Nothing like siding with the one voice of reason...
The "alleged" works both ways here. If it's decided that there is no violation, the case is dismissed. If it's decided that there is a violation, these women win and so will every other handicapped person who ever enters this store. If the violations were defined as anything other than "alleged" there would be no question.
Your "alleged" breakfast routine sounds unhealthy, by the way.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
-1_thumbnail.jpg)
Nothing like siding with the one voice of reason...
The "alleged" works both ways here. If it's decided that there is no violation, the case is dismissed. If it's decided that there is a violation, these women win and so will every other handicapped person who ever enters this store. If the violations were defined as anything other than "alleged" there would be no question.
Your "alleged" breakfast routine sounds unhealthy, by the way.