Supports dual video streams (e.g. PIP commentary): No
Supports October 2007 Mandated Requirements: No
Supports Ethernet for Firmware Updates: Yes
Supports Ethernet for Interactivity, Enhanced Features, etc.: No
Blu-ray Video Quality: On par with other Blu-ray (no bad filtering enabled this time)
SD DVD Upsampling Video Quality: Better than other Blu-ray players, on par with Toshiba's $799 HD DVD player
It's too bad that Samsung couldn't have produced a player that was compliant with the October 2007 mandate. It's also too bad that a high-definition player built in 2007 still doesn't support the lossless Dolby and DTS codecs.
Maybe Sony's upcoming BDP-S300 for $599 will do better?
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
So, let's see if I can summarize the BD-P1200:
List Price: $799
Supports 1080p/24: Yes
Supports DTS-HD: No
Supports DTS-HD Master Audio: No
Supports DolbyTrueHD: No
Supports dual video streams (e.g. PIP commentary): No
Supports October 2007 Mandated Requirements: No
Supports Ethernet for Firmware Updates: Yes
Supports Ethernet for Interactivity, Enhanced Features, etc.: No
Blu-ray Video Quality: On par with other Blu-ray (no bad filtering enabled this time)
SD DVD Upsampling Video Quality: Better than other Blu-ray players, on par with Toshiba's $799 HD DVD player
It's too bad that Samsung couldn't have produced a player that was compliant with the October 2007 mandate. It's also too bad that a high-definition player built in 2007 still doesn't support the lossless Dolby and DTS codecs.
Maybe Sony's upcoming BDP-S300 for $599 will do better?
Audio support (or rather lack of) sucks for this player. The Panasonic DMP-BD10A looks like a better option.