this is fundamentally wrong. Biometrics should be used to verify identity, not establish it in the absence of other controls. If it is based on an imaging system it can be bypassed and unless this follows the mantra of all other "high tech" security controls, future revisions of it will be backwards compatible and will unavoidably inherit the flaws of their predecessors.
I agree; the subatomic biometrics of superatomic particles coinciding with detrimental x-ray laser coreographics will undoubtedly lead to a supercilious correlation of compounding interests while the government controls compatibility, backwardforth.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
this is fundamentally wrong. Biometrics should be used to verify identity, not establish it in the absence of other controls. If it is based on an imaging system it can be bypassed and unless this follows the mantra of all other "high tech" security controls, future revisions of it will be backwards compatible and will unavoidably inherit the flaws of their predecessors.
I agree; the subatomic biometrics of superatomic particles coinciding with detrimental x-ray laser coreographics will undoubtedly lead to a supercilious correlation of compounding interests while the government controls compatibility, backwardforth.