Wait... Has anyone besides me looked at the full test results they posted? On a 1-5 scale: CPU 4.4, RAM 5.4, 60GB of HDD space 3.8, GPU 3.6, GFX memory 3.3, Overall 3.
Obviously, there's a problem when something scores over 5 on a 1-5 scale, but I also wonder just how much HDD space is optimal when 60GB free isn't enough. The most disconcerting thing is the fact that the overall rating is a 3, while no other score ever went that low. There seems to be no real context for determining just what any of this means, not to mention the fact that it comes off as a little wacky. I like the idea they have going, I'm a sucker for benchmarks, but can't they atleast have this make some sense? Keep it simple!
The phone has 256MB of RAM and a 1GHz processor, which do the job reasonably well, though the Anna interface will likely leave something to be desired for many smartphone users.
The most commented posts on Engadget over the past 24 hours.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
Wait... Has anyone besides me looked at the full test results they posted? On a 1-5 scale: CPU 4.4, RAM 5.4, 60GB of HDD space 3.8, GPU 3.6, GFX memory 3.3, Overall 3.
Obviously, there's a problem when something scores over 5 on a 1-5 scale, but I also wonder just how much HDD space is optimal when 60GB free isn't enough. The most disconcerting thing is the fact that the overall rating is a 3, while no other score ever went that low. There seems to be no real context for determining just what any of this means, not to mention the fact that it comes off as a little wacky. I like the idea they have going, I'm a sucker for benchmarks, but can't they atleast have this make some sense? Keep it simple!