"laboratory-quality display performance" contradicts "dynamically enhances the contrast, color saturation and sharpness of images or video". Laboratory-quality would require a consistent and correct image. Dynamic enhancements are never consistent nor correct.
Exactly. Especially since Philips has been sinking endless capacities into these systems since the 90s - without much improvement ever since. Smearing, ghosting... Problem is that at Philips' usual price points, all effort is pointless. This is a computer display now, but when you look at TVs, a halfway decent standalone scaler will easily exceed the price of your regular run of the mill Philips set that is crammed full of "enhancers". All you can hope for is that all of them can be turned off.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
"laboratory-quality display performance" contradicts "dynamically enhances the contrast, color saturation and sharpness of images or video".
Laboratory-quality would require a consistent and correct image. Dynamic enhancements are never consistent nor correct.
Exactly. Especially since Philips has been sinking endless capacities into these systems since the 90s - without much improvement ever since. Smearing, ghosting... Problem is that at Philips' usual price points, all effort is pointless. This is a computer display now, but when you look at TVs, a halfway decent standalone scaler will easily exceed the price of your regular run of the mill Philips set that is crammed full of "enhancers". All you can hope for is that all of them can be turned off.