Samsung SGH-Z150: 9.8mm thin(nest?) 3G phone

At just 9.8-milimeters (0.39-inches) thin, the SGH-Z150 might just be the world's slimmest 3G (UMTS) handset to date. Hell, it's thin by any comparison since it's already a full 4.1-milimeters slimmer than the famously-thin v3 RAZR or just 2.9-milimeters thicker than the iPod nano. Afraid that's all we have until this is unveiled at 3GSM...but really, what more do you need to know?

[NeoteriX Posted Feb 9th 2006 12:22PM]

Holy crap, it's another Samsung knockoff of a motorola phone. They totally stole the design of the SLVR! Jeebus!

[(Unverified) Posted Feb 9th 2006 12:34PM]

4: Except it's 3G and not 2G. Samsung are pulling away from Moto. They might not have the creativity but they have the skillz.

[(Unverified) Posted Feb 9th 2006 1:09PM]

Thats a sweet phone....and I love all these posts on ultra thin phones because I prefer not to look like I'm walking around with a banana in my pocket. Keep up the thin phone posts Engadget!

[amnesia Posted Feb 9th 2006 1:20PM]

@4, wrong. Why is it just because something is more well known that they think it's the first. The NEC iMode n343.

see http://www.fluidmobile.com reviews area.

[NeoteriX Posted Feb 9th 2006 2:08PM]

Hrmm... I was being sarcastic, but I guess no one picked it up. I guess it didn't help that my [moto fanboy] [/moto fanboy] tags were erased. Oops.

[scl23enN4m3 Posted Feb 9th 2006 8:12PM]

So where/when can I get one of these?

[ran Posted Feb 9th 2006 9:56PM]

Hustle: That girl is Korean. Samsung is a Korean company. Chinese/Korean/Japanese don't look alike. If you think they are alike then I guess all white people are the same too.

[ran Posted Feb 9th 2006 10:00PM]

Arjun: "Afraid that's all we have until this is unveiled at 3GSM..." That would mean the phone does actually exist yet, so unless you have good contacts with Samsung, good luck.

[(Unverified) Posted Feb 9th 2006 11:18PM]

oh...jealous chinese and Jap! lol

[(Unverified) Posted Feb 10th 2006 3:50AM]

That's an awesome phone! I fell in love with the RAZR V3 when I first saw pictures of it, but became disappointed when I held it in my hands (had a cheap feeling to it). After that, Samsung came out with the A900 (current handset), I held it, and totally fell in love with it. It just felt (and it is) like a superior product than the RAZR. My point is, Samsung might not be all 100% innovative about the physical design of their phones, but at least their handsets are superior (IMHO) to Motorola's.

[(Unverified) Posted Feb 10th 2006 4:28AM]

Its a nice phone but who really uses 3g anyways. 3G phones are a waste of time , i personally have never seen anyone walking in the street having a video call and if i did see it i would call the geek police to arrest him/her immedaitly

[(Unverified) Posted Apr 12th 2006 9:16AM]

This cell phone is very similar to Motorola SLVR. I hope that don't have the same problem: battery!