Um guys... this guy only has one post. Why would you consider any of this fact? The fact that Microsoft doesn't want to break compatibility ought to have given you your first clue. Most of those "features" are total crap. Jim Allchin already told me what to expect in my recent interview. (http://www.windows-now.com/blogs/robert/archive/2006/11/08/blogcast-show-1-jim-allchin-interview.aspx), and ti wasn't about "breaking compatibility". It was about virtualizing applications and the application level.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Robert M. @ Dec 30th 2006 7:37PM
Um guys... this guy only has one post. Why would you consider any of this fact? The fact that Microsoft doesn't want to break compatibility ought to have given you your first clue. Most of those "features" are total crap. Jim Allchin already told me what to expect in my recent interview. (http://www.windows-now.com/blogs/robert/archive/2006/11/08/blogcast-show-1-jim-allchin-interview.aspx), and ti wasn't about "breaking compatibility". It was about virtualizing applications and the application level.