I don't care what the eventual cost of such an available service. $15, 20, 25 bucks a month means nothing to me as opposed to being a slave of "free" radio. I'm all for paying a premium for what I consider ultimate listening freedom. Let the free market decide what's "value" and let the "free" combatants fight for market share. Any correlation or difference to pay-per-view or cable fighting for their market share? I think not. This merger should be done and no other input or "opposing" positions should be considered. It's a buyers market... hello, capitalism?
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
I don't care what the eventual cost of such an available service. $15, 20, 25 bucks a month means nothing to me as opposed to being a slave of "free" radio. I'm all for paying a premium for what I consider ultimate listening freedom. Let the free market decide what's "value" and let the "free" combatants fight for market share. Any correlation or difference to pay-per-view or cable fighting for their market share? I think not. This merger should be done and no other input or "opposing" positions should be considered. It's a buyers market... hello, capitalism?