How is it possible that companies are still making TWENTY ONE INCH displays with only 1600x1200 resolution.
My 15" laptop display has higher resolution than that!
Where are the 3200x2400 displays? Then I might be impressed.
And please, no comments about how text would be too small to read at that resolution. You can adjust font and icon sizes. Everything just becomes much crisper and clearer.
>>companies are still making TWENTY ONE INCH displays with only 1600x1200 resolution.
At the moment the main commercial OSes are not resolution independent (Windows is 96dpi and Mac OS is 72dpi). Once this changes, I expect that it will be advantageous for LCD manufacturers to offer as high a resolution as possible.
The Galaxy Tab 10.1, much like its Limited Edition sibling that we reviewed last month, is ever-so-slightly thinner than the iPad 2, a slate that most sane individuals (and competitors, for that matter) would confess is the market leader today.
The most commented posts on Engadget over the past 24 hours.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
How is it possible that companies are still making TWENTY ONE INCH displays with only 1600x1200 resolution.
My 15" laptop display has higher resolution than that!
Where are the 3200x2400 displays? Then I might be impressed.
And please, no comments about how text would be too small to read at that resolution. You can adjust font and icon sizes. Everything just becomes much crisper and clearer.
>>companies are still making TWENTY ONE INCH displays with only 1600x1200 resolution.
At the moment the main commercial OSes are not resolution independent (Windows is 96dpi and Mac OS is 72dpi). Once this changes, I expect that it will be advantageous for LCD manufacturers to offer as high a resolution as possible.