http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/13/sidekick-id-vs-sidekick-3-hands-on-gallery/ Engadget Comments for Sidekick iD vs Sidekick 3 hands-on gallery http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2010 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/13/sidekick-id-vs-sidekick-3-hands-on-gallery/http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/13/sidekick-id-vs-sidekick-3-hands-on-gallery/
Eh.... no.

]]>Apr 13th 2007 7:44PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/04/13/sidekick-id-vs-sidekick-3-hands-on-gallery/http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/13/sidekick-id-vs-sidekick-3-hands-on-gallery/Apr 13th 2007 7:57PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/04/13/sidekick-id-vs-sidekick-3-hands-on-gallery/http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/13/sidekick-id-vs-sidekick-3-hands-on-gallery/Apr 13th 2007 8:23PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/04/13/sidekick-id-vs-sidekick-3-hands-on-gallery/http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/13/sidekick-id-vs-sidekick-3-hands-on-gallery/
it's a cell phone with a QWERTY keyboard, full-featured web browser, push email, Yahoo/AIM/MSN messenger apps, and perhaps the most well-designed and intuitive cell phone operating system available. and it's ninety-nine dollars.

everybody complains about the lack of EDGE but anyone who's upgraded from an SK2 to and SK3 knows that the performance difference is practically unnoticable. plenty of people don't care about a camera, either. bluetooth, meh, personally i use AIM and email on my SK3 more than i do the phone feature.]]>Apr 13th 2007 8:47PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/04/13/sidekick-id-vs-sidekick-3-hands-on-gallery/http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/13/sidekick-id-vs-sidekick-3-hands-on-gallery/Apr 13th 2007 10:39PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/04/13/sidekick-id-vs-sidekick-3-hands-on-gallery/http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/13/sidekick-id-vs-sidekick-3-hands-on-gallery/
I've always said, and will continue to say, that the only thing the Sidekick has going for it (besides hipster and emo cred) is its form factor, which is actually kind of cool. I also wonder if this thing has the same durability problems as the other sidekicks.]]>Apr 14th 2007 10:25AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/04/13/sidekick-id-vs-sidekick-3-hands-on-gallery/http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/13/sidekick-id-vs-sidekick-3-hands-on-gallery/Apr 15th 2007 1:44AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/04/13/sidekick-id-vs-sidekick-3-hands-on-gallery/http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/13/sidekick-id-vs-sidekick-3-hands-on-gallery/Apr 16th 2007 11:10AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/04/13/sidekick-id-vs-sidekick-3-hands-on-gallery/http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/13/sidekick-id-vs-sidekick-3-hands-on-gallery/if only the sidekick 3 looked like that
i would be one happy camper!
i have a sidekick 3.
and im thinking of getting the ID
but soooo many people tell me not to!
should i do it or not?]]>Apr 22nd 2007 7:05PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/04/13/sidekick-id-vs-sidekick-3-hands-on-gallery/http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/13/sidekick-id-vs-sidekick-3-hands-on-gallery/
Sidekick is convenience.
Phone, and a full QWERTY keyboard.

Blue tooth is for trekkies.
And who honestly doesnt already own a digital camera already that puts ANY cell phone camera to shame.


Bottom line:::

Sidekick iD - $99
New bumpers - $15
Easily flipping out the screen to gracefully type out a lengthy text or email?
PRICELESS.

For some things in life theres 3G and other gay barely faster interent browsing capabitilies.

For everyone else.. There the Sidekick iD]]>Jun 16th 2007 11:52PM