<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Engadget</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com</link>
<description>Engadget</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Intel launches new Ivy Bridge Xeons, targets microservers]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/intel-launches-new-ivy-bridge-xeons-targets-microservers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/intel-launches-new-ivy-bridge-xeons-targets-microservers/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/intel-launches-new-ivy-bridge-xeons-targets-microservers/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center; "> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/intel-launches-new-ivy-bridge-xeons-targets-microservers/"><img alt="Intel launches new Ivy Bridge Xeons, targets microservers" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/intelxeone31200v2v1table.jpg" style="margin-left: 4px; margin-right: 4px; margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 500px; height: 383px; " /></a></p><p> Intel is pushing out that delicious <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/ivybridge">Ivy Bridge</a> update to server chips and, interestingly, it's not focusing purely on the high end to start. In total, 28 new <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/xeon">Xeon</a> CPUs were introduced today, including the E5-4600 and 2400 families targeted at four and two socket systems, respectively. Those tweaked mainstream processors aren't the interesting part, though. We're more intrigued by the updated E3 series, the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/12/intel-plans-ivy-bridge-based-xeon-e3s-and-low-power-atom-microservers/">low-end offerings</a> that are aimed small businesses and light web-hosting duty. In particular the new E3-1220L v2 slashes power consumption to an impressive 17w by going with just two cores and only 3MB of cache. While that 3W advantage over its predecessor may not sound like much, it can make a huge difference in the microserver market and in high-density environments where cooling a room full of servers can become problematic. Even in its stripped down form the extremely low-power processor still supports Turbo Boost, Trusted Execution Technology and PCI-Express 3.0. Considering that last-gen's Atom-based server chip pulled down 15W, we'd consider the 1220L v2 an impressive feat of engineering. Now we've just gotta hope that Intel can carry through on that promised <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/12/intel-plans-ivy-bridge-based-xeon-e3s-and-low-power-atom-microservers/">6W Centerton</a> chip. Check out the PR after the break.</p><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/intel-launches-new-ivy-bridge-xeons-targets-microservers/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Intel launches new Ivy Bridge Xeons, targets microservers</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/intel-launches-new-ivy-bridge-xeons-targets-microservers/">Intel launches new Ivy Bridge Xeons, targets microservers</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 15 May 2012 01:41:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/intel-launches-new-ivy-bridge-xeons-targets-microservers/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20237828/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/15/intel-launches-new-ivy-bridge-xeons-targets-microservers/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CPUs</category><category>intel</category><category>intel xeon</category><category>IntelXeon</category><category>ivy bridge</category><category>IvyBridge</category><category>server</category><category>servers</category><category>xeon</category><category>Xeon e3</category><category>xeon e3-1200</category><category>Xeon E3-1200 v2</category><category>Xeon E3-1220L v2</category><category>xeon e5</category><category>xeon e5-2400</category><category>xeon e5-4600</category><category>XeonE3</category><category>XeonE3-1200</category><category>XeonE3-1200V2</category><category>XeonE3-1220lV2</category><category>XeonE5</category><category>XeonE5-2400</category><category>XeonE5-4600</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Terrence O'Brien]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 01:41:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel plans to roll out Ivy Bridge based Xeon E3s, low-power Atom chips for micro servers]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/12/intel-plans-ivy-bridge-based-xeon-e3s-and-low-power-atom-microservers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/12/intel-plans-ivy-bridge-based-xeon-e3s-and-low-power-atom-microservers/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/12/intel-plans-ivy-bridge-based-xeon-e3s-and-low-power-atom-microservers/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/12/intel-plans-ivy-bridge-based-xeon-e3s-and-low-power-atom-microservers/"><img alt="Intel plans to roll out Ivy Bridge based Xeon E3s, low-power Atom chips for micro servers" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/04/png-ivy-centerton.png" style="margin: 4px; width: 596px; height: 116px;" /></a></div>Ask any gardener, once you let ivy grow, it gets <em>everywhere</em>. Even though Intel <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/06/intel-intros-xeon-e5-2600-family/">just planted</a> a fresh family of Sandy Bridge-based server CPUs, reports of a new line of Xeon E3 chips sporting the firm's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/ivybridge">next generation architecture</a> are sprouting up. The new Ivy Bridge server chips use the firm's<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/04/intel-will-mass-produce-22nm-3d-transistors-for-all-future-cpus/"> 3D Tri-Gate transistors</a> to improve performance without using more power. For micro servers looking for an even <em>smaller </em>power footprint, Intel is introducing an Atom-based system on a chip, dubbed Centerton. These new 64-bit chips will feature two Atom processor cores and consume only six watts of electricity. Intel hasn't said yet just where these new processors are going to end up, but mentioned that it had a few customers on board.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/12/intel-plans-ivy-bridge-based-xeon-e3s-and-low-power-atom-microservers/">Intel plans to roll out Ivy Bridge based Xeon E3s, low-power Atom chips for micro servers</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 12 Apr 2012 05:27:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/12/intel-plans-ivy-bridge-based-xeon-e3s-and-low-power-atom-microservers/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20213871/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/12/intel-plans-ivy-bridge-based-xeon-e3s-and-low-power-atom-microservers/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Centerton</category><category>Intel</category><category>Intel Atom</category><category>intel centerton</category><category>Intel Corporation</category><category>IntelCenterton</category><category>Ivy Bridge</category><category>IvyBridge</category><category>micro servers</category><category>MicroServers</category><category>processors</category><category>Sci/Tech</category><category>server chips</category><category>ServerChips</category><category>system on a chip</category><category>SystemOnAChip</category><category>Xeon</category><category>Xeon E3</category><category>XeonE3</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Buckley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 05:27:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel intros Xeon E5-2600 family, finally ushers servers into the Sandy Bridge era]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/06/intel-intros-xeon-e5-2600-family/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/06/intel-intros-xeon-e5-2600-family/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/06/intel-intros-xeon-e5-2600-family/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/06/intel-intros-xeon-e5-2600-family/"><img alt="Xeon E5-2600" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/03/3-6-2012xeone5die.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px 12px; float: right;" /></a>On the eve of the release of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/ivybridge">Ivy Bridge</a>, Intel is finally bringing its server chips up to speed by introducing the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/sandybridge">Sandy Bridge</a>-based E5-2600 family of CPUs. The company claims its latest processors outperform the previous generation of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/xeon">Xeons</a> by up to 80 percent in raw speed, while improving per-watt performance by 50 percent. The eight-core chips support up to 768GB of RAM, PCI Express 3.0, Hyper-Threading, Turbo Boost, Intel Virtualization -- basically the whole Chipzilla portfolio of tricks. A grand total of 17 different Xeons will be available, ranging in price from $198 to $2,050. For complete details hit up the more coverage link and check out the PR after the break.<br /><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/06/intel-intros-xeon-e5-2600-family/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Intel intros Xeon E5-2600 family, finally ushers servers into the Sandy Bridge era</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/06/intel-intros-xeon-e5-2600-family/">Intel intros Xeon E5-2600 family, finally ushers servers into the Sandy Bridge era</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 06 Mar 2012 14:47:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/06/intel-intros-xeon-e5-2600-family/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20187116/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/06/intel-intros-xeon-e5-2600-family/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cpu</category><category>e5-2600</category><category>intel</category><category>intel xeon</category><category>intel xeon e5-2600</category><category>IntelXeon</category><category>IntelXeonE5-2600</category><category>processor</category><category>sandy bridge</category><category>SandyBridge</category><category>server</category><category>servers</category><category>xeon</category><category>xeon e5-2600</category><category>XeonE5-2600</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Terrence O'Brien]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 14:47:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[T-Platforms to build ten petaflop supercomputer for Moscow State University]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/26/t-platforms-to-build-ten-petaflop-supercomputer-for-moscow-state/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/26/t-platforms-to-build-ten-petaflop-supercomputer-for-moscow-state/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/26/t-platforms-to-build-ten-petaflop-supercomputer-for-moscow-state/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center; ">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/26/t-platforms-to-build-ten-petaflop-supercomputer-for-moscow-state/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/12/russiansupercomputer-1324834653.png" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
In post-<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/22/secret-soviet-era-laser-tank-pops-up-in-the-ivanovo-oblast/">Soviet Russia</a>, massive supercomputer programs <em>you. </em>(Sorry, we had to.) Recently, Russia's Moscow State University contracted with high-performance computing company T-Platforms to create a ten petaflop cluster that'll be operational in 2013. The computer would fall just short of the fastest supercomputer on Earth (the Japanese <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/20/fujitsu-k-supercomputer-now-ranked-fastest-in-the-world-dethron/">K Computer</a>, which is rated at 10.51 petaflops) and will incorporate a mixture of different node types to achieve the ten petaflops. T-Platforms will reportedly build the nodes from Sandy Bridge or Ivy Bridge Xeon processors and NVIDIA's next-generation <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/21/nvidia-reveals-fermis-successor-kepler-at-28nm-in-2011-maxwel/">Kepler GPU</a> coprocessors, and Intel's Many Integrated Core (MIC) architecture could also be included if it's available during construction. The reason for the project? Unknown officially, but we're guessing it's just another reason for Putin to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/29/putin-orders-russian-federal-agencies-to-switch-to-open-source-s/">rip his shirt off and celebrate</a>.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/26/t-platforms-to-build-ten-petaflop-supercomputer-for-moscow-state/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>T-Platforms to build ten petaflop supercomputer for Moscow State University</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/26/t-platforms-to-build-ten-petaflop-supercomputer-for-moscow-state/">T-Platforms to build ten petaflop supercomputer for Moscow State University</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 26 Dec 2011 19:48:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/26/t-platforms-to-build-ten-petaflop-supercomputer-for-moscow-state/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20135088/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/26/t-platforms-to-build-ten-petaflop-supercomputer-for-moscow-state/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Ivy Bridge</category><category>IvyBridge</category><category>K-Computer</category><category>Kepler</category><category>Kepler GPU</category><category>KeplerGpu</category><category>Many Integrated Cores</category><category>ManyIntegratedCores</category><category>Moscow State University</category><category>MoscowStateUniversity</category><category>Sandy Bridge</category><category>SandyBridge</category><category>supercomputer</category><category>T-Platforms</category><category>Xeon</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Barylick]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2011 19:48:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[VT nears completion of HokieSpeed, world's 96th most powerful supercomputer]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/23/vt-nears-completion-of-hokiespeed-worlds-96th-most-powerful-su/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/23/vt-nears-completion-of-hokiespeed-worlds-96th-most-powerful-su/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/23/vt-nears-completion-of-hokiespeed-worlds-96th-most-powerful-su/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/23/vt-nears-completion-of-hokiespeed-worlds-96th-most-powerful-su/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/12/wu-feng-1222.jpg" style="margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
If basking in the presence of a powerful supercomputer is on your list of "must-haves" when selecting a proper university, then you may wish to fire off an admissions application to the Hokies at <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/virginia+tech">Virginia Tech</a>. The school's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/07/virginia-techs-hokiespeed-supercomputer-to-rely-on-cpu-and-gpu/">HokieSpeed</a> system is now in its final stages of testing, which combines 209 separate computers, each powered by dual six-core Xeon E5645 CPUs and two NVIDIA M2050 / C2050 448-core GPUs, with a single-precision peak processing capability of 455 teraflops. To put things in perspective, HokieSpeed is now the 96th most powerful computer in the world, and yet it was built for <em>merely</em> $1.4 million in loose change -- the majority of which came from a National Science Foundation grant. As a further claim to fame, HokieSpeed is the 11th most energy-efficient supercomputer in the world. Coming soon, the system will drive a 14-foot wide by four-foot tall visualization wall, which is to consist of eight 46-inch Samsung 3D televisions humming in unison. After all, with virtually limitless potential, these scientists will need a fitting backdrop for all those Skyrim sessions. The full PR follows the break, complete with commentary from the system's mastermind, Professor Wu Feng.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/23/vt-nears-completion-of-hokiespeed-worlds-96th-most-powerful-su/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>VT nears completion of HokieSpeed, world's 96th most powerful supercomputer</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/23/vt-nears-completion-of-hokiespeed-worlds-96th-most-powerful-su/">VT nears completion of HokieSpeed, world's 96th most powerful supercomputer</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 23 Dec 2011 18:43:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/23/vt-nears-completion-of-hokiespeed-worlds-96th-most-powerful-su/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20134125/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/23/vt-nears-completion-of-hokiespeed-worlds-96th-most-powerful-su/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>3d</category><category>acc</category><category>C2050</category><category>cpu</category><category>E5645</category><category>gpu</category><category>HokieSpeed</category><category>intel</category><category>M2050</category><category>National Science Foundation</category><category>NationalScienceFoundation</category><category>nvidia</category><category>research</category><category>samsung</category><category>supercomputer</category><category>supercomputing</category><category>university</category><category>Virginia Tech</category><category>VirginiaTech</category><category>vt</category><category>Wu Feng</category><category>WuFeng</category><category>xeon</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Lutz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 18:43:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[NVIDIA's Tesla GPU powers Tsubame 2.0 to green supercomputer supremacy]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/23/nvidias-tesla-gpu-powers-tsubame-2-0-to-green-supercomputer-sup/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/23/nvidias-tesla-gpu-powers-tsubame-2-0-to-green-supercomputer-sup/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/23/nvidias-tesla-gpu-powers-tsubame-2-0-to-green-supercomputer-sup/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/23/nvidias-tesla-gpu-powers-tsubame-2-0-to-green-supercomputer-sup/"><img alt="Tsubame 2.0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/11/11-23-2011tsubame.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></a></div>
The <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/13/tokyo-universitys-grape-dr-supercomputer-is-a-tangled-green-pow/">Green500</a> might not be quite as well known as the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/top500">Top500</a>, but it's no less of an honor to be counted among the world's most energy efficient supercomputers. NVIDIA is tooting its own horn for making it on to the list for the second year in a row as part of the "greenest" petaflop machine. The <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/tokyo-institute-of-technology-announces-ssd-packing-2-39-petafl/">Tsubame 2.0</a> at the Tokyo Institute of Technology's Global Scientific Information Center is powered by Intel's Xeon CPUs, but NVIDIA's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/nvidiatesla">Tesla</a> general purpose GPUs do a vast majority of the number crunching, allowing it to deliver 1.19 petaflops of performance while consuming only 1.2 megawatts. That's roughly 958 megaflops per watt, a huge increase over the most efficient CPU-only super computer, the Cielo <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/cray">Cray</a>, which gets only 278 megaflops per watt. The Tsubame 2.0 isn't the greenest machine on the planet though, that honor belongs to IBM's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/bluegene">BlueGene</a> which takes the top five spots on the Green500. Still, number ten ain't bad... right? Check out the PR after the break.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/23/nvidias-tesla-gpu-powers-tsubame-2-0-to-green-supercomputer-sup/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>NVIDIA's Tesla GPU powers Tsubame 2.0 to green supercomputer supremacy</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/23/nvidias-tesla-gpu-powers-tsubame-2-0-to-green-supercomputer-sup/">NVIDIA's Tesla GPU powers Tsubame 2.0 to green supercomputer supremacy</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 23 Nov 2011 17:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/23/nvidias-tesla-gpu-powers-tsubame-2-0-to-green-supercomputer-sup/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/20113344/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/23/nvidias-tesla-gpu-powers-tsubame-2-0-to-green-supercomputer-sup/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CUDA</category><category>green500</category><category>GSIC</category><category>nvidia</category><category>nvidia tesla</category><category>NvidiaTesla</category><category>super computer</category><category>SuperComputer</category><category>tesla</category><category>Tokyo Institute of Technology</category><category>tokyo institute of technology GSIC</category><category>Tokyo Institute of Technologys Global Scientific Information Cen</category><category>TokyoInstituteOfTechnology</category><category>TokyoInstituteOfTechnologyGsic</category><category>TokyoInstituteOfTechnologysGlobalScientificInformationCenter</category><category>Tsubame</category><category>Tsubame 2.0</category><category>Tsubame2.0</category><category>Xeon</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Terrence O'Brien]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 17:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel plans exascale computing by 2018, wants to make petaflops passé]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/20/intel-plans-exascale-computing-by-2018-wants-to-make-petaflops/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/20/intel-plans-exascale-computing-by-2018-wants-to-make-petaflops/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/20/intel-plans-exascale-computing-by-2018-wants-to-make-petaflops/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/20/intel-plans-exascale-computing-by-2018-wants-to-make-petaflops/"><img border="1" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/06/aubreyisledie.jpg" vspace="4" /></a></div>
Sure, Fujitsu has a right to be proud of its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/20/fujitsu-k-supercomputer-now-ranked-fastest-in-the-world-dethron/">K supercomputer</a> -- performing over 8 petaflops with just under 70,000 <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/15/fujitsus-supercomputer-ready-venus-cpu-said-to-be-worlds-fast/">Venus CPUs </a>is nothing to sneeze at. Intel isn't giving up its status as the supercomputing CPU king, however, as it plans to bring <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/24/exascale-computing-its-the-new-terascale/">exascale computing</a> to the world by the end of this decade. Such a machine could do one million trillion calculations per second, and Intel plans to make it happen with its Many Integrated Core Architecture (MIC). The first CPUs designed with MIC, codenamed Knights Corner, are built on a 22nm process that utilizes the company's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/04/intel-will-mass-produce-22nm-3d-transistors-for-all-future-cpus/">3D Tri-Gate transistors</a> and packs over 50 cores per chip. These CPUs are designed for parallel processing applications, similar to the NVIDIA GPUs that will be used in a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/11/darpa-enlists-nvidia-to-build-exascale-supercomputer-thats-100/">DARPA-funded supercomputer</a> we learned about last year. Here we thought the war between these two <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/10/intel-agrees-to-pay-nvidia-1-5b-in-patent-license-fees-signs-c/">was over</a> -- looks like a new one's just getting started. PR's after the break.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/20/intel-plans-exascale-computing-by-2018-wants-to-make-petaflops/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Intel plans exascale computing by 2018, wants to make petaflops passé</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/20/intel-plans-exascale-computing-by-2018-wants-to-make-petaflops/">Intel plans exascale computing by 2018, wants to make petaflops passé</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 20 Jun 2011 20:13:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/20/intel-plans-exascale-computing-by-2018-wants-to-make-petaflops/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19972040/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/20/intel-plans-exascale-computing-by-2018-wants-to-make-petaflops/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>22nm</category><category>3d transistor</category><category>3dTransistor</category><category>exaflop</category><category>exascale</category><category>intel</category><category>intel xeon</category><category>IntelXeon</category><category>knights corner</category><category>KnightsCorner</category><category>moores law</category><category>MooresLaw</category><category>nvidia</category><category>supercomputer</category><category>supercomputing</category><category>tri-gate</category><category>tri-gate transistors</category><category>Tri-gateTransistors</category><category>xeon</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Gorman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 20:13:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel rolls out 10-core, 20-threaded Xeon E7s, shows everyone who's boss]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/06/intel-rolls-out-10-core-20-threaded-xeon-e7s-shows-everyone-wh/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/06/intel-rolls-out-10-core-20-threaded-xeon-e7s-shows-everyone-wh/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/06/intel-rolls-out-10-core-20-threaded-xeon-e7s-shows-everyone-wh/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/06/intel-rolls-out-10-core-20-threaded-xeon-e7s-shows-everyone-wh/"><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/04/11x0406n82xdxeon07.jpg" /></a></div>
Someone deep down in Intel's development dungeons must be laughing a haughty laugh of disdain at us mere mortals getting excited about <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/02/qualcomms-1-5ghz-dual-core-msm8660-destroys-the-competition-in/">dual-cores in smartphones</a>. The old Chipzilla has just turned out its <em>10</em>-core Xeon E7 processor family, which can work on 20 simultaneous computational threads courtesy of the company's Hyper-Threading knowhow. Needless to say, there aren't that many casual workloads that will ever properly harness such extremely parallelized prowess, but then Intel isn't really gunning for the Facebook crowd here anyhow. The new E7s are for those dealing with truly data-intensive tasks, meaning that Facebook <em>itself</em> would be a good candidate to buy up a few, provided it's tempted by such things as 40 percent performance improvements over the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/amd-launches-12-core-opteron-server-chips-intel-counters-with-t/">Xeon 7500</a> tied to dynamic power adjustment for increased energy efficiency. Pricing for the Xeon E7s starts at $774 and climbs up to $4,616 per 32nm chip, with the usual proviso that Intel won't sell them in batches of less than 1,000. More details follow in the press release and video after the break.<br />
<br />
[Thanks, <a href="http://itechvision.blogspot.com/2011/04/intel-unveils-new-10-core-xeon.html">Khan</a>]<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/06/intel-rolls-out-10-core-20-threaded-xeon-e7s-shows-everyone-wh/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Intel rolls out 10-core, 20-threaded Xeon E7s, shows everyone who's boss</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/06/intel-rolls-out-10-core-20-threaded-xeon-e7s-shows-everyone-wh/">Intel rolls out 10-core, 20-threaded Xeon E7s, shows everyone who's boss</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 06 Apr 2011 09:03:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/06/intel-rolls-out-10-core-20-threaded-xeon-e7s-shows-everyone-wh/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19904539/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/06/intel-rolls-out-10-core-20-threaded-xeon-e7s-shows-everyone-wh/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>10-core</category><category>32nm</category><category>cpu</category><category>e7</category><category>enterprise</category><category>high-end</category><category>hyper-threading</category><category>hyperthreading</category><category>intel</category><category>intel xeon</category><category>IntelXeon</category><category>launch</category><category>mission critical</category><category>MissionCritical</category><category>official</category><category>performance</category><category>processor</category><category>release</category><category>server</category><category>video</category><category>xeon</category><category>xeon e7</category><category>XeonE7</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlad Savov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 09:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel learns from Dr. Dre, wants Atom chips in NFL helmets to know when heads are ringing]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/17/intel-learns-from-dr-dre-wants-atom-chips-in-nfl-helmets-to-kn/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/17/intel-learns-from-dr-dre-wants-atom-chips-in-nfl-helmets-to-kn/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/17/intel-learns-from-dr-dre-wants-atom-chips-in-nfl-helmets-to-kn/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/17/intel-learns-from-dr-dre-wants-atom-chips-in-nfl-helmets-to-kn/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/11/intel-helmet-rm-eng-1289943800.jpg" /></a></div>
We always understood that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/search/?q=intel&amp;sort=date">Intel</a> looked after the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/07/video-intel-we-are-rock-stars/">rock stars of tomorrow</a>, but who knew that included football players? Yup, according to <em>PC World</em>, Intel is currently investigating adding <a href="http://www.engadget.com/search/?q=atom+processor&amp;invocationType=wl-gadget">Atom chips</a> inside NFL helmets to provide real-time impact data to medical staff on the sidelines. While there's no explicit time frame set for this project, we're thinking the sooner the better -- lest we forget it took the league until 2009 to require players who display signs of a concussion to stop playing for at least one day. This isn't the first time though that the world's largest chip maker has actually helped make the gridiron safer. In fact, it previously worked with helmet maker Riddell's fittingly named <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/18/riddell-starts-shipping-concussion-monitoring-football-helmets/">HITS (Head Impact Telemetry System)</a> and academic researchers to run head injury simulations using linked Xeon-powered computers. Off the field, Intel is also currently partnering with the Mayo Clinic to boost medical cranial scans using MIC (Many Integrated Core) supercomputer co-processors. Codenamed Knights Corner, this hardware puts teacher's pets to shame by running trillions of calculations per second, and apparently accelerates head scans by up to 18 times. Sure, safety's all well and good, but we know Intel's really just curious about how Moore's Law holds up to the shoulder pressure of NFL d-backs.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/17/intel-learns-from-dr-dre-wants-atom-chips-in-nfl-helmets-to-kn/">Intel learns from Dr. Dre, wants Atom chips in NFL helmets to know when heads are ringing</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 17 Nov 2010 04:03:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/17/intel-learns-from-dr-dre-wants-atom-chips-in-nfl-helmets-to-kn/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19719922/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/17/intel-learns-from-dr-dre-wants-atom-chips-in-nfl-helmets-to-kn/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Atom</category><category>chips</category><category>chipset</category><category>chipsets</category><category>football</category><category>football helmet</category><category>football helmets</category><category>FootballHelmet</category><category>FootballHelmets</category><category>head impact telemetry system</category><category>HeadImpactTelemetrySystem</category><category>HITS</category><category>Intel</category><category>intel atom</category><category>Intel MIC</category><category>Intel Xeon</category><category>IntelAtom</category><category>IntelMic</category><category>IntelXeon</category><category>Many Integrated Cores</category><category>ManyIntegratedCores</category><category>MIC</category><category>procesor</category><category>research</category><category>riddell</category><category>Riddell HITS</category><category>RiddellHits</category><category>safetey research</category><category>SafeteyResearch</category><category>saftey</category><category>xeon</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Bowers]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 04:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Mac Pro Server quietly introduced as Xserve heads for the grave, starts at $3,000]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/05/mac-pro-server-quietly-introduced-as-xserve-heads-for-the-grave/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/05/mac-pro-server-quietly-introduced-as-xserve-heads-for-the-grave/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/05/mac-pro-server-quietly-introduced-as-xserve-heads-for-the-grave/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/05/mac-pro-server-quietly-introduced-as-xserve-heads-for-the-grave/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/11/mac--pro-server.png" /></a></div>
Sneaky Apple... real sneaky. Just as the company announced that it would be <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/05/apple-xserve-sales-end-january-31-support-will-continue-indefin/">axing its rack-mountable Xserve</a> come January 31st, in flies an all-new Mac Pro to effectively take its place. The <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/MacPro/">Mac Pro</a> Server -- which is slated to ship in "two to four weeks" -- has joined the fray this morning on Apple's website, with the workstation equipped with a single 2.8GHz quad-core Intel Xeon 'Nehalem' processor, 8GB (4 x 2GB) of DDR3 ECC SDRAM, a pair of 1TB (7200RPM) hard drives, one 18x SuperDrive, ATI's Radeon HD 5770 with 1GB of GDDR5 video memory, and a fresh copy of Mac OS X Server (the unlimited-client license version, for those wondering). Curiously enough, this marks the second time Apple has thrown a "server edition" into the mix, with the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/15/apple-updates-mac-mini/">Mac mini Server</a> popping up in June. As you'd expect, the $2,999 base price can be pushed far north by slapping in a pair of 2.93GHz six-core 'Westmere' chips (a modest $3,475 increase), 32GB of RAM (only an extra $3,400), a Mac Pro RAID card (pocket change at $700) and a quad-channel 4Gb fibre channel PCIe card (just an extra grand). But hey, financing is available! <br />
<br />
[Thanks, Adrian]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/05/mac-pro-server-quietly-introduced-as-xserve-heads-for-the-grave/">Mac Pro Server quietly introduced as Xserve heads for the grave, starts at $3,000</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 05 Nov 2010 09:54:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/05/mac-pro-server-quietly-introduced-as-xserve-heads-for-the-grave/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19704578/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/05/mac-pro-server-quietly-introduced-as-xserve-heads-for-the-grave/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>breaking news</category><category>BreakingNews</category><category>desktop</category><category>mac</category><category>mac pro</category><category>Mac Pro Server</category><category>MacPro</category><category>MacProServer</category><category>os x</category><category>OsX</category><category>server</category><category>tower</category><category>westmere</category><category>workstation</category><category>xeon</category><category>xserve</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2010 09:54:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Origin PC's Big O desktop: half gaming PC, half Xbox 360, all muscle]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/07/origin-pcs-big-o-desktop-half-gaming-pc-half-xbox-360-all-mu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/07/origin-pcs-big-o-desktop-half-gaming-pc-half-xbox-360-all-mu/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/07/origin-pcs-big-o-desktop-half-gaming-pc-half-xbox-360-all-mu/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/07/origin-pcs-big-o-desktop-half-gaming-pc-half-xbox-360-all-mu/"><img hspace="4" border="0" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/09/big-o-origin-pc-tall.jpg" /></a></div>
Oh, sure -- we've seen an <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/25/the-xbox-360-pc-ditches-gaming-for-windows-and-os-x/">Xbox 360 enclosure stuffed</a> with x86 innards, but we can't say we've ever seen anything quite like this. Gaming upstart <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/OriginPC/">Origin PC</a> has just shattered every preconceived notion about its potential with the Big O, an appropriately titled luxury machine that combines a liquid-cooled gaming PC with a liquid-cooled Xbox 360 Slim. <em>In one box</em>. A pair of base configurations are available (though customizations are limitless), with both of 'em rigged up to run the PC and Xbox concurrently. In other words, these bad boys can actually crunch <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/02/confused-school-district-fires-sysadmin-for-running-seti-as-an/">SETI@home</a> data while you explore the vastness of <i>Halo: Reach</i>. The $7,669 build includes an overclocked 4.0GHz Core i7-930 CPU, Rampage III Extreme mobo, twin NVIDIA GTX480 graphics cards, 6GB of Corsair memory, a 1,500 watt power support, 12x Pioneer Blu-ray burner, two 50GB OCZ SSDs wired up as a boot drive, Windows 7 Home Premium, a liquid-cooled Xbox 360 and bragging rights the size of <strike>Texas</strike> Alaska. For those still unsatisfied, there's a $16,999 version that's frankly too lust-worthy to spell out here (but is in the gallery below). Hit the source link if you're feeling ambitious, but don't blame us for blowing your kid's college fund in one fell swoop. <div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/origin-pcs-big-o-desktop-half-gaming-pc-half-xbox-360-all-muscle/">Origin PC's Big O desktop: half gaming PC, half Xbox 360, all muscle</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/origin-pcs-big-o-desktop-half-gaming-pc-half-xbox-360-all-muscle/#3337627"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/09/3sc-big-o003-exterior_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/origin-pcs-big-o-desktop-half-gaming-pc-half-xbox-360-all-muscle/#3337628"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/09/3sc-big-o010-interior_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/origin-pcs-big-o-desktop-half-gaming-pc-half-xbox-360-all-muscle/#3337629"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/09/big-o-spec-chart_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/origin-pcs-big-o-desktop-half-gaming-pc-half-xbox-360-all-muscle/#3337630"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/09/big-o003-exterior_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/origin-pcs-big-o-desktop-half-gaming-pc-half-xbox-360-all-muscle/#3337631"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/09/big-o010-interior_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/07/origin-pcs-big-o-desktop-half-gaming-pc-half-xbox-360-all-mu/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Origin PC's Big O desktop: half gaming PC, half Xbox 360, all muscle</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/07/origin-pcs-big-o-desktop-half-gaming-pc-half-xbox-360-all-mu/">Origin PC's Big O desktop: half gaming PC, half Xbox 360, all muscle</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 07 Sep 2010 10:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/07/origin-pcs-big-o-desktop-half-gaming-pc-half-xbox-360-all-mu/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19623511/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/07/origin-pcs-big-o-desktop-half-gaming-pc-half-xbox-360-all-mu/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>awesome</category><category>big o</category><category>BigO</category><category>console</category><category>desktop</category><category>expensive</category><category>game console</category><category>GameConsole</category><category>gaming</category><category>gaming pc</category><category>gaming rig</category><category>GamingPc</category><category>GamingRig</category><category>GeForce</category><category>liquid cooled</category><category>liquid cooling</category><category>LiquidCooled</category><category>LiquidCooling</category><category>luxury</category><category>microsoft</category><category>nvidia</category><category>origin pc</category><category>OriginPc</category><category>pc</category><category>wild</category><category>Xbox 360</category><category>Xbox 360 slim</category><category>Xbox360</category><category>Xbox360Slim</category><category>xeon</category><category>Xeon X5680</category><category>XeonX5680</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 10:31:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Eurocom serves up GTX 480M SLI and HD 5870 CrossFireX options, seasons with Core i7-980X]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/17/eurocom-serves-up-gtx-480m-sli-and-hd-5870-crossfirex-options-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/17/eurocom-serves-up-gtx-480m-sli-and-hd-5870-crossfirex-options-s/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/17/eurocom-serves-up-gtx-480m-sli-and-hd-5870-crossfirex-options-s/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/17/eurocom-serves-up-gtx-480m-sli-and-hd-5870-crossfirex-options-s/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/08/10x0817ihb235rewfdx.jpg" /></a></div>
It boggles the mind to think that one <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/02/nvidia-gtx-480m-will-bring-fermi-to-laptops-this-june-crazy-pow/">Fermi GPU</a> could be fit inside a laptop, but <em>two</em>? Eurocom has just outed its 17.3-inch Panther 2.0 mobile gaming station -- which looks like a straight rebadge of the Clevo X7200 -- with the most overpowered set of component choices we've yet seen. You can go SLI with the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/17/nvidia-geforce-gtx-480m-reviewed-fastest-mobile-gpu-to-date/">GTX 480M</a> or NVIDIA's more professionally minded <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/28/hp-crams-fermi-based-quadro-5000m-gpu-inside-17-inch-elitebook/">Quadro 5000M</a>, crank up CPU speed to 3.33GHz and beyond with the Core i7-980X from Intel (yes, the desktop variant), stash up to 24GB of onboard RAM, and jack in up to four storage drives, our preference being for the 2TB of SSD goodness option. Of course, if you prefer ATI's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/all/radeon">Evergreen</a> side of the fence, dual Mobility Radeon HD 5870 GPUs are on tap as well. Sadly, we've no idea how much these spectacular specs will set you back, but launch is set for later this month and you can always call up and get yourself a quote; we're guessing it'll be in five figures.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/17/eurocom-serves-up-gtx-480m-sli-and-hd-5870-crossfirex-options-s/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Eurocom serves up GTX 480M SLI and HD 5870 CrossFireX options, seasons with Core i7-980X</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/17/eurocom-serves-up-gtx-480m-sli-and-hd-5870-crossfirex-options-s/">Eurocom serves up GTX 480M SLI and HD 5870 CrossFireX options, seasons with Core i7-980X</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 17 Aug 2010 09:06:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/17/eurocom-serves-up-gtx-480m-sli-and-hd-5870-crossfirex-options-s/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19596346/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/17/eurocom-serves-up-gtx-480m-sli-and-hd-5870-crossfirex-options-s/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>5000m</category><category>ati</category><category>clevo</category><category>clevo x7200</category><category>ClevoX7200</category><category>Core i7-980X</category><category>CoreI7-980x</category><category>crossfire</category><category>crossfirex</category><category>directx 11</category><category>Directx11</category><category>dual gpu</category><category>DualGpu</category><category>dx 11</category><category>Dx11</category><category>eurocom</category><category>eurocom panther</category><category>EurocomPanther</category><category>evergreen</category><category>fermi</category><category>gaming laptop</category><category>GamingLaptop</category><category>gpu</category><category>graphics</category><category>gtx 480m</category><category>Gtx480m</category><category>hd 5870</category><category>Hd5870</category><category>laptop</category><category>mobile gaming</category><category>mobile gpu</category><category>MobileGaming</category><category>MobileGpu</category><category>nvidia</category><category>overpowered</category><category>panther</category><category>powerful</category><category>quadro</category><category>quadro 5000m</category><category>Quadro5000m</category><category>radeon</category><category>radeon mobility</category><category>RadeonMobility</category><category>retail</category><category>sli</category><category>workstation</category><category>xeon</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlad Savov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 09:06:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[12-core Apple Mac Pro orders are go]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/09/mac-pro-orders-are-go/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/09/mac-pro-orders-are-go/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/09/mac-pro-orders-are-go/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/09/mac-pro-orders-are-go/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/08/12-core-mac-pro-hero.jpg" /></a></div>
After a brief outage the Apple Store is back with the previously announced <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/27/apple-mac-pro-line-overhauled-with-new-design-and-12-core-proces/">12-core Mac Pro</a> (and revamped quad- and 6-core models) ready to order. Prices start at $4,999 for a pair of 6-core Xeon Westmere processors humming along at 2.66GHz, 6GB of memory, a 1TB hard drive, SuperDrive, and ATI <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/13/ati-radeon-hd-5770-and-5750-steal-away-reviewers-hearts/">Radeon HD 5770</a> graphics. We configured ours with a pair of 2.93GHz CPUs, 2x HD 5770 graphics cards, 32GB of memory, 4x 512GB SSDs, and pair of optical drives for $16,249 just 'cause we could. Ships in 7 to 10 business days... bankruptcy in 365. <br />
<br />
[Thanks, Nathan]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/09/mac-pro-orders-are-go/">12-core Apple Mac Pro orders are go</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 09 Aug 2010 04:51:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/09/mac-pro-orders-are-go/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19585789/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/09/mac-pro-orders-are-go/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>12-core</category><category>5770</category><category>6-core</category><category>apple</category><category>hd 5770</category><category>hd 5870</category><category>Hd5770</category><category>Hd5870</category><category>mac pro</category><category>MacPro</category><category>order</category><category>quad-core</category><category>Radeon HD 5770</category><category>RadeonHd5770</category><category>retail</category><category>Westmere</category><category>xeon</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Ricker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 04:51:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[EVGA's dual-CPU Classified SR-2 motherboard put to the test: worth the money if you know what you're doing]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/05/evgas-dual-cpu-classified-sr-2-motherboard-put-to-the-test-wor/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/05/evgas-dual-cpu-classified-sr-2-motherboard-put-to-the-test-wor/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/05/evgas-dual-cpu-classified-sr-2-motherboard-put-to-the-test-wor/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/05/evgas-dual-cpu-classified-sr-2-motherboard-put-to-the-test-wor/"><img hspace="4" border="0" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/08/10x0805oiub1h4evga.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
You know things are changing when cooling units that could once stave off overheating on top-tier graphics cards are starting to show up <em>on motherboards</em>. EVGA's Classified SR-2 is a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/17/evga-classified-sr-2-fits-two-980x-cpus-for-24-threads-exemplif/">supersized</a>, dual-socket desktop building block that tries to do it all, and -- unusually for dual-CPU logic boards -- it's targeted at enthusiasts rather than buttoned-down business types. Four PCI-Express x16 slots, room for a dozen memory sticks (up to 48GB of RAM), and two USB 3.0 ports add some spec sheet glamor, but you'll likely be wanting to know how much performance you can wring out of two 3.33GHz Intel Xeon 5680 chips working in tandem. The short answer is a lot. The long answer is, of course, that you'll need to apply those 24 threads of power to applications that can really utilize them, such as the predictable video processing and 3D rendering. That's where the multithreaded, multicore, multiprocessor rig really shone in this review, and the EVGA board underpinning it also acquitted itself with distinction. Hit the source for the benchmark results and more photography of exposed circuitry.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/05/evgas-dual-cpu-classified-sr-2-motherboard-put-to-the-test-wor/">EVGA's dual-CPU Classified SR-2 motherboard put to the test: worth the money if you know what you're doing</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 05 Aug 2010 10:06:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/05/evgas-dual-cpu-classified-sr-2-motherboard-put-to-the-test-wor/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19581838/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/05/evgas-dual-cpu-classified-sr-2-motherboard-put-to-the-test-wor/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>classified</category><category>dream machine</category><category>DreamMachine</category><category>dual cpu</category><category>dual processor</category><category>dual socket</category><category>dual-socket</category><category>DualCpu</category><category>DualProcessor</category><category>DualSocket</category><category>evga</category><category>evga classified</category><category>EVGA Classified SR-2</category><category>EvgaClassified</category><category>EvgaClassifiedSr-2</category><category>intel xeon</category><category>IntelXeon</category><category>powerhouse</category><category>review</category><category>rig</category><category>sr-2</category><category>triple-channel</category><category>usb 3</category><category>usb 3.0</category><category>Usb3</category><category>Usb3.0</category><category>xeon</category><category>xeon 5680</category><category>Xeon5680</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlad Savov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 10:06:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple Mac Pro line overhauled with 12 processing cores, arriving in August for $4,999]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/27/apple-mac-pro-line-overhauled-with-new-design-and-12-core-proces/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/27/apple-mac-pro-line-overhauled-with-new-design-and-12-core-proces/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/27/apple-mac-pro-line-overhauled-with-new-design-and-12-core-proces/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/27/apple-mac-pro-line-overhauled-with-new-design-and-12-core-proces/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/07/10x0727oin234twedegvd.jpg" /></a></div>
So shall it be <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/26/apple-launching-new-mac-pros-speedbumped-imac-new-cinema-displ/">written</a>, so shall it be done. The Mac Pro has at long last proven <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/apple-said-to-be-preparing-12-core-mac-pros-and-27-inch-led-cine/">rumors</a> of its impending refresh accurate, as Apple has just updated its most powerful hardware with even more grunt. As we'd heard previously, that means you can now get dual-CPU rigs that offer a full dozen cores to play with, courtesy of Intel's Xeon server-class chips, though in order to get in on that game you'll have to splash a cool $4,999 entry fee. The quad-core starting price is still $2,499, though the eight-core machines have jumped up to $3,499, with both variants getting mild speed bumps to 2.8GHz and 2.4GHz, respectively. <br />
<br />
Perhaps the most welcome upgrade is on the graphical front, where the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/13/ati-radeon-hd-5770-and-5750-steal-away-reviewers-hearts/">Radeon HD 5770</a> takes up the mantle of default GPU, with additional options for a pair of such cards or a step up to a 1GB HD 5870 alternative if you're keen on maxing out those frame rates. Memory isn't neglected either, with choices ranging all the way up to 32GB of RAM, 4TB of conventional HDD storage, or an array of <em>four </em>512GB SSDs -- though you're probably better off not asking how much that last one will set you back. The comprehensive specs can be found in the full press release after the break.<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/apple-mac-pro-august-2010/">Apple Mac Pro - August 2010</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/apple-mac-pro-august-2010/#3208826"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/07/macprog2010-07-27-1_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/apple-mac-pro-august-2010/#3208827"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/07/macprog2010-07-27_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/apple-mac-pro-august-2010/#3208824"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/07/macprog2010-07-27-3_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/apple-mac-pro-august-2010/#3208825"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/07/macprog2010-07-27-2_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/apple-mac-pro-august-2010/#3208836"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/07/macprog2010-07-27-6_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/27/apple-mac-pro-line-overhauled-with-new-design-and-12-core-proces/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Apple Mac Pro line overhauled with 12 processing cores, arriving in August for $4,999</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/27/apple-mac-pro-line-overhauled-with-new-design-and-12-core-proces/">Apple Mac Pro line overhauled with 12 processing cores, arriving in August for $4,999</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 27 Jul 2010 08:34:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/27/apple-mac-pro-line-overhauled-with-new-design-and-12-core-proces/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19569731/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/27/apple-mac-pro-line-overhauled-with-new-design-and-12-core-proces/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>12-core</category><category>2010</category><category>6-core</category><category>apple</category><category>apple mac pro</category><category>AppleMacPro</category><category>ati</category><category>breaking news</category><category>BreakingNews</category><category>computer</category><category>crossfire</category><category>desktop</category><category>hd 5770</category><category>Hd5770</category><category>hexacore</category><category>intel</category><category>intel xeon</category><category>IntelXeon</category><category>mac</category><category>mac pro</category><category>MacPro</category><category>pc</category><category>professional</category><category>radeon</category><category>radeon hd 5770</category><category>RadeonHd5770</category><category>refresh</category><category>six-core</category><category>tower</category><category>update</category><category>upgrade</category><category>workstation</category><category>xeon</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlad Savov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 08:34:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Tokyo Institute of Technology announces SSD-packing, 2.39 petaflop supercomputer]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/tokyo-institute-of-technology-announces-ssd-packing-2-39-petafl/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/tokyo-institute-of-technology-announces-ssd-packing-2-39-petafl/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/tokyo-institute-of-technology-announces-ssd-packing-2-39-petafl/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/tokyo-institute-of-technology-announces-ssd-packing-2-39-petafl/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/06/100623-tsubame2-01.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">IBM has announced plans to start using <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/sandforce-makes-ssds-cheaper-faster-more-reliable-just-how/">SandForce SSDs</a> in its enterprise machines, and now it looks like the Tokyo Institute of Technology is doing one better, working with NEC and HP to produce Tsubame 2.0. This next-gen supercomputer will reportedly operate at 2.39 petaflops (that's a lot of flops!) and uses a new multilevel storage architecture consisting of DRAM as well as SSDs. Not only will this bad boy have thirty times the computing capacity of Tsubame 1.0 (due in part to its some 2,816 Intel <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Westmere/">Westmere</a> microprocessors and 4,224 NVIDIA Tesla M2050 GPUs), its power draw should be some 1/25th of its predecessor's. If all goes according to plan, it should be in operation this fall, at a cost of &yen;3.2 billion (approx $35.5 million).<br />
<br />
[Thanks, Dylan]</div><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/tokyo-institute-of-technology-announces-ssd-packing-2-39-petafl/">Tokyo Institute of Technology announces SSD-packing, 2.39 petaflop supercomputer</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 23 Jun 2010 14:06:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/tokyo-institute-of-technology-announces-ssd-packing-2-39-petafl/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19528017/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/tokyo-institute-of-technology-announces-ssd-packing-2-39-petafl/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>flash memory</category><category>FlashMemory</category><category>hp</category><category>intel</category><category>japan</category><category>nec</category><category>nvidia</category><category>petaflop</category><category>ssd</category><category>SuperComputer</category><category>tesla</category><category>Tesla M2050</category><category>TeslaM2050</category><category>Tokyo Institute of Technology</category><category>TokyoInstituteOfTechnology</category><category>Tsubame 1.0</category><category>Tsubame 2.0</category><category>Tsubame1.0</category><category>Tsubame2.0</category><category>westmere</category><category>xeon</category><category>Xeon 5600</category><category>Xeon5600</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph L. Flatley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 14:06:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel plans to stuff more than 8 cores, extra speed into 2011 server chips]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/07/intel-plans-to-stuff-more-than-8-cores-extra-speed-into-2011-se/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/07/intel-plans-to-stuff-more-than-8-cores-extra-speed-into-2011-se/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/07/intel-plans-to-stuff-more-than-8-cores-extra-speed-into-2011-se/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.macworld.com/article/151104/2010/05/westmereex.html?lsrc=rss_main"><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/05/10x0507m3ubweintel.jpg" /></a></div>
Yeah yeah, "more cores and faster speeds," you've heard it all before right? That'd be our reaction too if we weren't talking about the successor to the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/intel-readies-8-core-nehalem-ex-processors-for-a-march-launch/">Nehalem-Ex</a>, Intel's most gruesomely overpowered chip to date. Launched under the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/amd-launches-12-core-opteron-server-chips-intel-counters-with-t/">Xeon 7500</a> branding in March, it represents Intel's single biggest generational leap so far, and with its eight cores, sixteen threads, and 24MB of shared onboard cache, you could probably see why. Time waits for no CPU though, and Intel's planned <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/14/intel-begins-production-of-32nm-westmere-processors/">32nm</a> Westmere-Ex successor will move things forward with an unspecified increase in both core count (speculated to be jumping up to 12) and operating frequencies, while keeping within the same power envelope. Given the current 2.26GHz default speed and 2.66GHz <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/turbo+boost">Turbo Boost</a> option of the 7500, that means we're probably looking at a 2.4GHz to 2.5GHz <em>12-core</em>, hyper-threaded processor, scheduled to land at some point next year. Time to make some apps that can use all that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/nvidia-vp-says-moores-law-is-dead/">parallel processing</a> power, nay?<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/07/intel-plans-to-stuff-more-than-8-cores-extra-speed-into-2011-se/">Intel plans to stuff more than 8 cores, extra speed into 2011 server chips</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 07 May 2010 07:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/07/intel-plans-to-stuff-more-than-8-cores-extra-speed-into-2011-se/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19468433/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/07/intel-plans-to-stuff-more-than-8-cores-extra-speed-into-2011-se/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>32nm</category><category>cpu</category><category>eight-core</category><category>intel</category><category>intel xeon</category><category>IntelXeon</category><category>multicore</category><category>nehalem</category><category>nehalem-ex</category><category>parallel processing</category><category>ParallelProcessing</category><category>plans</category><category>processor</category><category>professional</category><category>roadmap</category><category>servers</category><category>superfast</category><category>westmere</category><category>westmere-ex</category><category>workstations</category><category>xeon</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlad Savov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 07:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[AMD launches 12-core Opteron server chips, Intel counters with the 8-core Xeon 7500]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/amd-launches-12-core-opteron-server-chips-intel-counters-with-t/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/amd-launches-12-core-opteron-server-chips-intel-counters-with-t/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/amd-launches-12-core-opteron-server-chips-intel-counters-with-t/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.intel.com/pressroom/archive/releases/2010/20100330comp_sm.htm#story"><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/03/3-30-10-xeon7500wafer.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
You thought <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/six-core/">six cores</a> were nifty? This week, AMD and Intel have begun the multithreaded battle in earnest -- if only on the IT front -- with chips that have up to double that core density. First up, AMD has officially brought us that Opteron 6000 series <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/amd-12-core-opterons-leaked-ahead-of-launch/">leaked last week</a>, a set of 8- and 12-core processors aimed at dual- and quad-CPU servers that it claims have both higher performance and lower cost than Intel's recent hex-core offerings. Not to be outdone, Intel has just introduced a 8-core processor series of its own, the Xeon 7500, that it envisions deployed in mammoth 256-processor configurations. In bulk orders of 1,000, a single 12-core Opteron costs nearly $1,200, while the cheapest single 8-core Xeon will set you back a cool $2,461 in the same quantity. We don't doubt they're powerful, and we'd kill for a pair of either in our gaming rig. At those prices though, we'll stick to building our supercomputer <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/25/us-air-force-orders-up-2-200-more-ps3s-says-they-help-it-think/">out of PS3s</a> -- <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/28/older-ps3s-losing-install-other-os-option-in-thursdays-firmwa/">oh, wait</a>.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/amd-launches-12-core-opteron-server-chips-intel-counters-with-t/">AMD launches 12-core Opteron server chips, Intel counters with the 8-core Xeon 7500</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 30 Mar 2010 23:03:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/amd-launches-12-core-opteron-server-chips-intel-counters-with-t/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19420564/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/30/amd-launches-12-core-opteron-server-chips-intel-counters-with-t/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>12-core</category><category>6-core</category><category>8-core</category><category>amd</category><category>AMD Opteron</category><category>AmdOpteron</category><category>bulk</category><category>core</category><category>hex-core</category><category>intel</category><category>Intel Xeon</category><category>IntelXeon</category><category>Multithreaded</category><category>Opteron</category><category>Opteron 6100</category><category>Opteron6100</category><category>server</category><category>servers</category><category>supercomputer</category><category>Xeon</category><category>Xeon 7500</category><category>Xeon7500</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Hollister]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 23:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple said to be preparing 12-core Mac Pros and 27-inch LED Cinema Displays]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/apple-said-to-be-preparing-12-core-mac-pros-and-27-inch-led-cine/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/apple-said-to-be-preparing-12-core-mac-pros-and-27-inch-led-cine/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/apple-said-to-be-preparing-12-core-mac-pros-and-27-inch-led-cine/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/10/03/18/apple_preps_27_inch_led_cinema_display_dodeca_core_mac_pro.html"><img hspace="4" border="0" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/03/19mar10ou2bt4.jpg" alt="" /></a><em>AppleInsider</em> has rounded up its stable of "people familiar with the matter" and squeezed them for info on Cupertino's plans for the near term. Firstly, they've heard that a 27-inch version of the currently available <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/15/apples-24-inch-led-cinema-display-review/">24-inch LED Cinema Display</a> is on its way, sporting a 2,560 x 1,440 resolution and targeted for release "by June." The more exciting tip from those in the know, however, relates to the well aged Mac Pro and its future upgrade path. Apple has apparently firmed up plans to offer 6- and 12-core options (to replace the current 4- and 8-core variants), though the star of the show internally is said to be Intel's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/17/evga-classified-sr-2-fits-two-980x-cpus-for-24-threads-exemplif/">Xeon 5600</a>, rather than the similarly specced <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/intels-core-i7-980x-extreme-edition-gulftown-review-roundup/">Core i7-980X</a> that had been rumored. This seems to be motivated by the fact the i7 beast can't do dual-CPU configurations, which are necessary to offer a dozen cores. Pricing for the single Xeon CPU model is expected to be close to the current $2,499 starting sticker, but  release dates still elude us.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/apple-said-to-be-preparing-12-core-mac-pros-and-27-inch-led-cine/">Apple said to be preparing 12-core Mac Pros and 27-inch LED Cinema Displays</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 19 Mar 2010 07:32:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/apple-said-to-be-preparing-12-core-mac-pros-and-27-inch-led-cine/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19406260/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/apple-said-to-be-preparing-12-core-mac-pros-and-27-inch-led-cine/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>12-core</category><category>6-core</category><category>apple</category><category>apple mac pro</category><category>AppleMacPro</category><category>cinema display</category><category>CinemaDisplay</category><category>gulftown</category><category>intel</category><category>intel gulftown</category><category>intel xeon</category><category>intel xeon 5600</category><category>IntelGulftown</category><category>IntelXeon</category><category>IntelXeon5600</category><category>led cinema display</category><category>LedCinemaDisplay</category><category>mac pro</category><category>MacPro</category><category>multicore</category><category>workstation</category><category>xeon</category><category>xeon 5600</category><category>Xeon5600</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlad Savov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 07:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[EVGA Classified SR-2 fits two Xeon CPUs for 24 threads, exemplifies overkill]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/17/evga-classified-sr-2-fits-two-980x-cpus-for-24-threads-exemplif/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/17/evga-classified-sr-2-fits-two-980x-cpus-for-24-threads-exemplif/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/17/evga-classified-sr-2-fits-two-980x-cpus-for-24-threads-exemplif/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.evga.com/articles/00537/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/03/3-17-10-classifiedsr2-600.jpg" /></a></div>
Remember EVGA's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/evgas-w555-motherboard-gets-a-once-over-can-hold-seven-gpus/">seven-GPU motherboard monstrosity</a>, the W555? That experimental beast of a board just got declassified -- and given immediate launch orders. Under the new "Classified SR-2" callsign, the board's layout has hardly changed since CES (though the heatsinks certainly got a makeover) but the big news here is that each of its two CPU sockets will support those fancy new six-core Xeon processors. As you're well aware, two times six is twelve -- and since each of the Xeon 5600's cores can handle 2 threads, you're looking at the basis for a 24-threaded powerhouse for mondo multitasking performance. Factor in enough slots for 4-way <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/SLI/">SLI</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/CrossFireX/">CrossFireX</a> and 48GB of RAM, and it's not hard to figure out why the red-and-black HPTX (15- x 13.6-inches!) creation commands a $600 price point. The only questions are how much a full system will deplete your wallet, and how many fuses your house will blow after pressing the power button.<br />
<br />
<strong>Correction</strong>: Just a note that Intel's Core i7-980X <em>isn't</em> supported here, but the new Xeon 5600 CPUs are.<br />
<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/evga-classified-sr-2/">EVGA Classified SR-2</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/evga-classified-sr-2/#2809659"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/03/3-17-10-classifiedsr2-800-2_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/evga-classified-sr-2/#2809658"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/03/3-17-10-classifiedsr2-800-1_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/evga-classified-sr-2/#2809660"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/03/3-17-10-classifiedsr2-800-3_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/evga-classified-sr-2/#2809661"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/03/3-17-10-classifiedsr2-800-4_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/evga-classified-sr-2/#2809662"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/03/3-17-10-classifiedsr2-800-5_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/17/evga-classified-sr-2-fits-two-980x-cpus-for-24-threads-exemplif/">EVGA Classified SR-2 fits two Xeon CPUs for 24 threads, exemplifies overkill</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 17 Mar 2010 16:33:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/17/evga-classified-sr-2-fits-two-980x-cpus-for-24-threads-exemplif/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19403909/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/17/evga-classified-sr-2-fits-two-980x-cpus-for-24-threads-exemplif/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>980X</category><category>Classified SR-2</category><category>Classified SR2</category><category>ClassifiedSr-2</category><category>ClassifiedSr2</category><category>Core i7-980X</category><category>Core i7-980X extreme edition</category><category>CoreI7-980x</category><category>CoreI7-980xExtremeEdition</category><category>EVGA</category><category>EVGA Classified</category><category>EVGA Classified SR-2</category><category>EVGA Classified SR2</category><category>EVGA W555</category><category>EvgaClassified</category><category>EvgaClassifiedSr-2</category><category>EvgaClassifiedSr2</category><category>EvgaW555</category><category>Gulftown</category><category>HPTX</category><category>mainboard</category><category>motherboard</category><category>six-core</category><category>xeon</category><category>Xeon 5600</category><category>Xeon5600</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Hollister]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 16:33:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel readies 8-core Nehalem-Ex processors for a March launch]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/intel-readies-8-core-nehalem-ex-processors-for-a-march-launch/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/intel-readies-8-core-nehalem-ex-processors-for-a-march-launch/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/intel-readies-8-core-nehalem-ex-processors-for-a-march-launch/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://hothardware.com/News/Buckle-Up-Intel-Preps-8Core-NehalemEX-Chips-for-March-Launch/"><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/03/8mar10nehaleobu23t.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
Intel's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/30/intels-xeon-3500-5500-series-officially-unveiled-for-servers-a/">current generation</a> of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/xeon">Xeon</a> processors already represents some of the fastest silicon you can buy, and yet the company's forthcoming <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/27/intels-new-nehalem-ex-cpus-rock-servers-with-eight-cores-16-th/">Nehalem-Ex</a>-based Xeons are being touted as the single greatest generational jump in its history. To achieve that, Intel has strapped <em>eight</em> cores into each CPU, with a pair of threads per core and 24MB of shared cache, along with integrated quad-channel memory controllers, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/turboboost">Turbo Boost</a>, and the pretty awesome ability to scale up to eight sockets -- meaning you could have 64 processing cores in the same rig. Don't even ask whether these chips can run <em>Crysis 2</em>, they'll probably be showing up in the machines that are <em>making</em> the game... and maybe yours, provided you have the cash to splash later this month.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/intel-readies-8-core-nehalem-ex-processors-for-a-march-launch/">Intel readies 8-core Nehalem-Ex processors for a March launch</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 08 Mar 2010 15:51:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/intel-readies-8-core-nehalem-ex-processors-for-a-march-launch/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19388364/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/08/intel-readies-8-core-nehalem-ex-processors-for-a-march-launch/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>8-core</category><category>business</category><category>high end</category><category>HighEnd</category><category>hyperthreading</category><category>intel</category><category>intel xeon</category><category>IntelXeon</category><category>nehalem</category><category>nehalem-ex</category><category>professional</category><category>quad-channel</category><category>servers</category><category>turbo boost</category><category>TurboBoost</category><category>workstation</category><category>workstations</category><category>xeon</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlad Savov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 15:51:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Lenovo unleashes cut-rate ThinkStation E20 workstation on an unsuspecting public]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/09/lenovo-unleashes-cut-rate-thinkstation-e20-workstation-on-an-uns/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/09/lenovo-unleashes-cut-rate-thinkstation-e20-workstation-on-an-uns/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/09/lenovo-unleashes-cut-rate-thinkstation-e20-workstation-on-an-uns/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/09/lenovo-unleashes-cut-rate-thinkstation-e20-workstation-on-an-uns/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/02/100209-lenovoe20-01.jpg" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">Kids, are you a corporate buyer of CAD and DCC (digital content creation, duh!) systems looking to save a few pennies in a difficult economic environment? Well, you're in luck: we've dug up yet another <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/06/lenovos-new-thinkstations-look-pretty-sharp/">demure, innocuous Lenovo</a> with an oversized novelty handle for you, the ThinkStation E20. Shipping with your choice of an Intel Core i3, i5, Pentium, or Xeon 3400 Series processor and either Intel Core HD or NVIDIA Quadro graphics, this guy supports DDR3 memory and carries certifications from Autodesk, Siemens, Dassault Systemes, among others. If that weren't enough, the company is really pushing the green thing, with more than half of the plastic here coming from post-consumer recycled materials. Available sometime mid-month at prices starting at $599, so start save those pennies! You didn't really want that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/24/lenovo-thinkstation-s20-d20-sport-new-xeon-cpus-tesla-c1060-g/">Tesla GPU</a> anyways, did you? PR after the break.</div><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/09/lenovo-unleashes-cut-rate-thinkstation-e20-workstation-on-an-uns/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Lenovo unleashes cut-rate ThinkStation E20 workstation on an unsuspecting public</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/09/lenovo-unleashes-cut-rate-thinkstation-e20-workstation-on-an-uns/">Lenovo unleashes cut-rate ThinkStation E20 workstation on an unsuspecting public</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 09 Feb 2010 16:36:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/09/lenovo-unleashes-cut-rate-thinkstation-e20-workstation-on-an-uns/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19350768/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/09/lenovo-unleashes-cut-rate-thinkstation-e20-workstation-on-an-uns/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>core i3</category><category>core i5</category><category>CoreI3</category><category>CoreI5</category><category>E20</category><category>intel</category><category>Lenovo</category><category>Lenovo ThinkStation E20</category><category>LenovoThinkstationE20</category><category>NVIDIA Quadro</category><category>NvidiaQuadro</category><category>pentium</category><category>ThinkStation</category><category>ThinkStation E20</category><category>ThinkstationE20</category><category>xeon</category><category>xeon 3400</category><category>Xeon3400</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph L. Flatley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 16:36:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[EVGA's W555 motherboard gets a once over, can hold seven GPUs]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/evgas-w555-motherboard-gets-a-once-over-can-hold-seven-gpus/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/evgas-w555-motherboard-gets-a-once-over-can-hold-seven-gpus/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/evgas-w555-motherboard-gets-a-once-over-can-hold-seven-gpus/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/motherboards/2010/01/27/evga-w555-dual-xeon-motherboard/1"><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/01/evga-w555.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
Think <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/CrossFireX/">CrossFireX</a> is nifty? We're betting you're a big fan of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/SLI/">SLI</a>, huh? For those who grew up bragging about their "dual Voodoo" setup, there's nothing in the world that can stop you from lusting over this bad boy. Quietly introduced at CES, the EVGA W555 is just now being shown to the world in proper (prototype) form, and aside from being crafted to hold two overclocked processors and a dozen DDR3 DIMM slots, there's also space for <i>seven</i> PCI expansion slots. In other words, you could theoretically run seven GPUs in this thing. Of course, you'd need some serious software hacking skills to drive all that horsepower into a single display, but we get the feeling you like challenges, anyway. Hit the source link for more of the madness, but don't expect any units to hit retail until later in the year.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/evgas-w555-motherboard-gets-a-once-over-can-hold-seven-gpus/">EVGA's W555 motherboard gets a once over, can hold seven GPUs</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 28 Jan 2010 08:39:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/evgas-w555-motherboard-gets-a-once-over-can-hold-seven-gpus/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19333867/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/28/evgas-w555-motherboard-gets-a-once-over-can-hold-seven-gpus/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>EVGA</category><category>EVGA W555</category><category>EvgaW555</category><category>gpu</category><category>mainboard</category><category>mobo</category><category>motherboard</category><category>W555</category><category>xeon</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 08:39:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Gulftown processor dubbed Core i7-980X, making its debut Q1 2010?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/gulftown-processor-dubbed-core-i7-980x-making-its-debut-q1-2010/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/gulftown-processor-dubbed-core-i7-980x-making-its-debut-q1-2010/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/gulftown-processor-dubbed-core-i7-980x-making-its-debut-q1-2010/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/12/091215-corei7-980x-01.jpg" alt="" /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">If you didn't make it to eBay in time to put down $1,200 or so for your very own <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/leaked-intel-core-i9-chip-makes-its-way-to-ebay/">pre-release Gulftown chip</a>, cheer up! The countdown to the six core wonder continues apace, with more news each passing day. According to a purportedly leaked slide that popped up on China's <em>PC Online</em>, the 32nm chip will be known as the Core i7-980X and not the Core i9, as previously rumored. Part of the i7 "Extreme Edition" series (<em>so extreme!</em>). If everything goes as leaked, the 3.33GHz processor could be included in new Mac Pro systems come early 2010 -- which more or less jibes with rumors that the processor will be available sometime in March. See the new product name appear on the roadmap after the break.</div><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/gulftown-processor-dubbed-core-i7-980x-making-its-debut-q1-2010/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Gulftown processor dubbed Core i7-980X, making its debut Q1 2010?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/gulftown-processor-dubbed-core-i7-980x-making-its-debut-q1-2010/">Gulftown processor dubbed Core i7-980X, making its debut Q1 2010?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 15 Dec 2009 17:13:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/gulftown-processor-dubbed-core-i7-980x-making-its-debut-q1-2010/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19282369/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/gulftown-processor-dubbed-core-i7-980x-making-its-debut-q1-2010/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2.4 ghz</category><category>2.4Ghz</category><category>3.3 GHz</category><category>3.3Ghz</category><category>6 core</category><category>6-core</category><category>6core</category><category>chip</category><category>core</category><category>Core i7-980X</category><category>core i9</category><category>CoreI7-980x</category><category>CoreI9</category><category>cpu</category><category>gulftown</category><category>i9</category><category>intel</category><category>intel core i9</category><category>Intel Extreme</category><category>IntelCoreI9</category><category>IntelExtreme</category><category>leak</category><category>leaks</category><category>lga 1366</category><category>Lga1366</category><category>processor</category><category>six core</category><category>six-core</category><category>SixCore</category><category>taiwan</category><category>westmere</category><category>westmere gulftown</category><category>WestmereGulftown</category><category>xeon</category><category>xeon westmere</category><category>xeon westmere gulftown</category><category>XeonWestmere</category><category>XeonWestmereGulftown</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph L. Flatley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 17:13:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple adds 3.33GHz Xeon, 2TB hard drive options to Mac Pro]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/04/apple-adds-3-33ghz-xeon-2tb-hard-drive-options-to-mac-pro/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/04/apple-adds-3-33ghz-xeon-2tb-hard-drive-options-to-mac-pro/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/04/apple-adds-3-33ghz-xeon-2tb-hard-drive-options-to-mac-pro/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://store.apple.com/us_smb_78313/configure/MB871LL/A?mco=MTM3NDc3ODQ"><img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="0" align="left" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/12/mac-pro-upgrade-12-04-09.jpg" alt="" /></a>We know it can be tough scraping by with a measly 2.93GHz Xeon processor and 1TB hard drives in your <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/macpro">Mac Pro</a>, so you'll no doubt be pleased to know that Apple has finally seen fit to add a bit of extra horsepower to its humble little desktop. That includes a new option for a speedy 3.33GHz Xeon processor, which will add a hefty $1,200 to the base price, and a new <span id="intelliTxt" name="intelliTxt">a 2TB SATA 3Gb/s 7,200rpm hard drive option (also now available on Apple's Xserve server), which is a comparative bargain at just $350 -- though you can, of course, add four of them. Unfortunately, anyone </span><span id="intelliTxt" name="intelliTxt">that's thinking about doubling up on those 3.33GHz Xeon processors is still out of luck, as the 8-core rigs still top out at <em>just</em> 2.93Ghz. <br />
</span><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/04/apple-adds-3-33ghz-xeon-2tb-hard-drive-options-to-mac-pro/">Apple adds 3.33GHz Xeon, 2TB hard drive options to Mac Pro</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 04 Dec 2009 14:41:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/04/apple-adds-3-33ghz-xeon-2tb-hard-drive-options-to-mac-pro/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19266020/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/04/apple-adds-3-33ghz-xeon-2tb-hard-drive-options-to-mac-pro/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>3.33ghz xeon</category><category>3.33ghzXeon</category><category>apple</category><category>apple mac pro</category><category>AppleMacPro</category><category>mac</category><category>mac pro</category><category>mac pro upgrade</category><category>MacPro</category><category>MacProUpgrade</category><category>xeon</category><category>xeon processor</category><category>XeonProcessor</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald Melanson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 14:41:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Leaked Intel Core i9 chip makes its way to eBay?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/leaked-intel-core-i9-chip-makes-its-way-to-ebay/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/leaked-intel-core-i9-chip-makes-its-way-to-ebay/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/leaked-intel-core-i9-chip-makes-its-way-to-ebay/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://cgi.ebay.com/Intel-6-Core-Xeon-Westmere-Gulftown-2-4GHZ-LGA1366-ES_W0QQitemZ280425533697QQihZ018QQcategoryZ164QQcmdZViewItemQQ_trksidZp3286.m7QQ_trkparmsZalgo%3DLVI%26itu%3DUCI%26otn%3D2%26ps%3D6#ht_876wt_907"><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/12/intel-i9-core-ebay-rumor-rm-eng.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
Would you pay $1,200 for an as-of-yet unreleased Intel <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Corei9/">Core i9</a> chip? Hard to say if the transaction actually occurred, but an auction recently ended from a Taiwanese eBay user who claims to be selling a six-core, 2.4GHz Xeon Westmere Gulftown processor. We can't vouch for the validity of the listing, but those are some pretty convincing pictures being tossed around -- ones that aren't blurred, which might give Intel an advantage in snooping out the leak. That's not all, though -- <em>Nordic Hardware</em> (via <em>Tom's Hardware</em>) also reports that the <em>OCTeamDenmark</em> forums had it listed for on sale for $850. The 32nm fella had some <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/24/early-core-i9-benchmarks-promising-make-you-wonder-why-you-even/">promising benchmarks</a> released recently, although its release isn't slated until at best sometime early 2010. Sure, it's great to be first, but with early adopter prices like that, we don't mind waiting until it goes official.<br />
<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intel-core-i9-ebay-listing/">Intel Core i9 eBay listing</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intel-core-i9-ebay-listing/#2504649"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/12/intel-cire-i9-rm-eng-b_thumbnail.png" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intel-core-i9-ebay-listing/#2504650"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/12/intel-core-i9-rm-eng-a_thumbnail.png" alt="" title="" /></a></div><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/leaked-intel-core-i9-chip-makes-its-way-to-ebay/">Leaked Intel Core i9 chip makes its way to eBay?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 03 Dec 2009 22:06:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/leaked-intel-core-i9-chip-makes-its-way-to-ebay/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19264948/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/leaked-intel-core-i9-chip-makes-its-way-to-ebay/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2.4 ghz</category><category>2.4Ghz</category><category>6 core</category><category>6-core</category><category>6core</category><category>chip</category><category>core</category><category>core i9</category><category>CoreI9</category><category>cpu</category><category>ebay</category><category>gulftown</category><category>i9</category><category>intel</category><category>intel core i9</category><category>IntelCoreI9</category><category>leak</category><category>leaks</category><category>lga 1366</category><category>Lga1366</category><category>processor</category><category>six core</category><category>six-core</category><category>sixcore</category><category>taiwan</category><category>westmere</category><category>westmere gulftown</category><category>WestmereGulftown</category><category>xeon</category><category>xeon westmere</category><category>xeon westmere gulftown</category><category>XeonWestmere</category><category>XeonWestmereGulftown</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ross Miller]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 22:06:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[How would you change Apple's Nehalem-based Mac Pro?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/09/how-would-you-change-apples-nehalem-based-mac-pro/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/09/how-would-you-change-apples-nehalem-based-mac-pro/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/09/how-would-you-change-apples-nehalem-based-mac-pro/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><img hspace="4" border="0" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/05/apple-nehalem-mac-pro-side.jpg"  alt="" /><br /></div>
Apple's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/18/apple-nehalem-based-mac-pro-in-depth-impressions/">freshest Mac Pro</a>, which was the first machine of any kind to ship with Intel's newest Nehalem-based <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Xeon/">Xeon</a> processors, has been on the block for a few months now. By our estimation, that's plenty of time for the pros (and "prosumers," if you will) to get a good feel of their new workstation. Design wise, not a lot has changed in the machine, but we're anxious to know how you feel about the more subtle changes as well as the internal overhauling. Apple's charging a small fortune for this bad boy, so we fully expect you to be critical here. What's it missing? What should've been included? Are you still bitter that WiFi is a $50 option on a multi-thousand dollar machine? Sound off below!<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/" rel="tag">Desktops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/09/how-would-you-change-apples-nehalem-based-mac-pro/">How would you change Apple's Nehalem-based Mac Pro?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sat, 09 May 2009 00:41:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/09/how-would-you-change-apples-nehalem-based-mac-pro/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1539216/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/09/how-would-you-change-apples-nehalem-based-mac-pro/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>features</category><category>how would you change</category><category>HowWouldYouChange</category><category>HWYC</category><category>mac</category><category>mac pro</category><category>MacPro</category><category>Nehalem</category><category>os x</category><category>OsX</category><category>quad-core</category><category>workstation</category><category>xeon</category><category>xeon 5500</category><category>xeon 5520</category><category>Xeon5500</category><category>Xeon5520</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 00:41:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel's Xeon 3500, 5500 series officially unveiled for servers and workstations]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/30/intels-xeon-3500-5500-series-officially-unveiled-for-servers-a/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/30/intels-xeon-3500-5500-series-officially-unveiled-for-servers-a/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/30/intels-xeon-3500-5500-series-officially-unveiled-for-servers-a/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;newsId=20090330006184&amp;newsLang=en"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/03/intel-xeon-5500-rm-eng.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
Intel's announced this week its latest batch of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Nehalem/">Nehalem</a>-based <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Xeon/">Xeon</a> processors, the single-socket 3500 and dual-socket 5500 series for servers and workstations. Both models boast speeds up to 3.2 GHz and feature Intel's turbo boost, hyper-threading, and virtualization technologies, as well as integrated power gates. If you've got the newest <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/MacPro/">Mac Pro</a>, however, then you're already using the new quad-core CPUs,, but for everyone else, they're now being sold en masse to manufacturers at a price ranging from $188 to $1,600 for the Xeon 5500 and $284 to $999 for the 3500. We've already heard about 5500 / 3500-equipped <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/24/lenovo-thinkstation-s20-d20-sport-new-xeon-cpus-tesla-c1060-g/">Lenovo</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/24/dell-unveils-nehalem-based-precision-t3500-t5500-and-t7500-wor/">Dell workstations</a>, but if that doesn't suit you, Intel promises over 230 systems are in the pipeline from companies such as Cisco, Fujitsu, HP, IBM, among others.<br /><div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intels-xeon-3500-5500-series-officially-unveiled-for-servers-and-workstations/">Intel's Xeon 3500, 5500 series officially unveiled for servers and workstations</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intels-xeon-3500-5500-series-officially-unveiled-for-servers-and-workstations/#1462400"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/03/mini-intelxeon-06_5x7_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intels-xeon-3500-5500-series-officially-unveiled-for-servers-and-workstations/#1462401"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/03/mini-nehalemglamourshot1_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intels-xeon-3500-5500-series-officially-unveiled-for-servers-and-workstations/#1462402"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/03/mini-nehalemglamourshot2_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intels-xeon-3500-5500-series-officially-unveiled-for-servers-and-workstations/#1462403"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/03/mini-nehalemwafershot1_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/intels-xeon-3500-5500-series-officially-unveiled-for-servers-and-workstations/#1462404"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/03/mini-nehalemwafershot2_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/" rel="tag">Desktops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/30/intels-xeon-3500-5500-series-officially-unveiled-for-servers-a/">Intel's Xeon 3500, 5500 series officially unveiled for servers and workstations</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:44:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;newsId=20090330006184&amp;newsLang=en>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/30/intels-xeon-3500-5500-series-officially-unveiled-for-servers-a/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1502788/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/30/intels-xeon-3500-5500-series-officially-unveiled-for-servers-a/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>intel</category><category>intel xeon</category><category>intel xeon 3500</category><category>intel xeon 5500</category><category>IntelXeon</category><category>IntelXeon3500</category><category>IntelXeon5500</category><category>nehalem</category><category>xeon</category><category>xeon 3500</category><category>xeon 5500</category><category>Xeon3500</category><category>Xeon5500</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ross Miller]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:44:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Dell unveils Nehalem-based Precision T3500, T5500, and T7500 workstations, EqualLogic PS6000S solid state storage arrays]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/24/dell-unveils-nehalem-based-precision-t3500-t5500-and-t7500-wor/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/24/dell-unveils-nehalem-based-precision-t3500-t5500-and-t7500-wor/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/24/dell-unveils-nehalem-based-precision-t3500-t5500-and-t7500-wor/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/03/2009-03-24dellprecisionpage.jpg" /><br /></div>
Well, what do we have here? An industry source has sent along information and images for a trio of new <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Dell,Precision/">Dell Precision</a> workstations using Intel's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Nehalem/">Nehalem</a> architecture. The T3500 (starts at $999) sports up to 24GB DDR3 ECC memory. Just above that, we've got the T5500 (starts at $1,620) with up to 72GB of memory and dual socket Intel Xeon. Meanwhile, granddaddy T7500 (pictured; starts at $1,800) boasts 192GB of three-channel DDR3 ECC memory up to 1066 or 1333MHz, dual native Gen 2 PCIe graphics slots and supports NVIDIA SLI technology. All models feature an E-SATA port, up to 1.5TB SATA HDD, dual / quad monitor support, DisplayPort connectors, and for those trying to keep some assemblance of eco friendliness, these are all Energy Star 5.0 compliant. We also caught wind of new EqualLogic PS6000 and SSD-equipped PS6000S storage arrays, which start at around $17,000 and $25,000, respectively. Interests piqued? Hit up the gallery below for some pics. <strong><br /><br />Update: </strong>Dell releases the <a href="http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/home/permalink/?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;newsId=20090324006152&amp;newsLang=en">official presser</a> for the PS6000S.<br /><div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/dell-nehalem-based-precision-t3500-t5500-and-t7500-workstations-equallogic-ps6000s-solid-state-storage-arrays/">Dell Nehalem-based Precision T3500, T5500, and T7500 workstations, EqualLogic PS6000S solid state storage arrays</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/dell-nehalem-based-precision-t3500-t5500-and-t7500-workstations-equallogic-ps6000s-solid-state-storage-arrays/#1450910"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/03/2009-03-24dellprecision-3_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/dell-nehalem-based-precision-t3500-t5500-and-t7500-workstations-equallogic-ps6000s-solid-state-storage-arrays/#1450911"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/03/2009-03-24dellprecision-2_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/dell-nehalem-based-precision-t3500-t5500-and-t7500-workstations-equallogic-ps6000s-solid-state-storage-arrays/#1451060"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/03/intuos4-tablet-2009-03-25_01-31-55-rm-eng_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/dell-nehalem-based-precision-t3500-t5500-and-t7500-workstations-equallogic-ps6000s-solid-state-storage-arrays/#1451061"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/03/intuos4-tablet-2009-03-25_01-32-27-rm-eng_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/dell-nehalem-based-precision-t3500-t5500-and-t7500-workstations-equallogic-ps6000s-solid-state-storage-arrays/#1451062"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/03/intuos4-tablet-2009-03-25_01-32-34-rm-eng_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/" rel="tag">Desktops</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/storage/" rel="tag">Storage</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/24/dell-unveils-nehalem-based-precision-t3500-t5500-and-t7500-wor/">Dell unveils Nehalem-based Precision T3500, T5500, and T7500 workstations, EqualLogic PS6000S solid state storage arrays</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 24 Mar 2009 23:36:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/24/dell-unveils-nehalem-based-precision-t3500-t5500-and-t7500-wor/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1497511/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/24/dell-unveils-nehalem-based-precision-t3500-t5500-and-t7500-wor/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dell</category><category>dell precision</category><category>dell precision t3500</category><category>dell precision t5500</category><category>dell precision t7500</category><category>DellPrecision</category><category>DellPrecisionT3500</category><category>DellPrecisionT5500</category><category>DellPrecisionT7500</category><category>intel nehalem</category><category>intel xeon</category><category>IntelNehalem</category><category>IntelXeon</category><category>nehalem</category><category>precision</category><category>precision t3500</category><category>precision t5500</category><category>precision t7500</category><category>PrecisionT3500</category><category>PrecisionT5500</category><category>PrecisionT7500</category><category>t3500</category><category>t5500</category><category>t7500</category><category>work station</category><category>WorkStation</category><category>xeon</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ross Miller]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 23:36:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Lenovo ThinkStation S20 / D20 sport new Xeon CPUs, Tesla C1060 GPU]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/24/lenovo-thinkstation-s20-d20-sport-new-xeon-cpus-tesla-c1060-g/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/24/lenovo-thinkstation-s20-d20-sport-new-xeon-cpus-tesla-c1060-g/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/24/lenovo-thinkstation-s20-d20-sport-new-xeon-cpus-tesla-c1060-g/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/03/lenovo-thinkstation-gdc.jpg" alt="" /><br /></div>
We have to say, we didn't exactly expect <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Lenovo/">Lenovo</a> to have any hard-hitting news emanating from the floor at Game Developer's Conference, but this is pretty swank. The company has just unveiled two new ThinkStation desktops, the S20 and D20, both of which are designed exclusively for specialized professionals in fields such as computer-aided design and digital content creation. Within, you'll find your choice of Intel's latest Nehalem-based Xeon chips (yep, the same 5500 and 3500 series as in Apple's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/18/apple-nehalem-based-mac-pro-in-depth-impressions/">newest Mac Pro</a>), NVIDIA's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/18/nvidia-announces-cost-energy-saving-tesla-personal-supercompute/">Tesla C1060 GPU platform</a> (or an ATI FirePro, if you prefer) and Windows Vista or RedHat Enterprise Linux 5.2 running the show. Hit up the gallery below for the specifications breakdown, and as for pricing, you'll find 'em in Q1 for $1,070 and $1,550, respectively. Full release is after the break.<br /><div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/lenovo-thinkstation-s20-d20-sport-new-xeon-cpus-tesla-c1060-gpu-1/">Lenovo ThinkStation S20 / D20 sport new Xeon CPUs, Tesla C1060 GPU</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/lenovo-thinkstation-s20-d20-sport-new-xeon-cpus-tesla-c1060-gpu-1/#1448220"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/03/thinkstation-lenovo-bottles_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/lenovo-thinkstation-s20-d20-sport-new-xeon-cpus-tesla-c1060-gpu-1/#1448221"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/03/lenovo-s20-and-d20_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/lenovo-thinkstation-s20-d20-sport-new-xeon-cpus-tesla-c1060-gpu-1/#1448222"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/03/lenovo-thinkstation-s20_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/lenovo-thinkstation-s20-d20-sport-new-xeon-cpus-tesla-c1060-gpu-1/#1448223"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/03/lenovo-thinkstation-0d20_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><br /><div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/lenovo-thinkstation-s20-d20-sport-new-xeon-cpus-tesla-c1060-gpu/">Lenovo ThinkStation S20 / D20 specs</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/lenovo-thinkstation-s20-d20-sport-new-xeon-cpus-tesla-c1060-gpu/#1447392"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/03/ww_thinkstation-s20-d20_1_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/lenovo-thinkstation-s20-d20-sport-new-xeon-cpus-tesla-c1060-gpu/#1447393"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/03/ww_thinkstation-s20-d20_2_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/lenovo-thinkstation-s20-d20-sport-new-xeon-cpus-tesla-c1060-gpu/#1447394"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/03/ww_thinkstation-s20-d20_3_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/lenovo-thinkstation-s20-d20-sport-new-xeon-cpus-tesla-c1060-gpu/#1447391"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/03/ww_thinkstation-s20-d20_4_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/24/lenovo-thinkstation-s20-d20-sport-new-xeon-cpus-tesla-c1060-g/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Lenovo ThinkStation S20 / D20 sport new Xeon CPUs, Tesla C1060 GPU</em></a></p><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/" rel="tag">Desktops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/24/lenovo-thinkstation-s20-d20-sport-new-xeon-cpus-tesla-c1060-g/">Lenovo ThinkStation S20 / D20 sport new Xeon CPUs, Tesla C1060 GPU</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 24 Mar 2009 00:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/24/lenovo-thinkstation-s20-d20-sport-new-xeon-cpus-tesla-c1060-g/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1493871/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/24/lenovo-thinkstation-s20-d20-sport-new-xeon-cpus-tesla-c1060-g/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ati</category><category>C1060</category><category>eLounge</category><category>firepro</category><category>Lenovo</category><category>nvidia</category><category>quadro</category><category>s20</category><category>Tesla</category><category>Tesla C1060</category><category>TeslaC1060</category><category>ThinkStation</category><category>ThinkStation D20</category><category>ThinkStation S20</category><category>ThinkstationD20</category><category>ThinkstationS20</category><category>workstation</category><category>xeon</category><category>xeon 3500</category><category>xeon 5500</category><category>Xeon3500</category><category>Xeon5500</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 00:01:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple Nehalem-based Mac Pro in-depth impressions]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/18/apple-nehalem-based-mac-pro-in-depth-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/18/apple-nehalem-based-mac-pro-in-depth-impressions/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/18/apple-nehalem-based-mac-pro-in-depth-impressions/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/03/apple-mac-pro-open.jpg" alt="" /></div>
When Apple's ever-so-slightly refreshed Nehalem-based Mac Pro <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/14/apple-nehalem-based-mac-pro-unboxing-and-hands-on/">showed up on our doorstep</a>, we were understandably taken aback by the enclosure. Sure, it looks exactly like the previous Mac Pro externally, and only slightly more beautiful internally, but it's hard to deny the gorgeousness of this metallic wonder. That said, the so-called cheese grater design is one that's mighty familiar to Mac fans by now, so we'll spare you the details there. What you're probably wondering is whether or not <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/apple-announces-nehalem-based-mac-pro/">this rig</a> is really worth the steep asking price. At $2,499 for a single quad-core 2.66GHz rig and $3,299 for a twin quad-core 2.26GHz machine (which is our test system, by the way), neither option is particularly "affordable." And outside of the refreshed Intel Xeon processor, there aren't too many new hardware components to really convince you that an upgrade is a dire necessity. Follow us past the break to get a real-world perspective on the value proposition, and moreover, to get a better understanding of who exactly benefits most from a workstation of this magnitude.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/18/apple-nehalem-based-mac-pro-in-depth-impressions/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Apple Nehalem-based Mac Pro in-depth impressions</em></a></p><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/" rel="tag">Desktops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/18/apple-nehalem-based-mac-pro-in-depth-impressions/">Apple Nehalem-based Mac Pro in-depth impressions</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 18 Mar 2009 13:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/18/apple-nehalem-based-mac-pro-in-depth-impressions/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1491036/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/18/apple-nehalem-based-mac-pro-in-depth-impressions/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>benchmark</category><category>benchmarks</category><category>desktop</category><category>features</category><category>impressions</category><category>mac pro</category><category>MacPro</category><category>Nehalem</category><category>preview</category><category>quad-core</category><category>review</category><category>reviewed</category><category>workstation</category><category>xeon</category><category>xeon 5500</category><category>xeon 5520</category><category>Xeon5500</category><category>Xeon5520</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 13:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Video: Apple Nehalem-based Mac Pro unboxing and hands-on]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/14/apple-nehalem-based-mac-pro-unboxing-and-hands-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/14/apple-nehalem-based-mac-pro-unboxing-and-hands-on/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/14/apple-nehalem-based-mac-pro-unboxing-and-hands-on/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/03/apple_nahalem_mac_pro_unbox.jpg" alt="" /><br /></div>
Here she is, fresh off the Saturday Express. Apple's latest <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/apple-announces-nehalem-based-mac-pro/">Mac Pro</a> is said to be significantly more nimble and entirely easier to upgrade than its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/10/penryn-based-mac-pro-gets-benchmarked/">Penryn-based predecessor</a>, and while it'll take us a few days yet to check out the former claim, we can already assure you that the second one is valid. Upon unboxing this beast (to be fair, it's not all <em>that </em>monstrous), we immediately dug within the cover to see what was up with <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Apple/">Apple</a>'s new tray system. Rather than forcing users to squeeze their hands into unfathomably tight places just to pop in a new DIMM or add in a fresh <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/western-digital-2tb-caviar-green-8tb-sharespace-and-friends-han/">2TB hard drive</a>, the engineers at Cupertino found a way to place all eight RAM slots on a removable tray, meaning that you can actually take that piece elsewhere and operate under better lighting. The tray was dead simple to remove and replace, and while it's a small inclusion, it's definitely an appreciated one. We'll be stressing this thing out and writing up a more thorough review soon, but for now, enjoy the snapshots / video below and after the break, respectively.<br /><div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/apple-nehalem-based-mac-pro-unboxing-and-hands-on/">Apple Nehalem-based Mac Pro unboxing and hands-on</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/apple-nehalem-based-mac-pro-unboxing-and-hands-on/#1430825"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/03/apple-nahalem-mac-pro_-(1)_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/apple-nehalem-based-mac-pro-unboxing-and-hands-on/#1430907"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/03/apple-nahalem-mac-pro_-(10)_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/apple-nehalem-based-mac-pro-unboxing-and-hands-on/#1430886"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/03/apple-nahalem-mac-pro_-(11)_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/apple-nehalem-based-mac-pro-unboxing-and-hands-on/#1430887"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/03/apple-nahalem-mac-pro_-(12)_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/apple-nehalem-based-mac-pro-unboxing-and-hands-on/#1430908"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/03/apple-nahalem-mac-pro_-(13)_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/14/apple-nehalem-based-mac-pro-unboxing-and-hands-on/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Video: Apple Nehalem-based Mac Pro unboxing and hands-on</em></a></p><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/" rel="tag">Desktops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/14/apple-nehalem-based-mac-pro-unboxing-and-hands-on/">Video: Apple Nehalem-based Mac Pro unboxing and hands-on</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sat, 14 Mar 2009 12:58:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/14/apple-nehalem-based-mac-pro-unboxing-and-hands-on/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1487959/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/14/apple-nehalem-based-mac-pro-unboxing-and-hands-on/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>64-bit</category><category>apple</category><category>desktop</category><category>featuredvideo</category><category>features</category><category>hands-on</category><category>intel</category><category>mac pro</category><category>MacPro</category><category>Nehalem</category><category>quad-core</category><category>unboxing</category><category>video</category><category>workstation</category><category>xeon</category><category>Xeon 3500</category><category>Xeon 5500</category><category>Xeon3500</category><category>Xeon5500</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 12:58:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel said to be prepping eight-core Xeon for launch next month]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/29/intel-said-to-be-prepping-eight-core-xeon-for-launch-next-month/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/29/intel-said-to-be-prepping-eight-core-xeon-for-launch-next-month/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/29/intel-said-to-be-prepping-eight-core-xeon-for-launch-next-month/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.macworld.com/article/138510/2009/01/intel.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/01/intel-01-29-09.jpg" /></a><br />
<div align="left">Nothing's official just yet, but Macworld is reporting that Intel will be rolling out an eight-core Xeon processor at the International Solid-State Circuits Conference in San Francisco next month, marking the company's first foray into octa-core processors, and paving the way for 16-core systems using two of the chips. Unfortunately, there aren't many more details than that, with the only other word being that it'll be a 16-thread processor, and be manufactured using a 45-nanometer process. As Macworld notes, however, it does seem likely that the processor in question is the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/nehalemep">Nehalem-EP </a>seen on the roadmap above, which is based on the Tylersburg platform -- the first product of Intel's throw-a-dart-at-a-map naming scheme.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.9to5mac.com/intel-8-core">9 to 5 Mac</a>]</div>
</div><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/" rel="tag">Desktops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/29/intel-said-to-be-prepping-eight-core-xeon-for-launch-next-month/">Intel said to be prepping eight-core Xeon for launch next month</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 29 Jan 2009 17:07:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.macworld.com/article/138510/2009/01/intel.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/29/intel-said-to-be-prepping-eight-core-xeon-for-launch-next-month/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1444806/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/29/intel-said-to-be-prepping-eight-core-xeon-for-launch-next-month/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>intel</category><category>nehalem</category><category>nehalem ep</category><category>NehalemEp</category><category>xeon</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald Melanson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 17:07:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Upcoming dual-processor Nehalem EP machine benchmarked -- yeah, it's fast]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/20/upcoming-dual-processer-nehalem-ep-machine-benchmarked-yeah/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/20/upcoming-dual-processer-nehalem-ep-machine-benchmarked-yeah/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/20/upcoming-dual-processer-nehalem-ep-machine-benchmarked-yeah/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.techradar.com/news/computing-components/processors/world-exclusive-intel-s-dual-socket-nehalem-ep-platform-benchmarked-487131"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/08/smackover-1.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /></div>
Intel's new <a href="http://engadget.com/tag/corei7">Core i7</a> chip has been showing up in tons of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/18/intel-core-i7-desktop-roundup-the-rest-of-whats-new/">silly-spec'd high-end gaming rigs</a> for about three days now, so it's obviously time to get bored and move on -- and right on cue, <em>TechRadar</em>'s got the first benchmarks we've seen of the upcoming dual-processor Nehalem EP platform. The secret test machine featured two 2.8GHz Nehalem EP chips (likely to hit retail in 2009 as the Xeon X5560) and 24GB of 1,066MHz DDR3 RAM controlled by the new Quick Path Interconnect and on-die memory controllers, which together cranked out a SPECfp base rate of 160 -- way above the 90 posted by current 3.4GHz Xeon setups, and higher than the 105 scored by a 2.7GHz dual-processor rig with AMD's new <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/amd-launches-first-45nm-quad-core-shanghai-opterons-hitting-de/">Shanghai</a> chips. Yeah, that's silly fast, and it's bound to get even faster when these bad boys launch with a 3.2GHz part along for the ride. Now if Intel could just siphon some of that speed into these pokey Atoms we can actually afford, we'd be grins-a-plenty.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/" rel="tag">Desktops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/20/upcoming-dual-processer-nehalem-ep-machine-benchmarked-yeah/">Upcoming dual-processor Nehalem EP machine benchmarked -- yeah, it's fast</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:46:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.techradar.com/news/computing-components/processors/world-exclusive-intel-s-dual-socket-nehalem-ep-platform-benchmarked-487131>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/20/upcoming-dual-processer-nehalem-ep-machine-benchmarked-yeah/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1378464/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/20/upcoming-dual-processer-nehalem-ep-machine-benchmarked-yeah/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>benchmark</category><category>benchmarks</category><category>core i7</category><category>CoreI7</category><category>intel</category><category>nehalem ep</category><category>NehalemEp</category><category>xeon</category><category>xeon x5560</category><category>XeonX5560</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nilay Patel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:46:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft and Cray deliver "mainstream" CX1 supercomputer: starts at $25k]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/16/microsoft-and-cray-deliver-mainstream-cx1-supercomputer-start/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/16/microsoft-and-cray-deliver-mainstream-cx1-supercomputer-start/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/16/microsoft-and-cray-deliver-mainstream-cx1-supercomputer-start/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/microsoft-cray-team-up-drive/story.aspx?guid=%7B36F2CC5A-B364-4A06-B296-4416AD3E948D%7D&amp;dist=hppr"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/09/9-16-08-cray_cx1.jpg"  alt="" /></a><br /></div>
C'mon, who here <em>doesn't</em> want their very own <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/supercomputer/">supercomputer</a> to do, um, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/WillItBlend/">whatever they want with</a>? In an effort to make sure every man, woman and child has an absurdly powerful number cruncher in their home (let's go with OSPP, or One Supercomputer Per Person), Microsoft has tag-teamed with the fabled <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/14/britains-new-fastest-supercomputer-makes-it-ominous-debut/">Cray</a> in order to "drive high productivity computing into the mainstream." The Cray CX1 Supercomputer comes loaded with <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/25/fastest-ever-windows-hpc-cluster-nets-68-5-teraflops/">Windows HPC Server 2008</a> and incorporates up to 8 nodes and 16 Intel Xeon CPUs (dual- or quad-core); additionally, it boasts up to 4TB of internal storage, 64GB of memory per node and interoperates nicely with Linux. The CX1 is said to be the most affordable supercomputer offered by Cray (not to mention the "world's highest-performing computer that uses standard office power"), but it'll still run you anywhere between $25,000 to well over $60,000. Chump change, right?<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/091608-microsoft-cray-launch-personal-supercomputer.html?hpg1=bn">NetworkWorld</a>]<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/" rel="tag">Desktops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/16/microsoft-and-cray-deliver-mainstream-cx1-supercomputer-start/">Microsoft and Cray deliver "mainstream" CX1 supercomputer: starts at $25k</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 16 Sep 2008 16:03:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/microsoft-cray-team-up-drive/story.aspx?guid=%7B36F2CC5A-B364-4A06-B296-4416AD3E948D%7D&amp;dist=hppr>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/16/microsoft-and-cray-deliver-mainstream-cx1-supercomputer-start/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1315896/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/16/microsoft-and-cray-deliver-mainstream-cx1-supercomputer-start/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cluster</category><category>cray</category><category>Cray CX1</category><category>CrayCx1</category><category>CX1</category><category>DARPA</category><category>intel</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>server</category><category>supercomputer</category><category>Windows HPC</category><category>WindowsHpc</category><category>Xeon</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 16:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[XtremeNotebooks stuffs quad-core X3360 Xeon CPU in Xtreme 917V]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/16/xtremenotebooks-stuffs-x3360-xeon-quad-core-cpu-in-xtreme-917v-l/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/16/xtremenotebooks-stuffs-x3360-xeon-quad-core-cpu-in-xtreme-917v-l/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/16/xtremenotebooks-stuffs-x3360-xeon-quad-core-cpu-in-xtreme-917v-l/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="left">
<div align="center"><a href="http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=109&amp;STORY=/www/story/05-15-2008/0004815151&amp;EDATE="><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/05/5-16-08-917v_laptop.jpg" /></a><br /></div>
XtremeNotebooks is taking its quad-core <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/15/xtremenotebooks-launches-quad-core-xtreme-917v-laptop/">Xtreme 917V</a> up a notch by tossing an Intel X3360 Xeon processor in there. Notably, the company is pushing this as the "first US-distributed" lappie to boast such a chip, but we already saw Eurocom reveal its X3360-based <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/12/eurocom-lets-loose-quad-core-xeon-based-d901c-phantom-x-server-l/">D901C PHANTOM-X</a> earlier this week. Semantics aside, prospective buyers can get this mobile server equipped with a Blu-ray burner, RAID 0/1/5 hard drive arrays, twin NVIDIA GeForce 8800 or Quadro FX GPU setups and up to 4GB of RAM. As of this moment, this particular system isn't listed on the outfit's website, but you can probably count on it demanding upwards of three grand -- and yes, that's with the "sweet talking the CSR" discount already factored in.<br /></div><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/laptops/" rel="tag">Laptops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/16/xtremenotebooks-stuffs-x3360-xeon-quad-core-cpu-in-xtreme-917v-l/">XtremeNotebooks stuffs quad-core X3360 Xeon CPU in Xtreme 917V</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 16 May 2008 07:55:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=109&amp;STORY=/www/story/05-15-2008/0004815151&amp;EDATE=>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/16/xtremenotebooks-stuffs-x3360-xeon-quad-core-cpu-in-xtreme-917v-l/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1197202/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/16/xtremenotebooks-stuffs-x3360-xeon-quad-core-cpu-in-xtreme-917v-l/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>917v</category><category>mobile server</category><category>MobileServer</category><category>quad-core</category><category>server</category><category>us</category><category>x3360</category><category>xeon</category><category>Xtreme 917V</category><category>Xtreme917v</category><category>XtremeNotebooks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 07:55:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Eurocom lets loose Quad Core XEON-based D901C PHANTOM-X server laptop]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/12/eurocom-lets-loose-quad-core-xeon-based-d901c-phantom-x-server-l/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/12/eurocom-lets-loose-quad-core-xeon-based-d901c-phantom-x-server-l/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/12/eurocom-lets-loose-quad-core-xeon-based-d901c-phantom-x-server-l/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://web.eurocom.com/EC/ec_model_config1(1,188,0)"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/05/eurocom-d90xc.jpg" /></a>
<div align="left">It's not often we see laptop manufacturers boast of a one-hour battery life, but in the case of Eurocom's new D901C PHANTOM-X "mobile server," that spec is certainly hard-earned enough to warrant notice. The battery drain begins with a 2.8GHz Quad Core XEON X3360 processor, which gets paired with 1.5 terabytes of storage in the form of three SATA-300 hard drives (complete with various RAID options), 8GB of DDR2-800 memory, a Blu-ray burner, and a comparatively modest 17-inch display, to name but a few specs. All that, not surprisingly, takes just as big a toll on your back as it does on battery life, with the PHANTOM-X weighing in at a lugabble 12-pounds. No word on a price just yet, but Eurocom's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/29/eurocoms-quad-core-d900c-phantom-x-laptop-gets-official/">non-Xeon-based server laptops</a> already easily push past the $3,000 mark, so you can probably take a pretty good stab at assessing the damage to your budget.<br /></div>
</div><p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/laptops/" rel="tag">Laptops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/12/eurocom-lets-loose-quad-core-xeon-based-d901c-phantom-x-server-l/">Eurocom lets loose Quad Core XEON-based D901C PHANTOM-X server laptop</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 12 May 2008 12:48:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://web.eurocom.com/EC/ec_model_config1(1,188,0)>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/12/eurocom-lets-loose-quad-core-xeon-based-d901c-phantom-x-server-l/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1193013/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/12/eurocom-lets-loose-quad-core-xeon-based-d901c-phantom-x-server-l/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>eurocom</category><category>phantom-x</category><category>quad core</category><category>QuadCore</category><category>server laptop</category><category>ServerLaptop</category><category>xeon</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald Melanson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 12:48:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel's 6-core Xeon and Nehalem CPU info leaked]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/25/intels-6-core-xeon-and-nehalem-cpu-info-leaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/25/intels-6-core-xeon-and-nehalem-cpu-info-leaked/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/25/intels-6-core-xeon-and-nehalem-cpu-info-leaked/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.dailytech.com/Sun%20Leaks%206core%20Intel%20Xeon%20Nehalem%20Details/article10834.htm"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/02/dunnington.jpg"  alt="" /></a><br /></div>
Intel's had its new processor plans slipped out to the public thanks to Sun, according to DailyTech. Details on the 6-core (!) <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Xeon/">Xeon</a> Dunnington, as well as the kinda-sorta hush-hush <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Nehalem/">Nehalem</a> were apparently leaked out onto Sun's public web server over the weekend, including plans for the new Xeons to overtake the company's Tigerton CPU line. The Dunnington processors will have a 16MB L3 cache shared by all six cores, and will be pin-compatible with the Tigertons, thus making integration with your <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Clarksboro/">Clarksboro</a> chipset slightly less painful... by being possible. The Nehalem also got the spy treatment, with news that it will not only replace the Penryn line in Q4 '08, but will also be the first time in 18 years that Intel includes on-die memory controllers. If this sort of thing is important to you (and we think it may be) hit the read link and get all the juicy details.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/" rel="tag">Desktops</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/laptops/" rel="tag">Laptops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/25/intels-6-core-xeon-and-nehalem-cpu-info-leaked/">Intel's 6-core Xeon and Nehalem CPU info leaked</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 25 Feb 2008 12:02:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.dailytech.com/Sun%20Leaks%206core%20Intel%20Xeon%20Nehalem%20Details/article10834.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/25/intels-6-core-xeon-and-nehalem-cpu-info-leaked/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1123910/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/25/intels-6-core-xeon-and-nehalem-cpu-info-leaked/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cpu</category><category>dunnington</category><category>info</category><category>intel</category><category>leak</category><category>nehalem</category><category>penryn</category><category>processor</category><category>roadmap</category><category>sun</category><category>tigerton</category><category>xeon</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua Topolsky]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 12:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel's newest gaming platform, Skulltrail]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/28/intels-newest-gaming-platform-skulltrail/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/28/intels-newest-gaming-platform-skulltrail/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/28/intels-newest-gaming-platform-skulltrail/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://www.hothardware.com/News/Intel_Skulltrail_Motherboard_Sneak_Peek/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/12/big_skultrail_2.jpg"  alt="" /></a><br /></div>
Intel seems like it's going to be making a bigger push at gamers with the launch of <a href="http://engadget.com/tag/penryn">Penryn</a>, and HotHardware managed to score some deets on the company's upcoming "Skulltrail" platform, which is built-around server-class hardware reconfigured for gaming. The new mobo pictured here supports dual quad-core Penryn Xeon processors, SLI graphics, and four PCI Express x16 slots, as well as two standard PCI slots. You're also looking at a whopping six internal SATA ports, dual eSATA ports, six USB ports, a lone FireWire port, and Gigabit Ethernet. That's quite a foundation for a gaming rig -- let's just hope pricing is at least pretend reasonable, eh?<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/" rel="tag">Desktops</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/gaming/" rel="tag">Gaming</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/28/intels-newest-gaming-platform-skulltrail/">Intel's newest gaming platform, Skulltrail</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 28 Dec 2007 13:39:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.hothardware.com/News/Intel_Skulltrail_Motherboard_Sneak_Peek/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/28/intels-newest-gaming-platform-skulltrail/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1072701/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/28/intels-newest-gaming-platform-skulltrail/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>intel</category><category>penryn</category><category>skulltrail</category><category>xeon</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nilay Patel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 13:39:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Dell releases Precision T5400 and T7400 powerhouse workstations]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/27/dell-releases-precision-t5400-and-t7400-powerhouse-workstations/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/27/dell-releases-precision-t5400-and-t7400-powerhouse-workstations/</guid><comments>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/27/dell-releases-precision-t5400-and-t7400-powerhouse-workstations/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.dell.com/content/topics/topic.aspx/global/products/precn/topics/en/us/precn_t5400_t7400_landing?c=us&amp;l=en&amp;s=gen"><img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/11/t7400_t5400.jpg" /></a>When a regular consumer desktop just won't serve your demanding computing needs, it's time to go workstation, and Dell's got a pair of new quad-core-packin' models that are spec'ed to be some of the fastest on the planet. Both the Precision T7400 and T5400 are available with either one <em>or </em>two of Intel's newest 45-nanometer Xeon Processors (up to a 3.20GHz X5482 on the 7400), as many as two 1.5GB nVIDIA Quadro FX5600 graphics cards (capable of driving four 30-inch monitors), up to 4GB of RAM (with a whopping 128GB promised using a memory riser card chassis when 8GB DIMMs become available) and either three (5400) or five (7400) hard drives for up to 3TB of storage -- all topped off with a little Blu-ray action. Available immediately, the new rigs start at just $1,600 and $1,850, but for a configuration that meets your ridiculous specifications, expect to shell out well north of ten grand.<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/category/desktops/" rel="tag">Desktops</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/27/dell-releases-precision-t5400-and-t7400-powerhouse-workstations/">Dell releases Precision T5400 and T7400 powerhouse workstations</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 27 Nov 2007 10:47:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.dell.com/content/topics/topic.aspx/global/products/precn/topics/en/us/precn_t5400_t7400_landing?c=us&amp;l=en&amp;s=gen>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/27/dell-releases-precision-t5400-and-t7400-powerhouse-workstations/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/1048953/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/27/dell-releases-precision-t5400-and-t7400-powerhouse-workstations/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>45nm</category><category>blu-ray</category><category>dell</category><category>intel</category><category>precision t5400</category><category>precision t7400</category><category>PrecisionT5400</category><category>PrecisionT7400</category><category>quad core</category><category>QuadCore</category><category>workstation</category><category>xeon</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Evan Blass]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 10:47:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
