EncryptedMobileVoice

Latest

  • AT&T goes live with Encrypted Mobile Voice, kills your dreams of breaking into Pelosi's social circle

    by 
    Darren Murph
    Darren Murph
    10.07.2010

    AT&T told us back in July that it was fixing to launch the first carrier-provided two factor encryption service, and it seems that today's the day. The day it goes live, we mean. At any rate, the company's Encrypted Mobile Voice service is reportedly active, and it's already providing "high-level security features for calls on the AT&T wireless network." Of course, none of this fancy security is meant for simpletons like us -- instead, it's targeting government agencies, law enforcement organizations, financial services institutions and international businesses. We're told that the tech combines KoolSpan's TrustChip and SRA International's One Vault Voice, with the former being a microSD card and the latter being a software layer. Currently, it only plays nice with BlackBerry and Windows Phones, but until we see Biden bust out a Bravo, we'll assume the lack of Android support isn't "a big flipping deal."

  • AT&T Encrypted Mobile Voice to bring extra security to Obama's BlackBerry calls

    by 
    Darren Murph
    Darren Murph
    07.23.2010

    Yeah, we know that the Prez was once seen rocking a Verizon-branded BlackBerry 8830, but just bend your mind a bit and bear with us. Shortly after lighting up Wall Street with an exceedingly excellent quarterly earnings report, AT&T has announced an Encrypted Mobile Voice service that'll hit later in the year. Assuming Obama actually does own an AT&T-branded 'Berry, he'll soon be able to enjoy what AT&T calls "the first mobile-to-mobile voice encryption solution using two-factor authentication offered by a US operator." Said service is expected to provide a higher level of security for calls across the AT&T wireless network, and naturally, it'll be shopped to government agencies, law enforcement organizations, financial services institutions and international businesses, all of which will pay far too much for what's likely a false sense of security. We mean, haven't these guys ever seen 24?