I use both DreamScene and SD's DreamScape on my Vista Ultimate and it's like buttah. Smooth, and eats very little of my resources. And I run with 1 GB of RAM to boot. So I don't get the negative BS I see from some of you here.
DreamScenes and DreamScape are definitely unnecessary... but then so are still wallpapers.
For productivity they could just stick with a solid-colored background. But where's the fun in that? Just as a photo/image background takes some juice to put up, so does animating it - and both are just for fun.
So, enjoy them and use them or STFU and let the rest of us enjoy and use them. Why moan about what you don't like when it's OPTIONAL to install?
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
I use both DreamScene and SD's DreamScape on my Vista Ultimate and it's like buttah. Smooth, and eats very little of my resources. And I run with 1 GB of RAM to boot. So I don't get the negative BS I see from some of you here.
DreamScenes and DreamScape are definitely unnecessary... but then so are still wallpapers.
For productivity they could just stick with a solid-colored background. But where's the fun in that? Just as a photo/image background takes some juice to put up, so does animating it - and both are just for fun.
So, enjoy them and use them or STFU and let the rest of us enjoy and use them. Why moan about what you don't like when it's OPTIONAL to install?
Sheesh.