http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/03/no-motorola-q-until-april/ Engadget Comments for No Motorola Q until April? http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2010 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/03/no-motorola-q-until-april/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/03/no-motorola-q-until-april/VZW locked up an exclusive w/ the Treo700 which should end in March, i cant imagine them bringing to market another "cool" PDA during the time they have the exclusive on the Treo700.. Thus, April sounds about right.. Plus it gives me more time on my VZW contract to try to wangle my way out of the phone i have now.

In addition, i find it humourous to her how verizon has a rigiorous process that they put their phones through before they go to market. If thats the case, half the phones ive had w/ vzw shouldnt have even been sold! Wonder how they fell through the cracks........]]>Feb 6th 2006 4:00PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/03/no-motorola-q-until-april/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/03/no-motorola-q-until-april/
C'on Cingular - show the GSMers what you got...something better and less complicated pls...photon???]]>Feb 6th 2006 7:48PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/03/no-motorola-q-until-april/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/03/no-motorola-q-until-april/I'LL REVISIT ONCE THE PHONE IS OUT AND RECONSIDER..IT SOUNDS GOOD AND I HAD PLANNED TO PURCHASE IT WHEN THE LAUNCH WAS PLANNED FOR JAN.. ]]>Feb 7th 2006 12:39AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/03/no-motorola-q-until-april/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/03/no-motorola-q-until-april/Feb 7th 2006 3:08PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/03/no-motorola-q-until-april/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/03/no-motorola-q-until-april/Feb 7th 2006 3:20PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/03/no-motorola-q-until-april/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/03/no-motorola-q-until-april/Feb 8th 2006 7:17PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/03/no-motorola-q-until-april/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/03/no-motorola-q-until-april/
A longer wait for the Q is just ridiculous. And if it doesn't hit Verizon until April, how long until it hits Cingular? We've been hearing about this thing for how long now? Sorry, but if the Treo 700w, or even the HP iPaq 6900 makes it to Cingular ahead of the Q, I'll just get that instead. I can't wait forever, no matter how cool it is.]]>Feb 8th 2006 11:30PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/03/no-motorola-q-until-april/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/03/no-motorola-q-until-april/Feb 10th 2006 6:21PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/03/no-motorola-q-until-april/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/03/no-motorola-q-until-april/Feb 12th 2006 1:33AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/03/no-motorola-q-until-april/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/03/no-motorola-q-until-april/Feb 12th 2006 10:37PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/03/no-motorola-q-until-april/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/03/no-motorola-q-until-april/
R.C.MCKENNA, MD ]]>Feb 14th 2006 1:17AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/03/no-motorola-q-until-april/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/03/no-motorola-q-until-april/
PLEASE TAKE OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK!!!

thanks!]]>Mar 22nd 2006 9:40PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/03/no-motorola-q-until-april/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/03/no-motorola-q-until-april/
Word is that the Push email update for the VX6700 is delayed because they are requiring the manufacturer to rewrite the bluetooth stack. I’m sure it’s something similar for Motorola.

If they weren't the only vendor with decent signals in my area I'd leave them in a heartbeat.
]]>Mar 30th 2006 4:49PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/03/no-motorola-q-until-april/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/03/no-motorola-q-until-april/Apr 6th 2006 7:59PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/03/no-motorola-q-until-april/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/03/no-motorola-q-until-april/Apr 8th 2006 7:46PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/03/no-motorola-q-until-april/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/03/no-motorola-q-until-april/
*cough PS3*]]>Feb 3rd 2006 6:08AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/03/no-motorola-q-until-april/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/03/no-motorola-q-until-april/
http://www.qusers.com/img/moto_q_mockup.pdf]]>Feb 3rd 2006 6:16AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/03/no-motorola-q-until-april/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/03/no-motorola-q-until-april/
Give us GSMers some love :)]]>Feb 3rd 2006 6:20AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/03/no-motorola-q-until-april/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/03/no-motorola-q-until-april/
]]>Feb 3rd 2006 6:33AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/03/no-motorola-q-until-april/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/03/no-motorola-q-until-april/
But as far as AKU2.0, people on the forums claim that the update has already been given to manufacturers, they just have to go through testing (and see what happens with NTP/RIM!).

And as far as GSM phones go, T-Mobile just got the SDA and the MDA, and europe is always rocking something nice. :)
-Taylor]]>Feb 3rd 2006 7:19AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/03/no-motorola-q-until-april/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/03/no-motorola-q-until-april/
Whatever help you sleep at night (or till April). ;)]]>Feb 3rd 2006 8:04AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/03/no-motorola-q-until-april/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/03/no-motorola-q-until-april/
It's better they delay the release and get it right than rush it out and end up with a lot of pissed users, in my opinion.]]>Feb 3rd 2006 8:16AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/03/no-motorola-q-until-april/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/03/no-motorola-q-until-april/Feb 3rd 2006 8:39AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/03/no-motorola-q-until-april/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/03/no-motorola-q-until-april/
http://www.modaco.com/Get_a_Motorola_Q_in_Your_Hands_TODAY_-t235522.html]]>Feb 3rd 2006 9:15AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/03/no-motorola-q-until-april/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/03/no-motorola-q-until-april/Feb 3rd 2006 9:23AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/03/no-motorola-q-until-april/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/03/no-motorola-q-until-april/Feb 3rd 2006 9:43AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/03/no-motorola-q-until-april/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/03/no-motorola-q-until-april/Feb 3rd 2006 10:32AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/03/no-motorola-q-until-april/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/03/no-motorola-q-until-april/Feb 3rd 2006 11:10AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/03/no-motorola-q-until-april/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/03/no-motorola-q-until-april/Feb 3rd 2006 11:38AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/03/no-motorola-q-until-april/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/03/no-motorola-q-until-april/
and what happened to the black one? by far better...]]>Feb 3rd 2006 11:43AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/03/no-motorola-q-until-april/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/03/no-motorola-q-until-april/
I miss the black one, its so much better. what happened to it?

]]>Feb 3rd 2006 11:57AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/03/no-motorola-q-until-april/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/03/no-motorola-q-until-april/Feb 3rd 2006 2:00PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/03/no-motorola-q-until-april/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/03/no-motorola-q-until-april/Feb 3rd 2006 2:09PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/03/no-motorola-q-until-april/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/03/no-motorola-q-until-april/
If the former, that would sort of suck, not being getting the GSM release until October!]]>Feb 3rd 2006 2:30PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/03/no-motorola-q-until-april/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/03/no-motorola-q-until-april/
I'>http://www.pdatoday.com/index.php/weblog/comments/ces_2006_photoblog_and_news/

I played with it at another PR event and not I just have to have one. That phone with the new GPS Galaxy device would be a powerfull team IMO.]]>Feb 3rd 2006 5:30PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/03/no-motorola-q-until-april/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/03/no-motorola-q-until-april/Feb 4th 2006 1:21PM