Let the hive mind of Engadget get that for you.
"I finally got a new laptop with a lone USB 3.0 port. I'm now looking at getting a USB 3.0 hub with a power adapter so I can use both of my USB 3.0 hard drives at faster speeds. I've read lots of horror stories where some hubs either don't come with power adapters -- and as a consequence the portable drives don't work with them properly -- or they are designed poorly which results in USB 2.0 speeds. Or, the hard drives keep getting disconnected. Do your readers have any suggestions or experience using USB 3.0 hubs? Thanks!"
You are way wrong, Alexander Micek. Okay, not way wrong, but off by a bit, I think.
From www.oled-info.com (yes, I've had this site bookmarked for almost a year, so what?):
12 January, 2006: Universal Display Announces Advances in Blue Phosphorescent OLED Technology
"[Universal Display] will present a proprietary new blue PHOLED with CIE (0.16, 0.29), excellent luminous efficiency of 21 cd/A and over 17,500 hours of operating lifetime at 200 cd/m2. This corresponds to over 3,000 hours at 500 cd/m2, a target luminance for commercial applications." And that's just referring to "deep blue," the company has already maxed out the a lighter, "sky blue" so a deep blue was the only challenge remaining... well, that and *mumble*mumble*, but because of the way these displays are made a lot of companies are saying that they will be able to use the same fabrication lines as they currently use for LCDs.
I think charlie is right too about picking up some shares of UD, they seem like a good company, they are at the front, they hold a lot of the cards. Of course, Kodak has a lot of the key technology locked up too, but I think UD is probably the best bet we have right now in the OLED field - they roxxor! I just wish I wasn't so poor or I'd gamble on them too.