Let the hive mind of Engadget get that for you.
"We need a digital camera that can be switched on and fire off that first shot fast. It's not a commonly tracked statistic on any review site, and nobody seems to have this information for every camera. We were hoping other readers could inform us as to what small digital cameras can fire off their first pics in under a second (ideally under half a second). It needs to be small, but mostly, just really quick in operation. Thanks!"
"Right, but will it continue to work after the month is up and you dont pay?"
The phone service will not work but every other function will.
Exactly.........
I would use it just as a video ipod.
I'd pay for the bigger screen.
My 755p is just as "iphony" as the iphone
We've all wasted money on worse off things, why not have an iphone and use it just for the ipod function. 4gb or 8gb just for videos is great. Especially when you just watch the newest movies in theaters and delete them afterwards....
@brian:
I'm not trying to be rude here, but why would you even just buy an iPhone for $600 just to use it as a (better) video iPod? I'm sorry, but I would just feel like I was ripping myself off if I paid that much for an iPod/phone and just only use the iPod part of it. Sure, it has a big "widescreen" display, but the 480x320 display isn't even a 16:9 aspect ratio. Basically, I'm just trying to say that you can get a REAL WIDESCREEN display (16:9 aspect ratio) and watch videos/listen to music with as much as 8GB space (or even more) for a cheaper price than just using the iPhone as a "video iPod nano". Unless you're just a big fan of iTunes/Apple software, other gadgets out there such as the PSP can do the same thing (you can also surf the internet and play games too) and is much cheaper. In short, if you're going to get the iPhone, USE IT TO ITS FULL POTENTIAL and use it as a phone too, LOL. It just doesn't make any sense to pay that much for something just to use it as a "video iPod nano".