
We've been waiting just about forever
for Apple to add an FM receiver to the iPod, and the company's competitors have had no trouble exploiting that lack;
it's almost impossible to find a digital audio player from another company that doesn't have an FM tuner. Now Apple has
thrown in the towel and added an FM receiver of their own to the iPod — sort of. The new iPod Radio Remote has a
built-in FM receiver, something that's been available for some time on third-party products like
Griffin's iFM. Of course, now that
Apple's doing it themselves, the vendors can just throw in the towel. The iPod Radio Remote supports the nano and iPod
with video, and is powered by the iPod. Stations can be saved as favorites, and the radio supports the Radio Data
System for display of song or station information. Of course third-party vendors may still find an audience for their
products given that Apple's offering only works with the most recent iPod models, and doesn't include a voice recorder
or some of the other bells and whistles available on some aftermarket products.
hooray for no mini support! >:{
Wow look how long those cables are.
Is it for giants.
Nothing like playing 50.00 more for something that comes standard on most other players.
i'm not a mac user so the mac users can you tell me if this mac world lived up to the hype around it. i thought the announcement was going to be something bigger then this, maybe i'm not giving this news (fm radio, new macbooks, and new imacs) the credit it deserves?
Hmmm, my iRiver already had that functionality.
Nothing like paying* 50.00 more for something that comes standard in other players is what I meant to say above.
I guess that's cool but I didn't buy an ipod to listen to the radio. That's just dumb. Get a Walkman or something if you wanna do that.
i hate the way apple discards all there customers apart from the ones buying the latest products.
whats wrong with some 4th gen support? people have managed to get videos running on (linux) so a simple radio app shouldnt be hard for apple
Anybody know why no digital audio player has AM radio? You know for baseball games.
I know some people will disagree but I think it is good that it is external because I know not everyone will want it. I am sure it will be nice to have in the future models of the iPod. But now i hardly listen to my iPod as it is. In fact the most I ever use it is when I get tired of listening to the radio. What would I need a FM receiver for when I have music I like and enjoy when the radio plays the same old song 25 times a day and has commercials? Plus, what is the big deal of another over priced iPod accessory?
ahahahahaha.....LOL where are the big fanboys that bragged..no...no...iPod doesnt need FM radio...uber fanboys....LOL...still missing radio and voice recording...suckers
Pricey seeing that it's FM only. Why no AM tuner? There ARE folks like me who need to get their sports and talk radio.
jg, when was the last time anything lived up to the hype around it?
Like the man said. "Don't believe the hype."
I'm considering buying it but is it really worth the 4$0 ???
The Griffin iFM(s) support the mini, as well as other iPods with either dock connector or remote connector.
FM sucks anyway.
Except maybe for NPR.
I'd rather have AM, so I could tune in a ballgame every now and then.
Better yet, a truly portable Sirius receiver.
The wires are long because they are the Antenna for the FM receiver.
Dangit, I need AM, not FM. The traffic and weather reports are on AM.
Too bad they didn't go with XM instead. FM is so 20th century. :-)
i listen to AM....oh well.
http://groups.myspace.com/engadgetreaders (please join!)
For me FM is no needed when I have podcast.
And why can't they support ALL the iPods?
Am I a "sucker uber fanboy"? What's wrong with that?
So....looks like the tuner seems to be built into the iPod video and Nano and this thing mearly "unlocks" it. Why else would it not work with the older iPods?
Am I the only one that wishes someone would provide AM support? How hard can it be?
They say it need iPod software 1.1 or later but the latest version available as of now is only 1.0.
hmm...this might be perfect for me - at work I listen to ipod all day, except when I have to switch over to a radio to listen to NPR news updates, etc. With this, i could accomplish all that, and just keep my nano in my change pocket all day!
Whatever. The radio is for shit anyway. I'm glad it's optional. I had no interest anyway. The NPR shows I *do* listen to I can get as podcasts.
going a little heavy on the towel-throwing talk, no?
No 4G support? Lame...
What a piece of crap. An FM receiver? For the love of pete, the main reason I carry and iPod is to ESCAPE from FM radio. Where the heck is my video iPod microphone and recording functionality? You want to do something revolutionary, then add recording/publishing to iTunes along with the hardware for an iPod. Record in the field, then sync/dock/publish audioblog/podcast in one fell swoop. /rant off
it would also be good if these DAP's (DIGITAL audio players) would support the digital (DAB) form of radio instead of the ancient anolog frequencies
I'm not a huge music fan, so I have no use for an IPOD. What I would have a use for is a device that is basically a portable TIVO for radio...so you can play MP3's etc, but if you could also have it tune into an FM (or AM, actually AM is more important for me...there's like 4 different talk AM stations I listen to), and record that would be an awesome & handy device. Plus let me copy the hopefully open formatted sound files to my PC for bonus points!
On the bottom of the product page on the Apple store it says:
"Requires iPod software v1.1 or later."
w00t! Let's hope there's a new firmware coming soon!
Not sure what #9 is trying to say exactly because we've had fm and voice with many 3rd partyoptions but, I probably wont get this accessory. It seems over priced and I dont listen to FM anyway. Alot of people probably wont buy this, but its an option like everything else.
"2. Wow look how long those cables are.
Is it for giants."
It doubles as a jump rope. Apple's always thinking...
WOW! What a lame azz addition! Most all other players have had FM tuners AND FM and voice recording built in for a long time already... and cheaper! #7, you're a fool, I'll sell you my 1989 Walkman for $20 (half off the Apple add-on price). Come on Apple fanboys, lets hear what an awesome add-on this is... another Apple $40 bandaid add-on that should be standard equipment!
I only see a white offering! Where is the black one to match the black iPods?
But...with an iPod I can pick what music to listen to. That's why I got an iPod instead of a radio. There's nothing on the radio but annoying DJs and commercials.
INTEGRATED FM and AM would push me over the edge for a new iPod upgrade from me 4G. FM would be great for the gym since the TV brodcasts work with FM and AM would be good for sports talk and games.
Make it happen Apple.
$50 to just get FM though is retarded.
Having FM is nice for weekends (when there's not many ads), and for listening to Cartalk and NPR and stuff. I'd rather have it built in though.
This is just like the old remote+earbuds but now includes a radio for $10 extra. However the old remote used the connectors on the top of the iPod and this one doesn't because the new iPods don't have them anymore. This isn't a good thing because you could use the old remote AND charge the iPod at the same time...
So it's use as a remote in a car is now totally useless (as you'd have a FM radio anyway and your iPod is going to be stuck either playing or charging).
On the cost of stuff, did somebody hold you up at ransom in the mall and force you to walk into the Apple store? Nobody's twisting your arm to get it!
Personally I'm not trading in my 3rd or 4th gen iPod for this.
Sooo gay. My old 20g iPod came with a wired remote. Fercrissakes Steve, WTF is it with the wires?
Besides, for $10 you can get a tiny FM radio if you really want to hear FM. This thing is crap.
I got excited when someone told me today they had a remote... I'm thinking a wireless one that drops in your pocket. THAT I would pay $50 for.
FM? Who wants that crap anymore?
Give me XM or give me death. Ok, don't everyone line up with your lethal weapons. ;-)
i'm sure apple will come up with shorter cables for another 50
This would have been awesome when Howard Stern was still on FM.
To be honest i am not impressed with what they have announced. I do appreciate that adding a radio is good, but Apple should have anticipated and acted on it a long time ago. Also, the thing i wish to know is that i hope that the wired remote allows you to detach the earbuds and add your own. I can't really tell by looking at the images. And before i forget, i was anticipating bluetooth capability for the ipod.
Forget FM, I want AM. I want to be able to go to a ballgame and listen in on my iPod. Why is it that no one carries AM when most sports stations are on AM?
The reason nobody offers AM is the problems with electronic interference, plus the crappy reception which would result from compact antennas in the players. Try holding your hard drive based MP3 Player, flash player or most any other electronic device right up to your radio on the AM band, use some of the functions on said electronic device and notice the horrible interference you get over the AM signal.
Hmm.. neat accessory... am I the only one that thinks this is cool? I mean really ... The rds system is great like in a moving train or bus, because if imlemented correctly it allways searches for the stromgest signal. Also you could listen to mp3's and the unit automaticly swtiches to traffic announcements and news. Besides that I no more need to look for my iPod from my bag because I have the remote. I'll wait for the first reviews, but I'm sure I'm getting one.
All you people who want radio in your music player (FM or AM):
Step 1: Go to the dollar store.
Step 2: Pick out one of the dozen-or-so cheapass micro radios.
Step 3: Pay the guy behind the counter his dollar.
Step 4: Listen.
Seriously, you're willing to pay a premium for a music player so you can listen to a technology that is almost 100 years old, being phased out slowly, and is filled with advertisements and obnoxious DJs? When you can buy a little radio in just about any dollar store for less than the cost of a cup of Starbucks coffe?
I bought an iPod to *avoid* radio. If I want to listen to NPR or something, I'll use the radio at home, or in my car, or I'll bring my tiny little portable radio instead of an iPod. However, I almost never prefer to listen to radio over my own playlists, because RADIO SUCKS.
You must be the same people who buy all those Blue Collar Comedy Tour products and purchase all your DVDs in fullscreen because you "don't like it when they cut off the picture with them thar black bars onna top'n bottom."
Seriously. Join us in the 21st century where radio's a dinosaur.
YEAH!!! Now the overpriced Ipod costs even more!!!
WOOHOO!!
I like the Radio Data System feature...
WOOOOHOOOO lets hear it for a waste of money. I have an ipod filled with 27 some odd gigs of my favorite music why in the world would I want to listen to the radio and have to listen to stuff i dont like??????????
#8 I agree, nothing ticks me off more with Apple, than the discarding of the customers that have bought their past products. I have a 3rd and 4th generation iPod and come on they can't support that? Or any firmware updates what so ever? I am officially an iPod/Apple hater now. Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. Fool me 3 or more times, "Do I look stupid to you?"
Give me a remote with an LCD screen that offers FULL control of the main unit, and I will gladly pay $50 for it (without the worthless FM radio option).
Wow that cable is long.... I guess its for those who want to be across the room from their iPod yet don't want to invest in wireless?
God forbid Apple ever bloat up the size of the iPod to include a feature I'd never use. The FM remote is a great idea. The small amount of FM listeners can have their radio, while the rest of use can keep our slim iPods.
Hey, I got an Apple Store gift card for Christmas. Guess what I'll buy with it?
Holy shit, I just realised this is a RECEIVER and not a BROADCASTER. I was thinking this was for broadcasting music onto other FM stations. AWESOME!
To #19: if you don't need radio because you have podcasts, what happens if you want to listen some important news, lets say, for example, one particular day of September of 2001? Go to your home and download the MP3?
Maybe FM is full of commercials and stupid DJ's in USA, but do you know something? There're other countries with other kind of radio.
Most of you seem to have overseen the fact that the unit doubles as a wired remote. I want to buy this, and I have ABSOLUTELY NO INTENTION OF USING IT TO LISTEN TO THE RADIO.
One reason that I was VERY hesitant about buying a Nano or a 5G iPod was because the remote socket next to the headphone port from the 3G, 4G, and Mini was ommitted.
Maybe it's because I'm used to portable music players from Japan, but I cannot imagine using a portable music device without a inline wired remote clipped to my jacket or collar with the player safely tucked away in a backpack or carrying case.
The remotes aren't for everyone. Most people laugh when I say that many people in Japan and South Korea use remotes on their music players, then proceed to ask who would be so lazy that they can't just take the iPod/MD player/CD player out of their pocket or bag and push the FF button... If you're on a crowded train or on a bicycle, pushing a button on a remote clipped to your collar or backpack strap is convenient beyond words.
I'm guessing that this device will sell like hotcakes in Japan, and I'm sure that nobody will even care that there's an FM tuner built in. Now people here are bitching about the cost. You all should see how much they charge for wired remotes for MD/CD players at Audiocubes and Minidisco...
Granted, those are imported AND have LCD displays, those things aren't cheap to begin with by any means.
I'd only use this thing for emergencies like if I was in a hurricane. Do serious music lovers listen to fm radio anyway? XM or Sirius yes, FM no.
Urm, if the remote is anything like their 4G ones, bad times ahead (I've had 2 brand new apple remotes basically stop working on me within about two months or so of usage -- lame).
Oh, and the price is just ridiculous. Cut it and dice it however you want, $50 is just too much money for this marginal of an addition in functionality. But this IS Apple -- they've perfected the art of marketing less functionality for more money *coughipodshufflecough*.
Though I do agree on the usefulness of wired remotes, in general. Pretty much every portable player I've had since high school had one. It's very convenient.
Just got my FM radio today - I was a little skeptical originally, but was missing having a radio with my nano, and so shelled out the $44 (educ. discount).
I got to say I am convinced it was worth it - it is a great addition, with fantastic sound quality and reception (even in the interference-filled section of downtown NYC where I live). I also love that it is such a small device and so easily integrated with the ipod itself. The radio presets are easy to use and well-done (the old-fashioned dial is cute) and the RDS functionality is great. Really a wonderful addition, even at the price. I'm even happier now with my ipod...