From what I can tell, the main differences between this and the Axim X50v/X51v are:
- Video acceleration (iPaq doesn't have the Intel 2700g 3D accelerator -- or any other dedicated video chipset for that matter) - OS (WM6, though you can get Football's WM6 for the X51v, or Maglite's WM6 for the X50v) - Processor (PXA310 vs. the Dell's PXA270. Not sure what that means in practical terms, if anything.) - Screen (4.0" on iPaq, 3.7" on Axim) - Biometrics (optional on iPaq, not available on Axim) - Battery (iPaq comes standard with a nice 2200mAh, while the Axim comes with an 1100mAh. You can get higher capacity batteries on the Dell, but that requires a new, fatter battery cover.)
Other than the nice battery and larger screen, the Axim still kicks its ass.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
From what I can tell, the main differences between this and the Axim X50v/X51v are:
- Video acceleration (iPaq doesn't have the Intel 2700g 3D accelerator -- or any other dedicated video chipset for that matter)
- OS (WM6, though you can get Football's WM6 for the X51v, or Maglite's WM6 for the X50v)
- Processor (PXA310 vs. the Dell's PXA270. Not sure what that means in practical terms, if anything.)
- Screen (4.0" on iPaq, 3.7" on Axim)
- Biometrics (optional on iPaq, not available on Axim)
- Battery (iPaq comes standard with a nice 2200mAh, while the Axim comes with an 1100mAh. You can get higher capacity batteries on the Dell, but that requires a new, fatter battery cover.)
Other than the nice battery and larger screen, the Axim still kicks its ass.