Cool Article!
Just a quick statment though, even though they don't attach the patch from the book, interestingly enough Tyrell meantons the "Blush Respone" (and, indeed, one of the tracks on the soundtrack is titled "Blush Response"). I'm not sure if that means this machine is somehow measureing the Blush Response as well (perhaps some thermal scanner that's fed back to the user in a digital data format instead of a visual?), or if perhaps this was an older part of the machine that was cut out because the eye part has become more accurate and it makes it more portable?
In response to the above comment, Total Recall was "decent" but Minority Report was excillent. I wish they would somehow make a movie from "The Man in the High Castle."
As to the Esper, I'm not entirely sure. Both sides make good points, but it would seem that it DID do more than just pan and zoom.
(Oh yeah, and a couple people tried Neuromancer, but none to Gibson's satisfaction. I have to respect Gibson giving up a whole lot of money because he wants his film done right and not completely mashed and garbled. I think the only way that's going to happen is with an independent and not with the major studios and indie films don't have the budget.)
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Dr. Zoidberg @ Dec 19th 2005 12:04AM
Cool Article!
Just a quick statment though, even though they don't attach the patch from the book, interestingly enough Tyrell meantons the "Blush Respone" (and, indeed, one of the tracks on the soundtrack is titled "Blush Response"). I'm not sure if that means this machine is somehow measureing the Blush Response as well (perhaps some thermal scanner that's fed back to the user in a digital data format instead of a visual?), or if perhaps this was an older part of the machine that was cut out because the eye part has become more accurate and it makes it more portable?
In response to the above comment, Total Recall was "decent" but Minority Report was excillent. I wish they would somehow make a movie from "The Man in the High Castle."
As to the Esper, I'm not entirely sure. Both sides make good points, but it would seem that it DID do more than just pan and zoom.
(Oh yeah, and a couple people tried Neuromancer, but none to Gibson's satisfaction. I have to respect Gibson giving up a whole lot of money because he wants his film done right and not completely mashed and garbled. I think the only way that's going to happen is with an independent and not with the major studios and indie films don't have the budget.)