I don't think it's necessarily true that people especially large organisms such as an adult human or dog can occur illnesses such as cancer from EMF. What we should be concentrating on is developmental issues. We are not fully grown humans at all points in our lives and definitely a majority of us don't live near high voltage EMF centers. Those that live near high voltage EMF center can solve that problem quite easily and inexpensively. They can move. Now, what we should focus on, referring back to the developmental aspect of humans is that we, at some point are enveloped in single cell which is the size of all of our selves after we fully develop into our multicellular form or Adulthood. The effect of low EMF exposure is much greater on things of relative size, meaning that if 1200V at 60 hz can influence and epidermal skin cell and can penetrate still further causing mild changes that can be repaired, then we have to consider that these forces can and most likely influence conception and fetal development. Through our research on cigarettes and alcohol it can be deduced that a small amount of either of these things and the substances it contains can and does effect fetal development where as the adult suffers minor short term complications.
What i'm trying to say is that these forces are relative to size, if we were adult multicellular organisms then we can cope with the introduction of widespread and long term exposure to EMF. Being that at some point all of us are single cell diploid organisms, the influence of what we consider low impact from EMF is comparatively different for organisms of a different size. Take this as an example not as proof of my argument but maybe enough to warrant research. If we know that exposure to UV rays over 3 hours a day, 3 days a week, for 8-10 years on an individual who's weight is 180 has a high probability to cause cancer then we can deduce that if that person weighs less the duration and intensity of exposure may also be less to lead to the same outcome.
if a 180lb individual exposed to 1200V at 60 hz over 16 years develops a malignant tumor then wouldn't an individual who weighs 2g be subject to developing a malignant tumor with less time of exposure or less intensity of EMF?
(The comparisons i'm using and the measurements i'm using are hypothetical. I'm merely using mock data to show that the relationships are present and that they do have effect. What needs to be addressed is at what point are we most vulerable.)
The Rip is the latest addition to the Boogie eWriter line, devices that let you scribble notes and drawings and can be wiped away with the press of a button.
The most commented posts on Engadget over the past 24 hours.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
I don't think it's necessarily true that people especially large organisms such as an adult human or dog can occur illnesses such as cancer from EMF. What we should be concentrating on is developmental issues. We are not fully grown humans at all points in our lives and definitely a majority of us don't live near high voltage EMF centers. Those that live near high voltage EMF center can solve that problem quite easily and inexpensively. They can move. Now, what we should focus on, referring back to the developmental aspect of humans is that we, at some point are enveloped in single cell which is the size of all of our selves after we fully develop into our multicellular form or Adulthood. The effect of low EMF exposure is much greater on things of relative size, meaning that if 1200V at 60 hz can influence and epidermal skin cell and can penetrate still further causing mild changes that can be repaired, then we have to consider that these forces can and most likely influence conception and fetal development. Through our research on cigarettes and alcohol it can be deduced that a small amount of either of these things and the substances it contains can and does effect fetal development where as the adult suffers minor short term complications.
What i'm trying to say is that these forces are relative to size, if we were adult multicellular organisms then we can cope with the introduction of widespread and long term exposure to EMF. Being that at some point all of us are single cell diploid organisms, the influence of what we consider low impact from EMF is comparatively different for organisms of a different size. Take this as an example not as proof of my argument but maybe enough to warrant research. If we know that exposure to UV rays over 3 hours a day, 3 days a week, for 8-10 years on an individual who's weight is 180 has a high probability to cause cancer then we can deduce that if that person weighs less the duration and intensity of exposure may also be less to lead to the same outcome.
if a 180lb individual exposed to 1200V at 60 hz over 16 years develops a malignant tumor then wouldn't an individual who weighs 2g be subject to developing a malignant tumor with less time of exposure or less intensity of EMF?
(The comparisons i'm using and the measurements i'm using are hypothetical. I'm merely using mock data to show that the relationships are present and that they do have effect. What needs to be addressed is at what point are we most vulerable.)