Canon EOS 40D rumors abound
By Thomas Ricker 
posted Feb 21st 2007 8:17AM
posted Feb 21st 2007 8:17AM
It all started with an EOS 40D splash page posted (and later pulled) from Canon's official Hong Kong web site. Now the 40D's specs are popping on digicam retail sites all over the Intertubes. Most interesting is the supposed spec sheet posted, pulled, and then extracted from a Belgian site by our tireless Engadget interns; here's what it says: 10.1 megapixel CMOS sensor measuring 22.5 x 15-mm, 5fps burst mode, integrated anti-dust cleaning system, 2.5-inch LCD, and sadly... DIGIC II (not III) image processing. It's that last bit of information which makes us a bit skeptical. Although the DIGIC II can be found in their [Via Digital Photography Blog]
Brand new CAMERA , MOBILE PHONE, LAPTOP , GAME and many more come with complete accessories with Two year international warranty.
camr_inc@hotmail.com
Canon EOS 40D.......$600usd
Nikon D300 Black SLR Digital..$700usd
Samsung GX-20 .....$700usd
Nokia n96 16gb......$500usd
PS3 60GB............$300usd
APPLE iphone 3G.....$300usd
Welcome to the next generation of digital SLR photography-the Canon EOS 40D. The EOS 40D combines Canon's tremendous know-how in both the digital and photographic worlds, creating a camera that not only does everything one would expect of a traditional digital SLR, but one that incorporates staggering leaps forward in technological innovation. With new features like Canon's EOS Integrated Cleaning System, Live View Function, a more powerful DIGIC III Image Processor, plus a 10.1 megapixels CMOS sensor, a 3.0" LCD monitor and more, the EOS 40D elevates digital photography to new heights, enhancing the shooting experience, and delivering images one could only expect from a Canon.
Display & Graphics
Screen Size: 3"
Display Type: Active Matrix TFT Color LCD
Display Resolution: 230Kilopixel
Camera Resolution: 10.1Megapixel Effective - 10.5Megapixel Total
Image
Image Formats: JPEGRAW
Maximum Image Resolution: 3888 x 2592
Video
Video Formats: Not Applicable
Lens
Focal Length: 28mm to 135mm
Optical Zoom: 4.8x
Digital Zoom: Not Applicable
Image Stabilization: Not Applicable
Autofocus Type: Passive CMOS
Focus Modes: Auto FocusManual Focus
Exposure
Shutter Speed: 30 to 1/8000 Second
Flash
Flash Modes: Auto Flash
Viewfinder
Viewfinder Type: SLR
Memory
Memory Card Support: CompactFlash (CF) Card
Interfaces/Ports
Interfaces/Ports: 1 x USB1 x DC Power In1 x Video Out
Battery Information
Battery Include: Yes
Physical Characteristics
Dimensions: 4.2" Height x 5.7" Width x 2.9" Depth
Weight: 26.1oz
WE MAKE SHIPMENT VIA UPS AND FEDEX SHIPPING COMPANY 2DAYS DELIVER WORLD WIDE , IF YOU ARE INTERESTED IN BUYING YOU CAN CONTACT OUR EMAIL ADDRESS OK.
camr_inc@hotmail.com
The 400D isn't a full-frame camera.
Eos 5D still better than Eos 40D for CMOS sensor. Eos 40D is almost same like Eos Xti. Same idea like Eos 20D is almost same as Eos XT.
@Nick, right but the 5D is a full frame SLR using the DIGIC II. Hope Canon has some more interesting releases for PMA show! 2D?
Indeed so. Single-digit models always seem to be the top-end of the EOS market.
1D 1Ds 5D etc, all brilliant cameras. The xxD series don't seem to have changed much since the 20D (Which I own and I'm very happy with until I can afford a 5D, I WANT a full-frame sensor!) - afterall, the 20D was voted camera of the year a couple of years running.. for good reason.
Canon seem to be bringing out these intermediate models just for the hell of it - c'mon guys, give us a Prosumer full-frame sensored camera!
IMO, this is a warmed-over 30D, which was a warmed-over 20D. This is what the 30D should have been. If Canon wants to remain strong in this segment, they're going to need to trump the Nikon D200, which is a feature-laden camera now selling in the range of the 30D's original street price. I'd be floored if Canon released such a weak camera was the 30D's successor - floored enough to switch to Nikon.
As for the hopes of full-frame, I don't think Canon has any intentions of selling more affordable full-frame cameras. They have a corner on the market, they're staying strong in the 1.6X market with their EF-S lenses, and I'd wager most people who want full-frame want it in a capable camera body with some features - all of which cost money. I just hope Nikon comes to the FF game soon - and I hope Canon shows up to the 1.6x game with a better player.
Mind you, Digic III improvements upon Digic II is minor. The new features it offers are only viable for compact cameras, not DSLR's, such as face recognition and iSAPS.
I do like the 40D. But by far I prefer the 38DD.
I think the 40D page may have been intended to read 400D. If you look at the page, http://www.canon.com.hk/en/consumer/product/productdetail.aspx?product_id=10320&series_id=1000 now, it's changed to say 400D. Not to mention, the specs sound awful similar to the 400D.
If they are coming out with a 1D MkIII for only $4500 with digic 3 they are probably trying to come up with something that doesn't make it unnecessary to buy that.
There is on official announcement because Canon must be aware that Sony is eventually going to do to them what they did to Nintendo and Sega.
Just watch. Bye bye Canon and Nikon too. For the prosumer market anyway.
Like I said Eos 20d and Xt are almost same. I already tried on Eos D30,D60,10D,20D,20Da,30D,D. Rebel,Xt, Xti,1D,1Ds,1DMII,1dsMII,1d Mark IIn. Yeah. Most EOS AF point are not same. I must sell my 20D and get Eos 5D soon
If DIGIC III on the EOS line is anything like DIGIC III on their compact cameras, I'm glad they didn't use DIGIC III in the 40D. DIGIC III in the SD800 is considerably worse than DIGIC II in the SD700.
Why I want Eos 5D because it's lighter weight than Eos 1DMIIn,less noise at high ISO,full-frame and big LCD than Eos 20D. Eos 30D almost same as Eos 40D. Just more MP and self-clean dusts. In fact, self-clean dusts is not 100% clean.
@ TOnY T,
Canon and Nikon have about 80% of the DSLR market share. They have owned that market forever; Sony isn't about to take that away, not with crappy sensors and lack of convincing offerings. The A100 is a total joke.
Have you any idea how skint Sony is? I doubt whether they have the resources to take on Canon who are super efficient. Canon are super canny and to be fair, there is a good chance that they are only playing with Nikon. The research and development budget at Canon almost certainly dwarfs the one available to Nikon and I feel, therefore that Nikon will never catch Canon. It is in Canon's interest to have some competition, but I do not think that it is from Sony. Sony need Playstation 3 and Blu Ray to be successful so desperately, that they will die otherwise. Samsung and Matsushita are in a much stronger position than Sony.