http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/ Engadget Comments for Knockoff artists take "nano" in "iPhone nano" too seriously http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2010 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/]]>Oct 27th 2007 11:32AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/Oct 27th 2007 11:36AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/Oct 27th 2007 11:39AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/
Apple injects ZERO INNOVATION in most products they pedal.

Problem is they market REALLY REALLY WELL.]]>Oct 27th 2007 11:52AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/Oct 27th 2007 12:42PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/Oct 27th 2007 1:57PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/Oct 27th 2007 11:31AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/Oct 27th 2007 12:21PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/http://jyopp.com/iphone-pmp.jpg

The one they had on display at the market in Zhongguancun (in Beijing) had a plastic film over the screen, but it should be obvious that if it isn't the same thing, the manufacturers were probably sharing notes. It's a plain-vanilla 2GB PMP, and to increase the cheeziness, red illuminated buttons show through the face on all four corners, that look a bit like the LG Chocolate's buttons. No touchscreen, only four buttons using click-switches at the four corners of the face.]]>Oct 27th 2007 3:15PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/Oct 27th 2007 4:11PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/You're absolutely right... Apple has never created something uninspiring, or for that matter done anything stupid...
*cough* iPod Touch
*cough* http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/apple-refusing-to-accept-cash-for-iphone-limits-em-to-two-per/]]>Oct 27th 2007 5:22PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/
cheaper (or same price for x2 memory of iPhone), has all the best iPhone features, and there's NO overpriced two year contracts]]>Oct 27th 2007 6:24PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/
Please read the comment in order as posted.

Uninnovative was mentioned first = Ipod Touch

Stupid = Apple No likey the Green

Comprende?]]>Oct 27th 2007 7:02PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/
http://www.chinagrabber.com/index.asp?PageAction=VIEWPROD&ProdID=1414&HS=1

Don't let ipod of no-name china clones deprive you of the features you should get for that kind of price tag! I got mine, and i am obviously happy with it... :)
]]>Dec 24th 2007 5:46AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/
What's different about the ipod classic that you couldn't get a generation or so previous? Except for coverflow, which stinks anyways. Plus, the nano was nothing but a smaller ipod (no innovation there either, chief)

I think it's fake, but a nano iphone is definately an Apple-esque move.]]>Oct 27th 2007 11:33AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/
I posted this nearly 4 months ago: http://www.flickr.com/photos/83512992@N00/718518654/]]>Oct 27th 2007 12:10PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/Oct 27th 2007 12:14PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/Oct 27th 2007 11:36AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/Oct 27th 2007 1:48PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/Oct 27th 2007 11:49AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/Oct 27th 2007 11:55AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/Oct 27th 2007 11:57AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/Oct 27th 2007 12:00PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/Oct 27th 2007 11:54PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/
I have that keyboard, not a Dell. It's just a generic Lite-on OEM KB, similar to this one: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16823107120]]>Oct 27th 2007 12:04PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/Oct 27th 2007 12:57PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/
pfft..

tbh id be happy/unsurprised if that was the iphone nano form, although what features they going to be taking out worries me..]]>Oct 27th 2007 12:15PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/Oct 27th 2007 12:15PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/Oct 27th 2007 9:26PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/
just sayin.]]>Oct 27th 2007 12:20PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/Oct 27th 2007 12:40PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/Oct 27th 2007 12:27PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/Oct 27th 2007 12:35PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/dont need to type there, do you..?!??]]>Oct 27th 2007 12:38PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/Oct 27th 2007 12:54PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/
I can see this being real, a large portion of the population (older market) want something that is easier to use and don't give a shit out text message or emails. Just make it easy to load some tunes and photos, and small so it'll fit easily in the pocket. And be cheap, which it will be by losing a whole bunch of features.]]>Oct 27th 2007 1:16PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/Oct 27th 2007 1:14PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/Oct 27th 2007 1:51PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/Oct 27th 2007 8:10PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/Oct 27th 2007 1:58PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/Oct 29th 2007 9:11AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/Oct 27th 2007 4:14PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/ - Silver thingy on ear speaker of phone, instead of a black hole

Fake!]]>Oct 27th 2007 2:36PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/
Though I'm not sure there's any point until the capacity of the flash versions get much larger or batteries get better to allow hdd versions...]]>Oct 28th 2007 5:59AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/Oct 27th 2007 2:55PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/Oct 27th 2007 2:51PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/Oct 27th 2007 3:24PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/Oct 27th 2007 3:34PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/
Roll on iPhone uk, less than 2 weeks to go now...]]>Oct 27th 2007 5:43PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/27/knockoff-artists-take-nano-in-iphone-nano-too-seriously/
AND just because some of you guys highly rank uninformed posts doesn't make then true.]]>Oct 27th 2007 5:47PM