I would say that the lower pop density, the harder and more expensive it is to connect everyone due to greater cost pr capita.
It sure is easier to build a good infastructure in a smal country, however the cost pr capita is greater, and because the US is such large and powerfull market you have a totaly different level of competition between companies.
In Sweden we pay much more tax than the us , between 30 to 50%(on our salaries). Thus the government have more money to build a good infastructure (pr capita again). Due to the fact that Sweden is such a small country, the politics in the US would never work here, and the other way around. This makes the two countries totaly different, and quite hard to compare.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
theycallmeMartin @ Mar 20th 2008 4:56AM
I would say that the lower pop density, the harder and more expensive it is to connect everyone due to greater cost pr capita.
It sure is easier to build a good infastructure in a smal country, however the cost pr capita is greater, and because the US is such large and powerfull market you have a totaly different level of competition between companies.
In Sweden we pay much more tax than the us , between 30 to 50%(on our salaries). Thus the government have more money to build a good infastructure (pr capita again). Due to the fact that Sweden is such a small country, the politics in the US would never work here, and the other way around. This makes the two countries totaly different, and quite hard to compare.