It's fairly clear that much of his tenure as Warchief of the Horde has been a tumultuous one, he's made some spectacularly bad decisions, and as his ladders are all gone and we lie down where all those ladders would have started, in the fel iron wrought bone shop he's made of Orgrimmar, I can't shake this feeling of sympathy. Garrosh Hellscream has become the villain of his own story. Had he died in Northrend, we'd still tell stories of how he rallied the Horde and helped defeat the Lich King. Had he perished fighting on his flagship over the Twilight Highlands, we'd share tales of how he kicked a dragon off the ship by himself.
Now we're just going to kill him.
There are those players and commenters who believe Garrosh's personality has taken some huge turn over the course of Mists of Pandaria
, but I categorically disagree with those who make this argument. Garrosh today is the Garrosh who picked a fight with Thrall in Orgrimmar before the attack of the Lich King, the Garrosh who impatiently argued with Varok Saurfang in the Borean Tundra about pushing the Alliance out of the way. He's the orc who started a fight inside the Kirin Tor's sanctum with Varian Wrynn and who insulted the Alliance in the stands of the Argent Coliseum. (To be fair to Garrosh, that whole tournament was perishingly stupid.) His actions in Cataclysm
showed some depth to his character - his initial hesitation to take on the burden of Warchief, his panic at the idea of having slain Cairne Bloodhoof dishonorably, his anger at a subordinate having murdered Horde civilians in his name - but these elements only enforce
Garrosh's portrayal. This is an orc who has embraced his people because they
have embraced him
, who wanted to belong, to surpass his effectively unknown father and prove to the world, and to himself, that he is the son of Hellscream. His wearing of Mannoroth's tusks is just one sign of this obsession - he borrows the trophies of his father's deed to cloak his own deep insecurity over his own.
The Garrosh who killed Krom'gar
did so for many reasons. He killed him for acting without orders. He killed him for dishonoring his Warchief by proxy. He killed him for his actions against Horde civilians, and his misuse of a Horde weapon. And he killed him because of one question - "Am I a murderer?"
Garrosh Hellscream aspires to much, but he does not
aspire to be a murderer. He would have killed Cairne in the Mak'gora, yes, although he didn't seek
the old bull's death, but he never sought to murder
the tauren. Similarly, while killing Alliance (civilians or not) is part and parcel of the ever expanding war with that faction, killing Horde
at that time was not war, and as such, had no honor, could bring no glory. In a way, Garrosh must be relieved
that Vol'jin has finally raised the flag of rebellion against him - now, at least in Garrosh's eyes, killing the troll and his followers won't be murder, but war.
Garrosh's insecurity and aspirations fascinate me because they've led him, step by step, down the path that brings us here. He wanted to be his people's savior, to liberate them from the privation of their lives toiling in a desert for subsistence - and in many ways, he's made strides towards doing exactly that. Garrosh pushed the Alliance back from the very gates of Orgrimmar by conquering Azshara, once a night elf territory and now fully Horde. He made inroads deep into Ashenvale and Stonetalon. He may not have actually conquered Gilneas, but his support made sure that the Worgen who joined the Alliance did so as nationless refugees unable to contribute the resources of their native land to the fight. His destruction of Theramore pushed a major Alliance threat off of the continent, even if it ultimately rebounded to his disadvantage. Through it all, Garrosh's strengths were offset by the very weaknesses he protested to Thrall when he was appointed. He is not a politician, and leads in the style of a general commanding a military. This was sufficient in the time of Doomhammer, because the Horde then was
a purely military machine, composed primarily of Doomhammer's own people.
Where Garrosh has failed, he's failed because he was trying to lead the Horde of his father's time. And it's sad, really, to see him lose his grip on the Horde because he never really understood it - he was an orc who grew up in the shadow of a dreadful figure suddenly relieved of a lifelong burden and thrown into a position he had no experience with, finding himself heir to his father's skill in battle and also, perhaps, his lack of patience. Garrosh isn't his father - for one thing, he's physically bigger
than Grom ever was, a hulking, massive brute where his father was described as lithe for an orc - and in many ways its that struggle between who he wants to be and who he actually is that has caused him so much grief. If only Thrall had appointed someone else to lead the Horde and left Garrosh as supreme commander of the military, one suspects that everyone involved (even Garrosh himself) would have been happier.
Instead, now we're just going to kill him.
I don't think, even at this late juncture, it's fair to call Garrosh Hellscream evil
. Perhaps that's why I am so sympathetic towards him, while viewing pretty much his entire reign as Warchief as a cavalcade of disasters and horrors. To be fair, Garrosh is racist, petulant at times (his killing of Krom'gar in particular strikes me as a panicked reaction to the idea of his own
dishonor and not a measured response to a subordinate's failure) and is as ruthless as Doomhammer, willing to commit atrocities and use any resource necessary to win and heedless of the cost. And ironically, like his father, Garrosh will embrace even the foulest means to achieve victory. There's a lot to hate about the son of Hellscream, and yet, I don't hate him.
In the end, Hellscream's ultimate enemy was, in fact, Hellscream.