This is impressive, but as of right now, what the heck ya gonna use this for? Any of the other high end cards can more than handle the latest DX9 games. I think ATI is going to release as some of the newer DX10 games arrive.
Well y'know, Call of Duty 2 only runs at an average of 23 fps at 2560x1600 on maximum quality with the old X1950... that's simply unacceptable for todays gamer! Imagine the lack of enjoyment such a gamer would have from being arduously forced to scale back the resolution to perhaps something as low as... gasp... 1920x1200! Only a whee-tad greater than HDTV resolution! Any cinematic quality in the game would be lost! Oh woe!
“An engineer explained to us that hundreds of ear impressions were gathered in the name of research, and while each one obviously boasted its own unique shape and size, one single characteristic remained uniform across the board: the entrance into the ear canal is not a perfect circle, it's an oval.”
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
This is impressive, but as of right now, what the heck ya gonna use this for? Any of the other high end cards can more than handle the latest DX9 games. I think ATI is going to release as some of the newer DX10 games arrive.
Of course, I could be totally wrong as usual!
Well y'know, Call of Duty 2 only runs at an average of 23 fps at 2560x1600 on maximum quality with the old X1950... that's simply unacceptable for todays gamer! Imagine the lack of enjoyment such a gamer would have from being arduously forced to scale back the resolution to perhaps something as low as... gasp... 1920x1200! Only a whee-tad greater than HDTV resolution! Any cinematic quality in the game would be lost! Oh woe!