Panasonic claims world's thinnest speaker

by Donald Melanson, posted Dec 5th 2006 at 4:51PM

Panasonic has unveiled what it claims to be the world's thinnest speaker, cutting its previous best effort (an enormous 2.5 millimeters thick) by a full 40%, with this room-shaker sliding in at a far more manageable 1.5 millimeters (or 0.059 inches) . Rest assured, despite being sliced nearly in half, according to Panasonic, the speaker will boast the same great sound quality you've come to expect from a speaker the size of a postage stamp. You'll have to wait a little while to sample the quality yourself though, with full production slated to start in May 2007, and availability dependent on the cellphone makers that decide to pick it up.

[Via Plastic Bamboo]

Filed under: Cellphones, Portable Audio

Tags: panasonic, speaker, thin speaker, ThinSpeaker, world's thinnest, World'sThinnest

Subscribe to these comments

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)

Neutral

Moneyman @ Dec 5th 2006 5:35PM

"Same quallity...Stamp"
So crappy?

Neutral

Nate @ Dec 5th 2006 5:58PM

"Yay! With a small fortune, I purchased tiny, cool speakers!" :D

Later...

"Oh, crap, I lost my speakers!"

Neutral

Ken @ Dec 5th 2006 6:19PM

Electrostatic speakers are thinner and produce some of the best sound possible. I don't know what they think they accomplished here.

Neutral

Tom @ Dec 5th 2006 8:03PM

Electrostatic speakers are highly susceptible to humidity changes, and also eat up a lot of power. In addition, a transformer is needed, and that usually takes up a lot of precious space. A thinner dynamic speaker in cell phones will help companies push the "thin" edge without other compromises, whereas a super-thin electrostatic speaker will draw a ton of power from the phone's battery and also require a transformer to be placed inside of the phone. Consider the context of this accomplishment.

Neutral

Nipponese @ Dec 5th 2006 9:06PM

Electrostats are actually thicker due to the space you need between the diaphragm and the charged grids, and besides that, you need a transformer for the charged grids which in itself is quite bulky. I would argue that ceramic/piezo speakers are thinner though it may not achieve the frequency response compared to these. I guess what they really wanted to say was "the worlds thinnest DYNAMIC speakers".

Neutral

[Jesse] @ Dec 5th 2006 7:23PM

I wonder if this will sound the same as playing a record without the speakers turned on.

Neutral

Mr. B @ Dec 5th 2006 7:54PM

A little innovation in laptop speakers would be nice.

Low Ranked

JRA219psu @ Dec 5th 2006 7:55PM

I have one word for this absolutley life changing achievement. Just one word. Can you guess what it is? Oh come on. Just guess. Well? Nothing? Are you sure? Think really hard....

Gay.

Neutral

Tom @ Dec 5th 2006 8:30PM

Yes, you are so funny. Now give me my three scrolls back.

Neutral

CM @ Dec 5th 2006 8:15PM

Didn't we have this already? It's called earphone.

Neutral

GJP303 @ Dec 6th 2006 7:13AM

But these (hopefully) are louder (and thinner)

Add your comments

Your comments:

Remember me

E-Mail me when someone replies to this comment

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.

When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.

To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.