I managed to take a look at this unit and the picture quality was surprisingly good on a regular TV (non-HD) given the limitations of the encoding. It looked much better then connecting the iPod directly to my TV.
There were 2 pieces to this device, a transmitter (which the iPod was plugged into) and a receiver which hooks up via standard audio-video cables to the TV's auxiliary AV input. It was an interesting demonstration with the best part being there was no configuration required to get it working. There is also a USB port on this which I suspect can be used to sync with iTunes but that is just a guess.
BTW, these guys only make the chip that transmit the video wirelessly over 802.11a/g and what they showed was only an application reference design.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
I managed to take a look at this unit and the picture quality was surprisingly good on a regular TV (non-HD) given the limitations of the encoding. It looked much better then connecting the iPod directly to my TV.
There were 2 pieces to this device, a transmitter (which the iPod was plugged into) and a receiver which hooks up via standard audio-video cables to the TV's auxiliary AV input. It was an interesting demonstration with the best part being there was no configuration required to get it working. There is also a USB port on this which I suspect can be used to sync with iTunes but that is just a guess.
BTW, these guys only make the chip that transmit the video wirelessly over 802.11a/g and what they showed was only an application reference design.