<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2010 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</guid><description><![CDATA[On paper the N82 sounded great. I bought one while traveling through the Hong Kong airport. What a night mare. The phone worked for five days before some sort of software bug prevented it from booting up. Dealing with Nokia customer service in Hong Kong has been about as enjoyable as a root canal without an anesthetic.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[m stein]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 31st 2008 11:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why couldnt they put at least a VGA display on it?<br><br>QVGA is lame .. you can get an iPhone with much better resolution and a 10x better browsing experience for much less thatn $657 ... with money left over to buy a quality GPS.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Johan S]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2007 3:47AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wow, that was quick.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[reticulate]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2007 3:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</guid><description><![CDATA[Except that there are no quality GPS software, wait, no native GPS software on the Iphone is there? There is no 5Mp AF camera too. Apart from the resolution browsing on a Nokia is equivalent to the Iphone. If your whole idea of better browsing equals higher res then you should invest in a WVGA Windows Mobile with Opera/NetFront browser.<br><br>And $657 is for the unlocked sim-free no contract price. Expect it to be sold here on contract for much much less than the Iphone. The Nokia N95 for example is free on a £35 tariff on O2.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2007 3:13AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</guid><description><![CDATA[*At least* VGA? You do realise that the iPhone isn't even VGA, right?<br><br>Also, the price comparison is stupid. You're comparing Nokia's unlocked price to Apple's locked price. In the UK, the iPhone retails for £269. This phone will be free. You could buy an 16GB iPod touch with the difference in money.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[xbit]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2007 3:16AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</guid><description><![CDATA[Interestingly, its predecessor the N80 has a 352 x 416 resolution display.<br><br>I don't know why Nokia appear to have gone backwards, but I don't think I will be 'upgrading' my ancient N80 (to this model).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[c]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2007 7:49AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</guid><description><![CDATA[the N80 isnt its predecessor, its just the way the numbers have worked out.<br>I'd see this as the N73 successor. And the N80 resolution sucked for developers ive heard.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[srw985]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 15th 2007 5:28AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</guid><description><![CDATA[There is all that nasty 3rd party application stuff to be concerned with.  Since the iPhone is not supporting any standard application environment (such as J2ME or Symbian), this was not an issue; however the Nokia N80 ran into some problems with 3rd party applications due to its non-standard screen resolution.<br><br>(There is of course the Nokia E90 Communicator as well; though this does not support U.S. 3G bands.  Not that the iPhone supports ANY 3G, but still...)<br><br>As far as the N95 vs. the iPhone - give it up.  The iPhone does not even have some of the features you would expect in a standard low-end phone (e.g. basic bluetooth profiles such as DUN, A2DP, etc,  or being able to connect to an external bluetooth GPS receiver.  Even if you were able to do so, and to run 3rd party GPS-aware map applications such as MGMaps or AmazeGPS, the EDGE speed would simply be too slow to update the maps while you are driving...).    Once you compare against any 3G phone, let alone the N95, you'll find the iPhone lacking in a lot of respects.<br><br>The iPhone's strenghts is not in features.  It is in its UI (including, of course, the multi-touch interaction and the half-VGA screen).  Enjoy it for that.<br><br>(BTW, as a portable internet device, I find the Nokia N800/N810 internet tablets far superior to the iPhone/iPod Touch.   For starters, they have flash support, and are able to see YouTube on the "real" internet.  And unlike the iPhone's half-VGA screen, they sport a WVGA (800x480) resolution screen.  They have real bluetooth support (for connectivity to internet via your phone, wireless audio devices, even bluetooth keyboard and mice..) Finally, the N810 has a built-in hardware keyboard).<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tor Slettnes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 26th 2007 4:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</guid><description><![CDATA[Incredible.  Another amazing phone from Nokia that does HSDPA on 2100MHz.  Guess USA customers took it in the a** once again.  Thanks USA cellular carriers and/or Nokia.<br><br>Jerks.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[herb gunner]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2007 3:05AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</guid><description><![CDATA[It is actually not the carriers' fault, but the U.S. government. The 2100 MHz band is used by the military, and unavailable for commercial bidding. <br><br>Hopefully, the winner of the 700 MHz band will work with international standards bodies to do something more sensible this time around.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tor Slettnes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 26th 2007 3:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</guid><description><![CDATA[N95 in a candybar form, instead of slide.<br>Nothing new here]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[srw985]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2007 3:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</guid><description><![CDATA[...... and theres nothing EVER new with any Sony Ericsson phone in that case. The same phone, identical software, just a different exoskeleton and differences in the camera module. <br><br>The N82 may have similar features to the N95 but its a much needed replacement for the N73. This has better build quality, an updated UI and a nicer camera. Good enough. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[euclid]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2007 3:19AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</guid><description><![CDATA[The N73 was an incredibly popular phone and is still sold here in various colour schemes so Nokia releasing a candy bar format replacement of it makes perfect business sense,]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2007 3:22AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</guid><description><![CDATA[what about<br><br>+Battery (BP-6MT) 1050mAh<br>+Automatic screen rotation (native)<br>+Xenon flash<br>+touchwheel<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[chilko]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2007 3:38AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</guid><description><![CDATA[I wonder if it inherits the crap software from the N73. I had one and the camera was nice but it tended to suddenly lose the autofocus. Which you would find out about at the end of the day when all those fun party shots come out blurry.<br>It was also spectacularly slow. 4 seconds to open a text message can seem like an eternity. It is an eternity on a mobile phone.<br>What's on that screen is that Windows Mobile? Or Some new S60 version?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nikster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 15th 2007 3:12AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</guid><description><![CDATA[its symbian s60v3, the same that was on N73, and most other N-series phones, with a few tweaks.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[srw985]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 15th 2007 5:26AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</guid><description><![CDATA[The buttons are too small and close together.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mild7]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2007 4:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</guid><description><![CDATA[The buttons couldn't be further apart if they tried!! <br><br>I thought the buttons were too small on my K810 but it's really nice to use... how big are your fingers?!?! If they're bigger than mine I would try writing a text on an iPhone!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Giles]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2007 6:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</guid><description><![CDATA[AT&T sucks... even with 2 yr contract, don't even think about getting a phone as good as N95 for free. not to mention that they never carry the latest phones like rest of the world do. N75 still costs $99 now with a 2 yr AT&T contract, and that's the only n series phone they have.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[benjasmine]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2007 5:33AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</guid><description><![CDATA[Nokia told ATT to go to hell because they always want to remove features from their phones.  Hence the only selling of unlocked phones.  And the reluctance of Nokia to send over phones optimized for our networks.  They do so little of their over all business in the united states they are contemplating pulling them completely]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Damon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2007 9:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</guid><description><![CDATA[Awesome! My next phone I think - unless something better comes along between now and April... Everything I want - WLAN, GPS, 5MP and a real flash...<br>The N80 was disappointing due to speed - hopefully there's a better processor in there!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Giles]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2007 6:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's got all the same problems as the N80.<br><br>Symbian runs like a sludge, and my laptop boots faster.<br><br>The buttons are too close.<br><br>The battery goes from fully charged to nearly depleted without passing through intermediate states.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2007 7:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</guid><description><![CDATA[biggest usability problem with earlier s60 3rd eds is that they had really shitty amounts of ram free after boot(10-17mbyte)<br><br>n82 has the same amount of ram as n95-8gb, as is almost any other spec of it(including 3d accel in hw).<br><br>90mb free after boot, so the browser etc run like they should and don't die in the background.<br><br>so, a lot of things wrong with n80 are fixed with the newer models.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[lassi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2007 7:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</guid><description><![CDATA[Aye thats true after so many years they finally noticed that they need more ram, but at least they got it fixed eventually. <br>This might be my next phone just if it would have 2.6 and its a no brainer =(<br>Well will see how much will it be from carrier other option is N95 8gb, but i would take the candy bar any day before any other form factor.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Pdexter]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2007 7:25AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</guid><description><![CDATA[N80 had a 220Mhz processor. All the newer S60 devices has either 332 or 369Mhz processors and at least double the free RAM available after initial booting. Newer Symbian versions also feature memory paging to improve RAM usage.<br><br>My old N80 can last a week on standby if 3G is switched off when not needed and WiFi consumption is lowered.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2007 7:31AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</guid><description><![CDATA[I can't get mine to last on standby for more than 2 days even with 3G off and no WIFI usage.<br><br>I can't think why 8GB would be needed. Windows XP can run faster in 256MB!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2007 10:07AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</guid><description><![CDATA[Here is a tip for decreasing WiFi usage (by default the N80's WiFi is always on). When I first got the N80 the battery lasted just two days but after switching off 3G and lowering the WiFi's power the standby time increased to 5 days.<br><br>settings - connections - wireless lan - options - advanced settings<br><br>Go down to TX power level and change to 4mW (the default is 100mW). In my experience while the WiFi range did decrease slightly the massive improvement in standby time was worth it. <br><br>I don't have a N80 now but my girlfriend still has one and her charger recently broke on Sunday. Today her N80 still has 3/5 battery bar.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2007 12:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</guid><description><![CDATA[Mike you really are clueless - Id stop commenting on this topic as youare digging yourself into a deeper hole the more you say.<br><br>1. Symbian have got their issues well and truely sorted - the N95 and even better N95 8Gb load quickly, navigate quickly and can multitask very well indeed (the N95 8gb very very well indeed).<br>2. 8Gb is for storage - ie for music/videos - it doesnt need 8Gb to run you dumbass. The 256Mb on the N95 8GB is RAM - ie multitasking and quicker loading of apps.<br><br>I simply dont believe you have ever touched an N82, or even an N95 - because everything you say points to you talking out of your botty!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chrisphillers]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2007 5:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</guid><description><![CDATA[TO chrisphillers bottymouth.<br><br>I'm querying the 8GB because the above commenters use it to (partly) justify the extra RAM free after boot. I've added 2GB without it making an iota of difference.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2007 5:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</guid><description><![CDATA[From Bottymouth - I guess they are talking out of their arses too then!:p ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chrisphillers]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2007 6:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</guid><description><![CDATA[So when is the N82 8Gb/16Gb edition coming? ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Unregistered]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2007 7:19AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</guid><description><![CDATA[and Music Edition like N73 does?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[benjasmine]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2007 10:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</guid><description><![CDATA[Thew nice thing is that is had TV out!!<br><br>Now you can connnect the video glasses from <a href="http://www.relaxview.eu" rel="nofollow">http://www.relaxview.eu</a> and have a hands free mobile cinema<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Asper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2007 7:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</guid><description><![CDATA[About 4 months and we will have N82 music(black) and a long way after that i version then maybe N82-3 ;)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Pdexter]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2007 7:27AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</guid><description><![CDATA[5 megapixel camera?  Very nice. But, I sure bet the noise on this thing when it goes over ISO 100 will be horrendous.  I'd love to see one of the photo sites/mags do an in-depth review on the camera part of this phone.  While cell phone sensors will never be able to handle what full-frame or even APS-C sized sensors can do in regular cameras, it's fascinating to see a higher-resolution sensor in phone.<br><br>Maybe the pictures taken on cellphones will actually be worth to save and print instead of being kept prisoner on the phone's microSD card.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[iczer2]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2007 8:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</guid><description><![CDATA[Agreed. Let's see a real-world typical pic taken by the camera. <br><br>That means in a nightclub, shooting quickly (ah... the fleeting club candid). If it can produce good quality low light, rapid shot candids, I'm sold.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2007 8:55AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</guid><description><![CDATA[thus, how software processes images is very important for camera phones, as well as for regular cameras. For example, Sony DSLR-A100 and Nikon D200 both use the same CCD sensor. however, the Nikon D200 outperforms the Sony A100 on high ISO. I hope Nokia has improved the image processing method on this one.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[benjasmine]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2007 10:41AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</guid><description><![CDATA[And just as important to the firmware processing the image is the actual image processor itself.  Most Canon cameras have either the DiG!C II or III processors which make short work of both RAW and JPG image processing.<br><br>Either way, I sure hope they didn't skimp on that part of the phone if they were putting in a 5 megapixel sensor.  It would be such a waste...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[iczer2]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2007 11:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ive seen the phone in action in regards to pictures.  Moving pictures taken from my car while driving.  This is officially the best camera phone to date and the pictures are on par with that of a real digital camera.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Damon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 15th 2007 12:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</guid><description><![CDATA[So this is the handset the world has been waiting for?   I always wanted to see the handset that changes the way of the handset industry and the handset all the mobile carriers are fighting for.<br><br>This wonderful Nokia device should sell by the millions.  It may just be the world's most perfect and most highly demanded smartphone ever.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Constable Odo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2007 12:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</guid><description><![CDATA[Its more like filling the spaces for the N73 that is starting to be dead and you are right N82 will probaly sell millions as did N73. Nokia didnt ever say that its revolutionary =)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Pdexter]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2007 2:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</guid><description><![CDATA[I love this phone. But what irks me is that centimeter devoid of purpose around the word 'Nokia'. That screen could have played '16:9' video in landscape pretty well without that branding there.<br><br>It is after all, supposed to be a 'media-centric mobile'.<br><br>Maybe in six monthes when they re-release it in black we'll also see some widescreen lovin'.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[L.Rawlins]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2007 2:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</guid><description><![CDATA[Good observation! I think this is a sign that Nokia is losing it in the design department. They could have made the screen bigger, or the keyboard. As it is they have a piece of branding fluff in the middle that serves no purpose. <br><br>Also I don't like the N-series displaying "N82" or whatever on the front plate - no Nokias prior to N did that.<br><br>Another point of criticism: That front facing camera. Nobody is using these cameras, Nokia. <br><br>I thought that Nokia is doing some innovative usage patterns research - and I wonder where on this planet have they found people who hold the phone a foot from their face while talking via video conferencing. Can you imagine how silly that would look? <br>I have never seen such a person, and I have traveled many cities with blazingly fast 3G networks. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nikster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 15th 2007 3:25AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</guid><description><![CDATA[Amazing phone i was about to upgrade my n95 to N95 8gb version but now lookin at this its a nice phone jam packed with applications and functions one big question where can i buy it from i live  in UK<br>can some one post as where can i buy it form within EU<br>Thank you]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nahman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2007 7:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</guid><description><![CDATA[oh,my god, it's perfect!! i will instead my NOKIA 1100 by this one!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Arigu]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 15th 2007 10:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</guid><description><![CDATA[Have to tell you that Carl Zeiss lenses don't have 5 mega pixels - no lenses do. 5 mega pixels refers to the sensor that captures the image.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 17th 2007 7:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/14/the-nokia-n82-gets-official/</guid><description><![CDATA[If you take a picture with this, are the GPS coordinates embedded (geo-tagged)?  I've been looking for a digital camera that's not crazy-expensive with that feature, and can't find one.  But if it's also a phone, multimedia device, etc. etc. why not?<br>OR... if this DOESN'T do that, does anyone know a camera or camera/phone that DOES do that for under $800?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 20th 2007 9:22AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>