Oh and you can I hear rub off the annoying text on devices by using a sugarcube or some salt, people say it works great but I never tried it myself so far.
it's using screen estate, in modern device the screen could be bigger.
but that's not the point.
the whole point of it being giorgio armani is that it has giorgio armani in big letters. like those god awful d&g frames. but that's fashion. for the buyer it's a bonus that it reads it in biiiiiiiiiiiiiig letters.
what i'd be more intrested is how sophisticated the haptic feedback is, like, if you press a button do you get a normal vibr or a solid "knock".
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
Now thats a touch phone I would consider.
I would prefer it doesn't come with the designers name on it though.
I'm saddened that they threw away valuable screen real estate for that huge G Armani name on it, but not surprised.
That is a wee-bit off putting, yes.
that's the whole point of the phone- it is called the "Armani phone" for a reason.
one assumes the name is on there for the PR shots and doesn't have to be on there.
Oh and you can I hear rub off the annoying text on devices by using a sugarcube or some salt, people say it works great but I never tried it myself so far.
@Randomness
How is the Armani logo using valuable screen real estate? It seems to me it's using plastic real estate.
They've gotta put the electronics somewhere, it's not all magic screen.
it's using screen estate, in modern device the screen could be bigger.
but that's not the point.
the whole point of it being giorgio armani is that it has giorgio armani in big letters. like those god awful d&g frames. but that's fashion. for the buyer it's a bonus that it reads it in biiiiiiiiiiiiiig letters.
what i'd be more intrested is how sophisticated the haptic feedback is, like, if you press a button do you get a normal vibr or a solid "knock".