The Decider watch has all the answers

Those of you who suffer from the same paralyzing indecision as us when confronted with an electronics purchasing opportunity may want to take a look at the Decider watch from the UK's Mr. Jones Watches, which promises to greatly speed up those Best Buy trips. The white dial features two rows of alternating slots that click back and forth between YES and NO, allowing you to change destiny by simply waiting a second longer -- or you can get all spiritual and just wait for the battery to die, as Mr. Jones suggests. The indecisive can place their orders now for £79 ($160) -- we're just going to keep buying anything that lights up.

[Via Core77]

[(Unverified) Posted Jul 17th 2007 8:17AM]

The constant flickering between yes and no looks really annoying to me.

[LS Posted Jul 17th 2007 8:41AM]

what a heap of ugly expensive crap

[(Unverified) Posted Jul 17th 2007 8:55AM]

But what the hell am I gonna use to decide if I buy this watch? Oh yea , common sense... so that's a no then.

[chadow Posted Jul 17th 2007 9:01AM]

G.W. Bush should get one of these. I mean, he said HE was the "decider", but I think most would agree he needs something a little more advanced to turn to for the really TOUGH questions.

[(Unverified) Posted Jul 17th 2007 9:08AM]

Anything is better that GWB's magic 8-ball with only too answers right?

"Cut taxes!"

"Invade!"

All the answers a shrewed political mind needs right?

[(Unverified) Posted Jul 17th 2007 9:09AM]

Doh! Should be two not too...Oh the humanity!

[(Unverified) Posted Jul 17th 2007 12:11PM]

That's Engadget's fault for not letting you delete or edit your post. It's easy to miss things now and then--even if you profread.

[(Unverified) Posted Jul 17th 2007 12:28PM]

Aahh! profread!

[(Unverified) Posted Jul 17th 2007 9:33AM]

"Those of you who suffer from the same paralyzing indecision as us . . ." should be edited to read:
"Those of you who suffer from the same paralyzing indecision as we do . . ." I though that would be clear to someone who writes for a living.

[SSUK Posted Jul 17th 2007 10:48AM]

Both make sense, stop nit-picking things that don't need to. Huge gramatical errors or incorrect information, sure... This? I mean, who the hell goes around spell checking blogs anyway?

[SSUK Posted Jul 17th 2007 10:48AM]

Don't need to BE.

Way to go, me, you just made your argument null. =P

[(Unverified) Posted Jul 17th 2007 9:35AM]

And, in other news, my comment should have said "I thought" rather than "I though." How appropriate!

[(Unverified) Posted Jul 17th 2007 10:54AM]

Hoisted by your own petard... also IN YOUR FACE!

[icecreamsocialist Posted Jul 17th 2007 11:25AM]

Calm down, nerds. It's just a tongue-in-cheek art piece.

[(Unverified) Posted Jul 17th 2007 12:06PM]

but can it run doom?

[(Unverified) Posted Jul 17th 2007 6:26PM]

What if you're indecisive as to whether or not you should wait another second for the watch to make your decision? Things could get exponentially recursive.

[(Unverified) Posted Aug 13th 2007 10:21AM]

Hmmmm. Should I buy one.
Yes, No, Yes, No, Yes, No, Yes, No....