??? view finders ??? Who uses view finders in compact digital cameras nowadays? Most new digicompact cameras are without view finders...
who? anyone who realizes a camera can be held much more steadily in an elbows-tucked, camera-to-the-eye position than in an arms-extended-in-order-to-view-an-LCD position. it's pretty common knowledge and many sites advise to use the optical viewfinder when sharpness is particularly critical, or in low-light situations where slow shutter speeds will be used. the WSJ's Walt Mossberg has complained about the diminishing number of models with optical view finders for this very reason, though as these models show, he's not had a lot of impact.
the problem is that manufacturers know they can cut costs and perhaps reduce size by eliminating the feature, because too many uninformed buyers don't know why the absence matters.
fwiw: Canon's SD800-IS still has the optical viewfinder AND one of the widest-angle focal length zoom lenses* of any compact/pocket digital camera, making it an excellent choice. My hope is that if/when canon refreshes that wide-angle model it'll retain the optical viewfinder.
terry *--so why's the wide-angle feature matter? a couple of examples: a) it makes for great scenic shots outdoors; b) indoors, you can capture much more of a full-room view; c) on flash shots, you can capture the same image area--say a group of people--from a closer position, allowing the flash to better illuminate the scene than if you had to back farther away "to get everyone in the picture"; d) there's greater depth-of-field at wider focal lengths, so for closeups, for example, where there's often a very narrow field of focus, more of your subject will be sharp if you shoot at the widest focal length.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
??? view finders ??? Who uses view finders in compact digital cameras nowadays? Most new digicompact cameras are without view finders...
who? anyone who realizes a camera can be held much more steadily in an elbows-tucked, camera-to-the-eye position than in an arms-extended-in-order-to-view-an-LCD position. it's pretty common knowledge and many sites advise to use the optical viewfinder when sharpness is particularly critical, or in low-light situations where slow shutter speeds will be used. the WSJ's Walt Mossberg has complained about the diminishing number of models with optical view finders for this very reason, though as these models show, he's not had a lot of impact.
the problem is that manufacturers know they can cut costs and perhaps reduce size by eliminating the feature, because too many uninformed buyers don't know why the absence matters.
fwiw: Canon's SD800-IS still has the optical viewfinder AND one of the widest-angle focal length zoom lenses* of any compact/pocket digital camera, making it an excellent choice. My hope is that if/when canon refreshes that wide-angle model it'll retain the optical viewfinder.
terry
*--so why's the wide-angle feature matter? a couple of examples: a) it makes for great scenic shots outdoors; b) indoors, you can capture much more of a full-room view; c) on flash shots, you can capture the same image area--say a group of people--from a closer position, allowing the flash to better illuminate the scene than if you had to back farther away "to get everyone in the picture"; d) there's greater depth-of-field at wider focal lengths, so for closeups, for example, where there's often a very narrow field of focus, more of your subject will be sharp if you shoot at the widest focal length.