Apple, SanDisk, and Samsung sued by Texas MP3
By Darren Murph 
posted Feb 23rd 2007 5:07PM
posted Feb 23rd 2007 5:07PM
It's not like Apple, SanDisk, and Samsung haven't waded through their fair share of lawsuits in the past, and this most certainly isn't the first (nor the last, sadly) patent troll story you'll ever hear of, but a presumably off-kilter (and incredibly desperate) individual has filed a suit claiming that he masterminded the MP3 player. The current company, dubbed Texas MP3 Technologies, filed a currently ungranted patent application the very day before the suits were filed, but tried a little trickery by linking back to two previous patents -- one held by SigmaTel and the other by MPMan -- in order to force the giants to pay their dues. If you're suddenly scratching your noggin' over that last company, you'll probably recall that it actually was (loosely) deemed the first producer of an MP3 player, but considering that this latest company "shares a street address with one of its lawyers" in [Via TechDirt]
You are a dumb ass. If a couple people from Texas are suing for something stupid, that most mean we are full of a bunch of dumb cowboys. Wrong! Guess what, Dell is from Texas too! Are they dumb? No! Houston, one of the largest cities in the US is in Texas, now surly if we were full of dumb idiot cowboys, that would not be possible. Just because some stupid TV shows Texas full of idiots, doesn't mean we are.
Well, they say that everything in Texas is bigger.
I guess that means lies, too.......
the banhammer in 3....2....1....
i apologize! forgiveness please!!!
@Mario Mejia
Why do you think everyone files suit in Marshall? They're some of the biggest morons there, makes for easy manipulation of the jury.
Was this (my comment)really the first time sarcasm was ever used on Engadget? Or are you guys just really over-sensitive to any sort of comments on your home State?
I dont think anyone with an iota of education would ever make such an over-generalization about an entire population, so please, give me a little bit of credit.
"Guess what, Dell is from Texas too! Are they dumb?"
I believe the correct answer is yes. Dell sucks.
The patent issue over the mp3 player will pan out, its a frivolous attempt (like most) to make money off of big companies that take advantage of smaller companies and people. While this is totally wrong, wasting time and money on lawsuits that will never succeed will not pay off. Instead, that time and money should be spent invested in coming up with a new idea and product that might actually have a chance at making money.
wake me up when everybody has "their fair share" of money...
I'm going to go live in a cave for a while.
Marshall is preferred for its "combination of quick trials and plaintiff-friendly juries, many lawyers say," according to this article: http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/24/business/24ward.html?ei=5088&en=65001ada21beb03a&ex=1316750400&adxnnl=1&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss&adxnnlx=1159244426-TZeEnYm9mAOhbIBMqeRjGQ
Docket schedule (actually getting a chance to hash things out) is a big thing, because all that time your bill for infringement is running. If you're not infringing, there's still a quell on production (for fear of infringement).
Which gives you...let me think about this for a second...a first class registered letter worth absolutely nothing.
Sarcasm aside, the whole "first class registered letter" thing is a big myth. It doesn't do you any good. At all.
What did you expect after the idiot Judgement against Microsoft? I doubt this company or Lucent had any big deal it the mass adoption of Digital Music or MP3. The people that pushed the technology was really Napster, Apple (thru the iPod) and Microsoft.
http://www.startblue.net
What a surprise that this kind of idiocy comes from the same state as our genius president.
I was sued in Texas for a... ahhh... 'electronic trespassing'.
Texas is not a great place for an outsider to get sued -- Texas
jurys usually side with their own.
If you don't know what an Eiger Labs MPMan is, you don't deserve to call yourself a geek.
I think it's manditory to have owned one of those and a Diamond Rio PMP300.
There's a bit more to this story than reported... In 2005, SigmaTel consolidated all of the original MP3 player patents when they purchased Rio (they already had some of the MPMan patents). Last year, they sold the patents to a Dallas-based law firm (didn't want the negative publicity of prosecuting it themselves). That law firm is the one that's now suing for infringement. So this lawsuit is based on patents that really do form the foundation of today's DAPs. Have there been significant contributions to MP3 player technology since these inventions? Yes, of course. IMO, these patents don't justify a $1.5B judgment or anything. But a nominal royalty (say, $0.25-$0.50 per unit sold) is a reasonable price for the shoulders that the current technology stands on.