This new tablet isn't the lightest thing in the world, but for a convertible, it's one of the lightest on the market.
However, I don't quite agree w/ HP's decision to go for battery life on the battery/performance balancing act on both the hard drive (1.8inch 4200rpm) AND the processor (ULV instead of LV core 2 duo).
is there any place to get some solid benchmarks on the difference in performance between the ULV, LV, and regular core 2 duos? it would also be of worth to know the real-world battery life difference between the three variances...
"I'm a college student looking for a new laptop, but almost all of my media I receive digitally. I'm looking for a laptop, not a netbook, without an optical drive, and budget sensitive. The optical drive will just be a waste of space, when I can have thinner laptop. What's out there?"
The most commented posts on Engadget over the past 24 hours.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
This new tablet isn't the lightest thing in the world, but for a convertible, it's one of the lightest on the market.
However, I don't quite agree w/ HP's decision to go for battery life on the battery/performance balancing act on both the hard drive (1.8inch 4200rpm) AND the processor (ULV instead of LV core 2 duo).
is there any place to get some solid benchmarks on the difference in performance between the ULV, LV, and regular core 2 duos? it would also be of worth to know the real-world battery life difference between the three variances...