It has been saying all over the news sight for the bluetooth sig that they were headed towards bt 3.0 with ultra wide band (wireless usb) type http://www.batteryfast.co.uk/acer/batbl50l8h.htm speeds, and there was also going to be support for hd video and audio streaming thanks to the new speed, where did they pull this "2.1" sh@! from, why don't they just go to 3.0 with uwb, the improvements on 2.1 are superficial and will just be a stupid upgrade,
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
It has been saying all over the news sight for the bluetooth sig that they were headed towards bt 3.0 with ultra wide band (wireless usb) type http://www.batteryfast.co.uk/acer/batbl50l8h.htm
speeds, and there was also going to be support for hd video and audio streaming thanks to the new speed, where did they pull this "2.1" sh@! from, why don't they just go to 3.0 with uwb, the improvements on 2.1 are superficial and will just be a stupid upgrade,