<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Palm's license to next-gen ALP to expire this December!</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/29/palms-license-to-next-gen-alp-to-expire-this-december/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Palm's license to next-gen ALP to expire this December!</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2010 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm's license to next-gen ALP to expire this December!]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/29/palms-license-to-next-gen-alp-to-expire-this-december/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/29/palms-license-to-next-gen-alp-to-expire-this-december/</guid><description><![CDATA[This is why I switched to Windows Mobile. Back in the day there used to be way more software for Palm OS. Anymore, their products are lacking innovation. Pocket Pc's have caught up in the software abundance, and have grealty surpased Palm in hardware implementations.<br><br>BTW: first! :P]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 29th 2006 5:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm's license to next-gen ALP to expire this December!]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/29/palms-license-to-next-gen-alp-to-expire-this-december/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/29/palms-license-to-next-gen-alp-to-expire-this-december/</guid><description><![CDATA[I got a palm but my dad has a windows based HP PDA. I favor his to mine but his is worth more money then mine is. I agree wtih the above poster.<br><br>BTW. It's not hard to get first post]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Keim]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 29th 2006 5:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm's license to next-gen ALP to expire this December!]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/29/palms-license-to-next-gen-alp-to-expire-this-december/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/29/palms-license-to-next-gen-alp-to-expire-this-december/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ive always though Pocket PC would be better just on the fact that, "why would i buy palm if i could get pocket pc, the same makers as the OS i am using." it just make sense to me to buy a one company for all your OS needs. I say to Apple, go buy palm and start making some PDA phones/ipod. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Totalfixation]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 29th 2006 5:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm's license to next-gen ALP to expire this December!]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/29/palms-license-to-next-gen-alp-to-expire-this-december/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/29/palms-license-to-next-gen-alp-to-expire-this-december/</guid><description><![CDATA[Palm?  Do people still use that OS?<br><br>(Read the writing on the wall.  Palm is dead.)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ferris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 29th 2006 6:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm's license to next-gen ALP to expire this December!]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/29/palms-license-to-next-gen-alp-to-expire-this-december/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/29/palms-license-to-next-gen-alp-to-expire-this-december/</guid><description><![CDATA[Umm, what? Palm is dead?<br><br>Umm, okay.  I guess this is the Internet and every flaming idiot has the God-given right to spout whatever drivel.  I know the Treo 650 and Treo 700P are very hot sellers right now, though.  So it looks like somebody's still using it.  Total Treo revenues were 1.1 Billion, according to the same 10K with this stuff.  Are you claiming that's all from the Windows model???<br><br>Not only that, the Treo model with Windows Mobile gets crappy reviews everywhere.<br><br>I don't even think this is the death knell for Access, let alone Palm.  Just more corporate footwork before we find out what will actually happen when products are actually released and we find out if  they actually sell.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[zorg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 29th 2006 6:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm's license to next-gen ALP to expire this December!]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/29/palms-license-to-next-gen-alp-to-expire-this-december/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/29/palms-license-to-next-gen-alp-to-expire-this-december/</guid><description><![CDATA[I agree with you that the 700P and 650 are big sellers for Palm, but you can't deny that WinMobile is the most popular. The 700P is actually the only Palm OS Device I can think of off the top of my head that's been released lately. I wouldn't say Palm or Access is dead, but they're not doing all that good. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 29th 2006 7:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm's license to next-gen ALP to expire this December!]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/29/palms-license-to-next-gen-alp-to-expire-this-december/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/29/palms-license-to-next-gen-alp-to-expire-this-december/</guid><description><![CDATA[I really hope the Palm OS does not become the OS/2 of decade.  Admittedly, I too dumped it in favour of WM, but that was driven by what HP was doing with hardware and what Palm was not doing.  Still, tehPalm OS was more stable (and smaller) than WM and that's a generation back against Windows.  <br><br>I think cell phones must have had these poor guys thinking they were dead in the water.  They seemed to keep missing on features and convergence while phones just leapt ahead over Palm's old stalwarts.  <br><br>Still there is a lot of ground to cover in the PDA field.  It's nice that I can now listen to music and work on a spreadsheet or document at the same time while my daybook tells me I'm running behind.  It's getting there.  Better network access, a really good GIS (that is yet to come) and even a few simple things like a sync system that deals with the fact that most of us interact with a number of computers throughout the day and not just a PDA and a single other unit.  Why can't these machines all talk behind my back and keep me up to date, float other people's daybooks, know where they are and remember what is on what SD card?  <br><br>Oh, while I'm at it, on the hardware side, where's the universal power input, that'll take anyone's juice including the aux battery pack in my case?  And another thing, after 20 bloody years of R&D you still can't make a screen that needs to wear a condom or it will be ruined by a speck of dust under the stylus -- you've got to be kidding! <br><br>I'm trying to be nice here, I'm not asking for the moon, like making the device a central personal processor that has distributed components, like the wireless 80 gig HD in my pocket (leave it alone, I'm not glad to see you), the wireless microphone under my lapel, they little camera that uploads to it, finger-tipped mouse, optional 6 inch wireless screen, and such.  Yeah, a much more wearlable design in general...<br><br>Don't get me started...   Hurry up future!<br><br>  <br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kenno]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 29th 2006 7:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm's license to next-gen ALP to expire this December!]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/29/palms-license-to-next-gen-alp-to-expire-this-december/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/29/palms-license-to-next-gen-alp-to-expire-this-december/</guid><description><![CDATA[SmartPhones based on the Symbian platform are far more capable (simple example - they can run multiple apps at a time without hacking), stable, and sadly - more mature than those based on PalmOS. I've liked Symbian OS for a while, but picked up a Treo650 and was amazed at the limitations of the platform. Heck it doesn't even play MP3s and most ring tone formats without buying third party software. Their J2ME support (which is what most mobile applications are written in) is shameful. Damn thing doesn't even have bluetooth support without hacking around it and using a bluetooth com port. Then I went back to Symbian OS with a Nokia E61 and realized why I loved Symbian OS so much. Plenty of software, actually supports standard APIs that the rest of the industry does, multiple vendor support for device variety, and a platform that is actually advancing. Sometimes it seems that PalmOS is going backwards... but that's really because the OS hasn't improved in ages.<br><br>The fact that Palm had to resort to using Windows on the mobile devices was clear indication that not even Palm has faith in PalmOS anymore.<br><br>Let it die, its time has come.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gregory Pierce]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 29th 2006 8:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm's license to next-gen ALP to expire this December!]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/29/palms-license-to-next-gen-alp-to-expire-this-december/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/29/palms-license-to-next-gen-alp-to-expire-this-december/</guid><description><![CDATA[Strange... No one has licensed ALP yet and its not out so how can you report that it will expire. Also the link you point out is a gross misinterpretation of the statement.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TreoooUzer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 29th 2006 10:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm's license to next-gen ALP to expire this December!]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/29/palms-license-to-next-gen-alp-to-expire-this-december/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/29/palms-license-to-next-gen-alp-to-expire-this-december/</guid><description><![CDATA[Every time you buy a Pocket PC, God kills a kitten.<br>Please, think of the kittens... ;-)<br><br><a href="http://www.galleytech.com/Galley/images/palmkittens.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.galleytech.com/Galley/images/palmkittens.jpg</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Galley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 29th 2006 10:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm's license to next-gen ALP to expire this December!]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/29/palms-license-to-next-gen-alp-to-expire-this-december/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/29/palms-license-to-next-gen-alp-to-expire-this-december/</guid><description><![CDATA[I dumped Palm OS for Linux.<br><br>Hooray for the Sharp Zaurus SL-C1000!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Legodude522]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 29th 2006 11:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm's license to next-gen ALP to expire this December!]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/29/palms-license-to-next-gen-alp-to-expire-this-december/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/29/palms-license-to-next-gen-alp-to-expire-this-december/</guid><description><![CDATA[Your headline is way inaccurate.  It's based on the inaccurate headline for the message board post.<br><br>Read the statement more carefully.  There's NO license that expires in December.  And Palm has NEVER licensed ALP, so it can't expire.<br><br>Palm's license for PalmOS actually continues through 2009.  Under that license, Palm was required to make minimum payments to ACCESS.  After December, it is no longer required to do so.  This is hardly "trouble."<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 30th 2006 4:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm's license to next-gen ALP to expire this December!]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/29/palms-license-to-next-gen-alp-to-expire-this-december/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/29/palms-license-to-next-gen-alp-to-expire-this-december/</guid><description><![CDATA[Gregory Pierce's post contains several errors about the Treo650.<br><br>1. The Treo 650 does play MP3 without buying third party software.<br>Pierce states that it does not.<br><br>2. J2ME support is not built in, but by downloading the free J2ME package, I was able to run Opera, giving me a better browsing experience than the built-in.  Since the J2ME module has been upgraded over time, I would have had to download it anyway, even if it had originally been built in.  Pierce states that it is shameful, which is hard to quantify.<br><br>3. The Treo650 has excellent bluetooth support for my needs.  I use bluetooth mainly with a TomTom GPS unit and with Salling Clicker as a remote control for computers.  These have both turned out to be excellent and trouble free applications.  Both are applications where high reliability is extremely important.<br><br>4. There is plenty of software available for the Treo650 and a high degree of awareness of the Treo650 among software vendors, who frequently advertise Treo650 compatibility separately from or instead of Palm.  Pierce implies that there is not plenty of software by saying that he returned to Symbian to get plenty of software, etc.<br><br>Pierce is plainly confused between the enormously successful Treo650 and PalmOS.  No doubt everyone would like PalmOS to be replaced by a version of Linux that would be able to run existing Palm apps.<br><br>In the meantime, software vendors have done a great deal to make it work for consumers on the Treo platform.  Advanced phones are routinely crippled by carriers so that the only enabled functions can be billed monthly.  It's great to have a device like the Treo650 that can bypass carrier restrictions and provide terrific functionality that doesn't come with an additional monthly bill.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[zorg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 30th 2006 8:40AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm's license to next-gen ALP to expire this December!]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/29/palms-license-to-next-gen-alp-to-expire-this-december/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/29/palms-license-to-next-gen-alp-to-expire-this-december/</guid><description><![CDATA[What I want to know is why has Palm been so resistant to using even PalmOS Cobalt? I like the nature of PalmOS for the simple devices it runs on. A PDA doesn't need half a dozen pages of configuration screens or start menus that don't fit like Windows Mobile, but Palm went so far as to make a WM device before a Cobalt one.<br><br>I wouldn't say Palm is dead, but they are certainly becoming more and more anachronistic. I'd almost say we'd be better off waiting for Motorola's JUIX. :P]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kyran]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 30th 2006 8:45AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm's license to next-gen ALP to expire this December!]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/29/palms-license-to-next-gen-alp-to-expire-this-december/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/29/palms-license-to-next-gen-alp-to-expire-this-december/</guid><description><![CDATA[Let me guess - they will use new M$ produced software and give up on creating original competing OS... su# bad not only for fans of Palm but also for Win-Mobile users. No competition means less innovation.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[cheats gba]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 30th 2006 10:52AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm's license to next-gen ALP to expire this December!]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/29/palms-license-to-next-gen-alp-to-expire-this-december/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/29/palms-license-to-next-gen-alp-to-expire-this-december/</guid><description><![CDATA[The VAST majority of Treo users that I talk to don't use 3rd party applications.<br><br>The original idea of Palms and the PalmOS has been so utterly mismanaged that it's a joke now.<br><br>It's over. It ended a while ago. Any motion you see is purely Brownian.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[strider_mt2k]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 30th 2006 11:02AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm's license to next-gen ALP to expire this December!]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/29/palms-license-to-next-gen-alp-to-expire-this-december/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/29/palms-license-to-next-gen-alp-to-expire-this-december/</guid><description><![CDATA[>> "What I want to know is why has Palm been so resistant to using even PalmOS Cobalt?"<br><br>Uh...maybe it has something to do with the fact that Cobalt is garbage. A mangled, poorly performing codebase that neither Palm nor any other few remaining PalmSource licensees chose to adopt? <br><br>>> "A PDA doesn't need half a dozen pages of configuration screens or start menus that don't fit like Windows Mobile"<br><br>Agreed, a PDA (which is a dead segment of the mobile device market by the way) doesn't need a half dozen configurations screens. Or  Start menu that doesn't fit on the screen. Unfortunately for your argument, Windows Mobile has neither or those qualities. What OS does? More mindless bitching from the fish n' chips brigade. What I find so comical is that despite your constant bashing, Windows Mobile far outsells PalmOS in the mobile device market. So despite your incessant bashing, Windows Mobile continues to grow and lead over PalmOS. That must really piss you off, doesn't it?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kent Pribbernow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 30th 2006 2:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm's license to next-gen ALP to expire this December!]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/29/palms-license-to-next-gen-alp-to-expire-this-december/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/29/palms-license-to-next-gen-alp-to-expire-this-december/</guid><description><![CDATA[All palm devices still support mac. <br><br>Anyhow, I'm so depressed, because everytime I use another OS it's just so convoluted and crappy. I'm going to be depressed to move to something else. Multitasking is the last thing on my mind, I need usability. WM's UI is a hodgepodge, and the thing is a mess already internally (I actually see my friends with them messing with the registry. Nightmare). Symbian has no software and still has way too many configuration options and junk. Well, maybe Apple will do it right, it seems they're the only one capable of doing anything well any more.<br><br>So many good products are killed by shitty management and Palm's seems to be the shittiest around. Reminds me a lot of Commodore's handling of the Amiga. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 30th 2006 3:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm's license to next-gen ALP to expire this December!]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/29/palms-license-to-next-gen-alp-to-expire-this-december/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/29/palms-license-to-next-gen-alp-to-expire-this-december/</guid><description><![CDATA[>1. The Treo 650 does play MP3 without buying third party software.<br>>Pierce states that it does not.<br><br><br>Palm licensed RealPlayer for MP3 support (they buy) and if you want to use an MP3 as a ringtone you have to pay for Ringo or similar (you buy). If you want to counter this, please state specifically the application/methodology of PalmOS/Treo650 which does this.<br><br><br>>2. J2ME support is not built in, but by downloading the free J2ME package, I >was able to run Opera, giving me a better browsing experience than the built->in. Since the J2ME module has been upgraded over time, I would have had to >download it anyway, even if it had originally been built in. Pierce states that it >is shameful, which is hard to quantify.<br><br>The last update of the J2ME module was in Feb of 2005 and it doesn't even support all of the APIs that phones that are given away for free support - try to audio,video capture on the phone. Hope you know how to write native code and bind it to the J9.<br><br><br>>3. The Treo650 has excellent bluetooth support for my needs. I use bluetooth >mainly with a TomTom GPS unit and with Salling Clicker as a remote control >for computers. These have both turned out to be excellent and trouble free >applications. Both are applications where high reliability is extremely >important.<br><br>That's great and I'm glad that worked for you, however I wanted to write an application in J2ME that used the standard bluetooth API that every phone in a store supports and the Treo that I spend 4 times the price for did not.<br><br>>4. There is plenty of software available for the Treo650 and a high degree of >awareness of the Treo650 among software vendors, who frequently advertise >Treo650 compatibility separately from or instead of Palm. Pierce implies that >there is not plenty of software by saying that he returned to Symbian to get >plenty of software, etc.<br><br>Count the number of Treo titles and compare them to the number of Symbian titles. Its simple numbers folks, Nokia and Symbian make up the bulk of devices shipping followed by 15% for Windows and 7% for PalmOS.<br><br>>Pierce is plainly confused between the enormously successful Treo650 and >PalmOS. No doubt everyone would like PalmOS to be replaced by a version of >Linux that would be able to run existing Palm apps.<br><br>Successful compared to what? Its having its ass handed to it by the other smartphone vendors in the market. Sure its successful in the sense that they keep getting people to buy dated inferior technology, but not much else. It is the most underfeatured handheld operating system out there and shipping on a decreasing number of handheld devices.<br><br>>In the meantime, software vendors have done a great deal to make it work for >consumers on the Treo platform. Advanced phones are routinely crippled by >carriers so that the only enabled functions can be billed monthly. It's great to >have a device like the Treo650 that can bypass carrier restrictions and provide >terrific functionality that doesn't come with an additional monthly bill.<br><br>Yeah, keep on spinning. Let me know when the promised blackberry connect will be made available for the Treo650 in an update as promised. Oh wait, they're upselling you to a Treo 700p to get that functionality.<br><br>Zorg you sound just like every other "PalmOS will live forever" zealot out there, unable to recognize that the platform is horrible and willing to simply make continuous excuses for Palm.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gregory Pierce]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 30th 2006 4:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm's license to next-gen ALP to expire this December!]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/29/palms-license-to-next-gen-alp-to-expire-this-december/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/29/palms-license-to-next-gen-alp-to-expire-this-december/</guid><description><![CDATA[Explicatives (and bad typing) aside, I have to agree with Thanatos above.  For the longest time, (while I was a Palm user) I could not believe how misguided Palm was.  Now I have no idea how misguided they still are nor do I care because I use a Dell Axim.  <br><br>Palm ignored their customer base and kept turning out rehashed products with marginal improvements in functionality.  <br><br>Check this post in a few years.  Palm will still be using an archaic, limited, crappy OS 5.4 Garnet on devices with a max resolution of 320x320.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 30th 2006 4:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm's license to next-gen ALP to expire this December!]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/29/palms-license-to-next-gen-alp-to-expire-this-december/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/29/palms-license-to-next-gen-alp-to-expire-this-december/</guid><description><![CDATA[I agree with zorg, the Microsoft trolls are everywhere. It's an old tradition they started back in the days of the OS/2 vs. Windows 3.11 days...<br><br>They repeat the "Windows is unstoppable, any alternative is doomed" all the time, and sadly some newbies start to believe it.<br><br>Me? I wouldn't touch any bloated WinMob device, I prefer to go back to 800Mhz AMPS analog phones.<br><br>The reality is quite different, however, and outside of Microsoft-only corporate shops, the end users seem to have preferred the PalmOS running 650 and 700p over the 700w.<br><br>What WinMob users criticize is exactly one of the biggest features of PalmOS 5.4.x Garnet: small size, less hardware requirements, simplified user interface, not to mention that PalmOS apps are significantly smaller than WinMob equivalents.<br><br>PalmOS revived with Treo 700p release<br><a href="http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=31706" rel="nofollow">http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=31706</a><br><br>Treo 700p: Palm in PalmOS comeback, claim<br>Like a 650 and 700w put into a blender, WinMob-free<br><a href="http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=29519" rel="nofollow">http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=29519</a><br><br>GroupSense and Qool Labs make nice PalmOS GSM phones,<br>with almost no marketing, poor distribution<br><a href="http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=31366" rel="nofollow">http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=31366</a><br><br>NY Times and WSJ blast Windows-powered Treo<br><a href="http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=28776" rel="nofollow">http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=28776</a><br><br>How Palm Inc.'s CEO shot himself in the foot<br><a href="http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=27591" rel="nofollow">http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=27591</a><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Fernando]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 30th 2006 7:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm's license to next-gen ALP to expire this December!]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/29/palms-license-to-next-gen-alp-to-expire-this-december/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/29/palms-license-to-next-gen-alp-to-expire-this-december/</guid><description><![CDATA[Add me to the list of pissed off Palm faithful.  I still feel they have the best OS, but I have not used a Windows based device in quite sometime.  Aside from the constant crashing and lack of software updates, the platform has worked great for me.  Wouldn't you all agree that they do have the best VALUE in mobile computing, even if it's old technology?  You can't get a $99 windows pda can you?  Regardless, how long is the company going to just sit on it's hands and do NOTHING?  I sold my Treo to my boss (sucker) and I'm using a RAZR now - yes I AM holding my breath until Apple comes out with a PDA or iPhone.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[oxjox]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 30th 2006 11:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm's license to next-gen ALP to expire this December!]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/29/palms-license-to-next-gen-alp-to-expire-this-december/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/29/palms-license-to-next-gen-alp-to-expire-this-december/</guid><description><![CDATA[Our company writes software for smartphones, supporting Palm, M$ and Symbian.  While the number of Symbian devices is enormous most of these users are not aware of the power of the OS and don't realize that they can purchase software for the device.  Palm makes up 60% of our sales with M$ at 40%.  Our development on Symbian has been a TOTAL waste of money.  I have a lot of other friends that have also developed for Symbian.  They have the same story.  I would love to see a single OS.  It would make my life far easier.  For now it is not going to happen.  <br><br>The Treo is actually doing amazingly well after I believed it would die.  In the US it is Blackberry and  Treo that dominate the smartphone category.  Symbian is non existent.  The Moto Q will lift M$ significantly in the future.  I have heard that Nokia may be moving away from Symbian soon.  I guess they can't afford not to be in the US smartphone market in the long term.<br><br>For most users, the version of the OS is unknown and unimportant.  When they buy a Treo they get a great user experience and that is what is important to them.  I use both a WM handset and a Treo 650.  The 650 is my personal choice right now.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dev2]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 31st 2006 11:47AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm's license to next-gen ALP to expire this December!]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/29/palms-license-to-next-gen-alp-to-expire-this-december/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/29/palms-license-to-next-gen-alp-to-expire-this-december/</guid><description><![CDATA[I, too am getting tired of waiting for Palm to introduce the new operating system. I have had a Tungsten T3 for nearly 2 1/2 years. The T3 has been wonderful to use. It is fast and has a large screen. However, it is starting to show its age. I have been trying to hold on to this device until a worthwhile upgrade comes along. Unfortunately, it seems that at least one feature is either eliminated or downgraded on the Palm models released after the T3. Some features include:<br><br>1. Vibration alerts<br>2. Voice recording<br>3. Slower CPU speeds<br>4. A change in the type of memory (flash) used has caused compatability and performance issues<br><br>In addition to waiting for a new hardware device to be released, I am no longer interested in purchasing software for my T3. I feel better about waiting until I get a new device and then getting something compatible with it. If my T3 dies before a new Palm OS is released, I will probably switch to Windows Mobile. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[David W.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 1st 2006 10:53AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>