0</category><category>Android2.0</category><category>droid</category><category>elcair</category><category>jimmy fallon</category><category>JimmyFallon</category><category>late night</category><category>LateNight</category><category>twitterpeek</category><category>verizon</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Ricker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 02:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The TwitterPeek is... a Peek for Twitter?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B002R5AG50?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=livedigitally-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=B002R5AG50"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/10/10-27-09twitterpeek.jpg"  alt="" /></a></div>
Peek's never been one to shy away from the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/09/video-eccentric-peek-demonstration-highlights-the-pain-of-2-yea/">wacky</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/17/peek-arrives-for-small-businesses-in-149-5-pack/">and</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/peek-offers-disgruntled-sidekick-owners-a-free-pronto-internet/">opportunistic</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/peek-pronto-with-lifetime-service-299/">marketing</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/26/peek-ceo-buy-two-peeks-your-next-iphone-or-g1-bill-is-on-us/">schemes</a> but launching a whole product just for Twitter? That's courage, drive, and possibly a mental health issue. Yet here's the TwitterPeek -- what looks to be the same old <a href="http://engadget.com/tag/peek">Peek</a> you know, love, and probably haven't purchased, stripped of its email and SMS functionality and re-oriented towards telling the entire world too much about your body and what you're doing to it every waking moment of the day. Now, to be fair, we're getting a distinctly strange feeling of phoniness about this whole thing, but there's already an Amazon listing and a picture of the box has already surfaced on -- where else? -- Twitter, so this could <em>really be happening</em>. Just think about that for a second. And then tweet about it, of course.<br />
<br />
[Via <a href="http://www.livedigitally.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-real-cmon-no-seriously/">LiveDigitally</a>]<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B002R5AG50?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=livedigitally-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=B002R5AG50">Read</a> - Amazon TwitterPeek listing<br />
<a href="http://twitpic.com/n6hbi">Read</a> - Peter Ha's TwitPic of the box<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The TwitterPeek is... a Peek for Twitter?</em></a></p><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/handhelds/" rel="tag">Handhelds</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/">The TwitterPeek is... a Peek for Twitter?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 27 Oct 2009 18:13:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19212314/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>amazon</category><category>leak</category><category>leaks</category><category>peek</category><category>rumor</category><category>rumors</category><category>twitter</category><category>twitter peek</category><category>TwitterPeek</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nilay Patel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 18:13:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
