eh? no matter how i read it, having enough solar power to provide juice for 21,000 homes is definitely better... 64 acres of trees can probably provide these 21,000 homes firewood that would last a few nights... or a lotta paper for them to draw on
so, er... no, i don't think it's better if they planted trees
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
kingofwale @ Jul 9th 2007 8:29PM
640 acres for 21,000 homes? DOn't you think it might be BETTER for to just grew 640 acres of TREES?
Honestly, it's just not worth it, the technology is not even there yet.
mjl @ Jul 17th 2007 7:02AM
640 acres for 21,000 homes? DOn't you think it might be BETTER for to just grew 640 acres of TREES?
Do you think there really going to put this somewhere you can grow trees?
California does have quite a lot of desert.
LordFarkward @ Jul 10th 2007 3:37AM
eh? no matter how i read it, having enough solar power to provide juice for 21,000 homes is definitely better... 64 acres of trees can probably provide these 21,000 homes firewood that would last a few nights... or a lotta paper for them to draw on
so, er... no, i don't think it's better if they planted trees
PEZ @ Jul 10th 2007 7:20AM
Its in the friggin desert. If you want to save a cactus.. go ahead.