Yup AMD's definitaly better. They had asked intel for a challenge and they refused. But finally the Dual-core Optron VS Xeon challenge was accepted. Bet u cant guess who won, roflhttp://www.amd.com/us-en/0,,3715_13368_13369,00.htmlHeres the important part of that pageSPECint® rate2000 – Dual-Core AMD Opteron processor Model 280 outperforms the dual-core Xeon 2.8GHz processor by 28 %SPECfp® rate2000 – Dual-Core AMD Opteron processor Model 280 outperforms the dual-core Xeon 2.8GHz processor by 76 %SPECjbb®2005 – Dual-Core AMD Opteron processor Model 280 outperforms the dual-core Xeon 2.8GHz by 13%
Name
Email
Reason
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
Yup AMD's definitaly better. They had asked intel for a challenge and they refused. But finally the Dual-core Optron VS Xeon challenge was accepted.
Bet u cant guess who won, rofl
http://www.amd.com/us-en/0,,3715_13368_13369,00.html
Heres the important part of that page
SPECint® rate2000 –
Dual-Core AMD Opteron processor Model 280 outperforms the dual-core Xeon 2.8GHz processor by 28 %
SPECfp® rate2000 –
Dual-Core AMD Opteron processor Model 280 outperforms the dual-core Xeon 2.8GHz processor by 76 %
SPECjbb®2005 –
Dual-Core AMD Opteron processor Model 280 outperforms the dual-core Xeon 2.8GHz by 13%