<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Palm Treo 700p looking legit</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Palm Treo 700p looking legit</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2010 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Treo 700p looking legit]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ok, this looks real.  And it could be the reason why I've held off so long on getting a Treo.<br><br>I may actually stay with Sprint if this has great reception.<br><br>And just when I switched from Pocket PC to Palm as my main PDA.  The timing couldn't be better.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ChillyWilly]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 6th 2006 1:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Treo 700p looking legit]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</guid><description><![CDATA[I agree with 36, we dont need a useless camera.  We have to thank punks for this waste of space on the device...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[palm 5 crashes all the time?]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 6th 2006 8:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Treo 700p looking legit]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</guid><description><![CDATA[so any chance verizon will see one of these babies? i have been waiting to buy a smart phone for what seems like forever. as a mac guy, i refuse to use anything that's micro$oft branded, but i really want a treo that will let me use mp3 ringtones out of the box without cheezy after-market apps (call me juvenile. . . ), which ive been told 650's need. so, anyone got good news for me?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[trevor m]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 7th 2006 3:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Treo 700p looking legit]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</guid><description><![CDATA[so any chance verizon will see one of these babies? i have been waiting to buy a smart phone for what seems like forever. as a mac guy, i refuse to use anything that's micro$oft branded, but i really want a treo that will let me use mp3 ringtones out of the box without cheezy after-market apps (call me juvenile. . . ), which ive been told 650's need. so, anyone got good news for me?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[trevor m]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 7th 2006 3:13AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Treo 700p looking legit]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</guid><description><![CDATA[so any chance verizon will see one of these babies? i have been waiting to buy a smart phone for what seems like forever. as a mac guy, i refuse to use anything that's micro$oft branded, but i really want a treo that will let me use mp3 ringtones out of the box without cheezy after-market apps (call me juvenile. . . ), which ive been told 650's need. so, anyone got good news for me?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[trevor m]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 7th 2006 3:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Treo 700p looking legit]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</guid><description><![CDATA[^guess that mac of yours is so great that it posts up 3 of the same posts.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[robindurden]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 8th 2006 12:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Treo 700p looking legit]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</guid><description><![CDATA[I too have the 650 and like another user pointed out, it is the most unstable device I've ever used. Let me put it this way: it crashes more than any of the three computers I have at home running Windows. I never thought I'd see the day I considered Windows to be "stable." But that day arrived when I bought my Treo 650 and have had to live with it's frequent (weekly, sometimes daily) crashes. I too wish the company cared more about their maintaining and improving their OS and less about squeezing every last dime out of each aging OS. Besides, the next major release of their flagship smart phone and the best they do is up the camera to 1.3MP? Give me a break; other phones have twice that already. A little extra speed and EV-DO without a new OS means that my next smartphone will be Windows Mobile based and NOT a Palm. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Abe Burnett]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 9th 2006 2:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Treo 700p looking legit]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</guid><description><![CDATA[Cingular needs to have a treo 700w/p with PTT capability.  This would blow away any competition with the other carriers.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gregg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 17th 2006 9:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Treo 700p looking legit]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</guid><description><![CDATA[the 700p is real--saw one the other day as a Palm employee friend of mine was showing it off in a bar (only because i told him i was a gadget junkie)-it'll be out in a few months for Verizon & Sprint.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[possiblyaduck]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 19th 2006 1:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Treo 700p looking legit]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</guid><description><![CDATA[This is probably old news to all of you, but I spoke to a T-Mobile rep yesterday who told me that the GSM 700p is available in Europe right now. He advised me to just make certain that I get the unlocked version and can use my current (Treo 600) simm card. I have no way of confirming his statements at the present time.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 20th 2006 4:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Treo 700p looking legit]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</guid><description><![CDATA[Concerning post 46: hate to burst your bubble, Steven, but that T-Mobile rep must have been a fake or drunk ... or, more likely: a drunken fake. At least he/she does not know the European mobile scene: T-Mobile Germany has NEVER EVER carried any Handspring/Palm smartphones, much to my chagrin, ever since I bought my first Visor here in Germany in 2001. Neither has any of the other big carriers (namely: the British Vodafone). The best kept secret is that e-plus, the German daughter of the Dutch KPN, can at least SUPPLY the 650 (to the tune of 729,90 Euros without a monthly plan - roughly 870 USD ... talk about pricing yourself out of a market...). But they don't push is, no ads for it, NOTHING: www.eplus.de/handys/1/1_6/1_6_detail_224.asp The "bestsellers" of e-plus are, according to their website: Nokia 6230i, Motorola RAZR V3i and Nokia 6101. The only big "Treo carrier" is Orange (now belonging to France Telecom), who have sold a substantial amount of 600s and 650s, mainly in the UK and Switzerland. - So, I must wait some more with all the other Palm OS Treo aficinados ... ;-))) <br><br>Comment 7: Could it be that you are confusing GPS and GPRS? Besides, I believe the European market is already going a different direction from the US market: I just installed a Qualcomm 3G+ card in my bosses notebook: now still with UMTS, but as of next month (launch at the CeBIT computer fair in Hanover) with an HSDPA maximum (downlink) speed of 14 Mbps...<br><br>How does that grab you?<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilfried]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 21st 2006 5:34AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Treo 700p looking legit]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</guid><description><![CDATA[I have seen the treo 700p, it IS real, and Sprint is expecting it to be May before it rolls out to the public.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TreoMan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 25th 2006 10:30AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Treo 700p looking legit]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</guid><description><![CDATA[On Wednesday (Mar 1, 2006) while helping my friend purchase a Treo 650 at a Sprint store I was told that though there is no definitive date that Sprint would be getting the 700w soon. I was particularly intrigued by this sales person's answer to my questions about future Treos at Sprint because of her care to be very precise when answering my friends questions about his 650 purchase. She was cautious not to offer any false hope that something would or not work for him. So I was VERY encouraged by her simple but confident statement that they would be getting the 700w (and doubted a new Palm version would be appearing) and that it would be soon. HOORAY!!! I'm ready.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Craig]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 4th 2006 11:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Treo 700p looking legit]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</guid><description><![CDATA[I have been waiting for this model for 1.5 years, and a Sprint rep told me 2 weeks ago that the 700 Palm version would be available within the next 2 months.  I was considering buying the 650 since my 600 broke (which I used my insurance for).   I am very much hoping for the the voice function to be bette than the 600's.   ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[steve]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 14th 2006 2:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Treo 700p looking legit]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</guid><description><![CDATA[See this advertisement for a new silicone flexi-case for the Treo 700 on the Palm website.  It clearly is showing a new Palm 700 phone, branded for Verizon. The official announcement must be coming soon.<br><a href="http://web.palm.com/products/templates/ProductViewLargePhoto.jhtml?id=470002&cat=180040">http://web.palm.com/products/templates/ProductViewLargePhoto.jhtml?id=470002&cat=180040</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Donnie Shrum]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 15th 2006 5:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Treo 700p looking legit]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</guid><description><![CDATA[I agree that the 650 was ok, but the 700 is better. The W (Windows) version is for Verizon, and the P (Palm) version is for Sprint. Still the better camera is ok, but I hope the volume of the phone is higher with the 700. Also, I hear it has Wi-fi. That's great. An ideal treo would have wi-fi, great camera, nice MP3, headphone jack on the top, and high screen resolution. Also the ability to hang up on one person while talking to another. Finally, built in City Caller ID would be nice. After all, isn't this supposed to be the "cats meow" of cell phones?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 17th 2006 11:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Treo 700p looking legit]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</guid><description><![CDATA[The 700p is definitely coming to Sprint. More information has leaked, including a confirmation that the Connection Manager software for EvDO phones already includes a driver for palm 700p.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[werdmodo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 23rd 2006 12:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Treo 700p looking legit]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hey,<br>Does anyone know a predicted price to upgrade from the 650 to the 700p in its release next month?<br><br>If your already with the service you dont have to pay full for an exchange right?<br>thanks<br>-j]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[J]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 5th 2006 9:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Treo 700p looking legit]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</guid><description><![CDATA[You know I am tired of hearing about asses whining about, "NO WIFI" in the Treo. The Treo is a PHONE that is on a network. Sprint and Verizon want to make money off their network. THERE WILL NEVER BE WIFI BECAUSE THEY WANT YOU TO PAY FOR INTERNET ACCESS THROUGH THEIR NETWORKS.<br><br>For God sake go to business school and learn something about making money. Idiots.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ispsec]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 13th 2006 11:00AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Treo 700p looking legit]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</guid><description><![CDATA[I have been testing the Treo 700p. Sprint should have it by the end of May and it's looking pretty good. There are a few improvments. Better camera, EVDO. The treo now comes with ptunes instead of the realplay on the 650. There is also a new button configuration and if you have had the 650 for a while it will take some adjusting to get used to it.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TreoMan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2006 8:46AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Treo 700p looking legit]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</guid><description><![CDATA[I was just in the Sprint store here in Manhattan (23rd & 5th Ave.) today and they told me no Treo700p on Sprint. The 22 year old customer service girl told me it would be Windows and she had no idea when it might come out.<br><br>Personally, I think she's clueless, but I felt I had to add to the rumors. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[g$]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 4th 2006 10:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Treo 700p looking legit]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</guid><description><![CDATA[Haha I am glad I hold out.<br><br>Good old PalmOS is mom's apple pie, I can't let it go.  Plus superior screen woot!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tino]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2006 12:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Treo 700p looking legit]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</guid><description><![CDATA[It better have BT 1.2 and be able to support the latest 4 GB SD cards.  The 650 is capped at 2 GB.  I don't know if it's a OS or hardware issue though.  And they really need to add WiFi SD support too.  This still wouldn't be enough for me to upgrade my 650 but it certainly would convince my wife to upgrade her 600.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2006 12:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Treo 700p looking legit]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</guid><description><![CDATA[Its so simple, like osx. Me love Steve Jobs for long time.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JBaxt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2006 12:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Treo 700p looking legit]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</guid><description><![CDATA[Where's the gsm version at? Oh wait were not gonna get one here in the u.s till the end of the year(maybe) cause we don't have enuff real support for 3gsm yet. Sprint's version is looking hot though. I don't know if it's hot enuff for me to switch to a new $75 and more plan. I still want wifi. As i repeatedly post i'll gladly tote around an extra battery and spend $100 on a wifi card rather than pay sprint or VERI$ON for their EVDO(what an a$$ raping) That's my only gripe with the 650. I luv it,but it needs wifi. WHERE are the DRIVERS ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2006 12:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Treo 700p looking legit]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</guid><description><![CDATA[Where's the gsm version at? Oh wait were not gonna get one here in the u.s till the end of the year(maybe) cause we don't have enuff real support for 3gsm yet. Sprint's version is looking hot though. I don't know if it's hot enuff for me to switch to a new $75 and more plan. I still want wifi. As i repeatedly post i'll gladly tote around an extra battery and spend $100 on a wifi card rather than pay sprint or VERI$ON for their EVDO(what an a$$ raping) That's my only gripe with the 650. I luv it,but it needs wifi. WHERE are the DRIVERS ?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2006 12:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Treo 700p looking legit]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</guid><description><![CDATA[I call fake - look at the "reflection" in the screen.  It's supposed to be another Treo taking the picture, right?  The antenna's on the wrong side, though.  If someone were holding a Treo over it to take a picture, the antenna would reflect on the left side of the device, not the right.  Whoever 'shopped it didn't flip the antenna.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[StWaldo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2006 12:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Treo 700p looking legit]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</guid><description><![CDATA[Pic was taken with a separate digital camera...it's the real deal, been following the discussion all day - trust me, this is (FINALLY) completely legit. There will be a 700P]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MJSgl]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2006 12:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Treo 700p looking legit]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</guid><description><![CDATA[Cause the pic is not taken with a treo, it was taken with a 6700. Read the thread, then post]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Anothny]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2006 12:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Treo 700p looking legit]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</guid><description><![CDATA[>>>>>I call fake - look at the "reflection" in the screen. It's supposed to be another Treo taking the picture, right? The antenna's on the wrong side, though. If someone were holding a Treo over it to take a picture, the antenna would reflect on the left side of the device, not the right. Whoever 'shopped it didn't flip the antenna.<br><br><br>The pic wasn't taken with a Treo, but with a Sprint 6700...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[gfunkmagic]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2006 12:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Treo 700p looking legit]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</guid><description><![CDATA[#5 Its a PPC that took a pic, he even stated it.<br><br>This NOT A SHOPPED, ITS THE TRUE THING. Ive compared 3 pics from the guy, and everything is exactly the same, and constant. This is the real deal]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[XGM]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2006 12:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Treo 700p looking legit]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</guid><description><![CDATA[#7:<br><br>Palm/Handspring has and had been able to design phones cater to the US carriers.  600 was offered on all four carriers and the 650 was offered on the 3 biggest carriers.  Any competitor like iPaq 6500 hasn't been able to secure ANY mobile carrier.<br><br>I want to be nice but Nokia is quite dead in the US.  Plus the Nokia N80 is 3 years behind the Treo 600, and there is less application support.  GPS is more popular in the Europe than US yet GPS support on Symbian phones has been lagging behind WM and PalmOS for a long time.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tino]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2006 12:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Treo 700p looking legit]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</guid><description><![CDATA[5. I call fake - look at the "reflection" in the screen. It's supposed to be another Treo taking the picture, right? The antenna's on the wrong side, though. If someone were holding a Treo over it to take a picture, the antenna would reflect on the left side of the device, not the right. Whoever 'shopped it didn't flip the antenna.<br><br>Not only that moron, but they moved the camera lens underneath the antenna too!!1OnE!!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[teH Munk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2006 1:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Treo 700p looking legit]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's a fake. I sense a photoshop job, along with the one posted yesterday.<br><br>Sorry, had to say that ;-O<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[js]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2006 1:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Treo 700p looking legit]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yall are so crazy. ITS REAL. CONNECT THE DOTS!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TJ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2006 1:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Treo 700p looking legit]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</guid><description><![CDATA[What about this picture?<br><br><a href='http://www.pdamexico.net/content/view/1969/'>http://www.pdamexico.net/content/view/1969/</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[iZam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2006 1:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Treo 700p looking legit]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</guid><description><![CDATA[It is real. Yall need to connect the dots. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TJ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2006 2:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Treo 700p looking legit]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</guid><description><![CDATA[looks real to me... and the reflection is right!!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nono]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2006 2:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Treo 700p looking legit]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</guid><description><![CDATA[Whether or not you guys "think" the photo is fake or whatever is actually irrelevent since none of you are photo experts, just nerds behind a computer.<br><br>Second, the important thing here is that Shadowmite has the ROM from the 700P now and they are playing around with it (they tried to put the new Blazer on the 650 but to no avail).<br><br>Third, for those of us who were in Shadowmites IRC chat last night, we all have MORE pics of the phone that have NOT been released publicly.<br><br>Fourth, the phone has also been reportedly sold (for a hefty sum) already.  Some speculate Sprint or Palm  "bought it back".<br><br>Fifth, before anyone should comment they should read the forums where this originated  --> Treocentral.com.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Anarquista]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2006 2:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Treo 700p looking legit]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</guid><description><![CDATA[<br><br>Or what? You won't buy it? You'll cry?? What??? The supense is killing me!!! ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dcpmark]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2006 3:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Treo 700p looking legit]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</guid><description><![CDATA[So does that mean no Windows version of the Treo for Sprint?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2006 4:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Treo 700p looking legit]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</guid><description><![CDATA[All that resolution and they still have a cheap 256 color UI and low-res text. <br><br>Palm is just plain stupid, I hope they go bankrupt!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2006 4:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Treo 700p looking legit]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</guid><description><![CDATA[As someone who works with photoshop and other graphics program every day for the last 10 years, if that's photoshop, it's DAMN good photoshop. no seriously, the reflections and everythign is so damn perfect.<br><br>if it's fake, it's a real fake, as in, a fake device someone took a picture of.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cynicdave]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2006 4:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Treo 700p looking legit]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</guid><description><![CDATA[why the writing or whatever scrubbed out/blacked out thats next to "sprint"?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Shillabeer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2006 5:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Treo 700p looking legit]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</guid><description><![CDATA[With the greater number of Windows Mobile 5.0 devices like the 700w, XV6700, Q, HW6910 either out or coming out very soon, it's great to still see that Palm OS on a phone.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2006 5:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Treo 700p looking legit]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</guid><description><![CDATA["why the writing or whatever scrubbed out/blacked out thats next to "sprint"?"<br><br>'tester' or 'pre-release' Palm products traditionaly have a serial number on them for identification.  he blacked it out to protect the identity of the original owner.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Anarquista]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2006 5:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Treo 700p looking legit]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</guid><description><![CDATA[To #22.<br>I completely agree.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr. Orange]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2006 6:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Treo 700p looking legit]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</guid><description><![CDATA[As the owner and advocate of the 6700, the reflection is definitely that of a PPC 6700.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2006 8:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Treo 700p looking legit]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</guid><description><![CDATA[BUT WHERE IS THE MENU BUTTON ? That key cannot be missing on a Palm device! (or could there be another way to access the menus?)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Frank]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2006 9:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Treo 700p looking legit]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/04/palm-treo-700p-looking-legit/</guid><description><![CDATA[The only way to know for sure if this is real or not, someone has to go through the FCC documents to find if it's been certified as a released communication device.   If it's not there, this could be someone monkeying around.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tommer12]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 5th 2006 1:10AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>