If this is a Bluetooth device that goes on your wrist, it had BETTER pair with my phone using HandsFree profile for caller ID.
Imagine: The shiny Bluetooth iPhone stays safe in my pocket, safe from dropping and scratching. The Bluetooth headset stays on my ear where it belongs. The Bluetooth watch / DAP stays on my wrist and shows who is calling and I can answer, decline, mute, and switch lines from the watch.
Caller ID on a headset / earpiece is a logical fallacy. Bluetooth was designed for stuff like this. The Headset, HandsFree, A2DP, and AVRCP profiles were created FOR this kind of interaction between devices. Why haven't manufacturer's allowed us to use Bluetooth the way it was intended?
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
If this is a Bluetooth device that goes on your wrist, it had BETTER pair with my phone using HandsFree profile for caller ID.
Imagine:
The shiny Bluetooth iPhone stays safe in my pocket, safe from dropping and scratching.
The Bluetooth headset stays on my ear where it belongs.
The Bluetooth watch / DAP stays on my wrist and shows who is calling and I can answer, decline, mute, and switch lines from the watch.
Caller ID on a headset / earpiece is a logical fallacy. Bluetooth was designed for stuff like this. The Headset, HandsFree, A2DP, and AVRCP profiles were created FOR this kind of interaction between devices. Why haven't manufacturer's allowed us to use Bluetooth the way it was intended?