Sounds like a bad idea. Anything that shots a projectile with enough force to travel 450 feet is shooting a projectile with enough force to kill someone. At that distance, the chance of shooting the person in the throat or eye or some other vulnerable area is too great. It becomes a matter of they may not die - is that any better than shooting them with a gun.
Stun guns are useful as is the taser because it provides the user with options and control with very little to almost no risk of killing the person.
The Triumph proved to be one of the better looking and performing pre-paid handsets we'd had the pleasure of holding in our sweaty mitts, but we had one major hangup: the name.
The most commented posts on Engadget over the past 24 hours.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
Sounds like a bad idea. Anything that shots a projectile with enough force to travel 450 feet is shooting a projectile with enough force to kill someone. At that distance, the chance of shooting the person in the throat or eye or some other vulnerable area is too great. It becomes a matter of they may not die - is that any better than shooting them with a gun.
Stun guns are useful as is the taser because it provides the user with options and control with very little to almost no risk of killing the person.