Skip to Content
Vista has DX10 and with my tweaking is 2.3% slower than XP. I don't know what resource hog people talk about. I don't have an immediate need for a service pack, I'm having no problems that googling can't fix.
How much slower is it without your tweaking?
How much slower was XP than 2k without "tweaking?" When was the last time you ran XP on a system slow enough that the tweaking was necessary?The "resource hog" argument is MS hater FUD.
@Nobuyuki Idei11%
Name
E-mail
E-mail:
Password
Remember Me
E-Mail me when someone replies to this comment
Add your comments:
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments. And yes, comments are moderated.
Other Weblogs Inc. Network blogs you might be interested in:
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
fischju @ Jul 20th 2007 11:55AM
Vista has DX10 and with my tweaking is 2.3% slower than XP. I don't know what resource hog people talk about. I don't have an immediate need for a service pack, I'm having no problems that googling can't fix.
Nobuyuki Idei @ Jul 20th 2007 12:10PM
How much slower is it without your tweaking?
tcc3 @ Jul 20th 2007 12:32PM
How much slower was XP than 2k without "tweaking?" When was the last time you ran XP on a system slow enough that the tweaking was necessary?
The "resource hog" argument is MS hater FUD.
fischju @ Jul 20th 2007 1:00PM
@Nobuyuki Idei
11%