I know that this ad campaign is old and they have some stupid "Lil Monsta" (O_o) thing now, but honestly...it's an mp3 player. It plays mp3s. I've had iPods, and I've had Sandisk Sansas, and honestly...why does anybody really care about what brand it is? iPods might have a cooler design, but if I can get something that holds twice the songs for half the price, I'll get it, whether it's Sandisk or Apple. They both are of equal (crap) quality, anyway. I took perfect care of my nano...and a year later the backing fell off. So I went out, and got a Sansa...and a year later the screws to the backing fell out. I think the only things that they have over each other are that iPods are pretty and Sandisks are....well, Apple comes out with a new iPod like every six months, basically rendering your model obsolete. Sandisk doesn't.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
This...is pretty dumb.
I know that this ad campaign is old and they have some stupid "Lil Monsta" (O_o) thing now, but honestly...it's an mp3 player. It plays mp3s. I've had iPods, and I've had Sandisk Sansas, and honestly...why does anybody really care about what brand it is? iPods might have a cooler design, but if I can get something that holds twice the songs for half the price, I'll get it, whether it's Sandisk or Apple. They both are of equal (crap) quality, anyway. I took perfect care of my nano...and a year later the backing fell off. So I went out, and got a Sansa...and a year later the screws to the backing fell out. I think the only things that they have over each other are that iPods are pretty and Sandisks are....well, Apple comes out with a new iPod like every six months, basically rendering your model obsolete. Sandisk doesn't.