
Android accounts for one-quarter of mobile web traffic
Android is mopping up Apple and RIM's declining mobile mindshare in the US, you'll find nothing but corroboration from Quantcast. The analytics firm reckons a full one-quarter of mobile web traffic stateside comes from devices running Google's OS

Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
I read these comments and wonder what level of photograher is posting. Pro's don't shoot with DX or EFS lenses and Pro's know that shoving more pixels into the same size sensor does not mean a better image. The size of the pixel has just as much if not more to do with image quality as the number. As for who makes one sensor or another, how many plants do you think make sensors? Sony makes a large number of sensors. A couple of years ago Canon recalled a large number of thier p/s cameras as did a large part of the p/s market when the Sony sensors started to fail (fact look it up). Do you realy think Canon or Nikon make thier own sensors? As for this war on who is better, you buy the product that suits your lenses. I shoot Canon, why because I work for a Canon dealer (no I don't have any magical insight into new products, just a jump on being able to buy it) I have friends who shoot Nikon, Canon, Sony and Sigma. We don't argue over who has the best image quality, best sensor, best features, we look at who knows how to use their camera the best (I'm not at the top either). Why do you think only 645 backs are packing 22 + mp, because a smaller sensor with that many pixels don't have the image quality. The whole MP race is just a marketing scam. You can print an amazing 13x19 with 8mp. If your printing bigger than that you shouldn't be shooting SLR. Will I upgrade my 20D? Maybe, but that will depend on the price break I get and if I can sell my old one, not because marketing hyped the pixels and features that most professional don't realy have an interest in. (and no I'm not a professional either but I do hang out with them)
Well said.
"Pro's don't shoot with DX or EFS lenses"
Sorry, but this is a big statement and completely incorrect...
If you look at the some of the winning photos at the Shell wildlife photographer of the year, you will see that a great proportion of them was shot with the Nikon 12-24mm, including the photo that won the competition. A lot of other professional photographers in different areas including Mike Colon, Frans Lanting, Michael Webber, Alan Herman, Moose Peterson...And the list can go on...Shoot with DX lenses.