It was in the case, what can we say? We'd love to have gotten our hands on it, but this should tide you over until June when this thing hit the streets. You know what it does, check out our gallery.
Indeed!!! Releasing an OS that has not been widespread (compatible with 1000s of other mobile applications). How about the fact that it is $600 with a 2-year contract? And who knows how much it costs to sign up for the data plan?
Never thought I would be so impressed by a phone... Everything they have done... dear god. Makes the current ipod looks bad, real bad. Not even mentioning the Zune. LOL Can we expect a 40gig, 80gig or 100 gig with that design??
Not a chance that we will see any decent drive sizes in these models for at least a few years. They are releasing a 4gb and an 8gb I believe, so chances are we wont see one any time soon. I'll wait till they come out with the second or third generation of these phones, once they work all the bugs out. For now I'll stay with my Tmo Dash with my 2GB card and my old 40Gig 3rd Gen iPod. If it aint broke dont fix it right? Especially when "fixing it" will run me an extra $5-600 (ouch)
It just looks like an ordinary phone...It has nothing to do with the iPod. I guess we all thought it would be like an iPod. Whatever, besides that, I think it looks pretty sweet. Is it a touchpad? Or is that a joystick-like thing on the bottom? And why no pictures of it playing music???
Meh. It's beautiful, but after my HTC Wizard I'll never own a phone without a keypad again. Touchscreen dialing for teh lose. Trying to dial without any tactile feedback is miserable. Especially when you can't look at the phone: driving, texting under the desk during meetings/classes, navigating tele-menus. Microsoft voice command almost saved it, but not quite.
It looks nice, but it ain't a phone without a keypad. And it's 2G. And it's got a 2mp camera. Apple's actually behind the times on this in several pretty important ways.
I love my iPod, but no way I'm buying this. My current phone is actually better, spec-wise (it'll even support 8GB via cheap flash memory), and it cost me nothing. It just doesn't look quite as "groundbreaking".
You do realise that it has a multi-touch screen i.e. you use two fingers on the screen at the same time for certain instructions. Now that is something very new.
Apparently Cisco has licensing sorted out and it was all done in the few hours before and will be signed very soon. I read this on CNET's live coverage. They were reporting from MacWorld's coverage.
I hope a 6th gen iPod is coming. Using this screen, bluetooth, wi-fi, etc just take out the phone and camera and add a hard drive and bigger battery. It will have to be thicker but I would not even think twice about paying $599 or more for one...
So I had to worry about people jumping me for my ipod before, and now you want me to use it as a phone for all to see? Thats just asking to be robbed. It looks pretty damn cool, but I'll pass...
* The multi-touch interface is a plus, but lack of 3G is a minus. * 4/8GB of flash memory is a plus, but there are other phones that have this (e.g the Sony W950). * Triple wireless (GSM, WiFi, Bluetooth) is standard in all the new Series 60 phones from Nokia, so nothing new there. * You can’t call iPod-ness a plus because the familiar iPod interface is not carried through to the iPhone.
The summary of incremental features that the iPhone has over other smartphones is a gorgeous screen and multi-touch. Lack of 3G is a minus, so in my opinion, OSX on the iPhone needs to be 100% lag-free and crash-free in order to make the iPhone a definite winner over the rest of the crowded smartphone market.
you forgot the whole fact that no tactile feedback kills touchscreen lcd's even if its multitouch, people want feedback when they type simple but true.
Yes its beautiful but in those handson photos that screens looking quite pixelated dont know if thats the screen stretch or if its the pictures themselves...
But as ben said its not much new, i mean ya the osx is nice, but its not full blown osx, its the osx backend with a phone frontend ... kinda like when they said the xbox1 was running windows 2000 lol
I am very disappointed. That may sound like a bizzare statement but I am not happy. This thing is overkill. I would have been happier if they had released a TRUE VIDEO IPOD. This iPhone which is basically a PDA, takes no design cues from the iPod we know and (mostly) love. I would have prefered an iPod video in widescreen format, with aluminium design and thin form factor like a cross between the current iPod and the nano.
The other thing is they must have bumped their heads if they think they can market this in Asia by 2008, they probably manufacturing knock-off as we speak. And anyway they've entered a whole new market now, where phone manufacturers produces new models every quater and aren't as obsessively secretive as Apple. This things is going to attacked with competition full pelt. I'm sure when it ships (in Cal4 for me) other manufacturers will have a more viable, cheaper option, that not chained to some bloody phone company. $600 for an 8GB, in sterling thats going to end up as £500 (nearly $1000).
In summary, why don't they complete the iPod line with a proper 100GB iPod Video with wide/touch screen, not added onto a PDA with a poxy 8GB memory, how many movies is anyone going to store on that?
I like my phone. I don't a PDA, otherwise I would have bought one.
I haven't seen anything about this yet, but can you use the internet capability of the iPhone to download new videos/songs on the go? Or do you need to come home and sync with iTunes to get new content?
Ok first off, this thing is amazing. They have put so many things in such a nice form factor and I was beyond words when I saw it. But 500 bucks? wouldn't they have a much bigger market if they made something less simple but cheaper? I would definately consider this, but I just can't see how many people outside of business proffesionals can afford a 500 dollar phone, and that's not counting the service charges of 60 bucks a month for unlimited data.
Interface be white? I thought interface is the linking between two systems. Should you have referred to it as it's body or shell color? Also, what did you mean by it looking Vista? You used vista as an adj. when it's a noun meaning a view, not looking view. I was just wondering what your interpretation meant by describing the device as you did. Thanks.
Maybe I missed this, but does it have voice dialing/control? Without that it's not much good to me.
As for the specifications EDGE/design/etc... This is a pre-FCC model, I'm sure the production version will see some slight changes - hopefully for the better.
I enjoy reading these posts from people that don't actually read anything about the products being announced. Rather, they misconstrue fact with opinion. For example, I cannot even count how many of you stated something to the effect that "Isn't iPhone a trademark of Cisco?" If you had read any of the thousands of articles out there today, you would have realized that Apple and Cisco have come to an agreement so that Apple can use that title.
There is a deep seated satisfaction when you see a troll flaming a comments page when they should maybe take a dose of their own medicine.....maybe you should do some of your reading that you claim to enhjoy and be such a star at!!!
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 3)
Justin @ Jan 9th 2007 2:44PM
i must be the first one to say...... SWEEEEEEEEEEET!
Riz @ Jan 9th 2007 2:46PM
Apple has made HISTORY today in cell phones!!! GO APPLE..I'm with ya!
js @ Jan 9th 2007 2:52PM
Indeed!!! Releasing an OS that has not been widespread (compatible with 1000s of other mobile applications). How about the fact that it is $600 with a 2-year contract? And who knows how much it costs to sign up for the data plan?
It is revolutionary indeed!!!!!!!!!
Kevin @ Jan 9th 2007 2:49PM
Never thought I would be so impressed by a phone...
Everything they have done... dear god.
Makes the current ipod looks bad, real bad. Not even mentioning the Zune. LOL
Can we expect a 40gig, 80gig or 100 gig with that design??
js @ Jan 9th 2007 2:52PM
Yes, thicker, 3 hours less battery life, and can be yours for the ridiculously low price of $1400.
Proph @ Jan 10th 2007 9:48AM
Not a chance that we will see any decent drive sizes in these models for at least a few years. They are releasing a 4gb and an 8gb I believe, so chances are we wont see one any time soon. I'll wait till they come out with the second or third generation of these phones, once they work all the bugs out. For now I'll stay with my Tmo Dash with my 2GB card and my old 40Gig 3rd Gen iPod. If it aint broke dont fix it right? Especially when "fixing it" will run me an extra $5-600 (ouch)
Alex @ Jan 9th 2007 2:51PM
It just looks like an ordinary phone...It has nothing to do with the iPod. I guess we all thought it would be like an iPod. Whatever, besides that, I think it looks pretty sweet. Is it a touchpad? Or is that a joystick-like thing on the bottom? And why no pictures of it playing music???
v_dogg @ Jan 9th 2007 5:07PM
wow where have you been? ya its touch screen and the music interface uses the itunes album art scroll thing
Jen @ Jan 10th 2007 11:34AM
Or yours for just $500 on a 2 year contract. Do your homework man!
Chocolate Starfish @ Jan 9th 2007 2:53PM
Meh. It's beautiful, but after my HTC Wizard I'll never own a phone without a keypad again. Touchscreen dialing for teh lose. Trying to dial without any tactile feedback is miserable. Especially when you can't look at the phone: driving, texting under the desk during meetings/classes, navigating tele-menus. Microsoft voice command almost saved it, but not quite.
Jeff @ Jan 9th 2007 2:53PM
$499 for the 4GB, $599 for the 8GB. No way.
It looks nice, but it ain't a phone without a keypad. And it's 2G. And it's got a 2mp camera. Apple's actually behind the times on this in several pretty important ways.
I love my iPod, but no way I'm buying this. My current phone is actually better, spec-wise (it'll even support 8GB via cheap flash memory), and it cost me nothing. It just doesn't look quite as "groundbreaking".
BobbyW @ Jan 9th 2007 4:51PM
It will probably change by the time they release it. Stuff like the 2mp camera.
Is the camera on the BACK only? Not good for conferencing.
Richard Lai @ Jan 9th 2007 6:30PM
You do realise that it has a multi-touch screen i.e. you use two fingers on the screen at the same time for certain instructions. Now that is something very new.
I, Robot @ Jan 9th 2007 11:39PM
It does have a keypad. It's a touch screen. That's the whole point.
j0nkatz @ Jan 9th 2007 2:54PM
Great! Cingular only!
Apple just saved me some money because I won't be buying this thing.
Riven @ Jan 11th 2007 6:40PM
funny shit haha
Udayan @ Jan 9th 2007 2:55PM
Thank you. These 'in the wild' type shots give a better idea of the device. Apple's shots make it look the size of a Tablet PC.
jgib01 @ Jan 9th 2007 3:00PM
How can they get away with calling this thing an iPhone? Doesn't Linksys already have a VOIP unit called this?
eric f. @ Jan 9th 2007 2:57PM
It has everything I asked for+ more
Udayan @ Jan 9th 2007 3:08PM
Apparently Cisco has licensing sorted out and it was all done in the few hours before and will be signed very soon. I read this on CNET's live coverage. They were reporting from MacWorld's coverage.
wayne @ Jan 9th 2007 3:15PM
check out this news report that came out before all this was confirmed.
News Story about iphone
js @ Jan 9th 2007 3:01PM
BTW, is anybody craving for chocolate??
http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/15/the-lg-ke850-touchable-chocolate/
Mattso @ Jan 9th 2007 3:22PM
Good eye, JS. I forgot about that thing.
Rob @ Jan 9th 2007 3:01PM
Why is it called a widescreen ipod? cos everybody wanted one?
is it not a widescreen nano?
Did the nano defeat the true ipod which hasn't been updated for yonks?
Jugomugo @ Jan 9th 2007 3:01PM
I see the SIM card slot, but there's no memory expandability? MicroSD or something should be a given on this thing.
Zubarr @ Jan 9th 2007 3:02PM
That's weird, why are they calling the Sony PSP an iphone???
aural @ Jan 9th 2007 3:04PM
i just got a little hard.
Kenban @ Jan 9th 2007 3:06PM
I hope a 6th gen iPod is coming. Using this screen, bluetooth, wi-fi, etc just take out the phone and camera and add a hard drive and bigger battery. It will have to be thicker but I would not even think twice about paying $599 or more for one...
SickNic @ Jan 9th 2007 3:08PM
So I had to worry about people jumping me for my ipod before, and now you want me to use it as a phone for all to see? Thats just asking to be robbed. It looks pretty damn cool, but I'll pass...
Ben @ Jan 9th 2007 3:09PM
* The multi-touch interface is a plus, but lack of 3G is a minus.
* 4/8GB of flash memory is a plus, but there are other phones that have this (e.g the Sony W950).
* Triple wireless (GSM, WiFi, Bluetooth) is standard in all the new Series 60 phones from Nokia, so nothing new there.
* You can’t call iPod-ness a plus because the familiar iPod interface is not carried through to the iPhone.
The summary of incremental features that the iPhone has over other smartphones is a gorgeous screen and multi-touch. Lack of 3G is a minus, so in my opinion, OSX on the iPhone needs to be 100% lag-free and crash-free in order to make the iPhone a definite winner over the rest of the crowded smartphone market.
klew @ Jan 9th 2007 3:15PM
Where are the $100 leather sleeves that bulk it up and prevent scratches?
Jeff @ Jan 9th 2007 5:03PM
I am making them in my basement right now.
chris @ Jan 9th 2007 3:18PM
you forgot the whole fact that no tactile feedback kills touchscreen lcd's even if its multitouch, people want feedback when they type simple but true.
Yes its beautiful but in those handson photos that screens looking quite pixelated dont know if thats the screen stretch or if its the pictures themselves...
But as ben said its not much new, i mean ya the osx is nice, but its not full blown osx, its the osx backend with a phone frontend ... kinda like when they said the xbox1 was running windows 2000 lol
Rebecca @ Jan 9th 2007 3:20PM
so buy the w950i now and resell on time to buy the iphone when it comes out in June.
http://www.madeforzune.com
astutefool @ Jan 9th 2007 3:22PM
I am very disappointed. That may sound like a bizzare statement but I am not happy. This thing is overkill. I would have been happier if they had released a TRUE VIDEO IPOD. This iPhone which is basically a PDA, takes no design cues from the iPod we know and (mostly) love. I would have prefered an iPod video in widescreen format, with aluminium design and thin form factor like a cross between the current iPod and the nano.
The other thing is they must have bumped their heads if they think they can market this in Asia by 2008, they probably manufacturing knock-off as we speak. And anyway they've entered a whole new market now, where phone manufacturers produces new models every quater and aren't as obsessively secretive as Apple. This things is going to attacked with competition full pelt. I'm sure when it ships (in Cal4 for me) other manufacturers will have a more viable, cheaper option, that not chained to some bloody phone company. $600 for an 8GB, in sterling thats going to end up as £500 (nearly $1000).
In summary, why don't they complete the iPod line with a proper 100GB iPod Video with wide/touch screen, not added onto a PDA with a poxy 8GB memory, how many movies is anyone going to store on that?
I like my phone. I don't a PDA, otherwise I would have bought one.
Maybe I'll change my mind when I see it....
Shoefly @ Jan 9th 2007 3:22PM
Wonder if it'll fit in all of the iPod docks and cradles that are out there?
y2julio @ Jan 9th 2007 3:23PM
looks like an iPod with phone features as an afterthougt. seems like it;s going to be crap. btw, i thought cisco owned the trademark to iPhone?
http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/18/cisco-not-apple-announces-iphone-branded-voip-phones/
Jake @ Jan 9th 2007 3:26PM
I haven't seen anything about this yet, but can you use the internet capability of the iPhone to download new videos/songs on the go? Or do you need to come home and sync with iTunes to get new content?
Matt @ Jan 9th 2007 3:29PM
I'd rather use a stylus for a touch screen. At least include one. Using your thumbs is nice, but sometimes you want a bit more accuracy.
Rob @ Jan 9th 2007 3:29PM
if it was a pda, you would have spreadsheet, wordprocessor... something like iwork 2007. :)
nuguns101 @ Jan 9th 2007 3:33PM
Ok first off, this thing is amazing. They have put so many things in such a nice form factor and I was beyond words when I saw it. But 500 bucks? wouldn't they have a much bigger market if they made something less simple but cheaper? I would definately consider this, but I just can't see how many people outside of business proffesionals can afford a 500 dollar phone, and that's not counting the service charges of 60 bucks a month for unlimited data.
Sam @ Jan 9th 2007 3:34PM
SO obviously 'y2julio' is blind.
Mattso @ Jan 9th 2007 3:34PM
Shouldn't it and everything in the interface be white? Neither of the two look applesque, and the interface actually looks very Vista.
cpug @ Jan 10th 2007 4:52AM
Interface be white? I thought interface is the linking between two systems. Should you have referred to it as it's body or shell color? Also, what did you mean by it looking Vista? You used vista as an adj. when it's a noun meaning a view, not looking view. I was just wondering what your interpretation meant by describing the device as you did. Thanks.
MearWolf @ Jan 9th 2007 3:41PM
i know this is awsome but isnt it a bit like this:
http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/15/the-lg-ke850-touchable-chocolate/
blake @ Jan 9th 2007 3:41PM
will be be unlockable? id love this for tmo but would never switch to cingular.
Jeffrey @ Jan 9th 2007 3:43PM
Maybe I missed this, but does it have voice dialing/control? Without that it's not much good to me.
As for the specifications EDGE/design/etc... This is a pre-FCC model, I'm sure the production version will see some slight changes - hopefully for the better.
*
Ry @ Jan 9th 2007 3:44PM
Hate to disappoint you all but Linksys have released the iPhone already...unfortunately Apple will have to call it something else :o)
http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2006/12/18/linksys_launches_iphone/
JW @ Jan 9th 2007 3:44PM
I enjoy reading these posts from people that don't actually read anything about the products being announced. Rather, they misconstrue fact with opinion. For example, I cannot even count how many of you stated something to the effect that "Isn't iPhone a trademark of Cisco?" If you had read any of the thousands of articles out there today, you would have realized that Apple and Cisco have come to an agreement so that Apple can use that title.
Reading is a good thing. It really is.
Ry @ Jan 15th 2007 6:47AM
http://newsroom.cisco.com/dlls/2007/corp_011007.html?CMP=ILC-001
There is a deep seated satisfaction when you see a troll flaming a comments page when they should maybe take a dose of their own medicine.....maybe you should do some of your reading that you claim to enhjoy and be such a star at!!!