Skip to Content
Can you just feel Canon and Sony quaking in fear of this $99 camera having an impact on them? Me either. To Kodak's credit, good job on the image stabilization at the $99 price point, but there's not much else to say about it. 3x zoom is pitiful.
That's digital stabilization Zarniwoop, which means absolutely nothing. Optical stabilization is the ONLY good stabilizer that is even worth having in a camera.
Name
E-mail
E-mail:
Password
Remember Me
E-Mail me when someone replies to this comment
Add your comments:
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments. And yes, comments are moderated.
Other Weblogs Inc. Network blogs you might be interested in:
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Zarniwoop @ Jul 24th 2007 10:36AM
Can you just feel Canon and Sony quaking in fear of this $99 camera having an impact on them? Me either.
To Kodak's credit, good job on the image stabilization at the $99 price point, but there's not much else to say about it. 3x zoom is pitiful.
Dan @ Jul 24th 2007 10:40AM
That's digital stabilization Zarniwoop, which means absolutely nothing. Optical stabilization is the ONLY good stabilizer that is even worth having in a camera.