Let the hive mind of Engadget get that for you.
"We need a digital camera that can be switched on and fire off that first shot fast. It's not a commonly tracked statistic on any review site, and nobody seems to have this information for every camera. We were hoping other readers could inform us as to what small digital cameras can fire off their first pics in under a second (ideally under half a second). It needs to be small, but mostly, just really quick in operation. Thanks!"
I just don't understand. Where is the line here? How is this different than a software upgrade that would make the system "snappier"? Plus, if everyone who bought the computers at the time felt they were getting 802.11g instead of pre-n, then I think the argument is moot. As I understand it, this law would be more likely to apply if Apple had said "and in the future, this computer will also have 802.11N" when introducing the hardware. Should Comcast be charging us more whenever they magically give us more bandwidth to comply with this law?(Yikes, I hope no one from comcast sees this.)